Public Eye
January 2, 2007 3:09 PM

Should CBS Have Interrupted The 'Late Show' With News Of Ford's Death?

(AP)
Last week, the Chicago Tribune published a column by Phil Rosenthal in which he complains that "[w]hen Gerald Ford died Tuesday, CBS didn't even interrupt a 'Late Show With David Letterman' rerun. It just ran the news as a headline across the bottom of the screen." Rosenthal contrasts the decision not to break into the Late Show with CBS' handling of Lyndon Johnson's death in 1973, when Walter Cronkite took a phone call from the former president's spokesman live on the "Evening News."

"There was pride in relaying big stories first, putting one's stamp on them, reminding viewers this was the channel to watch for the latest news. But that was almost 34 years ago," writes Rosenthal. He argues that the era of people like Frank Stanton, "the man who made it possible for Edward R. Murrow to go after Sen. Joseph McCarthy," has "probably" "passed" at CBS.

I asked CBS News and Sports President Sean McManus to respond to Rosenthal's comments. He did so in an email. "…I think our extensive coverage of the funeral, including breaking in Friday for over 20 minutes during a live football game and the coverage of the Saddam execution and breaking into the network for that, shows that our commitment to covering the news and breaking stores is as strong as it has ever been," wrote McManus.

The decision to break into the football game, in fact, garnered complaints of a very different shade than Rosenthal's. "CBS broke into the Brut Sun Bowl game just to 'let us viewers see' Pres Ford's casket being carried out of the hearse at the family's funeral service. It's the family's private funeral after all! Good grief!," wrote one e-mailer to Public Eye. "Now they have a big mouthy political analyst yapping."

Wrote another: "Please stop interrupting our football game today with long, wasted TV shots of the church and finally Ford's casket.....interrupting for a minute or two wouldn't be so bad....interrupting for a long period of time when obviously anyone watching is on CBS for the football game is stupid."

The death of a former president puts television broadcasters in a difficult position. Obviously, it's impossible to please everyone with your coverage. Ford's death probably did merit at least a brief interruption of the Late Show, and interested viewers could have switched to a news channel or gone online for more extensive coverage. One can even look at the decision not to break in as evidence that entertainment trumps news at CBS. Of course, the decision to interrupt the football game provides evidence in the opposite direction.
Tags:
Phil Rosenthal ,
Sean McManus ,
Gerald Ford
Topics:
CBS News Issues
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by dyn175 January 5, 2007 5:28 AM EST
Note how CBS' Sean McManus avoids the first issue at hand -- whether a crawl reporting President Ford's death was sufficient or whether a repeat of David Letterman was so important that broadcasting should not have been interrupted with a live report. He didn't even touch on the issue. NBC and ABC did interrupt their programming. McManus apparently knows that CBS missed the boat but doesn't want to say so.
Reply to this comment
by fugitron January 4, 2007 7:02 AM EST
First off, to the person comparing 911 to the private funeral of President Ford. Come on, think about the severity of the two. Common sense rules that one is significantly bigger than the other.

The people who tuned in to watch the Sun Bowl for the most part were avid football fans, and alot of college students. Most of which weren't even alive during Ford's presidency nor even had a good grasp on who he was. The Sun Bowl is a once a year event and with all the other news channels showing this I would think if they really wanted to see what was going on they would just switch over. I know that means perhaps a loss of edge in news, but really... if the people watching CBS wanted news they wouldn't be watching football.


Now, while I disagree with interrupting the Sun Bowl, a regular season game would be acceptable or any other regularly broadcasted show (such as the late show or CSI). Odds are there will be another showing or it will be on again tomorrow. Given the once a year bowl, this stands a little more important than typical broadcasts. Not to mention the money Tositos paid CBS for advertising to host the game would prolly prompt them to rethink broadcasters next year.
Reply to this comment
by frb01 January 4, 2007 12:48 AM EST
Let's see, President Johnson dies 5 years after leaving office, when there will only three broadcast news outlets. And remember how we got news, very slowly. Even when the hostages were released in 1980, the news broke very slowly. On a holiday weekend, especially this holiday, I could see why CBS may have done it this way, then maybe second guessed a day later. What Mr. Ford did in his time in office was noble, he was a good man. But the fact remains that anyone under the age of 40, probably doesn't remember it live. And maybe they could have done the crawl and done a special report for a few minutes with the tag line breaking story. Certainly not out of line.
Reply to this comment
by rcirceo January 3, 2007 6:25 PM EST

While I think the death of a former president is a moment to be marked, I don't see the need to interrupt regular programming. I think a crawl is sufficient.

Interested viewers can then switch to a news channel or go online for more information.

The issue is not one of valuing entertainment programming over news. It's one of valuing the audience the network is serving at the time.

The situation would be different if the death was suspicious or premature. Ford's death, while sad, was not unexpected at his age. Truly, what is the purpose of breaking in to regular programming for such an event?
Reply to this comment
by geoffrey1986 January 3, 2007 5:40 PM EST
In response to JanieJane, I think that CSI issue actually happened when Yasser Arafat had died.

Honestly, I don't think special report bulletins should be determined by whatever ENTERTAINMENT programming is on. So what if one of CBS's biggest shows is airing? If they really wanted to show the end of the episode, they could either delay the schedule by a minute or two (as they do for football and golf all the time) or, and this is extremely unlikely, delete a few commercials.

The worst part is that someone at CBS News was actually fired for interrupting CSI to report a breaking story, no matter how expected it might have been.
Reply to this comment
by geoffrey1986 January 3, 2007 5:34 PM EST
CBS News absolutely should have broken in during The Late Show. CBS News learns of the passing of a former president and they decide to stay in a Letterman rerun in which people are throwing turkeys off a roof? I don't get it.

I don't care how extensively CBS News covered Ford's death in the week-plus that followed, it doesn't absolve you of covering a breaking story. The website didn't even carry the news for about a half hour after CBS ran the ticker.

My guess is that it wasn't a decision that was made so much as it was the only option: CBS News didn't have enough people standing by overnight during a holiday week. You were simply unable to do any better.

It's sad.
Reply to this comment
by pendragon679 January 3, 2007 2:53 PM EST
Heaven forbid we should interrupt a football game with something as trivial as the death of a President! Geez, if 9/11 had happened during football season we might never have known about it.
Reply to this comment
by Annabelle22 January 3, 2007 1:26 PM EST
I think CBS was being extra cautious after the whole CSI - King Hussein debacle (when CBS News broke in during the very last minutes of CSI, when the real murderer is always revealed, with news that King Hussein of Jordan had died). There was a lot of uproar over that, so much so that they fired the producer that made the decision. However, I don't think there would have been any uproar over an interruption of a David Letterman RERUN. Sounds like CBS News needs some better judgement.
Reply to this comment
by Shenonymous January 2, 2007 7:58 PM EST
The passing of former President Ford's is sad. All deaths are sad however inevitable. The news media and politicians have obsessed about the Ford funeral and memoriums. Notwithstanding that President Ford was "a good man," it's doubtful if anyone would disagree with that. But it will have been over a week of endless speeches, constant reiteration and parroting by both newspeople and politicians alike. Looking under every rock for an anecdote or homily about President Ford. Has there been any other such drawn out funeral service in the history of our country? It would be refreshing if anything fresh were said. It is debatable whether Ford%u2019s pardon of Nixon had merit. Nixon's own funeral display was noticeably shorter. But we don't wonder why. This overreaction seems to be a commentary on the paucity of "real" news and hence the funeral has become a "filler" for news. The media does love to beat a dog story to a bloody pulp. Using anything to deflect attention from their self-service, the superfluous programming of the Ford funeral implies that the Republicans are scrounging around for a diversion from their overwhelming disasters this past year. Why not use a funeral to sidetrack attention? It%u2019s remarkable how utterly different Mr. Ford is being portrayed from his fellow politicians. V.P. Cheney's posturing about how history decides the virtues of leaders is such a recognizable nod to the shenanigans of the present President showing his usual ulterior motives for his eulogy.
Reply to this comment

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye