Horserace
March 4, 2008 5:36 PM

Early Exits Polls Indicate Economy Key Issue For Democrats

Here are some data from the early CBS News exit polls:

The economy was the top issue for Democratic voters in all four states voting today, and large majorities say the economy is in bad shape.

Ohio Democratic voters hold mostly negative views on U.S. trade with other countries: Eight in ten say trade takes jobs away from their state. In Texas, 58 percent say trade takes jobs away, while a quarter say U.S. trade with other countries creates jobs.

Thirty-two percent of Texas Democratic primary voters are Hispanic, according to the early exit polls -– up from the 24 percent in 2004. Eighteen percent are black, down from 21 percent in 2004.

In Ohio, 20 percent of Democratic primary voters are African American, up from 14 percent in 2004.

Obama is seen by voters in Texas and Ohio as the candidate most likely to beat the Republican nominee in November. A larger percentage of voters in both states say Clinton has attacked Obama unfairly than the other way around.

In both Ohio and Texas, a majority of Democratic voters say superdelegates should cast their vote based on the results of the primaries. A third say the superdelegates should support the candidate who has the best chance of winning in November.

For more exit poll results, see our main election story.
Tags:
exit polls ,
texas ,
ohio ,
barack obama ,
hillary clinton
Topics:
Democrats
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 25 Comments
by hdinsight March 5, 2008 2:43 AM EST
Gene Sperling is Clinton''s economic adviser. That alone should be a valid reason for voting Clinton into the Oval Office. Read "The Pro-Growth Progressive: An Economic Strategy for Shared Prosperity" before believing Obama or McCain would save our economy from total implosion. His strategies led our country to prosperity in the past including a balanced budget & a reduced deficit. Let history repeat itself! Time is of the essence and we need the genius of Gene Sperling to help AMERICA out of this darkness.
Reply to this comment
by nearl4511 March 5, 2008 1:58 AM EST
Big night fir McCain. With Hiilary winning, he has just won me over.

AND I had so much hope ealry on....
Reply to this comment
by nearl4511 March 5, 2008 1:48 AM EST
Posted by yarow at 09:55 PM : Mar 04, 2008

Hey , work for FOX news. Stop spamming. We have seen your opinion over and over and over and you are an idiot.

Looks like this may make my state count after all.

Don''t know who to vote for if Clinton wins. Never voted for a Republican President in my life, but I cannot stand this legacy nonsense. What next? another Bush?

No one can win without FLA or Michigan. I don;t know how this can possibly get resolved.

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 1:22 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 1:17 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by elz523 March 5, 2008 1:10 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!
Posted by yarow at 10:03 PM : Mar 04, 2008

Again, there were no campaigns in those states. So... you really don''t know how an educated electorate would have voted.
Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 1:03 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 12:59 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 12:55 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by elz523 March 5, 2008 12:54 AM EST
If Obama wants to argue that party rules should be followed by not seating Florida and Michigan delegates, then he should endorse the right of superdelegates to vote for whomever they choose.

Posted by yarow at 09:43 PM : Mar 04, 2008
+ report abuse


What? Look I don''t care who wins. Whichever Democrat wins will get my vote. But c''mon(!), the candidates agreed not to compaign in Michigan and Florida. Y''know if we were going to vote without a compaign: #1, Hillary would win based on name recognition alone and #2, we could save alot of money by just going and voting without learning anything of the candidates. Is that what you want? Because that is what you are suggesting. If there was no contest in either Florida or Michigan, as agreed by the candidates, then you can''t seat the delegates as if there were one.

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 12:46 AM EST
Obama is trying to have it both ways. He thinks the superdelegates should adhere to their state vote outcomes despite rules that clearly give them freedom to support anyone they want. Yet, yet he fights against democracy when it doesn''t suit him by claiming that the democratically expressed preference of 1.5 million Florida Democrats, for example, should be ignored.

If Obama wants to argue that party rules should be followed by not seating Florida and Michigan delegates, then he should endorse the right of superdelegates to vote for whomever they choose. If he wishes to champion candidate selection by popular vote only, then let the votes of Michigan and Florida count fully. All polls and Super Tuesday voting trends suggest that Clinton would have still won Florida and Michigan in a landslide had there been vigorous campaigning in both states. She was clearly the choice of these states, and their voters should not be penalized for their state leaders'' timing decisions if Obama wants to argue that grassroots democracy alone should count.

In either outcome, Hillary is the winner.
Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 12:43 AM EST
Obama is trying to have it both ways. He thinks the superdelegates should adhere to their state vote outcomes despite rules that clearly give them freedom to support anyone they want. Yet, yet he fights against democracy when it doesn''t suit him by claiming that the democratically expressed preference of 1.5 million Florida Democrats, for example, should be ignored.

If Obama wants to argue that party rules should be followed by not seating Florida and Michigan delegates, then he should endorse the right of superdelegates to vote for whomever they choose. If he wishes to champion candidate selection by popular vote only, then let the votes of Michigan and Florida count fully. All polls and Super Tuesday voting trends suggest that Clinton would have still won Florida and Michigan in a landslide had there been vigorous campaigning in both states. She was clearly the choice of these states, and their voters should not be penalized for their state leaders'' timing decisions if Obama wants to argue that grassroots democracy alone should count.

In either outcome, Hillary is the winner.
Reply to this comment
by jason101other March 5, 2008 12:35 AM EST
New polls says that 25 percent of Clinton''s supporters won''t vote for Obama. Only 10 percent of Obamas says the same about Clinton. Now, who will beat McCain?
Reply to this comment
by destardi March 4, 2008 11:52 PM EST
Obama will never win the general election; anyone thinking it''s possible is purely deceiving themselves.
Reply to this comment
by lancepena March 4, 2008 11:42 PM EST
It is amazing all the hatred of Hillary. I feel sorry for you because you do not have the ability to look past your prejudices and actually look at the facts. This stupidity has got us 8 years of Bush and will probably get us more republicans elected. So SAD!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 4, 2008 11:10 PM EST
Posted by daffy64 at 06:51 PM : Mar 04, 2008

I want to live in your world! Which planet is it?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by AaaBee at 07:48 PM : Mar 04, 2008

It''s gotta be Pluto...wayyyyy out there! ROFL!
Reply to this comment
by aaabee-2009 March 4, 2008 10:48 PM EST
Posted by daffy64 at 06:51 PM : Mar 04, 2008

I want to live in your world! Which planet is it?
Reply to this comment
by sueann702 March 4, 2008 10:39 PM EST
Hillary will do more harm to the democrats than the republicans. With her ego, she will never drop out and with republican voters picking her so they can vote McCain in the General Election.
Hillary, we don''t want 12 years of republican rule. Obama is our best hope in winning back the White House.
Reply to this comment
by trace-sc March 4, 2008 10:37 PM EST
The Scarecrow Prophet is full of hay!
Reply to this comment
by lorinkundert March 4, 2008 10:34 PM EST
With 58% of the voters saying they will not vote for Hillary in the Presidential election, the GOP needs to either split the Democratic party or help Hillary win the nomination.
Reply to this comment
See all 25 Comments

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn