From The Road
April 3, 2008 8:12 PM

Clinton Campaign Backpedals on Richardson Comments

(CBS)
From CBS News' Fernando Suarez:

BURBANK, CALIF. - In an exchange with reporters at a press conference earlier today, Hillary Clinton was asked about reports that while, she was seeking his endorsement, she told Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M., that Barack Obama could not win the general election if he were the nominee. Clinton responded, “You know we have been going back and forth in this campaign about who said what to whom and let me say this about that. I don’t talk about private conversations. But I have consistently made the case that I can win because I believe I can win. You know, sometimes people draw the conclusions that I’m saying somebody else can’t win. I can win, I know I can win. That’s why I do this everyday. I’m in it to win it.”

The reporter pressed Clinton saying, “Is that a no?” To which Clinton responded, “That’s a no.”

But later, a senior Clinton spokesman told reporters that Clinton did not mean to imply that she was not referring to what she allegedly said to Richardson about Obama. Instead, the campaign explains that Clinton took the follow up question to mean that she “does not talk about private conversations."

Reporters pressed the aide about Clinton’s answer to which the aide maintained that Clinton’s “that’s a no” answer was aimed at the fact that Clinton does not discuss private conversations.

The campaign’s move leaves open the possibility that Clinton may have been worried that Richardson, who eventually endorsed Obama, would have come out and challenged Clinton’s denial.
Tags:
Clinton
Topics:
Hillary Clinton
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 107 Comments
by beebopareebo April 5, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
Why is it if we say that Barack Obama is not electable it is assumed that we are saying it is because he is black? He''s not electable because he is inexperienced, he changes his policy statements to suit him like NAFTA, his ultra ultra liberal policies when it comes to things like parental notification of abortion and his association with people like Reverend Wright and Tony Rezko -- not to mention his claims to run a "positive" campaign and yet inserting race and negative campaigning at each and every turn. Oh, and where are his records from his years of service in Illinois? If Hillary Clinton couldn''t find records for SIX YEARS the media would be going crazy!
Reply to this comment
by bttgghty April 5, 2008 4:28 AM EDT
I believe the comment was made. What is going unnoticed is that this was a civil presidential nomination race that should have been over but for the arrogance and entitlement to return to the White House by Clinton strategists. This race had a spirit that Senator Clinton''s continued self-serving presence will diminish.
Reply to this comment
by reltna April 4, 2008 7:43 PM EDT
And the Liberal media has been screaming about Bush and Cheney''s obnoxious wealth. CLINTONS SHOW $109M IN INCOME SINCE LEAVING WHITE HOUSE! What a spin job they''ve got on their hands now. Thank you Al Gore for inventing the Internet so we can find out about people like you and the Clinton''s.

Gore''s wealth 7 years ago was $2,000,000 and now is estimated at between $35,000,000 to $100,000,000. This is the same idiot that said on the Larry King show anyone making $250,000 a yr are millionaires with the connotation they were evil.

At least now we know where a lot of global warming gases are coming from:
Willie''s Speech Income: $51,855,599!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by jheckerman April 4, 2008 1:36 PM EDT
Majority Speaker Nancy Pelosi keep your big mouth shut. Who cares what you think. You get a high position and you yak, yak yak. You act like you speak for the democratic party. You don''t. If you disenfranchise Hillary Clinton Voters. Your going to get McCain voted into the Whitehouse. As a democrat I would rather vote for McCain than Obama. Tired of "Cheerleading" Jive! YES WE CAN Sheep. Rosie the rivitor had a very simular mantra in world war II "Yes we can do it! That promoted women doing mens jobs. Time to break the Glass ceiling...Ladies and Gentlemen! Young Women- dont forget the women before you who had to fight to vote. and be heard. Time to Roar Ladies!
Reply to this comment
by rjudy3 April 4, 2008 1:30 PM EDT
Who cares what Richardson(JUDAS) says or thinks?! He''s gonna have a hard time at reelection for Gov, he may run for dog-catcher though.
So whats wrong with telling the truth, Obama CANT win. That is fact. This country is NOT going to put him and his wife in the White House. That is reserved for the folks that LOVE our country and are PROUD of their country ALL the time not just when are husband runs for something. We want someone who says God BLESS AMERICA not G-- ---- America!!We want someone who loves ALL americans not just ONE race. And finally we want some with just a tad bit MORE experiance than being a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER!!
WE NEED HILLARY CLINTON!!!!
Keep Fighting Hil, there''s millions of us side by side with you!!!
Reply to this comment
by craigh9 April 4, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
Does anybody really want to put someone in the Whitehouse again who doesn''t know the meaning of simple words, or at least twists the meaning to fit their purpose. What a coniving, lying, loser.
Reply to this comment
by reltna April 4, 2008 11:23 AM EDT
Google this: OBAMA, RAILA ODINGA, FIDEL CASTRO. It gives you some information on Obama''s cousin in Kenya and other family members. A lot of controversy about Obama''s visit to Kenya in 2006 and also his teacher talking about his Muslim studies. Google, obama''s muslim studies

You might as well check it out now because you know the two bridge trolls will be sliding this information under the editor''s door pretty soon. Of course getting the Liberal media to jump off the Obama glory train might be impossible...
Reply to this comment
by ricardo4max April 4, 2008 11:08 AM EDT
WOW I can''t believe how stupid the left Wing CBS is. In my Hillary post I used the word s^e^x and they replaced it with ***! Welcome to left wing liberal censorship, goodbye First Amendment!
Reply to this comment
by ricardo4max April 4, 2008 11:06 AM EDT
After Hillary loses her bid to become Queen of the US, the Clintons should get their own reality show on cable TV. can you imagine the ratings it would pull?
The lying, the cheating, the violence, the *** (for one of them anyway),%u2026.
Reply to this comment
by madiusdog April 4, 2008 10:58 AM EDT
She''s a phony! She talks about uniting the country and she''s the most divisive force in the Democratic party.
Reply to this comment
by fujimo1950 April 4, 2008 10:36 AM EDT
I for one believe, that if she said what this story is trying to make us believe she said, I agree with her. Obama will not be an electable as the Republican camp will exploit all of his weaknesses and most of all they will not hesitate to play his racial hate monger association with his pastor and associates as the ace in the hole card.
Reply to this comment
by robinhunter April 4, 2008 10:21 AM EDT
If Clinton was trying to persuade Richardson to vote for her, was she supposed to tell Richardson that both candidates can win against McCain. She''s gonna say, "I can win this." If Richardson took that to mean "Obama can''t win," then that''s his interpretation. This whole thing has to do with pack jounalism and reporters with agendas of their own, and nothing to do with who can govern the country. An idiot can govern the country -- one''s doing it now.
Reply to this comment
by ricardo4max April 4, 2008 10:20 AM EDT
What I have trouble understanding is why 2 Senators (O''bama and Clinton)of the USA are hell bent on destroying America from within and why the liberal drive by media are willing accomplices. Capitalism and free enterprise enabled Americans to work their you-know-whats off t make this a great country and now the liberals want to tax and regulate the successful out of business. Can you say long lines for bread and toilet paper? There are 2 generations alive today that have no recollection of how bad communism / socialism / government run everything was in the USSR.
They ***** and moan about the TSA yet want "nationalized" health care. The government has NEVER done Anything as well as or as efficient as the private sector.
Reply to this comment
by ricardo4max April 4, 2008 10:13 AM EDT
Then we have Dirty Harry Reid,.. When it comes to cashing in on family connections, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay''s relatives can''t hold a candle to the clan of Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, who''s sponsored legislation that netted his family hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees. Then we have the champion of the little guy, Nancy Pelosi... The Pelosi family has a net worth of over US$25 million, primarily from Paul Pelosi''s investments. In addition to their large portfolio of jointly owned San Francisco Bay Area real estate, he also has millions of dollars in stock from publicly traded companies such as Microsoft, Amazon.com and AT&T. In 2003, the Pelosi family sold their eight-acre (three hectare) Rutherford vineyard. Pelosi continues to be among the richest members of Congress. She is also an shining example of ethics... The Washington Times reported today that Speaker Pelosi is exempting hometown companies from minimum wage increasing by passing legislation excludes American Samoa. Del Monte Foods based in San Francisco has tuna plants in American Samoa. Majority Speaker Nancy Pelosi''s husband Paul Pelosi is a primary Del Monte investor, with $17 million in shares!
Gotta love those Democrats!
Reply to this comment
by ricardo4max April 4, 2008 10:12 AM EDT
Let''s see; on one hand we have a shrill known liar, flip flopper, and proponent of big govt., inefficient socialized medicine, higher taxes, and limits on freedom of speech, to name a few things. On the other we have cold calculating America-hating racist, afro-centric Marxist (since college days) that looks to a racist America hater as a mentor, associates with a known violent domestic terrorist (Weather Underground member) and takes money and favors from Syrian shady character a la Chicago politics as usual. In October 2006, Rezko was indicted for extortion of businesses seeking to do business with the Illinois Teachers Retirement System Board and the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Board. In addition, he has been charged with wire fraud for staging false transactions of his pizza stores in order to secure $10 million in loans from GE Capital. The case is being prosecuted by Patrick Fitzgerald who prosecuted the case against Scooter Libby arising from the CIA leak scandal.
Reply to this comment
by reltna April 4, 2008 10:08 AM EDT
Well folks, we''re in for it now. When Ms. Hillary and Willie''s honed smear tactics don''t work eventually they''ll go nuclear. It is about time for the Clinton''s to drag out the big guns, Golden Wheelchair, LARRY FLYNT. Only this time Obama will be in the cross hairs.

Ms. Obama''s only proud moment as an American citizen won''t last much longer after the leaks to the National Enquirer for beginners.

Who''d a thunk six months ago when Ms. Hillary proclaimed to the world she would be crowned the next POTUS that the LIBERAL media was that desperate to get out from under these two bridge trolls. I mean, they trampled each other trying to get to an unknown, untested, inexperienced and less than one term Senator Obama! This is worse than when they dumped Mad Man Dean and flocked to Killer Kerry and his crackpot White African wife.
Reply to this comment
by smilinjack7 April 4, 2008 10:06 AM EDT
Good grief! Can the Clintons EVER just tell the truth?
Reply to this comment
by maxrap-2009 April 4, 2008 9:56 AM EDT
This story is a toal joke! Sounds like a big bunch of nothing. I have been shocked at the great lenghts the media goes to twist and turn anything to try to make the story anti-Hillary and pro-Obama. I have never watched FOXnews in my life until now because they are the only ones who give any real picture of Obama. And I have never voted for a republican for President but it will be McCain for me if Obama gets the nod. Obama is a smug lightweight at best and a raging anti-American radical at worst. And Richardson has real nerve in my opinion. He was a nobody until the Clintons helped him. Santiago you are living in a dream world if you think Americans should applaud him.
Reply to this comment
by kondor126 April 4, 2008 9:28 AM EDT
I supported Obama at first but all the stuff coming out on him leads me to believe he is no better than the Clintons. It''s incomceivable that after 20 years he had no idea what his pastor thought. The same guy that now live sin a white gated community costing thousands of dollars while preaching to his flock not to buy into the white society..Duh! Hillary is no better, it seems the democrats have the morals of the proverbial alley cat when it some to the truth. They just don''t recognize it. Keep fighting and letting the public know who you are. It doesn''t matter who the nominee is, you Dems are not going to win the Presidency. I''m not sure what McCain will do but at least he''s proven he has guts.
Reply to this comment
by kondor126 April 4, 2008 9:27 AM EDT
I supported Obama at first but all the stuff coming out on him leads me to believe he is no better than the Clintons. It''s incomceivable that after 20 years he had no idea what his pastor thought. The same guy that now live sin a white gated community costing thousands of dollars while preaching to his flock not to buy into the white society..Duh! Hillary is no better, it seems the democrats have the morals of the proverbial alley cat when it some to the truth. They just don''t recognize it. Keep fighting and letting the public know who you are. It doesn''y matter who the nominee is, you Dems are not going to win the Presidency. I''m not sure what McCain will do but at least he''s proven he has guts.
Reply to this comment
See all 107 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road

  • MOST POPULAR