Political Hotsheet
April 6, 2009 6:30 PM

Poll: Majority Would Pay Higher Taxes For Universal Health Care

(CBS)

A majority of Americans would pay higher taxes if it meant health insurance for everyone, according to a new CBS News/New York Times poll – though many worry that the nation’s economy will suffer if the government were to offer universal health care.

The poll also finds that health care is a major domestic concern for Americans, second only to the economy.

Fifty-seven percent of those polled say they are willing to pay higher taxes in order to provide all Americans with health care coverage. While seventy three percent of Democrats favor a tax increase to fund coverage, only twenty-nine percent of Republicans back such a move.

Read The Complete Poll (PDF)
Asked which domestic policy area the president and the Congress should focus on other than the economy, thirty-five percent said health care, the top choice. The second most popular choice was education at twenty-two percent, followed by social security at seventeen percent and energy at fifteen percent.

Despite the overall concern about health care and desire to do something about it, opinions are mixed about the what universal health insurance could mean for the nation’s economy.

Thirty-seven percent feel the economy will suffer if universal healthcare is implemented, while thirty-four percent say the economy will improve.

Again, differences follow party lines. Forty-six percent of Democrats feel the economy would be improved by guaranteed health insurance, while only twenty one percent of Republicans agree.

A majority of those surveyed say that providing health insurance for the uninsured is a more serious problem than keeping health care costs down, though by a narrower margin than two years ago.

When asked to choose between the two, fifty-four percent said providing health insurance for the uninsured is the more serious problem. Forty percent said keeping costs low was more important. In 2007, sixty-five percent of Americans said that proving universal health care was more important than low costs.

Fifty-nine percent of those polled say they have seen increase in health care costs compared to other household expenses in recent years. As a result, most are concerned about the health costs their family will face in the coming years; fifty-seven percent say they are “very” concerned about the costs. Those earning less than $50,000 a year are more likely to be very concerned than those with higher incomes.

More CBS News Polls Released Today:

Poll: Obama Approval Hits New High - 66%

Poll: 74 Percent Support Higher Taxes On The Rich

Poll: Support For Free Trade On The Rise



This poll was conducted among a random sample of 998 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone April 1-5, 2009. Phone numbers were dialed from RDD samples of both standard land-lines and cell phones. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher.

This poll release conforms to the Standards of Disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.
Tags:
cbs news ,
new york times ,
poll ,
healthcare
Topics:
Polling
Add a Comment See all 28 Comments
by WWWoDEMOCRATZoORG May 3, 2009 1:17 PM EDT
"First they laugh at you,
then they ignore you,
then they fight you,
then you win."
Gandhi *

Read and sign these legislative petitions please and get hundreds of people to sign them.

http://www.change.org/actions/view/stop_calling_our_party_the_democrat_party_

This petition below includes a demand to fix the lousy Medicare Part D that does not help the middle class.

http://www.change.org/actions/view/i_demand_congress_and_the_president_enact_single_payer_universal_health_care


http://www.change.org/actions/view/i_demand_congress_and_the_president_enact_the_employee_free_choice_act

http://www.change.org/actions/view/i_demand_that_the_congress_and_the_president_enact_a_10_an_hour_minimum_wage_into_law

http://www.change.org/actions/view/i_demand_that_norm_coleman_concede_the_senate_race

http://www.change.org/actions/view/i_demand_that_the_congress_and_the_president_enact_the_womens_freedom_of_choice_act_into_law
Reply to this comment
by charles786 April 21, 2009 8:37 PM EDT
as a fellow tax payer, I would like to state my outrage with the system. Our tax dollars are going to rediculous things like people with herion addictions, and bi polar disorder. Stating that those people are unable to work cause their mood swings, while americans with missing limbs are fighting with the social security administration tooth and nail I am one who has been fighting for Temporary disability for 2 years, ever since I lost my left leg. Judge maloy of dallas texas disability ajudication and review. stated that "a missing limb is not grounds for disability" if we are to have universal health care it should be fair.

Charles Spencer
Reply to this comment
by tocnwth April 19, 2009 10:27 PM EDT
I do not believe providing a form of universal health care where all are insured will raise the total amount of money now spent on health care including medicaid and medicare.

My wife and I pay more than 12 thousand dolars a year for premiums plus copays for drugs and and deductibles for dental.

I have a friend that pays 1400 hundreds dollars a month for health insurance.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti April 9, 2009 1:50 PM EDT
We don't need to raise taxes if we get universal single payer health care. Unfortunately in fascist countries like America, where big corporations run the political parties, it won't happen (unless we all rise up and threaten general strikes until we get what is due us).
Reply to this comment
by lethalfang April 9, 2009 5:27 AM EDT
What if our great nation runs our firefighting service the way we run our health care service?
This is free market: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnjQ3cV4x1I&feature=related
Reply to this comment
by CCBrad April 8, 2009 1:01 PM EDT
Did anyone notice that the graph is labeled incorrectly? The Yes 57% is labeled on the smaller portion of the pie and the No 43% is labele on the larger portion of the pie. Journalism at it's best!

More importantly, doesn't it strike anyone that only 1,000 people were surveyed - hardly statistically relevant.
Reply to this comment
by FormerDemocrat April 8, 2009 10:11 AM EDT
Socialized medicine has been the life's work of Ted Kennedy. Since he is dying of a cancer that has no hope, the Socialists will persue this in his memory. The funny thing about Socialized medicine, the rich like the Kennedy's will still have enough of Daddy's money to pay private insurance. The Socialist will pass laws for the masses which they have no intention of living by.
Reply to this comment
by danwithers April 7, 2009 5:13 PM EDT
You don't know what you're taking about. My Dad doesn't pay any taxes.............he's a Republican

----------------------------

OK, your Dad is the only Repub in the group. And you don't know what you're talking about if you don't believe the vast majority of non-tax-payers are Dems.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito April 7, 2009 5:05 PM EDT
The current employment-driven system is just plain wrong. It doesn't cover people who don't work for a big enough company, people who are retired and those who want to retire early, college students, people with pre-existing conditions, people who are laid off or in between jobs, or who just want to go back to school to learn a new careers. This is A LOT of people.

For those who work for a big enough company and are covered, they don't have real choice (unlike the usual argument). They get whatever coverage their employer decides for them and pay whatever their employer wants them to pay. And if they come down with a major illness that they have to stop working, they lose coverage or their premium goes UP. And people have noticed that premiums, copays, and deductibles have gone up every year far faster than the rate of inflation, while coverage keeps going down.

The current system is simply unsustainable. We need universal health care now. Don't let the scaremongers fool you. They always cite the UK as an example. In the UK doctors are government employees. In most other countries with UHC doctors work in the PRIVATE sector, and you can go to any of your choice (unlike our system). And you can still buy supplemental insurance if you want.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 April 7, 2009 5:02 PM EDT
Most of the rushing them out the door comes from Medigap private companies. The elderly buy those policies and most of what they do is try to get the old folks out of the hospital to try and save money.
Reply to this comment
by bashdj April 7, 2009 5:01 PM EDT
While the Canadian Healthcare system has it's weaknesses, I can tell you one of the greatest advantages of a Universal Healthcare System:

No Fear ! No Stress !

Canadians walk around everyday not fearing getting sick or getting injured and not being able to pay for care. We have no fear of losing our homes or going bankrupt over a health issue. Sure it's not perfect and it needs work, but the peace-of-mind it gives us is priceless and a health benefit as well.

Created by Keifer Sutherland's grandfather no-less,lol

The critics and media in the U.S. like to run our Healthcare into the ground but don't believe everything you hear. It is very comforting to have our system.

Good luck in reforming yours.
I wish you all the peace of mind that we enjoy.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 April 7, 2009 2:42 PM EDT
HMOs said that they would manage health care. They managed to increase their profits by denying health care to their customers.

The big scare in 1993 was that you could not pick your own doctor. That is what HMOs did, they have a "group" and if you do not go to them you pay much more.

National Health Insurance would be an affordable PPO. You can go to any doctor you want, you will just get better coverage for a lower premium payment.
Reply to this comment
by lostfreedom April 7, 2009 1:55 PM EDT
Yo, sleepyric.
That's how liberals do their math.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 April 7, 2009 1:55 PM EDT
I would offer National Health Insurance to those that wanted it. Private insurance takes more than 20% off the top, Medicare takes less than 2% to administer. Public can compete with private. Private always says that they can do everything more efficiently, let's see them do it.
Reply to this comment
by iam4honesty April 7, 2009 1:47 PM EDT
Get rid of the medical insurance companies and nationalize the pharmaceutical industry. Not only would no new taxes be necessary but the ridiculous profits being pillage by these corporations would go back into the system to improve it.
Posted by noloyalisti


EXACTLY!!!

And, for those who like to parrot the nonsensical 'talking points' of the far right... 'universal health care represents long waits and substandard care'... you're full of shiiit! you have not talked to anyone from a country with universal health care, and you certainly haven't traveled. You're just a lemming repeating what you have been told to believe.

Even Costa Rica, yeah Costa Rica,( that little country in Central America) has better quality health care than the United States... universal care.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti April 7, 2009 1:11 PM EDT
Get rid of the medical insurance companies and nationalize the pharmaceutical industry. Not only would no new taxes be necessary but the ridiculous profits being pillage by these corporations would go back into the system to improve it.
Reply to this comment
by danwithers April 7, 2009 12:36 PM EDT
You gotta remember that 40-45% of people (all Dems) don't pay ANY federal income tax now. ZERO. So, yea, those people are OK with paying "more" taxes because they know they likely are not going to pay anyway. The "more" taxes applies to those who already pay taxes.

This is going to be a f'ing disaster.
Reply to this comment
by jonesjep April 7, 2009 11:31 AM EDT
Anyone who likes the idea of the US Government running health care I suggest you take a trip to your local VA Hospital or travel to a hospital in England. Check into the British Government denying cancer treatment for breast cancer. Check into the 2 year waiting list for hip replacement. Imagine your mother in constant pain for 2 years while she waits. Check into that they do not provide ultrasounds for pregnant women. The US healthcare system is not perfect, but it is the highest quality in the world. Nobody in this country can be denied health care. It is the LAW!! I have no problem with all of your medical expenses being tax deductable. Ahhhhh...but that won't work for the Libs because they know that ~50% of the US working population does not pay any taxes. We are already losing manufacturing jobs because we have the second highest tax rate in the industrialized world. I am sure that corporations will flock to the US and provide millions of jobs just so they can pay even more taxes for the folks who have added the "Free Health Care" Amendment to the Constitution.
Reply to this comment
by der_schwarze_Ritter April 7, 2009 10:46 AM EDT
The pollsters didn't consult me. I don't think you have a right to health care and I certainly would be unwilling to pay for someone else's health care through higher taxes. Indeed, what happens to those who are happy with the status quo? Will we be forced to go along with this scheme? I have no interest in a health care system that rations care, eliminates research and development for new drugs and medical devices, and can only guarantee access to a waiting list to see a doctor or specialist.
Reply to this comment
by afmcalax April 7, 2009 9:50 AM EDT
Yes, the I got mine; scr*w the rest crowd is out in force today. Universal health care would be paid for by increased taxes on everyone (and hopefully on businesses also). The point being that if everyone is covered then the risk is spread and the system is sustainable. The premiums that businesses pay, the portion employees pay, and the cost that society pays for subsidizing the uninsured goes away. Healthcare is now portable so you can explore career opportunities without having to consider healthcare benefits. Our major corporations become instantaneously more competitive because they are no longer needing to expend large amounts of money on employee healthcare. Blood sucking companies that pay no benefits to seek a competitive advantage no longer have that option. The legacy health costs for retirees from the auto companies go away and again makes them more competitive for the future.

Every major industrial power has universal healthcare except for the United States. We provide some of the highest cost care to the fewest citizens. We need to start to realize that maybe the rest of the world knows more than we do.
Reply to this comment
See all 28 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER