From The Road
March 7, 2008 5:52 PM

Countering Clinton, Obama Says He's Committed to Ending War

(CBS)
From CBS News' Maria Gavrilovic:

CASPER, WYO. -- Today, Barack Obama stuck to his campaign’s promise to respond to every criticism by Hillary Clinton. During a town hall meeting here, Obama addressed the Clinton campaign’s latest criticisms of his Iraq withdrawal plan, which were based on comments a campaign adviser made to the BBC.

“Senator Clinton used this to try to imply that I wasn’t serious about bringing this war to an end. I just have to mention this because I don’t want anybody here to be confused,” Obama said.

“I was opposed to this war in 2002. If it had been up to me we would have never been in this war. It was because of George Bush with an assist from Hillary Clinton and John McCain that we entered into this war. A war that should have never been authorized, a war that should have never been waged.”

Samantha Power, the Obama campaign adviser who resigned today, recently suggested in an interview with the BBC that Obama's plan to that withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq within 16 months is a "best-case scenario" that he'll reassess if he becomes president.

"He will, of course, not rely on some plan that he's crafted as a presidential candidate or a U.S. senator," she said. "He will rely upon a plan - an operational plan - that he pulls together in consultation with people who are on the ground to whom he doesn't have daily access now, as a result of not being the president," Powers said.

Meantime, Obama took every opportunity available to go after Clinton and occasionally John McCain during the question & answer session. He accused Clinton of conjuring up the “politics of fear” with the “3 a.m. ad” that aired in Texas.

“That was designed to feed into your fears, right?,” Obama asked, “What do people think I’m going to do? I’m going to answer the phone and I will find out what’s going on and I won’t be browbeaten into launching a war that wasn’t necessary.”

Obama said his presidential campaign should be looked at by those who question his experience.

“Look who’s run the best campaign. Look who’s managed this campaign from scratch. That’s worth taking a look at. Look at what we’ve built from scratch to compete against people who have been building this thing for 20, 30 years, and we’ve done just fine.”
Tags:
Obama
Topics:
Barack Obama
Add a Comment See all 38 Comments
by elsylee28 March 10, 2008 4:54 PM EDT
BTW I found a fantastic article...A MUST read for EVERYONE

%u201CThe Hussein Dynamic%u201D at http://savagepolitics.com.

Brilliant writing that goes beyond what the MSM is feeding us!!!!
Reply to this comment
by elsylee28 March 10, 2008 4:53 PM EDT
BTW I found a fantastic article...A MUST read for EVERYONE

%u201CThe Hussein Dynamic%u201D at http://savagepolitics.com.

Brilliant writing that goes beyond what the MSM is feeding us!!!!
Reply to this comment
by szelag19 March 10, 2008 4:27 PM EDT
Here the media goes again..Bash Hillary...rah rah Osama.you''re pathetic..Are you trying to out bash NBC and ABC..I''d like to find out why the press does this and has been doing it since the beginning of this election..Is the media supposed to be neutral? I thought so..You gotta wonder what''s in it for them..They''re not shoving Osama down America''s throat for nothing..VOTE HILLARY !!
Reply to this comment
by pesojoe March 9, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
Clinton has nothing on Obama when it comes to Chicago style wallow in the mud politics. Another free ride for obama,no coverage of a trial in Chicago of a certain close friend and smelly contributer of Obamas. Lots of fishy aroma here but cbs would choose other things to cover that Obama feels better about. Please continue to not do your job, if you do your job Obama might not like you!
Reply to this comment
by Ehis Agbon March 9, 2008 10:38 AM EDT
My problem with American Style campaign is the emphasis on what your opponent cant do, demonising of political opponents even in the same political party. Clinton and Obama should know that the world is watching and learning.
Reply to this comment
by fjstratford March 9, 2008 9:28 AM EDT
Poor Samantha. Fired by Obama for speaking the truthy -that Obama has no plans of following up on his promises about Iraq.

Just like his NAFTA promises.

Beware of Obama. He is a habitual liar.
Reply to this comment
by poeticjust5 March 9, 2008 4:40 AM EDT
C''mon American people! Do you really want to vote for someone who is willing to throw her party under the bus if she''s not nominated for the presidency??? That unbelievable selfishness and arrogance is exactly what has been holding America back for all of these years. I just cannot stomach any more Clintonian dramas. Let''s move on and start a new chapter. Besides, in reality Obama has more experience in office than HRC does.
Reply to this comment
by hhkeller March 9, 2008 3:23 AM EDT
Obama is committed to ending the war as fast as he is uncommitted to ending the war. It really depends on the venue he''s speaking to. He is the expert in double speak. The one vote he had to send the clear statement to GW and the Iraqis, Obama decided to vote for continued war funding without strings.

His one vote gets my no vote. Not because he was totally wrong but but because he''s a lier to the people. Stop the double speak Obama!
Reply to this comment
by ccjenkins3 March 9, 2008 1:55 AM EST
Maria,
Please tell me when did Obama first vote "NO" on the war? The war on Iraq was declared in March 2003, and Obama was not a U.S. Senator until January 2005. So again, when did he first vote "NO" on the war?
Reply to this comment
by politicod March 8, 2008 11:24 PM EST
All campaigns have good and not so good weeks, and how they come out of those stretches tells us a lot about them. Sen. McCain was almost bankrupt this summer and faced a very weak Republican field. Sen. Clinton had to lend her campaign $5mill. and devised a "kitchen sink" strategy" which may not make her the nominee but looks like it is helping Sen. McCain. It is still too early to see if Senator Obama can regroup from a very bad week, strengthen his message and still remain the candidate of the "new politics." It is seven weeks until Pa. The economy is in terrible shape. The national security "3 a.m." argument may not work so well after the next employment figures come out. A lot can happen. Political junkies, enjoy it.
Reply to this comment
by xonroad March 8, 2008 7:38 PM EST
It''s 3am a phone rings in the White House, do you know where your spouse is?

Tax returns.

Obama or McCain: both honorable candidates who will lead with integrity. Both are better than the other alternative that will say/do anything for her power quest.
Reply to this comment
by elevando March 8, 2008 5:23 PM EST
Ummm, hey tom and mark, we had a black president on 24, so your arguments don''t hold any water. I''ll tell you what does, Obama running with Oprah as his VP. How do you like those apples?
Reply to this comment
by truth_speake March 8, 2008 11:36 AM EST
clinton experience is nothing but speeches about solutions.
I thought about her good before I see her real colors now. she is a shrewd politician and will do anything to get into whitehouse again because she got the taste of whitehouse before.
clinton and camp is allowed to label all LIES and deceits possible without any cross-questioning from the media.
media seems to have gone feminist in this campaign by being soft of a woman candidate.
Reply to this comment
by amy_2-2009 March 8, 2008 10:30 AM EST
America has a lot of SERIOUS problems : the war, crumbling economy and its shattered image in the world.

Are the American people naive enough to put these problems on the shoulder of Obama (an untested neophyte politician who doesn''t even have in his resume a REMARKABLE accomplishment that would prepare him for the toughest job in the world?)

For all his faults, it cannot be denied that during President Clinton''s time America''s image abroad was good and the economy was robust (those were the good old times and seems like only a fantasy now). This was a REAL accomplishment and don''t you think Hillary had a hand in President Clinton''s very good handling of the reins of the government?

In this DIRE times, I wouldn;t mind of a co-presidency of these two brightest minds to make decisions for America.

On the other hand, IF ONLY it is NORMAL times, then I would vote for Obama just to have a breath of fresh air (but it is not so I would not gamble for a neophyte)
Reply to this comment
by amy_2-2009 March 8, 2008 10:12 AM EST
with the recent succeeding gaffes that the OBAMA camp has been committing, I think that the "magic" which is the only thing working in his campaign may soon wane out.

Obama''s awestruck admirers will soon realize that magic, charisma and oratorical skills are NOT the best credentials to qualify a person to the toughest job in the world.

It has been confusing for me why he got this much adulation. He must have dome something VERY HEROIC in the past, but to my dismay there is none (Is being very good community organizer a remarkable accomplishment? If so then a lot of people are qualified to be Prez of the USA))

So Obama supporters stop this illusion of seeing Obama as the saviour of the world. Get real people!!!
Reply to this comment
by cecil4obama March 8, 2008 4:35 AM EST
Lets Not Forget;

-Billing-gate, Hillary Clinton''''s missing law-billing records. Those records -- which raised questions about Mrs. Clinton''''s role in the Castle Grande deal -- were subpoenaed in 1994. They were missing until early 1996, when they turned up in a White House room next to her office. She says she doesn''''t know how they got there.

-Cattlegate, Hillary Clinton''''s mysterious ability to turn a $1,000 investment into a $100,000 profit on cattle futures, a feat experts say was virtually impossible in normal trading.

-Castle Grande, a real-estate scheme that federal regulators say was a sham. A federal inspector general''''s report found Hillary Clinton drew up the legal papers that were used to improperly funnel hundreds of thousands of dollars to Seth Ward, father-in-law of her ex-law partner Webster Hubbell.
Obama 08
Reply to this comment
by cecil4obama March 8, 2008 4:34 AM EST
To Sen. Clinton, Know What Your Signing. "Experience 101"

Lets not forget, A lot of Men and Women have lost there lives in this Iraq war, because of the "YES" vote.

Better prepared to be commander-in-chief. I don''t think so.

To this day I can''t beleive that Sen. Clinton didn''t read the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq before she voted "Yes" in 2002. This vote gave President Bush the POWER to use military force against Saddam Hussein and Iraq.

Why didn''t she read this important report to get a better understanding of what was going on?

What a great leader she would make. Doesn''t bother to read very important report''s Then says President Bush lied about the Report. When did she read it. Where is the experience in this matter.

Pointing the finger at Bush, when she should point it at herself.

Obama 08
Reply to this comment
by PulSamsara March 8, 2008 3:42 AM EST
Barack Obama has the strength and moral fortitude to grow with America into a new era. Clinton has nothing but the same old tired politics we have lived with for far too long. She is the Rovian antithesis - opposite in parallel...the yin to the yang of the dark machine. I will vote against the democratic party for the first time in 20 years if she steals the nomination. I have voted for her family 3 times and finally saw the light when she chose the ''politically expedient'' choice of voting us into Iraq. I''ve simply had enough. - Enough.
Reply to this comment
by reece2076 March 8, 2008 3:40 AM EST
It''s obvious Hillary Clinton is attacking Obama to either convince the super delegates to overturn the will of the people and nominate her, or set herself up for 2012, by helping McCain defeat Obama. Just look at how many times she has said McCain is ready to be commander in chief, she is ready to be commander in chief, but Obama is not. She truly is a selfish Monster that puts her wants above the needs of the party and most Americans.
Reply to this comment
by kat1park March 8, 2008 2:27 AM EST
btw, she didn''t use the word "realistic". that was a paraphrase. bottom line, she said he would take a look at the state of things after he was elected to evaluate the time line for withdrawing troops.
Reply to this comment
See all 38 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road