Horserace
June 12, 2008 10:00 AM

Starting Gate: Rapid Rumor Response

Throughout the course of this presidential campaign, Barack Obama has had a concern on his mind. In speeches and rallies at various points, the Democrat has brought up the topic of rumors circulating about him via e-mail and the Internet as a way to debunk them.

That the candidate himself would feel the need to talk about e-mails claiming that he is a Muslim or other falsehoods certainly speaks to how serious the campaign views this modern-day media atmosphere that has very little checks on it.

Recently, another such rumor began to spread on the Internet that eventually started creeping into more mainstream outlets like talk radio and cable news chat. The rumor, depending on what version it’s in on a given day, boils down to speculation that a tape exists on which Michelle Obama uses some rather inflammatory language.

When asked about it by reporters last week, Obama responded in part by saying that he hoped the media would not be getting into the business of spreading such rumors by even raising them or asking about them. But today, his campaign appears to have taken a much different approach to addressing them.

Fight The Smears is a Web page created by the campaign specifically to debunk these kinds of rumors. The one about Michelle Obama is directly addressed, with several examples of what has been said. “Rush Limbaugh says a tape exists of Michelle Obama using the word ‘whitey’ from the pulpit of Trinity United,” is one example labeled a “lie.” The “truth,” says the campaign, is that “no such tape exists.”

There are several other rumors directly addressed, including the Muslim one, and the campaign urges users to “spread the truth” by e-mailing the examples to others. It’s an interesting approach and a novel one. Campaigns generally deal with such rumors by refusing to even acknowledge them, hoping to contain their spread and robbing them of any legitimate platform.

But that’s much more difficult in a world where anything can spread instantly in so many ways. So the Obama campaign is hitting these rumor campaigns head-on. Will it work? It can’t hurt for the campaign to try and quash these rumors early. But as we’ve seen already in the primary campaign, some people will believe what they want. Asked by a reporter why she voted for Hillary Clinton in the West Virginia primary, one voter said, “he’s a Muslim, and that has a lot to do with it.” When the reporter noted that Obama says he’s not a Muslim, the voter said, “I know he does.” Watch the interview here.


Around The Track

  • “I think if I was Senator Obama I would say the biggest economic problem we face is the biggest national security problem and the biggest environmental problem. And if I were him, I would ask Al Gore to serve as his vice president, his energy czar, in his administration to reduce our consumption and reliance on foreign energy sources,” – James Carville, giving Obama his advice on CNN.

  • Don’t look for Obama to accept John McCain’s invitation to join him at a town hall meeting tonight, reports CBS News’ John Bentley.

  • McCain will travel to Canada next week to talk about free trade, a move that could resurrect NAFTA as an issue in the campaign, reports the AP.

  • Former Bush adviser Karl Rove keeps up the talk about Obama and his varying pledges about meeting with foreign adversaries as president, writing in the Wall Street Journal: “If Mr. Obama wants to portray himself as Reagan, then let him show it by spelling out his strategy for Iran and the other rogue states he's pledged to spend his first year visiting. What specifically will he say in those meetings that will cause their leaders to change? What will he do to create the conditions that lead them to abandon their aggressive course? If Mr. Obama keeps dodging these questions, then the American people will have every reason to view him as unprepared for the world stage. America's adversaries are watching too.
  • Tags:
    Obama ,
    McCain ,
    rumors ,
    muslim
    Topics:
    Starting Gate
    Add a Comment See all 226 Comments
    by tbweb June 14, 2008 2:54 PM EDT
    Rapid Rumor Response

    Fight The Smears

    A good idea but a knife that cuts both ways! Those who were not aware of all the smears out there and who have bad intentions against Sen. Obama can now find them all in one place and create deceptive and misleading new web sites to promote the collective smears. But its still a good idea.
    Reply to this comment
    by beastof70 June 14, 2008 3:03 AM EDT
    You do know that that "most liberal member" is because he missed nearly 40% of the votes last year because he as campaigning. I guess that wouldn''t really matter to you though, it''''s not nearly as inflammatory if you actually understand how he got that rating.
    Posted by taddles3 at 12:07 PM
    ================================

    The interesting thing being....Whoever holds the #1 most conservative ranking would never make up such silly excuses to duck being called the #1 most American in the whole US Senate.

    And, one thing we don''t even have to wonder....A Democrat does not hold that #1 most American title.
    Reply to this comment
    by francise223 June 14, 2008 1:51 AM EDT
    Clearly, between the Obama campaign and Howard Dean, there is a great deal of worry that the vicious campaign that was run against Hillary Clinton has created a level of fury, which could explode at the convention. As Lyndon LaRouche warned, between George Soros, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and, not to mention the Obama campaign itself, there has been so much bad blood generated, that they have turned Hillary Clinton supporters into Hillary Clinton fanatics. According to one well-placed Washington source, if 20 percent of the Hillary Clinton voters were to sit out the November Presidential vote, that would amount to a loss of 4 million potential Obama voters--if, indeed, Obama wound up with the nomination in the first place. That could spell certain doom for Obama''s already-doomed candidacy.
    Reply to this comment
    by francise223 June 14, 2008 1:50 AM EDT
    Howard Dean Schemes To Shut Down Democratic Convention--June 12, 2008 (LPAC)--Billionaire George Soros is paying DNC Chairman Dean to shut the 18 million loyal Democratic and independent voters who supported Hillary Clinton out of the Denver convention altogether. In addition to reports that the Obama campaign is pushing to actually unseat all the Clinton delegates and replace them with Obama loyalists, there are more recent reports that Dean is trying to prevent any balloting for the Democratic nominee, and instead is trying to just ram through a voice vote for Obama, without a state-by-state roll call. Even after the two parties turned their nominating conventions into ersatz rock concerts, it was always the case that the losing candidates were all given the opportunity to speak from the podium, and a full vote taken, before the anointed candidate was confirmed. Usually, in a gesture of party unity, after the first ballot vote was taken, a motion would be presented to endorse the candidate by unanimous consent. These traditions actually did have the effect of unifying the party, often after a tight and hotly contested primary season, and at least conveyed the idea that the party came out of the convention unified behind the Presidential and Vice Presidential nominees, going into the November general elections.
    Reply to this comment
    by francise223 June 14, 2008 1:42 AM EDT
    Howard Dean Schemes To Shut Down Democratic Convention--June 12, 2008 (LPAC)--Billionaire George Soros is paying DNC Chairman Dean to shut the 18 million loyal Democratic and independent voters who supported Hillary Clinton out of the Denver convention altogether. In addition to reports that the Obama campaign is pushing to actually unseat all the Clinton delegates and replace them with Obama loyalists, there are more recent reports that Dean is trying to prevent any balloting for the Democratic nominee, and instead is trying to just ram through a voice vote for Obama, without a state-by-state roll call. Even after the two parties turned their nominating conventions into ersatz rock concerts, it was always the case that the losing candidates were all given the opportunity to speak from the podium, and a full vote taken, before the anointed candidate was confirmed. Usually, in a gesture of party unity, after the first ballot vote was taken, a motion would be presented to endorse the candidate by unanimous consent. These traditions actually did have the effect of unifying the party, often after a tight and hotly contested primary season, and at least conveyed the idea that the party came out of the convention unified behind the Presidential and Vice Presidential nominees, going into the November general elections.
    Reply to this comment
    by francise223 June 13, 2008 7:21 PM EDT
    Just as predicted...Obama declines McCain''s 10 town hall style debates!! http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=5064125Obama is a phoney!!
    Reply to this comment
    by missglo June 13, 2008 7:19 PM EDT
    Let dig up the Past of Rush, and his buddies. That should be amusing. When you live in a Glass House, Don''t throw no stones.
    Reply to this comment
    by francise223 June 13, 2008 6:33 PM EDT
    Billionaire George Soros and his friends are pouring funds into an attempt to control the U.S. Democratic Party. He has pledged an initial $10 million to ``Americans Coming Together%u201D (ACT), which aims at running the Democrats'' campaign against Bush. Soros has apparently pledged more millions, if needed. Also, six plutocrats allied to Soros have already given another $12 million combined, and reports of the group''s fund-raising ambition range from $75 million to the NewsMax estimate, $250 million. ACT would seem to be the oxymoron of a billionaire-backed ``grassroots%u201D organization.Soros'' and friends have been bankrolling Obama since 2006. Obama is a Fraud because his campaign was made famous by only taking contributions from the small guy. He is a FRAUD!!!! The truth is, he has been taking big $$$ from billionaires, millionaires and the little guy.
    Reply to this comment
    by francise223 June 13, 2008 6:32 PM EDT
    Billionaire George Soros and his friends are pouring funds into an attempt to control the U.S. Democratic Party. He has pledged an initial $10 million to ``Americans Coming Together%u201D (ACT), which aims at running the Democrats'' campaign against Bush. Soros has apparently pledged more millions, if needed. Also, six plutocrats allied to Soros have already given another $12 million combined, and reports of the group''s fund-raising ambition range from $75 million to the NewsMax estimate, $250 million. ACT would seem to be the oxymoron of a billionaire-backed ``grassroots%u201D organization.Soros'' and friends have been bankrolling Obama since 2006. Obama is a Fraud because his campaign was made famous by only taking contributions from the small guy. He is a FRAUD!!!! The truth is, he has been taking big $$$ from billionaires, millionaires and the little guy.
    Reply to this comment
    by francise223 June 13, 2008 6:08 PM EDT
    Sources say billionaire George Soros buying up DNC and bankrolling Obama''s campaign since 2006. Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and, not to mention the Obama campaign itself, have alot bad blood generated, that they have turned Hillary Clinton supporters into Hillary Clinton fanatics. According to one well-placed Washington source, if 20 percent of the Hillary Clinton voters were to sit out the November Presidential vote, that would amount to a loss of 4 million potential Obama voters--if, indeed, Obama wound up with the nomination in the first place. That could spell certain doom for Obama''s already-doomed candidacy.
    Reply to this comment
    by francise223 June 13, 2008 5:36 PM EDT
    Sources say billionaire George Soros buying up DNC and bankrolling Obama''s campaign since 2006. Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and, not to mention the Obama campaign itself, have alot bad blood generated, that they have turned Hillary Clinton supporters into Hillary Clinton fanatics. According to one well-placed Washington source, if 20 percent of the Hillary Clinton voters were to sit out the November Presidential vote, that would amount to a loss of 4 million potential Obama voters--if, indeed, Obama wound up with the nomination in the first place. That could spell certain doom for Obama''s already-doomed candidacy.
    Reply to this comment
    by beastof70 June 13, 2008 5:21 PM EDT
    "OsamaObama revels in the fact he''s a nation destroying, #1 ranked most liberal member in the US Senate.
    Posted by Beastof70 at 09:56 AM : Jun 13, 2008"

    You do know that that "most liberal member" is because he missed nearly 40% of the votes last year because he as campaigning. I guess that wouldn''t really matter to you though, it''s not nearly as inflammatory if you actually understand how he got that rating.
    Posted by taddles3 at 12:07 PM
    ======================

    Hey, this is slick I gotta admit.

    OsamaObama knows he can''t legitimately duck the #1 most liberal ranking, because the folks who scored it can prove it.

    So we see how Osama has breech loaded all his little minions like Toodles here with the above squirt and smoke. LOL!!!!
    Reply to this comment
    by beastof70 June 13, 2008 5:16 PM EDT
    "The two Democrats who did manage to get into the White House both lied by claiming to be conservatives.
    Posted by Beastof70 at 09:56 AM : Jun 13, 2008"


    I don''''t recall Carter ever claiming to be a conservative, I voted for him and I don''''t recall that being part of his platform. Could you please cite a reference to Carter claiming to be a conservative or for that matter Clinton?
    Posted by taddles3 at 12:26 PM :
    =====================

    Toodles, why should anyone believe you was even old enough to vote for Jimah Carter, after you showed a willingness to selectively edit my past posts to the degree of turning them into outright lies??

    Once a liar, pretty much always a liar might we assume??
    Reply to this comment
    by beastof70 June 13, 2008 5:13 PM EDT
    "Just asking??

    Posted by Beastof70 at 10:02 AM : Jun 13, 2008"


    80% of the 18 million Obama voters in the primaries were white, that''''s 14.4 million votes. Obama, and Hillary, have brought out Dems and new voters in historic numbers in ever state. What has been the Republican response? Record low turn outs to all primaries with an average of 25% of Republicans voting specifically coming out to the polls to vote against McCain in the final 8 primaries.

    These are just the numbers, you''''ll interpret them the way you like. To me it looks like there are going to be a lot of enthusiastic Dem voters in November.
    Posted by taddles3 at 12:13 PM :

    ================================
    Oh Toodles, so did George McGovern, just before Nixon left him walking off wearing his derrier for a hat. LOL!!!
    Reply to this comment
    by beastof70 June 13, 2008 5:11 PM EDT
    Have any of you ever truly sat and listened carefully to anything OsamaObama offers? Really tried to dissect the lawyer wording in his beatiful speeches??

    He is truly one outstanding speaker. Cabable of speaking on both sides of any issue, while leaving the audience convinced he was addressing the side they support.

    This is a technique they work hard in lawyer school teaching students. Osama was clearly a great student.
    Reply to this comment
    by taddles3 June 13, 2008 3:26 PM EDT
    "The two Democrats who did manage to get into the White House both lied by claiming to be conservatives.

    Posted by Beastof70 at 09:56 AM : Jun 13, 2008"


    I don''t recall Carter ever claiming to be a conservative, I voted for him and I don''t recall that being part of his platform. Could you please cite a reference to Carter claiming to be a conservative or for that matter Clinton?
    Reply to this comment
    by taddles3 June 13, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
    "Reckon why OsamaObama isn''''t playing up more the fact he actually managed to get the endorsement of the only member of the KKK ever to set in the US Senate?

    Posted by Beastof70 at 10:09 AM : Jun 13, 2008"


    Actually Senator Hugo Black from Alabama was also a KKK member. Robert Byrd was a member of the clan in 1942 and renounced it in 1952. Byrd has since become the longest serving senator in US history and has been a staunch supporter of civil rights. Byrd is a living testimony to the fact that there is good in everyone.
    Reply to this comment
    by taddles3 June 13, 2008 3:13 PM EDT
    "Just asking??

    Posted by Beastof70 at 10:02 AM : Jun 13, 2008"


    80% of the 18 million Obama voters in the primaries were white, that''s 14.4 million votes. Obama, and Hillary, have brought out Dems and new voters in historic numbers in ever state. What has been the Republican response? Record low turn outs to all primaries with an average of 25% of Republicans voting specifically coming out to the polls to vote against McCain in the final 8 primaries.

    These are just the numbers, you''ll interpret them the way you like. To me it looks like there are going to be a lot of enthusiastic Dem voters in November.
    Reply to this comment
    by taddles3 June 13, 2008 3:07 PM EDT
    "OsamaObama revels in the fact he''''s a nation destroying, #1 ranked most liberal member in the US Senate.

    Posted by Beastof70 at 09:56 AM : Jun 13, 2008"


    You do know that that "most liberal member" is because he missed nearly 40% of the votes last year because he as campaigning. I guess that wouldn''t really matter to you though, it''s not nearly as inflammatory if you actually understand how he got that rating.
    Reply to this comment
    by taddles3 June 13, 2008 3:02 PM EDT
    "I find it interesting that if anybody asks a question about Obama''''s disturbing past, it''''s called smearing?

    Posted by setumstrt9 at 10:37 AM : Jun 13, 2008"


    You can ask any question you want but as soon as you characterize it as "disturbing" you are no longer asking a serious question, you are implying, without any proof, that there is something untoward about his past, and that, by definition, is a smear.

    You might take a page out of Roves handbook and learn that if you are going to smear someone you shouldn''t actually use derogatory language in the statements and questions you use, it makes the fact that you are intending to smear rather obvious.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 226 Comments

    About Horserace

    Description for Horserace

    Add to your favorite news reader
    google
    yahoo
    msn