Obama Says Clinton Positions "Similar" To McCain's

(CBS)
WILMINGTON, DEL. -- Two days before Super Tuesday, Barack Obama stepped up his criticism of Hillary Clinton, comparing her policies to John McCain’s.
“We expect that John McCain may be the [Republican] nominee and if John McCain is the nominee then the Democratic Party has to ask itself, do you want a candidate who has similar policies to John McCain on the war in Iraq or somebody who offers a stark contrast?” Obama asked the crowd.
He pounced on Clinton for her vote for the Iraq war and for her vote on the Kyl-Lieberman Iran amendment.
“I can offer a clear and clean break from the failed policies of George W. Bush. I won’t have to explain my votes in the past,” Obama said.
Obama went after Clinton’s domestic policy as well, alluding that she worries about the political implications of her positions.
“When I went to Detroit, I said you have to raise fuel efficiency standards on cars,” Obama said, “When Senator Clinton went there, she wouldn’t say it because the concern was 'well may be I don’t know how that’s was going to play in Michigan.'”
He also accused her “talking 'Washington speak.'”
“We need clarity in this campaign. And that is what I offer,” he said.
Obama went on to criticize McCain for his support of the Bush tax cuts. He called his approach “more Bush.”
“You know I respected when John opposed Bush tax cuts early on, he said it was irresponsible to cut taxes at the same time we were going into war but now the wheels have fallen off the straight talk express and he is starting to say we need to extend them.”
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070918-0856-clinton-apinterview.html
Feb 3, 11:40 AM EST
Clinton health plan may mean tapping pay
By CHARLES BABINGTON
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans.
The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC''s "This Week," she said: "I think there are a number of mechanisms" that are possible, including "going after people''s wages ..."
"GOING AFTER PEOPLE''S WAGES" ...
IS THAT THE WAY REAL DEMOCRATS TALK? ...
THE REPUBLICANS WILL KILL THE DEMOCRATS WITH THAT KIND OF LOOSE-LIPPED LUNACY NEXT NOVEMBER ...
Martin Edwin Andersen
Churchton, Maryland
Same difference?
Due to the increasing unpopularity of the war, the Senator has had to dissociate herself from her most hawkish position on the Persian Gulf and the Middle East, and has been walking a thin line, positioning herself - depending on who her audience happens to be - as either a hawk or an "anti-war candidate," or both at the same time.
Which Hillary is the true Hilalry? Is the Senator just as hawkish as John McCain, and just as warlike as the current Bush administration has ever been %u2013 she just thinks that she would have done it better or can do it better. Or is her voting record and all her rhetoric just a show, a front she is putting on, to out-AIPAC the AIPAC whose support she needs both as a New York senator and as a presidential candidate.
Either way, I do not see anything to rejoice about. If you can''t get a straight answer out of Senator Hillary Clinton now, what reason is there to believe that we will get any better out of President Hillary Clinton (with all these newfound Presidential powers that have been accumulated for the Presidency)?
It is interesting then perhaps to note that being a woman doesn%u2019t seem to have made presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, any less warlike than any of the men, Republicans and Democrats alike, in this Presidential campaign.
The Senator%u2019s anti-Iranian rhetoric is exemplary to that regard.
On September 26, Senator Clinton voted for a Senate resolution (proposed by Senator Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona, and Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, an independent of Connecticut who votes with Republicans on war issues) urging Bush to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a major branch of the Iranian armed forces, as a foreign terrorist organization.
What was the meaning of this vote? A wink to AIPAC? A bid to outflank the GOP on the right? A %u201Cnon-binding,%u201D %u201Csymbolic%u201D gesture as she claimed in New Hampshire.
She said that the resolution simply gives the president authority to impose penalties.
Right! And in 2002, when she voted to authorize the invasion of Iraq, she did so only ON HER OWN UNDERSTANDING that the president would first get approval from the United Nations (and yet she voted at the time against an amendment - moved by Senator Carl Levin of Michigan - that would have required the president to do precisely that.)
Senator Clinton, a woman, has opposed bans on land mines and cluster-bomb exports, and advocated (along with Senator Joseph I. Lieberman) even more military spending than Bush requested. (Remember the United States Army Relief Act?)
Is it any surprise that more contributions from war contractors have reached Hillary for President than any competing campaign?
It would mean that a disabled person or someone with a costly condition couldn''t get a well paying job in financial strife (when they cannot afford costly premium) exactly when they most need it to get back on track.
Insensitive, one-sided and cynical. Their is no way she can triangulate such proposal, as no party will support it. Back to 1992+ when she already tried it and failed. Why can''t people learn?
It would mean that a disabled person or someone with a costly condition couldn''t get a well paying job in financial strife (when they cannot afford costly premium) exactly when they most need it to get back on track.
Insensitive, one-sided and cynical. Their is no way she can triangulate such proposal, as no party will support it. Back to 1992+ when she already tried it and failed. Why can''t people learn?
They are ALL liberals without the slightest claim to the highest office in the land.
Mitt Romney is the only conservative choice for President.
-
by akona2
February 5, 2008 2:54 PM PST
- D-emocrats and independents should ask themselves
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 21 CommentsI-s barack HUSSEIN OBAMA a MUSLIM or NOT?
S-eek for the truth, is that you say
A-ll of you who thought you knew
S-eek for a DNA test and you will know
T-he father is a MUSLIM, the brother and sister are MUSLIMs.
E-ducated in MUSLIM school
R-ight under our nose that we might not know...
DISASTER is spelled out if we get the FIRST MUSLIM PRESIDENT.