Horserace
April 28, 2008 3:18 PM

Poll: Clinton Fares Better Than Obama In Match Up With McCain

The campaigns of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama have been arguing over which candidate is more likely to beat presumptive GOP nominee John McCain in November.

The Clinton campaign, in particular, has argued that the former first lady is the more electable Democrat, an argument the campaign hopes will convince uncommitted superdelegates to back Clinton even if she goes into the party's convention with fewer pledged delegates than her rival, as is likely.

Now the Clinton camp has a fresh piece of evidence to argue its point: A poll out today from the Associated Press-Ipsos found that in head-to-head match ups with McCain, Clinton leads 50 percent to 41 percent. Obama led McCain as well, but by a smaller margin, 46 percent to 44 percent – a virtual tie. Three weeks ago, Clinton led McCain by three points in the poll, and McCain and Obama were tied at 45 percent.

The latest Gallup tracking poll, meanwhile, shows Clinton and Obama in a virtual tie among Democratic and Democratic leaning voters. And a Newsweek poll released over the weekend shows Obama leading Clinton 46 percent to 38 percent. (Obama led Clinton by 19 points in the same poll a week earlier.) Newsweek found that both candidates have a three point edge over McCain in a head-to-head match up.
Tags:
poll ,
clinton ,
mccain ,
obama ,
ap ,
head to head ,
general election
Topics:
Polls
Add a Comment See all 98 Comments
by blackyowe April 29, 2008 8:47 PM EDT
Obama can''t beat the Republicans so he needs to step aside for the good of the nation. Come back in 8 years when you are out of training pants, Obama!
Reply to this comment
by liar-clinton April 29, 2008 6:00 PM EDT
Obama gets big Kentucky endorsement

LOUISVILLE, Ky. | Kentucky bigwig Ben Chandler, a new U.S. rep and grandson of a former governor, will endorse Barack Obama today, Obama%u2019s state campaign director said.
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 April 29, 2008 5:36 PM EDT
IT''S NEVER TO LATE TO CHOOSE TO THINK OUTSIDE OF A DICTATORSHIP- VETO DOWN SOCIALISM AND ANY DEMOCRAT WHO WANTS TO CONTROL YOUR LIFE- IT''S TIME TO STAND UP AND HAVE FAITH IN YOURSELF FOR A CHANGE. IT''S TIME TO HAVE FAITH IN A PATRIOT. MCCAIN 2008
Reply to this comment
by libh8er April 29, 2008 5:25 PM EDT
Why hasn''''t FOX News taken any shots at her either?
Posted by zoroeltoro at 01:57 PM : Apr 29, 2008

I watch Fox all the time...they haven''t ''taken shots'' at anyone. Do you take sugar in your Kool Aid or do you chug it straight?
Reply to this comment
by libh8er April 29, 2008 5:24 PM EDT
This is what I''ve been telling you bedwetting Obama libs.....guess you just had to see it on CBS.
Reply to this comment
by zoroeltoro April 29, 2008 4:57 PM EDT
When was the last time you heard McCain attack Hillary Clinton? Why hasn''t FOX News taken any shots at her either? Seems like they have a common fear. Barack is the strongest candidate because he has battled Bill, Hillary, McCain, and now Jeremiah Wright. He''s my champion.
Reply to this comment
by dog7771 April 29, 2008 4:53 PM EDT
Now that she has bloodied and besmirched Obama, she claims to be a winner? I will hold my nose if she is the candidate, and vote for a faux-democrat. She should then pick Guiliani as her running mate and have Kerick as Atty Gen.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat April 29, 2008 4:38 PM EDT
It''s really rather amazing that McCain and Clinton aren''t doing better in the polls given that both of them are attacking Barack, and Barack''s not attacking either of them to nearly the same degree.

Just try and imagine what a Hillary versus McCain race would be like when they''re in the same age, race, and income bracket and it''s mudslinger versus mudslinger. The race is going to be reduced down to a gender war, and Karl Rove is going to have hookers hitting on Bubba 24/7 to make Hillary look like a woman who couldn''t walk away from her man.

Every candidate has their strengths and weaknesses . . .
Reply to this comment
by lochlan-2009 April 29, 2008 4:38 PM EDT
Obviously the DNC has recieved these numbers and are beginning to switch away from Obama. The main stream medias attacks on Obama today from multiple directions, while lacking to mention anything negative about Hillary have shown how spoon fed our sources of information are by the oligarchy.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat April 29, 2008 4:36 PM EDT
It''s really rather amazing that McCain and Clinton aren''t doing better in the polls given that both of them are attacking Barack, and Barack''s not attacking either of them.

Just try and imagine what a Hillary versus McCain race would be like when they''re in the same age, race, and income bracket and it''s mudslinger versus mudslinger. The race is going to be reduced down to a gender war, and Karl Rove is going to have hookers hitting on Bubba 24/7 to make Hillary look like a woman who couldn''t walk away from her man.

Every candidate has their strengths and weaknesses . . .
Reply to this comment
by lochlan-2009 April 29, 2008 4:36 PM EDT
Obviously the DNC has recieved these numbers and are beginning to switch away from Obama. The main stream medias attacks on Obama today from multiple directions, while lacking to mention anything negative about Hillary have shown how spoon fed our sources of information are by the oligarchy.
Reply to this comment
by efarris38 April 29, 2008 4:28 PM EDT
Senator Clinton can carry states like Ohio and Florida, most polls have been consistent with that but Obama has not delievered one large state outside of Illinois and it will be impossible for any Democrat to win the White House without Ohio or Florida on their lists of wins. Clinton''s chances are are far better than Obama''s , he is too far to the left. Clinton appeals to those "Reagan Democrats" and blue collar workers that will be needed in Novemeber. There is no doubt in my mind that with a 9 point lead over McCain that Senator Clinton would carry the states she needs to win as well as Arkansas and maybe New Mexico and win the Presidency.
Reply to this comment
by efarris38 April 29, 2008 4:27 PM EDT
Senator Clinton can carry states like Ohio and Florida, most polls have been consistent with that but Obama has not delievered one large state outside of Illinois and it will be impossible for any Democrat to win the White House without Ohio or Florida on their lists of wins. Clinton''s chances are are far better than Obama''s , he is too far to the left. Clinton appeals to those "Reagan Democrats" and blue collar workers that will be needed in Novemeber. There is no doubt in my mind that with a 9 point lead over McCain that Senator Clinton would carry the states she needs to win as well as Arkansas and maybe New Mexico and win the Presidency.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat April 29, 2008 4:26 PM EDT
It''s really rather amazing that McCain and Clinton aren''t doing better in the polls given that both of them are attacking Barack, and Barack''s not attacking either of them.

Just try and imagine what a Hillary versus McCain race would be like when they''re in the same age, race, and income bracket and it''s mudslinger versus mudslinger. The race is going to be reduced down to a gender war, and Karl Rove is going to have hookers hitting on Bubba 24/7 to make Hillary look like a woman who couldn''t walk away from her man.

Every candidate has their strengths and weaknesses . . .
Reply to this comment
by efarris38 April 29, 2008 4:26 PM EDT
Senator Clinton can carry states like Ohio and Florida, most polls have been consistent with that but Obama has not delievered one large state outside of Illinois and it will be impossible for any Democrat to win the White House without Ohio or Florida on their lists of wins. Clinton''s chances are are far better than Obama''s , he is too far to the left. Clinton appeals to those "Reagan Democrats" and blue collar workers that will be needed in Novemeber. There is no doubt in my mind that with a 9 point lead over McCain that Senator Clinton would carry the states she needs to win as well as Arkansas and maybe New Mexico and win the Presidency.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat April 29, 2008 4:21 PM EDT
It''s really rather amazing that McCain and Clinton aren''t doing better in the polls given that both of them are attacking Barack, and Barack''s not attacking either of them.

Just try and imagine what a Hillary versus McCain race would be like when they''re in the same age, race, and income bracket and it''s mudslinger versus mudslinger. The race is going to be reduced down to a gender war, and Karl Rove is going to have hookers hitting on Bubba 24/7 to make Hillary look like a woman who couldn''t walk away from her man.

Every candidate has their strengths and weaknesses . . .
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat April 29, 2008 4:19 PM EDT
It''s really rather amazing that McCain and Clinton aren''t doing better in the polls given that both of them are attacking Barack, and Barack''s not attacking either of them.

Just try and imagine what a Hillary versus McCain race would be like when they''re in the same age, race, and income bracket and it''s mudslinger versus mudslinger. The race is going to be reduced down to a gender war, and Karl Rove is going to have hookers hitting on Bubba 24/7 to make Hillary look like a woman who couldn''t walk away from her man.

Every candidate has their strengths and weaknesses . . .
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat April 29, 2008 4:17 PM EDT
It''s really rather amazing that McCain and Clinton aren''t doing better in the polls given that both of them are attacking Barack, and Barack''s not attacking either of them.

Just try and imagine what a Hillary versus McCain race would be like when they''re in the same age, race, and income bracket and it''s mudslinger versus mudslinger. The race is going to be reduced down to a gender war, and Karl Rove is going to have hookers hitting on Bubba 24/7 to make Hillary look like a woman who couldn''t walk away from her man.

Every candidate has their strengths and weaknesses . . .
Reply to this comment
by lorinkundert April 29, 2008 4:01 PM EDT
Don''t Think So Hillary.

"Party members increasingly dislike the contender they are not supporting in the bruising nomination fight, an Associated Press-Yahoo News survey and exit polls of voters show. That is raising questions about how faithful some will be by the November general election.

In the AP-Yahoo News poll %uFFFD which has tracked the same 2,000 people since November %uFFFD Obama supporters with negative views of the New York senator have grown from 35 percent in November to 44 percent this month, including one-quarter with very unfavorable feelings.

Those Obama backers who don''t like Clinton say they would vote for Republican candidate John McCain over her by a two-to-one margin, with many undecided.

As for Clinton supporters, those with unfavorable views of Obama have grown from 26 percent to 42 percent during this same period %uFFFD including a doubling to 20 percent of those with very negative opinions.

The Clinton backers with unfavorable views of Obama say they would vote for McCain over him by nearly three-to-one, though many haven''t made up their minds."
Reply to this comment
by popstom1 April 29, 2008 3:57 PM EDT
look like Hillary keeps trumping
Obama''s moves would say Gov.
Reply to this comment
See all 98 Comments

60 Minutes

The secrets of tennis legend Andre Agassi; the growing threat of cyber wars; and more.
Read More

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. House Passes Landmark Health Care Bill

    (479 recent comments)