Poll: Clinton Fares Better Than Obama In Match Up With McCain
The campaigns of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama have been arguing over which candidate is more likely to beat presumptive GOP nominee John McCain in November.
The Clinton campaign, in particular, has argued that the former first lady is the more electable Democrat, an argument the campaign hopes will convince uncommitted superdelegates to back Clinton even if she goes into the party's convention with fewer pledged delegates than her rival, as is likely.
Now the Clinton camp has a fresh piece of evidence to argue its point: A poll out today from the Associated Press-Ipsos found that in head-to-head match ups with McCain, Clinton leads 50 percent to 41 percent. Obama led McCain as well, but by a smaller margin, 46 percent to 44 percent – a virtual tie. Three weeks ago, Clinton led McCain by three points in the poll, and McCain and Obama were tied at 45 percent.
The latest Gallup tracking poll, meanwhile, shows Clinton and Obama in a virtual tie among Democratic and Democratic leaning voters. And a Newsweek poll released over the weekend shows Obama leading Clinton 46 percent to 38 percent. (Obama led Clinton by 19 points in the same poll a week earlier.) Newsweek found that both candidates have a three point edge over McCain in a head-to-head match up.
The Clinton campaign, in particular, has argued that the former first lady is the more electable Democrat, an argument the campaign hopes will convince uncommitted superdelegates to back Clinton even if she goes into the party's convention with fewer pledged delegates than her rival, as is likely.
Now the Clinton camp has a fresh piece of evidence to argue its point: A poll out today from the Associated Press-Ipsos found that in head-to-head match ups with McCain, Clinton leads 50 percent to 41 percent. Obama led McCain as well, but by a smaller margin, 46 percent to 44 percent – a virtual tie. Three weeks ago, Clinton led McCain by three points in the poll, and McCain and Obama were tied at 45 percent.
The latest Gallup tracking poll, meanwhile, shows Clinton and Obama in a virtual tie among Democratic and Democratic leaning voters. And a Newsweek poll released over the weekend shows Obama leading Clinton 46 percent to 38 percent. (Obama led Clinton by 19 points in the same poll a week earlier.) Newsweek found that both candidates have a three point edge over McCain in a head-to-head match up.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 98 Comments** Clinton Foundation gets $131 million for Bill''s public declaration for Kazakhstan''s leader WHILE Hillary attacks their human rights record
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html?ex=1359435600&en=33a4d96a239655bf&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
** Bill Clinton get $800,000 from Columbian government, yet Hillary attacks Obama on free-trade
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/what-a-story-candidate-pe_b_96052.html
** Bill and Hillary fraud trial (in OCT ''08) for taking Ron Paul''s money
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw
** Hillary votes against Gun rights but attacks Obama on small town gun comment
July 13, 2006 Hillary voted against amendment 4615 to H.R. 5441
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00202
** Hillary has never signed the American Freedom Pledge, Barrack has
http://www.americanfreedomcampaign.org/
** Hillary''s healthcare mandates would cause prices to skyrocket initially as 47 million new insured come on-board. It would be years before enough supply caught up and reduced prices.
** Rendell praises Farrakhan, yet Hillary attack Obama for being praised by F.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA&eurl=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/04/rendell_praised_farrakhan.html
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2007/07/29/us/politics/20070730_OBAMA_GRAPHIC.html
From the US Senate --
**the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006 (became law),
**The Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act, (became law),
**The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, passed the Senate,
**The 2007 Government Ethics Bill, (became law),
**The Protection Against Excessive Executive Compensation Bill, (In committee), and many more.
** Honest Leadership and Open Govt. Act (became law)
** Sponsorship with John McCain (R-AZ) of a climate change bill to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by two-thirds by 2050
** joined Chuck Hagel (R-NE) in introducing legislation to reduce risks of nuclear terrorism (partial passage)
Hillary...or McCain. NO OTHER WAY!
He told us about plans to change nafta but uses a back channel to tell Canada he doesn''t mean it. This weekend Wright plainly said that Obama says certain things only because he''s a politician, and not that he means it.
Sorry I don''t see how this is any kind of "change" he claims he''ll bring, or even what he wants to do.
I think that when Obama is President he needs to add something to his education plan: Classes on Critical Thinking for the newsmen and pundits.
The polls show now that more people beleive Hillary is stronger against McCain..and Hillary will be the next Presiedent!
Thanks for being there. I appreciate the fact that you can be counted on for commenting on the side of truth. On any site where I''ve run into you, you''ve been an excellent poster. Thank you.
I will vote for McCain if Obama gets the nomination....McCain may break the bank, but at least I''''ll feel safe when I lay my head down at night.
Hillary...or McCain. NO OTHER WAY!
Posted by ladyesq1 at 04:36 PM : Apr 28, 2008
I agree with that.
about obama the more he sinks
and now Rev.Wright has add a lot
of weight
Reverend Wright embedded threads of truth in a canvass of falsehoods: at one moment he states outright that he is not divisive or polarizing then he launches into thunderous, irreverent gestures and harsh critique of classical music, opera, psychiatry, pharmacology, JFK''s and Ted Kennedy''s Irish-American accents, and rationalizes this by making his thesis an imaginary cognitive difference between blacks and whites that elucidate his tangential truisms.
He speaks of embracing Change and transformation to that of respect and kindness while being irreverent of the late JFK, Lyndon Johnson and the above-mentioned; he speaks conceptually of embracing difference while he treads the threshold of a bitter diatribe of Eurocentrist thought, music, language and worship.
How does he do so? Leaping from left and right brain hemispheres to oral traditions of Hebrew teachings, he feigns authority and makes bold statements from non-existent sources adding new fields of knowledge as he thunders on.
Demarcating himself as a preacher not a politician or political analyst, he exclaims that his speech is not about the candidacies of Senators McCain, Clinton and Obama. Jeremiah Wright continuously makes an affirmation of a positive, inevitable Change to come; not coincidentally, he finally brings his speech of Change to a climax of Yes We Can make this Change as an obvious endorsement of Senator Obama and then he humbly makes a plug for his book which is to emerge sometime in 2008.
I also believe that Sen. Obama will ultimately collapse under the pressure of the Blackwell money laundering allegations (see contrariancommentary.blogspot.com), Rev. Wright, William Ayers, Rezko, Larry Sinclair, and whatever else comes up now that the press is beginning to look.
In any event, it should be entertaining.
I also believe that Sen. Obama will ultimately collapse under the pressure of the Blackwell money laundering allegations, Rev. Wright, William Ayers, Rezko, Larry Sinclair, and whatever else comes up now that the press is beginning to look.
Core democrats will never cast a vote for Obama, nor will cross=over republicans!
Even if you put aside all his freakoid anti-American associattes, he''s still incompetent! HIs credentials NEVER matched the job he''s applied for.
Hillary was the presumed nominee, had all the big donors, did not have to answer to negative campaigning, was ahead in Superdelegates, had over 20% margin in national polling, had the backing of a President, had more experience and identified more with voters. So why didn%u2019t she close the deal on Super Tuesday and why is she trailing behind an underdog newcomer like Obama?
The Federal Election Commission has just reported that her campaign debt is $15 million and not $10 million as the Clinton camp reported because she failed to list her $5 million loan among the debts.
This means that even after her new surge of fundraising, she is still $5 million in debt; but Hillary is still smiling; why? Because she knows that her $110 million fortune is nice and safe. It%u2019s the ordinary person on the street who is tricked into losing money on a campaign that is doomed to fail.
Mitt Romney put $42 million of his own money into his campaign, why doesn%u2019t Hillary show she has complete confidence in her campaign and put in some of her own millions. Why? Because she knows it%u2019s a lost cause.
Those of you who are fooled into contributing to her campaign ask yourself why she LOANS her own money but wants you to GIVE your money?
Hillary is winning in the today''s polls...the tide is turning and is now in her favor.
Hillary will be President!
Hillary was the presumed nominee, had all the big donors, did not have to answer to negative campaigning, was ahead in Superdelegates, had over 20% margin in national polling, had the backing of a President, had more experience and identified more with voters. So why didn%u2019t she close the deal on Super Tuesday and why is she trailing behind an underdog newcomer like Obama?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jockh at 07:54 PM : Apr 28, 2008
Obama did not have to negative comapaign against Clinton leading up to Super Tuesday. The media was hitting her with negative and even mysognistic comments day after day and night after night while giving Obama a free ride. Is it any wonder that her popularity took a nose dive and Obama''s soared? Of course not.
Obama definitely can not win.
Hillary will be President!
Newsweek has lost some credibility after the Pennsylvania primary, don''t you think?
Factcheck and Politifact tells us ''Don''t beiieve it''. Hillary in fact out performs OBAMA in all counts.
OBAMA and company should fold the lies and their campaign and stick it to their glorious only rear.
Why no protest by you on %u201CLIFE & DEATH REWARDS,%u201D [C] 2008 re. Sen. McCain, party in U.S. Court Case H 08-60, Texas, Ct Clerk Phone 713-250-5500 ?
McCain was saved from %u201Cretaliation of North Vietnamese Army%u201D when Plaintiff MacKenzie with U.S. 177th & 504th Military Police, II Corps, stopped two U.S. Army Fourth Infantry efforts to shoot 60 N. Vietnamese %u201CPOW%u201D in Qui Nhon, Vietnam, 1968. N.V. Army would have revenged by killing 60 U.S. POW & Naval Officer McCain, captive in Hanoi.
Sen. McCain owes captured U.S. soldiers same morality to survive capture in Iraq as McCain was provided by U.S. Military Police, which saved his life, 1968.
Plaintiff Kenneth MacKenzie, Uncle of Kristian Vasquez Menchaca, barbarically tortured to death with PFC Thomas Tucker in, Iraq, June 2006, proclaims %u201CNOTIFICATION OF $25 MILLION DOLLAR REWARD%u201D for Terrorist-captured U.S. Soldier PRISONERS OF WAR, ALIVE, Iraq & Afghanistan
Said $8 B. U.S. Case H 08-60, U.S. Court, Houston & filed in U.N. International Criminal Court, Procurator%u2019s Case OTP-CR-100/08, denounces U.S. %u201Cpremeditated%u201D $50,000-dollar %u201CLow-life%u201D Rewards causing torture deaths of captured U.S. soldier POW, Iraq, alongside U.S. mega-rewards of $25 Million on behalf of terrorists, which save Terrorists while 100% of captured U.S.%u201C$50,000-dollar %u201CPOW%u201D are murdered because no Presidential Candidate has complained.
Democrats have only themselves to blame if they pick the most polarizing candidate ever. She was polarizing before she started the race and she will be long after the race is over....So, we can continue to ignore those negatives and allow her and the powers that be destroy the party from within.
I hope that your racist will at least enable you to see throught.
Posted by phoenixandy at 09:46 PM : Apr 28, 2008
BALONEY!!!
President Hillary Clinton. Get used to it.
Posted by chuegevera at 09:46 PM : Apr 28, 2008
That''s a laugh. Obama''s been negative almost from the beginning. In fact Karl Rove himself is an Obama supporter. Check out the following very interesting article to see what Rove has been doing for Obama:
www.TheCityEdition.com/Pages/Archive/Winter08/2008Election.html
Posted by chuegevera at 09:41 PM : Apr 28, 2008
The answer is that there was essentially no vetting of Obama in the earlier days of the primary season. Network and cable newscasters were clearly biased in his favor and made mysoginistic comments about Hillary. Now alot more negative news has come out about Obama and alot of people would change their vote if they could.
Please vote smart Indiana and North Carolina.
Posted by libra127 at 09:58 PM : Apr 28, 2008
You are right. Now that people know the REAL Obama and his Anti-Americaan mentors and friends such as Wright, Ayers the terrorist bomber who invited Obama to his house to start his political career, and Rezko the middle east criminal who raised over $250,000 for Obama and helped him buy Obama''s $2 million mansion....most people who previously voted for Obama before they knew this...would NOW vote for Hillary.
Posted by philly1550 at 11:18 PM : Apr 28, 2008"
Rezko ? Rezko ? Oh, you mean Rove''s friend who raised 3.8 million for Bush ? that Rezko ?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 98 Comments