Political Hotsheet
January 14, 2009 10:33 AM

Obama Reaches Across The Table

(CBS)
President-elect Barack Obama last night had dinner at the home of conservative columnist George Will in Chevy Chase, Maryland. Also present: conservatives William Kristol, Charles Krauthammer and David Brooks.

The dinner was not announced – according to the pool report, the fact that it was Will's home was deduced from tax records, while other dinner guests were spotted through a window by a photographer.

Quipped pooler Kenneth Bazinet of the New York Daily News, in reference to the gathering of the new Democratic president and the conservative old hands: "The bloggers are going to love this one."

The transition office did not release details of the dinner table conversation.

UPDATE: It's not just the conservatives who are getting an audience with Mr. Obama. This morning, as Politico reports, the president elect met with a group of prominent moderates and liberals, among them E.J. Dionne, Eugene Robinson, Gerry Seib, Ron Brownstein, Frank Rich, Maureen Dowd, Andrew Sullivan, and Rachel Maddow.

The "totally off the record" meeting took place around a conference table at transition headquarters, and one attendee described it to Michael Calderone as an "intense back and forth about a lot of stuff."
Tags:
barack obama ,
george will ,
david brooks
Topics:
Barack Obama
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by enviro_wacko January 15, 2009 12:55 AM EST
obuma has never worked a day in his life

Posted by popstom11 at 06:48 PM : Jan 14, 2009

You are truly showing your ignorance. Just because the best that you can do is a part time job at the Dairy Queen doesn''t mean that Obama is a loser like you are.
Reply to this comment
by enviro_wacko January 14, 2009 6:27 PM EST
socialist means a movement that is defined by government control.

Do you mean like corporate subsidies that the Republicans have been handing out for the last 50 years?
Reply to this comment
by enviro_wacko January 14, 2009 6:24 PM EST
Oh no, what will these partisan wackos have left to complain about? LMAO!
Reply to this comment
by nomoredems January 14, 2009 4:35 PM EST
socialist means a movement that is defined by government control. Maybe you don''t know what it means. As for token black...it is what it is. I guess you feel good inside becuase you think somehow you changed racism. The most racist people I know are african americans, they push to make sure their race gets jobs, senate posts(Burris) and all the while claiming racism. guess what...we have a black president...there is no more racism....how long are we going to have slavery(none of us were alive then) thrown at us when a african american wants something? this is just ridicilous....liberals should be for education spending...they need it.
Reply to this comment
by johntate777 January 14, 2009 4:25 PM EST
cattiej said "Too bad that Obama didn''''t come back to Illinois and sit down with the voters who didn''''t want Roland Burris to be our next Senator."

How silly is this? Why should Obama waste time sitting with voters about something he has no control over? He has much bigger things going on if you didn''t notice!
Reply to this comment
by welshwoman-2009 January 14, 2009 4:17 PM EST
Is there something wrong with expecting people to earn what they get? We have become a fast food and welfare society. I am more than willing to give Obama a chance but don''t reach across the table while you are pulling things under the table at the same time. It just reflects more of the same dishonesty we have seen before on both sides and I think it''s a shame for this country. When people had to earn what they got and worked for a living they had more integrity.
Reply to this comment
by namiller101 January 14, 2009 3:49 PM EST
"dummying down the school systems to accommodate the minority population"

Oh good Lord. I think we actually starting dumbing down the school system when they let you in.
Reply to this comment
by namiller101 January 14, 2009 3:43 PM EST
cattiJ, that''s like blaming Bush for letting Cheney shoot Harry Whittington in the face.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 January 14, 2009 3:42 PM EST
===Voters wanted to restrain the Clintons'''''''' socialist ambitions.===
Posted by peace4321

You dumba$$, even most Republicans admit that Clinton was a centrist who governed from the center. But you neocons just have to see "socialists" everywhere (even you don''t even know what the word really means). Sad.
Reply to this comment
by cattiej January 14, 2009 3:39 PM EST
We are not in favor of Hillary Clinton being the Sec of State. She carries alot of baggage, namely Bill. Things are going to get ugly and there will be a lot on international pay to play. The people of America won''t hear about it until it''s too late. Bill Clinton should never be able to go to any other country and speak for our government of any business in America. He is a lobbyist, pure and simple and any decision that Hillary would make would be a conflict of interest. NO HILLARY.
John Kerry would make a better Secretary of State as would many other men and women...NO HILLARY
Reply to this comment
by cattiej January 14, 2009 3:35 PM EST
Too bad that Obama didn''t come back to Illinois and sit down with the voters who didn''t want Roland Burris to be our next Senator. Already has has forgotten about Illinois politics and the Chicago Mafia running the state. Well, the rest of the state hasn''t. Obama has let a pay for play politican replace him, this says a lot about just how he will govern our country. Many of his cabinet picks are suspect to various fringe dealings too. Where is the no drama Obama??? absent!
Reply to this comment
by cattiej January 14, 2009 3:31 PM EST
Obama is reaching across the table and putting the same crooks back in business. Our country is in trouble. Obama ran on change..there isn''t going to be any change..just the same people switching chairs at the table.
Reply to this comment
by gotalyf January 14, 2009 3:15 PM EST
Funny- most people here are just spouting off their upsets about losing the election. "Token Black" ?! Come On!

The only relevant post here is the one by aaronbdog (thank you!). I happen to agree with "aaron''s" view on this, but even if I didn''t, I would applaud his ability to stick to topic.

To echo the main sentiment, it''s time to grow up, people. It''s time to work together. We have big problems ("openly gay in the military"-- that''s a problem? Really!), let''s take ''em on.
Reply to this comment
by welshwoman-2009 January 14, 2009 3:06 PM EST
I believe Obama is not quite as grand as his party and supporters would have you believe. His records were hidden for a reason and still are. He was one of the token blacks pushed through Harvard with the power of money - not necessarily because he was very bright - at that time they were hungry for money and he was a cash cow. He has chosen 2 economic people I have quite a bit of faith in and 2 others who were part of the Clinton administration who started this downturn long before Bush came into power. I''m more than happy to give Obama a chance but he bragged too much during the election. Nancy Pelosi was far too partisan and should have been removed and we are busy dummying down the school systems to accommodate the minority population and it is killing us if you want to compete with other countries for business. No one party is right and we need to get our personal morals and values straight in the country. Put families back together and keep them together and teach our children self respect and respect for others. We also need to tend to all the mentally ill and emotionally disturbed in the country which is a huge majority and then your crime will diminish -banning guns will do nothing when evil and mental illness still flourish.
Reply to this comment
by aaronbdog January 14, 2009 2:48 PM EST
I think it was an excellent idea. What the country needs at this moment is for our leaders to set aside their partisan biases and engage in dialogue across the many political and social spectrums. Although I myself (and I suspect Obama) for the most part disagree with the opinions of this group of conservative writers, their ideas and opinions help shape the social and political discourse in this country. Therefore they cannot and should not be seen as the "enemy", the "other", the "opposition", etc.
One can retain their ideas and ideals and push forward with their guiding philosophy while engaging those with whom we differ. Who knows, they may help us to construct more holistic policy. It''s called being an adult. Haven''t we just experienced 8 years of childish and churlish behavior toward the "opposition"?
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER