From The Road
February 1, 2008 11:25 AM

Huckabee Continues Slamming Romney

(CBS)
From CBS News' Joy Lin:

OKLAHOMA CITY -- On morning talk television yesterday, Mike Huckabee called Mitt Romney a “man who didn’t hit political puberty in the Conservative ranks until he was sixty years old.”

Asked to explain the comment today at a press conference, Huckabee described his opponent as a Johnny-come-lately to issues central to the Republican Party. Huckabee landed in the area after 4am and was up and dressed by 7:30 to deliver a speech at a rally. Despite having had only about two hours of sleep under his belt, Huckabee gave a detailed, blow-by-blow account of why Romney wasn’t fit to be the nominee.

“On the second amendment – [Romney] supported Brady, he supported an assault weapon ban and still does. So if he says to anybody he’s a second amendment supporter, anybody who’s a true second amendment supporter knows if you support Brady and assault weapon ban, you’re not a second amendment supporter.”

“Secondly,” Huckabee continued, in an aggressive attack that eclipsed the last time he went negative (Iowa), “He was very pro choice, supported strong positions for same sex relationships, said on television that he would do more for the gay/lesbian agenda than Ted Kennedy. That’s pretty bold. He said he was not a part of the Reagan Revolution, said he was not a part of that Reagan/Bush thing -- that’s on camera, that’s not something I’m making up.”

“Said he marched with Martin Luther King but he didn’t, said he saw his father march with Martin Luther King but he didn’t. Claimed that he was in law school when his church reversed its doctrine on African Americans, turned out he had been out of law school for three years – on the issue of even taxes, he said he never raised taxes but he did raise fees by $700 million.”

Not letting up, Huckabee concluded, “I just think you can't just have a change of opinion on fundamental issues over and over and wait until you’re running for President to do it. “To say that you’ve never thought about the origins of human life until you were nearly 60 years old -- I find that hard to believe even for somebody who hasn’t run for office before, but certainly for somebody who had.”

Infuriated by attempts made to characterize the fight for the GOP nomination as a two-way race, the ever-scrappy but usually courteous Huckabee displayed a level of fight that hasn’t yet been seen on the trail.

Asked whether he or John McCain was more conservative, Huckabee vouched for himself.

"I think if you look at the record, I'm even more conservative. I supported the Bush tax cuts from the beginning and I believe in, you know, less government. I think that when it comes down to certain issues like the life amendment, the marriage amendment, those are issues I personally stand for very strongly. Those are conservative hallmarks. The human life amendment has been part of the GOP platform since 1980. So those are some specific issues that I think separate us."

But Huckabee also was more gracious to McCain than Romney, saying he still considered the former a conservative. He said Romney's characterization of McCain as a liberal was "absurd."

"If you look at Senator McCain compared to Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, he's no liberal."

Huckabee emphasized that only 8 percent of delegates had been allocated so far and there were no "inevitable" candidates in the race.

"It's a little early for some of the national media to start deciding who the next president's going to be and who the nominee is going to be. The people are going to decide that."

Huckabee argued he was a "natural fit" for Oklahomans, not just as a governor from the region, but as someone who valued agriculture, the military, gun rights, pro-life principles, traditional marriage, hard work, and low taxes. He said his experience as governor of Arkansas made him more sympathetic to the interests of the Midwest and the South than a "a governor from Massachusetts" or "a senator who spent 25 years in Washington."
Tags:
Huckabee
Topics:
Mike Huckabee
Add a Comment See all 83 Comments
by callenfallen February 1, 2008 1:32 PM PST
THANK YOU CBS! You are reporting the whole and rest of the story, just msg''d a few media sites that do not include all candidates and I agree the camera pointing isn''t the equality that USA was founded upon. I will be tuning into your network from now on! Also, go Mike Huckabee, well spoke and very true, hope all Americans will take the time and open mind to see what he is really about.
Reply to this comment
by johnjacobs99 February 1, 2008 1:34 PM PST
Huckabee is desparate. Instead of saying what he will do to fix the economy he slanders the only one who truly understands the economy.

Huckabee is a sham as far as honesty. He pressed for the release of Dumond and then denied his involvement. He had many ethical violations. Set up special funds to pay for private things.

Huckabee reminds me of another president -- Bill Clinton. A smooth talker but great on distortion.
Reply to this comment
by alvinels February 1, 2008 1:45 PM PST
Mike Huckabee is devious. He is not being taken seriously and knows that his only chance to remain mildly relevant is to pave the way for a McCain nomination with his limping campaign. All of this kissing up to McCain for a possible VP slot. The problem is, McCain will desperately need a conservative to balance the ticket, not a tax-raising, freely pardoning, mythical highway building ex-governor from the state that produced the Clintons.
Reply to this comment
by wendy731 February 1, 2008 1:49 PM PST
Huckabee has struggeled with Romney''s wealth but never says anything about McCain''s

What comments would Huckabee have for Jan?

Huckabee is a "Me" person. His advancement of McCain is only to get himself a chance in the White House. He has abandoned the Conservative Right. McCain and Guilani are not conservative and Huckabee is in step with them. He attacks Romney over his wealth, but has not mentioned McCain''s situation. What would Huckabee say to Jan?

January 31st,
2008
5:43 pm
After 10 years in AZ (I am a native NY%u2019er, for 27 years before moving)under McCain, I realize that he should not only NOT be running for President but should never have been re-elected in Arizona.
He is completely out of touch with reality and how real people have to live. He has multi-million dollar homes, lifetime free healthcare and a wealthy spouse. He%u2019s pro-illegal immigration and ignores the state that elected him to office to work for, instead of against, them. He%u2019s completely useless as a Senator, just imagine as President! I thought we%u2019d never get worse than George, but if people elect McCain we will be worse off than ever before
%u2014 Posted by Jan
Reply to this comment
by famman79 February 1, 2008 1:59 PM PST
Is Huckabee running for President or not? If he is then shouldn''t he be attacking the so called "front runner"? At this point it is quite obvious that he is simply running for vice president. Have some dignity Huck and drop out. Nobody likes the annoying lap-dog who nips and yalps until it gets table scraps.
Reply to this comment
by fairness1 February 1, 2008 1:59 PM PST
Here is the dirty BIG secret that *** Morris, the Democtrats and libereal media don''t want McCain and Huckabee supporters to understand:

1. a vote for Huckabee at this point in the race is a vote for McCain. Huckabee CANNOT win the primary and is almost out of money.

2. a vote for McCain in the Primary is a vote for Obama or Clinton in the general election. McCain CANNOT win the general election and he knows that wihtout the base of the party he like Dole before him will loose. The base will never support liberal McCain. Independants will flock to Obama.

For the reasons previuosly stated in this post, McCain who is hated by the Republican base will go down in flames in the general election. Anyone voting on super Tuesday and beyond who is considering McCain or Huckabee needs to think long and hard about who they are rally voting for. Do these folks prefer Obama or Clinton over Romney. If so my friends, you are playing right into the Democrat playbook to win the Whitehouse in ''08.

ALL REPUBLICANS NEED TO FLOOD THE INTERNET WITH THIS MESSAGE, SAHRE AND DEBATE IT WITH MCCAIN AND HUCKABEE SUPPORTERS AND TAKE BACK OUR PARTY.........IT IS NOT TOO LATE.....AND WE CAN WIN THE WHITHOUSE IN ''08
Reply to this comment
by simaah February 1, 2008 2:12 PM PST
Huckabee is a Huey Long politician in this campaign - the King Fish - Huckabee''s shameful gift receiving as governor and notorious requesting certain gifts for his new home after leaving office is on the same level as Huey Long''s corruption. Huckabee''s solution to our complex economic problems is build a big road - just like Huey Long (LAME) Huckabee holds closed door political meeting with Baptist ministers in Iowa excluding the press and Romney. Huckabee doesn''t fool anyone with his religious bigotry and is afraid of a Mormon becoming President. Clearly McCain has sent his lapdog to attack Romney. Huckabee doesn''t hold a candle to the interity of Mitt Romney. It is a shame in this great country of ours and during such a historic election where racism is finally being put behind us with Obama yet we still have the KKK religious intolerance with people like Huckabee who do not understand the First Amendment and the Constitution where there should be not religious test to be President. Huckabee says vote for me because I am Baptist. What does Huckabee feel about a Catholic President?
Reply to this comment
by anzianomike February 1, 2008 2:15 PM PST
Look, Huck can get the values voters together, but can he unite the foreign policy and economic guys? Probably not, but the values people want to be heard so they keep Huck at 10-15%. But doing that is giving it to McCain. His "new Republican coalition" is with Rudy and Ahnuld?!?! 2 social liberals and a president that pacifies social cons but is certainly no champion of social issues. Do you really think values voters will matter to a McCain presidency? A vote for Huckabee is not just a vote for McCain, it''s a vote for marginalizing the social conservatives. Where do we fit in this McCain-Rudy-Arnold crowd? Where?
Reply to this comment
by mjashley February 1, 2008 2:20 PM PST
I''m glad to see Governor Huckabee finally telling the truth about Romney. I think he was trying to not say anything negative at all but he underestimated Romney''s devious attacks earlier in the race and the conservative media''s overwhelming favoritism of Romney.

There is so much more about Romney that needs to said:

His company Bain Capital has bought out Clear Channel, the home of Hannity, Rush, Ingraham, Beck, etc. They are all under multi-million dollar contracts with Clear Channel. Any wonder why they all support him?

Also, look up Bain''s plans to sell highly sensitive military technology to the Chinese. Duncan Hunter backed Huckabee and refused to back Romney because of this---Hunter had a bill in Congress to stop this deal because it would put the country at risk.

Check out the truth about Romney''s record--it''s a real eye opener. He is more devious and deceitful than I ever realized.
Reply to this comment
by mjashley February 1, 2008 2:27 PM PST
Simaah you need to check your facts. Do you want to know about racism? Mitt Romney''s Mormon church would not allow blacks to be leaders until 1978. When asked by Tim Russert whether Romney thought the Mormon Church should have allowed blacks as leaders sooner, Romney refused to criticize the Mormon church and he said it happened at the right time. Are you kidding me?

In contrast, Mike Huckabee went against his entire congregation and risk being fired as a pastor in the late 1960''s when a young black man wrote and said he would like to attend his church but was afraid because it was all white. What did Mike Huckabee do? He told him of course to attend- that he was more than welcome. That''s leadership.

You need to really research these candidates and not just spew the lies you hear in the media.

Mitt Romney is trying to buy the White House and people aren''t paying close enough attention to see what is going on.

Governor Huckabee is a man of honor, dignity, and conviction. He is the only one I trust to run this country. Mitt Romney will say or do anything to be elected.
Reply to this comment
by vote4huck February 1, 2008 2:32 PM PST
I''m glad Huck is calling Romney out. Mitt is the biggest flip-flopper I''ve ever seen in my life.

For those who keep insisting that Huck drop out of the race: He''s either first or fighting for first in Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, Missouri, Tennessee, Arkansas, W. Virginia, North Carolina, and Texas - with a chance to compete in more.

Let me guess - those dumb southerners should just leave the "President Pickin''" to the intelligent people in NY and California.

To tell him to drop out is idiotic! Thats like having the ball 1st down on the opponents 20 yard line and punting!

Lets use your same weak logic on Mitt. Why doesn''t Mitt drop out? He CANT EVEN TAKE ONE REAL RED STATE BESIDES UTAH! What a joke. Sure, he can''t win those states because Huck is in the race. HMMMM that would tell me Red states like Huck better! "But if Huck would drop out.. Mitt could win..." Well no kidding! If all the better candidates drop out...Fred would have won, or Hunter, or Rudy.

A vote for Mitt is a vote for McCain! Hes stealing votes from Huck! Mitt needs to quit today! Tell the world!

The bottom line is real conservatives know Mitt is a slippery position changer! Don''t believe me? Watch the video!

www.voteforhuckabee.blogspot.com

..scroll down to the video about Mitt spending 5 whole minutes passionately defending a womans right to choose! What a slimebag!
Reply to this comment
by conspiracygirl February 1, 2008 2:39 PM PST
There are many reasons to be pro-life and pro-choice, and they are largely dependent upon one''s stage of moral development. People who are progressing, as we hopefully all are, start from the infantile stage of selfishness and move on through the others to the stage of universal care. They typically shift their stances and/or their reasons for a particular position throughout life. Some remain stagnant, like Huckabee.

To be cont.
Reply to this comment
by conspiracygirl February 1, 2008 2:40 PM PST
CONT...

Huckabee is at a very primitive stage of moral development. He is is the me-against-you phase, where the person can at least identify the existence of other human beings, but if their beliefs differ from his own, then they are considered the enemy. Someone in this stage of development often has beliefs that God will punish those in disagreement with hellfire or eternal suffering.

Romney, on the other hand, has made a full progression, whereby he can recognize other people AND their right to different viewpoints. He does not have the view that dissenters should die.

Romney has tried to govern with the mindset that the people of his state were AT a certain place and that he needed to work with them.

Even when Romney did not wish to change laws on abortion, he was still personally pro-life, as will be attested when the Dems finally start attacking him with THEIR data -- that he once counseled a married woman NOT to have an abortion. But she did anyway so now she loathes him....

It is intersting to note that Romney''s REASONS for his complex stance on abortion were more morally ADVANCED reasons than have been Huckabees.

Reply to this comment
by conspiracygirl February 1, 2008 2:41 PM PST
CONT....

You have to look at the state of mind of the person advocating the position. Even if they agree with you, it could be for a very different reason, sometimes a very primitive one. Someone with a primitive moral minset can make horrendous decisions on OTHER matters.

You also need to note that Huckabee''s level of moral development is very, very similar to that of certain fanatics in the Middle East. He expresses his level somewhat differently: He is not saying we should kill those we disagree with (for God will do that for him) but he definitely thinks people should be left to die if they seek a back-alley abortion.

That is not the stance of someone who has compassion for ALL people.... A morally evolved person might not approve of abortion, but would not want those who did so anyway to die from their mistake. A morally advanced person has compassion for ALL parties involved, not just his own.

Romney is a more evolved human being.
Reply to this comment
by kellis1955 February 1, 2008 2:44 PM PST
mjashley...wow...really hung up on an insignificant mormon doctrine of 30 years ago. Mormons also used to practice polygamy...Should we throw them all in jail? for their polygamous and racist past? I don''t think so!

Maybe we should look at all past religious doctrines of every Christian faith and castigate all of today''s church goers for having any association with any religious institution for questionable or controversial past practices!!

mmm. Maybe that includes you! What do you think?
Reply to this comment
by vote4huck February 1, 2008 2:51 PM PST
Fighting for the right to kill unborn children is the "full progression of moral development?" I have never in my life heard of a true man of principle, pushing his moral beliefs to the side so he could "meet the people where they''re at". That''s not leadership. That''s being swayed by popular opinion.

You give Mitt too much credit. He said whatever it took to get elected. Period. You can try to set him on some pedestal of higher moral standing than the rest of us "common folk", but at the end of the day - he sacrificed his honor for a political position. Hope it was worth it.
Reply to this comment
by conspiracygirl February 1, 2008 3:00 PM PST
150 years ago the Mormon Church would not allow blacks to hold their priesthood. Blacks could, however, be members of their church, preach sermons, and do everything else.

At the same time in history, the Baptist Southern Convention was advocating SLAVERY! (!)

Not holding the priesthood OR slavery...? Hmmm.

So slavery ended, but then white society proceeded to send blacks to the back of the bus and to different schools. They had to drink from different water fountains. Racial intermarriage was practically a crime.

So, what about later? It was in the 1970''s that the Mormons changed their policy, not far from the rest of society.

The Mormons NEVER promoted slavery
and were severely persecuted for opposing it. Many lost their lives to Christians who wanted Slavery in Missouri.

If you want to bash Mormons for not letting blacks hold the priestood, you had better take a long hard look at the history of your own faith.
Reply to this comment
by oliver71 February 1, 2008 3:03 PM PST
It''s very simple why Huckabee favor more McCain than Romney. Because of their character. As he said in his book: character is the issue. Romney may look as a conservative now but as Huckabee said you know how a person is by looking at his actions. I''m not talking about their past. I find hard to belive what media says of either one of them. I''m looking how they are at debates and how they run their campaign. Conclusion: Romney is arrogant, flip-flopper, sarcastic, fake. I know not everyone will agree with me because you measure people by the standards we live.
Reply to this comment
by sipleo333 February 1, 2008 3:10 PM PST
Huck is right!

"While in private business, Mitt Romney used shell companies in two offshore tax havens to help eligible investors avoid paying US taxes, federal and state records show."

The Boston Globe, Dec, 19, 2007.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/12/19/romney_utilized_offshore_tax_havens_to_help_investors/
Reply to this comment
by woman76 February 1, 2008 3:10 PM PST
Dear Romney, Paul and Huckabee supporters,

We don%u2019t like McCain and obviously the media does. They are purposefully withholding relevant information from the public. For example, John McCain has cancer, specifically melanoma, which is a very aggressive form of cancer. You can%u2019t ignore that with a candidate that would be 76 before leaving office!

Few Americans know that McCain cheated on his first wife with a woman 17 years younger than himself. People like him because they feel he has integrity, but they don%u2019t know the entire story.

I%u2019m sure this will all come out, AFTER McCain gets the nomination. We can%u2019t wait until then. Spread the word now!
Reply to this comment
by kellis1955 February 1, 2008 3:14 PM PST
carolm62. great comment and well said. appreciate the insight and the common sense. Evangelicals that attack Romney, unfortunately, show their true colors.

I am not disrespecting evangelicals, only those that would attack another man''s character with no apparent reason.

You hate him for flip flopping?? for being arrogant? fake? and sarcastic? I don''t think you can seriously get any of those to stick my friend Oliver. Keep looking ok? and let us know when you find something substantial!
Reply to this comment
by conspiracygirl February 1, 2008 3:15 PM PST
No. Mitt did not fight for the right to kill unborn children. He merely stated that changing the present law was not something he was going to do as governor. There is a big difference.

And there is a very big difference between someone who belives in "all abortions all the time for any reason because it''s my body and I''ll do whatever I want without consequences (selfish stage), and someone who believes that there may be some instances when an abortion may be sadly justified, such as the life of the mother, or fetal abnormalities incompatible with life outside the womb, or rape (to save the poor girl''s sanity). This reflects universal care, meaning the fetus has rights, but so does the mother, and her other children deserve to keep their mother alive.

On pro-life side, one can be equally selfish or equally display universal care. Pro-lifers in the universal care stage typically share the same postion as pro-choicers in the universal care stage. It''s an intersting thing.


You''ve got to marvel at a pro-life preacher who attacks someone for moving more towards life. (?) But, see, Huckabee does not operate from a Universal care mindset. He''s not willing to acknowledge Romney''s very humane and well-thought out position on abortion. He only sees himself and his own view.


Reply to this comment
by karen611-2009 February 1, 2008 3:36 PM PST
Hmm. Some of these accusations are not exactly accurate, but I guess we''re supposed to just trust him since he was a baptist preacher. For all you social conservatives who are worried about Mitt Romney not being truly socially conservative since he wasn%u2019t always pro life - check out his speech last summer to the National Right to Life convention.
http://www.mymanmitt.com/mitt-romney/2007/06/governor-mitt-romney-remarks-at.asp
In my opinion, it%u2019s one of the best speeches I%u2019ve heard by a presidential candidate.
Reply to this comment
by chrismattix February 1, 2008 3:50 PM PST
Mike Huckabee, it was truly time to come out and let people know the truth. There is more to be said about McCain than you imply, but I suppose you are letting it be for a better time, say farther down the road.
It must be hard for a preacher to accuse another man of doing wrong, I am a Christian and I know I am no more perfect than the person next to me, but it is truly difficult to just smile and hope people vote for you. He need to come out and open up his heart.
You are going to see a LOT more of this in the next few days.
God bless you Mike!
May the best man be chosen.
Reply to this comment
by db8877 February 1, 2008 3:54 PM PST
The Mormons were expelled from Missouri in the midst of being murdered and driven from their homes under the Governor''s "extermination" order. They were abolitionists of slavery and this inflamed the hatred. Among other things, abolition advocacy and pro-slavery Missouri did not mix.

Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism, had ordained blacks to the priesthood and to continue this practice would have only further fanned the flames of bigotry against the Mormons. So beginning with Brigham Young, Church leaders stopped the practice. It''s doubtful that any other church in America was ordaining blacks during the Slavery era. That makes Mormonism''s founder the most progressive civil rights champion of his time.

Churches, like other organizations, are institutions. They don''t change easily. The practice of denying Blacks the priesthood was ensconced in the Church and it was continued until 1978.

Critics might argue this is too late. Sadly, those same critics were not alive at the time that the practice began. If they had been they would have lauded the Church for its progressive stance against slavery and (one would hope) spoken out against the bitter bigotry against the Mormons as well.

Times change and so do attitudes. Unfortunately, institutions often change much more slowly.
Reply to this comment
by wendy731 February 1, 2008 4:07 PM PST
I recall Iowa, Mitt Romney was so critized by the Huckabee and McCain camps for doing less of attacks on them than Huckabee is engaging in now. He ran on the platform in Iowa that he would not use attack ads. Flip Flop for Huckabee.
Reply to this comment
by wendy731 February 1, 2008 4:13 PM PST
I for one wish that Huckabee would have several changes on the things that he believes such as on paroles, raising taxes, destroying hard drives, his acceptance of gifts, the fair tax, raising his children so they treat animals better.
Note:
Now my comments are crazy because they are taken out of context and so are Mike Huckabees when he talks about Romney. Get real and stop spinning records to appear the way you want them to Govenor Huckabee. Romney''s record is not at all what you are protraying it to be anymore than mine is of you. Stop the attacks!
Reply to this comment
by mcu08 February 1, 2008 4:45 PM PST
Presidents are to be real people. Gov. Romney is like an actor in a fictional drama and actors follow scripts that are written for them. I am exhausted with the seemingly presidential appearance of Gov. Mitt Romney%u2014attractive, engaging... almost believable but you had better NOT really believe him.

Mitt Romney has been groomed for this presidential race. But he doesn''t have what it takes to be President. His heart is lacking. America needs more than he can give. Romney loves winning. Romney doesn''t love America.

Mike Huckabee on the other hand is the genuine article. Gov. Huckabee is still who he was before he started running for president%u2014a brilliant, humble man of great character (integrity). Can anyone, honestly and in good conscience, say that about Mitt Romney? Brilliant? Humble? Great character? No.

At best, we can say Gov. Mitt Romney is still trying to figure himself out.
Reply to this comment
by marinepatriot February 1, 2008 4:50 PM PST
YEAH! FINALLY MIKE LET LOOSE AND LET THEM HAVE IT! GO MIKE, YOU HAVE BEEN KICKING BUT ALL CAMPAIGN SEASON! THE MEDIA THINKS THEY ARE SO SMART THAT THEY CAN ELECT THE PRESIDENT!

THEY DIDN''T KOW THAT WE COULD ELECT YOU!

YOU ARE OUR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!


FIGHT MIKE!

Dan Campbell
Sgt., USMC
Reply to this comment
by SabreHawk February 1, 2008 4:50 PM PST
Mitt Romney''s record-
Abortion
1994: Believed abortion should be safe and legal
2002: Personally against abortion but pro-abortion rights as governor, endorsed legalization of RU-486 (morning-after pill)
2007: Firmly anti-abortion

Stem Cell Research
2002: Endorsed embryonic stem cell research
2005: Vetoed stem cell research bill

Gun Control
1994: Supported assault weapons ban and Brady bill, rebuffed the NRA
2002: Supported assault weapons ban and Massachusetts'' tough laws on gun control
2006: Joined NRA as a life member and said that states should ease licensing requirements; claimed he was a gun owner but later admitted that he''s didn''t in fact own a firearm

Reply to this comment
by SabreHawk February 1, 2008 4:51 PM PST
Mitt Romney''s record cont. -

Minimum Wage
1994: Opposed increase as an "anti-business" position but told David Brinkley in October that he supported tying an increase to rate of inflation
2002: Supported increase in line with inflation
2006: Vetoed minimum wage increase

Gay Marriage
1994: Opposed federal marriage amendment, vowed to help establish "full equality for America''s *** and lesbians"
2002: Provided legal protection to same-*** couples in Massachusetts
2007: Supported federal marriage amendment, worked to block same-*** couples from adopting

*** in the Military
1994: Supported "don''t ask, don''t tell," saying it was a step toward "*** and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation''s military"
2007: Didn''t want to change "don''t ask, don''t tell" policy

Capital Gains Tax Cut
1994: Opposed capital gains tax cut
2002: Refused to sign "no new taxes" pledge
2007: Supported capital gains tax cut as part of his pledge to make President Bush''s tax cuts permanent; signed "no new taxes" pledge

Romney can not be trusted!
Reply to this comment
by bides2000 February 1, 2008 5:29 PM PST
I am happy to see Mike Huckabee stand up for himself. He has been belittled by Romney this whole campaign. Enough, is enough. Money cannot buy everyone and it won''t buy me. My support is behind Governor Huckabee 100%. His comments on Romney were not distortions, they were facts. Although, Romney says he is pro-life during this particular campaign, I heard him say in a televised interview a few years ago that he would always support the woman''s right to choose and would never waver from that position. How are we to know that he won''t change his mind again?
Reply to this comment
by melinda0464 February 1, 2008 5:36 PM PST
Wow, the truth is finally starting to come out. Religious discrimination! The Huckabee supporters are finally showing their true colors of not liking the Mormon faith and that is why they are slandering Romney and why Huckabee won''t drop out of the race. How sad. You are acting like McCain and distorting and twisting Romney''s record when you know it is not true. Huckabee made a big deal about the contrast ads (not attack ads) that Romney ran earlier in the primary yet here he goes name calling and using low brow tactics because he doesn''t believe a Mormon should be president. Everyone knew something was up when Huckabee wouldn''t attack McCain even though he is the front runner and here we thought it was because he wanted the VP job. I am just so disappointed in my fellow conservatives. You are more interested in dissing another Christian religion than making sure someone with values runs our Country.
Mitt Romney for President!!
Reply to this comment
by quo_vadis-2009 February 1, 2008 5:48 PM PST
Guys, this poll from Fox news today gives the lie:
(From http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/020108_election_release_web.pdf)

7. If John McCain and Mitt Romney were the only choices in the Republican
primary, how would you vote?
30-31 Jan 08
Republicans: McCain 62%/ Romney 29/ (Don%u2019t know) 6/ (Would not vote) 3

Not only is Huckabee NOT taking votes from Romney, but clearly a vote for Romney is actually a vote for McCain!!! (since Huck''s votes would mainly go to McCain if Huck dropped out)
Reply to this comment
by d123m1 February 1, 2008 6:00 PM PST
I have nothing against Huckabee, but I don''t think he is a serious candidate anymore.

Think about this: Romney has changed stance on many issues, but he has become more conservative over time. He won the voters summit in the summer, and everytime the issue of abortion came up in MA he sided for life. McCain has also changed his stance on these issues. He has become more liberal in many ways. The fact that he has been endorsed by NT Times, Rudy and Arnold (Two choice proponents) should tell you something.
Reply to this comment
by d123m1 February 1, 2008 6:03 PM PST
Regarding McCain see:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/01/antimccain_surprisingly_libera.html

Regarding Romney see:

January 30, 2008, 4:31 pm
Romney%u2019s Ideal Victory
By CHRIS SUELLENTROP
TAGS: FLORIDA, JOHN MCCAIN, MITT ROMNEY

CNN has the exit-poll numbers from Florida, and they reveal some surprising things:
%u2022 Romney won pro-lifers.
%u2022 Romney won the mainstream religious. (Huckabee won the very religious , less than one-fifth of the pool.)
%u2022 Romney won the Protestants.
%u2022 Romney tied Huckabee with Evangelicals.
%u2022 Romney won the pro-GWB voters.
%u2022 Romney is the primary second choice of Giuliani voters, Thompson voters %u2026. and McCain voters.
%u2022 Romney won the immigration hard-liners.
%u2022 Romney won the upper-middle class, earning between $100,000 and $200,000 annually.
%u2022 Romney won the terrorism-oriented voters.
%u2022 Romney won the self-identified conservatives and the self-identified very conservative.
%u2022 Romney won the values-oriented voters.
%u2022 Romney won the white voters.
%u2022 Romney won the tax-cutting voters.

Reply to this comment
by mcu08 February 1, 2008 6:06 PM PST
Mitt Romney REALLY wants to be president! He has the receipts to prove it. Mitt Romney has lots of money and owns Bain Capital which bought out Clear Channel, the home of Hannity, Rush, Ingraham and Beck. Why? The job of the media is to sell us on Mitt and get us to accept his flip-flopping as misunderstanding. The role of Rush, Hannity, Beck etc is to urge us along while we''re running scared from Hillary and Barak into the arms of Mitt%u2014our Republican savior and champion of conservative values.

Mitt is as much a conservative as Hillary Clinton. He is a champion of gay rights and recently, for political gain, has decided to put aside supporting the killing of babies until his nomination is secure. Then he will take off his mask but by them the Republican party (accept for the moral conservatives) will be stuck with him and too ashamed not to vote for him.

Vote for Huckabee!
Reply to this comment
by d123m1 February 1, 2008 6:11 PM PST
Ok, since some have to bring up religion to denounce a candidate (going against the constitution), I''ll comment:

Some criticize Mormon involvement in polygamy. Mormons stoppped this over 100 years ago, but others seem to bring this up all the time. It is interesting that they do not state that Abraham was also involved in the practice and an Angel actually told Hagar to return unto him (Gen 16:7-11).

Some assert that Mormons are racist. We are not perfect people (and others in different faiths also have a checkered past). Nevertheless, the Book of Mormon says that Black and White are alike unto God. Joseph Smith also denounced slavery (which was far different than many others during his time). Joseph Smith also gave his horse to a man so he could buy his family out of slavery.

Please stick to the issues of the presidency and not some religious test for office.
Reply to this comment
by marinepatriot February 1, 2008 6:17 PM PST
WOW! TALK ABOUT A STATEMENT! WHAT DO YOU THINK THIS SAYS?

Black Conservatives Rally to Urge Mike Huckabee to Stay in Presidential Race

PRESS CONFERENCE: Monday, February 4, 2008, 9:45 AM, National Press
Club, 529 14th Street NW, DC



WASHINGTON, Feb. 1 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A broad coalition of
black conservatives from across the country are holding a press conference
to urge former Governor Mike Huckabee to stay in the presidential race for
the Republican nomination until the Convention.



"Governor Huckabee should not be intimidated to stop his bid for the
republican nomination," states Don Scoggins, veteran GOP activist and among
other conservatives hosting the press conference. "The momentum of the
grassroots that propelled this party into victory is behind Mike and will
not stop fighting for him regardless of his bank account," also states
Scoggins, president of Republicans for Black Empowerment, a DC based
national grassroots organization.

(source)
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/02-01-2008/0004747698&EDATE=
Reply to this comment
by mikeinkc2 February 1, 2008 6:17 PM PST
Melinda:

Huckabee has never even eluded to the idea that a Mormon shouldn''t be president- where do you get that?!? I''ve heard countless media types questioning if a Baptist Minister should be president. "Is he going to try to impose his theological ideas on the whole country?!?" I lost count of how many times I heard that one.

And talk about religious discrimination... that''s what the media has been doing to Huckabee from the start. How many Huckabee introductions began: "Former Baptist Minister and Arkansas Governor". I''ve never heard any one introduce Romney as: "Mormon Bishop and Mass. Governor".

"Contrast Ads"? I like that! When you punch and punch at the other guy by distorting the facts and at time out right lie about your opponents accomplishments, it''s called "Contrast Advertising"?!? But when your opponent finally says "Enough is enough" and wipes the blood off of his nose and stands up for himself and gets in a few shots of his own it''s called "Attack Ads"?!? Is that how that works? I''ll have to remember that- thanks!
Reply to this comment
by melinda0464 February 1, 2008 6:26 PM PST
Why does everyone hate the fact that Romney uses some of his own money to run for the Presidency? Why do we demonize someone who has worked hard to be successful? I would think it shows that he puts HIS money where his mouth is. He feels so strongly that he would be able to do good things for our country that he would sacrifice some of that money he earned to help out the American people. I think he should be praised for his willingness to give to a good cause and not critisized. Too many in our country now a days are greedy and don''t want to give of their own time and money or as the Democrats and celebrities want the taxpayers to pay for their pet projects. Romney is an honorable man who earnestly wants to bring his expertise to help our country get back on track.
Vote Mitt Romney!
Reply to this comment
by melinda0464 February 1, 2008 6:33 PM PST
Hey Mike in KC. Can you tell me why Mike Huckabee does not talk about MCcain''s liberal policies but instead picks on another true Conservative like Romney? What is his agenda? Just curious because it doesn''t make sense.
Reply to this comment
by melinda0464 February 1, 2008 6:57 PM PST
This is worth checking out:
http://www.opinioneditorials.com/guestcontributors/mkuligowski_20080201.html
Reply to this comment
by ivote-2009 February 1, 2008 6:57 PM PST
It is about time Huckabee blasted that lying cheating Romney. He has been lying about Huckabee for months with his purchased media power. He thought he could say enough lies and spend enough money to buy the White House - WRONG!!! WE THE PEOPLE still decide elections.

WE ARE VOTING MIKE HUCKABEE!!!!
Reply to this comment
by jacksharp1 February 1, 2008 7:00 PM PST
Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
Reply to this comment
by jacksharp1 February 1, 2008 7:02 PM PST
Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
Reply to this comment
by jacksharp1 February 1, 2008 7:04 PM PST
Since when is telling the truth about an opponents record and stance "Slamming"? Only when you support the one being "outed"! Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
Reply to this comment
by jacksharp1 February 1, 2008 7:04 PM PST
Since when is telling the truth about an opponents record and stance "Slamming"? Only when you support the one being "outed"! Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
Reply to this comment
by jacksharp1 February 1, 2008 7:04 PM PST
Since when is telling the truth about an opponents record and stance "Slamming"? Only when you support the one being "outed"! Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
Reply to this comment
by jacksharp1 February 1, 2008 7:07 PM PST
Since when is telling the truth about an opponents record and stance "Slamming"? Only when you support the one being "outed"! Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
Reply to this comment
See all 83 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road

  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented