Political Hotsheet
March 24, 2009 9:31 PM

Obama: Economy Trumps Race

(AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

It's been a while since President Obama has publicly addressed the topic of race.

Perhaps it's because the once ubiquitous question of "will America elect a black president" has been put to rest. It's also that the economic crisis – and the populist rage associated with things like the AIG bonuses – has come to dominate the public discourse.

That remained the case tonight, as nearly every question centered on the economy. But one questioner, Ann Compton of ABC News, did ask Mr. Obama how his race has affected his presidency so far.

Of course, Mr. Obama still ended up talking about the economy. Here's the exchange:


QUESTION: I am surprised. Could I ask you about race?

OBAMA: You may.

QUESTION: Yours is a rather historic presidency. And I'm just wondering whether, in any of the policy debates that you've had within the White House, the issue of race has come up or whether it has in the way you feel you've been perceived by other leaders or by the American people? Or has the last 64 days before a relatively color-blind time?

OBAMA: I -- I think that the last 64 days has been dominated by me trying to figure out how we're going to fix the economy, and that affects black, brown and white.

And, you know, obviously, at the inauguration, I think that there was justifiable pride on the part of the country that we had taken a step to move us beyond some of the searing legacies of racial discrimination in this country, but that lasted about a day.

And -- and, you know, right now, the American people are judging me exactly the way I should be judged. And that is: Are we taking the steps to improve liquidity in the financial markets, create jobs, get businesses to re-open, keep America safe? And that's what I've been spending my time thinking about.


Full Coverage Of Obama's Press Conference:
Tags:
obama ,
race ,
color ,
economy ,
recession ,
press conference
Topics:
Press Conference
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by 167irishboy March 25, 2009 8:52 AM EDT
Poverty without any welfare system did not hold back many of the families who immigrated into America. Many of these families came out of wreched generational poverty and were completely unwelcome in America. The one thing they did hold highly important was the family. The thing that holds back certain communities in America isn't that everyone doesn't like them, it's the unbelievably high number of fatherless families. These aren't fatherless because of a death in the family either. It's because these men just don't give a dam to be involved with their children. That's the problem. Sometimes we need to look in the mirror instead of blaming everyone else for our problems.
Reply to this comment
by knowdalaw March 25, 2009 7:50 AM EDT
I thought the question by Ann Compton was untimely, inappropriate, off the subject, and unquestionably divisive.

The entire speech Obama had just made was not about race. Why did she pose such an insensitive question? You know, all these reporters are trying to seek glory here and finally be on first name basis with the President. I do not think the question was needed or relevant. Her question was a waste of time and taxpayers money.

We are not paying Obama or the White House expenses for him to hold a press conference to talk about race, when he said the purpose of his speech was to talk about the ?bank toxic assets? proposal and budget.

Why do these reporters get off the subject?

Duh.
Reply to this comment
by woodjd42 March 25, 2009 5:32 AM EDT
"You act like if an election is over, then this means anyone who opposes Obama and his policies should just sit down and shut up and give up their Constitutional rights."

You need to calm down. Of course you and everyone has the right to oppose Obama's policies. I think your hysteria is blurring the real issues.
Posted by nujac123

I seem to remember you folks calling me names, telling me to sit down and shut up, even that I should leave this country since I was un-american for opposing bush/chaney.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 March 25, 2009 2:06 AM EDT
"... Why should we be proud about someone who is trying to change our country into the U.nited S.ocialist S.tates of A.merica
The USSA?" Posted by Hyptnotized_Liberals

Because it is exponentially better than what it was becomung, the Disunited Fascist Aristocracy That Was Once Called America.
Reply to this comment
by nujac123 March 25, 2009 1:16 AM EDT
"You act like if an election is over, then this means anyone who opposes Obama and his policies should just sit down and shut up and give up their Constitutional rights."

You need to calm down. Of course you and everyone has the right to oppose Obama's policies. I think your hysteria is blurring the real issues.
Reply to this comment
by nujac123 March 25, 2009 1:14 AM EDT
"Thirdly, stop using the insanely immature "The election is over" card."

I think you are the one being immature. Who cares who voted for who and why?
Reply to this comment
by nujac123 March 25, 2009 1:12 AM EDT
"Secondly, it's not my fault that most of the black population voted for Obama. This is a fact. "

Most blacks vote democratic anyway. Who cares?
Reply to this comment
by Hyptnotized_Liberals March 25, 2009 12:57 AM EDT
"The rest of the USA based their votes on principle, not race. 99 % of the black vote went to Obama."

I don't think it is fair to judge others on how they voted especially when your guy didn't win
posted by nujac123

First off, "my guy" is not a politician, and it certainly wasn't John McCain if that's what you're insinuation.

Secondly, it's not my fault that most of the black population voted for Obama. This is a fact.

Thirdly, stop using the insanely immature "The election is over" card. This is about as immature as it gets.

You act like if an election is over, then this means anyone who opposes Obama and his policies should just sit down and shut up and give up their Constitutional rights.

Do you realize how Communist that sounds when you make insinuations like that??

Since WHEN does an election being "over" mean that people should just give up their Constitutional rights of freedom of speech and freedom of expression?
Reply to this comment
by Hyptnotized_Liberals March 25, 2009 12:54 AM EDT
Bush had socialist tendencies as well when he tried to bailout the banks. And your point is.....?
Posted by nujac123 at 9:40 PM : Mar 24, 2009


Are you not capable of living in the present and Recognizing what OBAMA'S administration is trying to do to our country or are you going to spend the rest of your life blaming Bush ??

What's it gonna be?

Loyalty to your country and our Constitution?

Or loyalty to Barak Obama?

The choice is up to you.

Nobody said a frigging word about "Bush". That's all you libs go by, Bush this, Bush that. You can't offer and objective thinking on your own.

How's about scrutinizing Obama here? He's proposed and pushed more outrageous spending in 2 short months than any sitting President in US HISTORY!

Yet you're sitting back pointing fingers at Bush...

GROW UP and start defending your country and drop your pride of your party!
Reply to this comment
by nujac123 March 25, 2009 12:40 AM EDT
"Why should we be proud about someone who is trying to change our country into the

U.nited S.ocialist S.tates of A.merica"

Bush had socialist tendencies as well when he tried to bailout the banks. And your point is.....?
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER