The Public Eye Chat With ... Bill Plante

(CBS)
Matthew Felling: Interesting week. Anything surprise you?
Bill Plante: Nothing much, actually. Anytime you challenge or appear to challenge the president – and I don’t care if the president is a Republican or a Democrat – there are people who will take issue with it and tell you it’s inappropriate. And you kind of expect that. I knew that what I did on Monday was smart-assed, but I think that that’s beside the point.
Our asking questions should not be dependent on what the White House thinks the mood or the tone of an event should be. And the fact that they say ‘no questions’ or don’t allow time for questions really has nothing to do with it. They don’t have to answer, but I think we need to preserve and aggressively push our right to ask.
Matthew Felling: This week, you asked a question, it got uploaded on the web, it got broadcast everywhere. Did you see any increased polarization or partisanship in the responses you received?
Bill Plante: Yes, the response was instant because of the Internet. In this case, my question got put up on DCFishbowl and then on Drudge, so then it spread like wildfire. That’s no surprise, since there are people that monitor those sites and others everyday.
When I did this 20 years ago in the Rose Garden, I yelled a question at Ronald Reagan at the ‘Teacher of the Year’ event as he was leaving and going inside. Several of the teachers complained and said I disrupted things and that it was inappropriate. In that case, I got a few phone calls but then had to wait for the angry letters to come in. Then after that, I wrote a Washington Post Outlook piece about questioning the president. It took more than a week to play out.
But in this case, it was instantaneous, of course. But I know that’s how things happen these days.
Matthew Felling: In your response to Public Eye earlier this week, you mentioned a question that you asked President Clinton that got him quote red-faced. Do you remember what that question was?
Bill Plante: The Clinton White House had set up a Rose Garden event. There, I asked Clinton whether he was going to sign a bill going through Congress to pay the legal fees of Billy Dale, who had headed the White House Travel Office before Hillary had the travel office fired early in their first term.
Clinton got absolutely apoplectic. He started talking about the legal expenses his staff had to take on. This was before Monica, so those were the bills surrounding the Whitewater investigation. He said “Who’s going to pay the expenses of my people?” And then Paul Bedard, who was then with the Washington Times, followed up with something that got him even angrier.
But because [then White House press secretary George] Stephanopolous pushed him, Clinton actually apologized to me. Stephanopolous came back to my work booth later and said “Do you have a minute?” So I walked with him out to the colonnade and Clinton popped up – and I had a pretty good idea of what was coming.
So I said “You don’t have to apologize. You’re the President.” And he said “Well, I shouldn’t have gotten angry.” He did not, however, apologize to Bedard. (laughter)
To me, it’s all part of the game. As far as I’m concerned, I have no vested interest in being ‘liked’ by the people in the White House. That would, admittedly, be different if CBS weren’t the so-called mainstream media. If we were one of the smaller outfits that cover this place, we’d have to maintain relatively good relations to get anything. But they’re going to deal with us – whether it’s me or a colleague – in any case.
Matthew Felling: Do you think it’s good for people to see the journalists go about their job or is it a “don’t watch the sausage get made” sort of situation?
Bill Plante: I’m absolutely and totally in favor of openness, even if it makes us look bad. The public is entitled to see what we see – and, increasingly, they do because of live coverage. If that means they see me or hear me asking what they think is an impertinent question, that’s fine. I’ve got no problem with it.
Nice work, Karl. They''''re coming home with bells around their necks.
Posted by One_American at 12:33 PM : Aug 17, 2007
You just may be absolutly correct on that!
Cows, or sheep...following the herd.
Posted by Mattcat25 at 10:51 AM : Aug 17, 2007
I would have to agree with you, too. In this case the "cows" are the Democrats - the example is how radically the Democrats are "changing course" on the war, national security, and fiscal responsibility.
Nice work, Karl. They''re coming home with bells around their necks.
It goes back as far as 1988, when I personally observed him on a number of occasions, sitting in a chair in the first row of the traveling press pool as President Reagan was delivering a speech. As he sat about 15 feet from the speaking President, Plante would deliberately and conspicuously put his glasses on, cross his legs and fully open up a newspaper and read.
Bill Plante has the right to ask questions and I suppose he even has the right to be rude. It%u2019s a shame that his forte is the latter.
It goes back as far as 1988 when I personally observed him on a number of occasions, sitting in a chair in the first row of the traveling press pool as President Reagan was delivering a speech. As he sat about 15 feet from the speaking President, Plante would deliberately and conspicuously put his glasses on, cross his legs and fully open up a newspaper and read.
Bill Plante has the right to ask questions and I suppose he even has the right to be rude. It%u2019s a shame that his only forte is the latter.
Posted by One_American at 01:30 AM : Aug 17, 2007
I would have to agree with this statement%u2026.and, it may appear that we are in the midst of witnessing the cows coming home for Karl Rove and the GOP.
What you sow is what you reap, or if you prefer, the chickens have come home to roost.
Hillary about anyting?
that is one of our big problems...everybody wants to remember the past, like 50 years ago, etc.
Bad things happened, can''t undo them, or bring folks back... they aren''t even lessons learned, or we would not be repeating them.
GREED will always have it''s punishmant...
(Oh, and if YOU''RE so smart, BILL, then why is Katie Couric sitting in the anchor chair, instead of you?? Ouch.)
"If we were one of the smaller outfits that cover this place, we%u2019d have to maintain relatively good relations to get anything."
CBS seems to be heading ever more rapidly toward that goal of "one of the smaller outfits," judging by declining viewership and approval polls. Many of those "smaller outfits" have already surpassed them in class and respect.
Posted by Marie2233
The reason Hillary fired the travel office was because she wanted to book a trip for her, bill and chelsea to visit the moon. Staffers advised that they would not be able to provide that request because the moon was full.
Karl Rove failed to effectively bandage over the hemorrhaging Republican Congressional Candidates in the 2006 election that would have maintained the majority to allow the continued cover of the illegal and detrimental actions of the Bush/Cheney Administration.
You are confusing the Republican''s "Contract with America" and the Democrat''s "War on America".
And the last election was no "mandate" for the Democrats; it was obtained only by the slimmest margin, and judging from current Congress approval ratings at about 14%, the same mistake from the voters will not be repeated at the next election.
Enjoy the "majority" while it lasts.
Immigration, Flag burning, Terri Schiavo and other failed motions along with rampant corrumption and two unsuccessful military campaigns in Afghanistan, and Iraq were Karl Rove steered issues that contributed to the People of the United States demanding a change.
- by one_american August 16, 2007 4:56 PM EDT
- Damage control is on red altert at CBS.
- Reply to this comment
See all 16 CommentsThe ship has just steered into another one of their own iceburgs, and is taking on water like crazy.
Keep re-arranging the deck chairs, Bill Plante. That''s bound to help.