From The Road
February 25, 2008 1:39 PM

Clinton Takes On Obama During Foreign Policy Talk

(CBS)

From CBS News' Fernando Suarez:

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Hillary Clinton took a break from campaigning in March 4th primary states to deliver what her campaign called a “major foreign policy speech” today, but her remarks were aimed more at discrediting the experience of Barack Obama.

Clinton stood on stage with 10 American flags, warning the audience that electing a president with little foreign policy experience could be harmful to America. “We’ve seen the tragic results of having a president who didn’t have either the experience or the wisdom to manage our foreign policy and safeguard our national security,” she said. “We can’t let that happen again. America has already taken that chance one time too many.”

Although Clinton rarely mentioned Obama by name, her jabs were no doubt intended at her opponent. “To me, this is not theoretical,” she said. “This is very much who I am, what I have done and what I will do. The American people don’t have to guess whether I understand the issues, or whether or not I need a foreign policy instruction manual to guide me through a crisis or whether I have to rely on advisors to introduce me to global affairs.”

Aside from knocking his experience, Clinton also dusted off comments Obama made months ago, when he said he would personally meet with leaders of rogue nations like Iran and North Korea. “I will not be penciling the leaders of Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, or Cuba on the presidential calendar without preconditions until we have assessed through lower level diplomacy motivation and intentions of these dictators,” she said, framing Obama’s comments as foreign policy inexperience. “We simply cannot legitimize rogue regimes or weaken American prestige by impulsively agreeing to presidential level talks that have no preconditions. It may sound good, but it doesn’t meet the real world tests of foreign policy.”

Obama has been quoted as saying he would take unilateral military action without the permission of a sitting government in order to take out Osama bin Laden, which drew criticism at the time. “One thing the American people can be sure of, I will not broadcast threats of unilateral military action against a country like Pakistan just to demonstrate that I am tough enough for the job,” Clinton said.

She wrapped up her remarks by telling voters that there is a clear distinction between herself and Obama. “He wavers from seeming to believe that mediations and meetings without preconditions can solve some of the world’s most intractable problems, to advocating brash, unilateral military action without the cooperation from our allies form the most sensitive region in the world,” she said. “Electing a president should not be an either or proposition when it comes to national security. We need a president who knows how to deploy both the olive branch and the arrows.”

Tags:
Clinton
Topics:
Hillary Clinton
Add a Comment
by juan343 February 25, 2008 4:22 PM PST
Obama and Clinton both voted to fund the Iraq war. Obama gives nice speeches but doesn''t back it up with his votes. Obama also gave a speech against the Patriot Act, then he voted Yes for the Patriot Act.
I''ll vote for Nader just because the Democrats decided to shove these two clowns as their potential nominee.
Reply to this comment
by hillsangels1 February 25, 2008 4:36 PM PST
Just as it is with the economy, our place in the world should be represented by someone who has strong leadership qualifications and convictions. You cannot have leadership without confidence and experience. Obama''s statements about our foes really reflect his not being ready to assume the position of commander-in-Chief. And his 130 ''present'' votes in the senate prove his lack of confidence and conviction. In my opinion, his not voting on Iraq does not qualify him as having better judgment but rather a result of him not being privy to intelligence that even Colin Powell argued was a matter of national security. I am convinced that he would have voted for it had he been aware of the same intellegence reports as Sen. Clinotn was. Why? Because every vote he made thereafter was in supprt of continuing the war.
Reply to this comment
by katefranklin February 25, 2008 9:24 PM PST
"We%u2019ve seen the tragic results of having a president who didn%u2019t have either the experience or the wisdom to manage our foreign policy and safeguard our national security.%u201D Wisdom? Did she blush while saying this? Only a Clinton could characterize her sponsorship of the biggest foreign policy fiasco, the Iraq War, as "wisdom".
Reply to this comment
by jtthaugen February 26, 2008 5:44 AM PST
Foreign policy experience. Well, Hillary sure has it. She''s so deep in the pocket of Israel AIPAC she can''t see outside the coat.
Reply to this comment
by miaw77 February 26, 2008 2:14 PM PST
Wong to all of the above bloggers!!!


The DEMS should have fought harder to get the troops out of Iraq, I agree!


BUT but you can''t just cut the funding, and expect that to solve everything! If troops are in combat, they need to be equipped and well supported!


You must have a very high opinion of Bush to think that cutting the funding would force him to bring the troops back home. He would either make the troops suffer, or take the money from somewhere else (he''s sneaky enough to do that).


Our public schools are already bad enough as it is!
Reply to this comment

About From The Road

Description for From the Road

  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented