Public Eye
May 19, 2006 9:20 AM

Outside Voices: Terence Smith’s Open Letter To Katie Couric

(PBS NewsHour)
Each week we invite someone from outside PE to weigh in with their thoughts about CBS News and the media at large. This week, we turned to Terence Smith, former media correspondent for “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” and a former CBS News correspondent (you can learn more about him at terencefsmith.com.) Below, Terry offers some advice to Katie Couric about how to reshape what is to become the new “Evening News.”As always, the opinions expressed and factual assertions made in “Outside Voices” are those of the author, not ours, and we seek a wide variety of voices. Here's Terry:

Katie:

Connie Chung tells me that when she called to congratulate you on your pending anchorship, she relayed the longstanding West 57th St. joke about the difference between NBC News and CBS News.

“The stains on the newsroom carpet at NBC are coffee,” the old line goes. “At CBS, they’re blood.”

Welcome to the Tiffany Network.

Since everybody is giving you free and unsolicited advice about your new assignment and how to reshape the broadcast that you are about to inherit, I thought I’d join the crowd. I offer this as a veteran of CBS News and more recently, PBS, at “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.”

It’s not necessary to reinvent the evening news wheel. The basic 30-minute format still works, even if the audiences of the three major network news broadcasts have fragmented and diminished in the 200-channel universe. An hour-long broadcast would be better, of course, but given the bottom-line mentality of the networks and their affiliates, that isn’t going to happen any time soon. So the question is how best to shape a nightly broadcast that can coherently report the news in the 22 minutes or less that remain after commercials and promos.

The evening news audience may be aging, as the silver-haired commercials clearly indicate, but it is still substantial. On any given weeknight, upwards of 25 million people are tuning in to the offerings on the three largest broadcast networks. They do so because they want to be informed, not entertained. Otherwise, they’d watch Jon Stewart or “The Colbert Report.”

If the 30-year history of the NewsHour and the recent galloping success of National Public Radio demonstrate anything, it is that there is a market for serious news thoughtfully and creatively presented. Do it right, and people will flock to it.

The recent audience growth of the CBS “Evening News” is a case in point.

Bob Schieffer’s easy, conversational style is part of the explanation. But mostly, it is the improved story selection and presentation. Bob and his excellent executive producer, Rome Hartman, respect their audience and give the viewer credit for intelligence and taste. They cover the news, not just in the first and second blocks, but throughout the broadcast. Imagine: interesting, important, relevant material from beginning to end, a revolutionary concept!

Katie, you bring a well-honed interviewing style to the mix (your romantic interlude with Cody the Chimp the other morning notwithstanding.) Bring back the Newsmaker interview as a frequent, if not regular, feature.

You will attract some major “gets” in the early going. Pair them with contrasting voices when possible. The debate concept works on the NewsHour, it can be a plus on your broadcast as well, although obviously at a shorter length.

Profiles help as well. The news is really about people, not places or things. Emphasize foreign news, it matters more than ever these days.

And please, don’t worry about gravitas. You’ll have it the moment you sit (or stand) behind that desk. And don’t check your sense of humor at the door.

There is nothing really new in these suggestions. That’s my point: quality, not novelty.

The CBS News you are joining is not, of course, what it once was. A succession of budget cutters beginning with Larry Tisch has whittled away over the last two decades what was once the premier network news operation.

Bureaus have been closed abroad and at home, the corps of correspondents diminished and in all too many instances, news-packaging has replaced news-gathering. It is no longer the world-wide operation it once was.

But that downsizing and budget cutting is not unique to CBS -- all the networks have gone through it. And despite all the staff cuts, many fine professionals remain at CBS. Who knows? If curiosity about your advent as the anchor of the CBS “Evening News” boosts the ratings, which it is almost certain to do at least at first, the bean-counters might even put a few beans back in the budget jar.

So have fun at CBS News. You’ll be great.

All the best,

Terry Smith
Tags:
terence smith ,
terry smith ,
outside voices ,
katie couric
Topics:
Outside Voices
Add a Comment
by brian5064 May 20, 2006 8:06 AM EDT
I agree with Smith's call for more foreign news. I would love to see Lara Logan do a five part series on the Darfur crisis for the Evening News. Mainstream American news broadcasts are sorely lacking in their coverage of foreign news stories. The only foreign news they give us is Iraq and Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by jaguar0 May 19, 2006 10:32 PM EDT
DS9Sisko, "can you say trap", Everyone on this board, is overlooking the main issue> Not who gives the news, what the news story is, or what network or time the news is on. The issue is, how viewers, respond to the news> Will they remember it? Will the viewer responded to the news story, that they just viewed, with opinions? Will the news get talked about. Will the viewer emotions, get stir, to want to be involved in the news? Will the viewer feel like they are a PART, of the story? Most broadcast news caster today do not have that gift. Katie does.
Reply to this comment
by DS9Sisko May 19, 2006 10:06 PM EDT
RICMICHEM: Are you actually reading what's being said. At no point did I argue(nor can it be found in Mr. Smith's piece)that personality or point of view/worldview did not or does not affect journalism. Nor, at any point, did I (or Mr. Smith) say that Ms. Couric should abandon what makes Katie "Katie." The only person who seems to have come to that erroneous conclusion is you. To that end and contrary to what you so wrongly assert, the news is not the same wherever you get it. The job of editors, producers, and news management is to decide what constitutes news, what will make it on the air, the length of time it will air, and whether it makes sense to or will be of interest to it's readership or viewership. In television news today, this dichotomy between what is considered news and what isn't can be found most blatantly in the coverage of the genocide in Darfur, where network television news programs present truncated reports and cable news makes intermittent passes at it, but PBS and the NewsHour in particular has made Darfur one of their top priorities of reportage. CNN has been focusing heavily on immigration, mostly due to the combination of it being a hot button issue and the relentless (and ratings grabbing) attention of Lou Dobbs. Particular to CBS, Steve Hartman's human interest stories have really soared under the Scheiffer regime and we are seeing more of those stories as a reflection of the interest of the editorial staff, the anchor and of course, ratings.
Reply to this comment
by jaguar0 May 19, 2006 8:55 PM EDT
In regard to One_American comment, that I get my views based on movies> The last time I sat in a movie theater, was when E>T. first came out, 1982. In so far as Ds9Sisko, view> "the news is the SAME, no matter how you get it, radio, net, papers, mags, or the net. Threw out the history of news, Personality, has alway interject, with the news? In magazines, there was Luce, and Wallaces. Newspapers- Hearst, Neharth, and broadcast, Cronkite, Murrow. You can not say, the different ways, these people, gave out the news, that their personal feeling, was not inter twine, with the news. I would suggest that Katie read the bio of long time Cleveland woman newscaster, "Dorthy Fuldheim." Dorthy was really the FIRST, and if Katie can do the night time news half as good as Dorthy did on WEWS. Then Katie will be twice as better, as her counter points on ABC, Fox or NBC.
Reply to this comment
by DS9Sisko May 19, 2006 4:41 PM EDT
Terence Smith is actually right on the money! Anyone who has followed his reporting, especially at the NewsHour on PBS where his skills and intelligence provided insightful and balanced coverage, knows that he is one of the best media reporters around. Not only is his advice sensible, it values NEWS that viewers can use and relate to in ways that goes beyond the infotainment syndrome that has infected too many news organizations. And poster rmichem completely misses the point: Mr. Smith's advice does NOT ask Ms. Couric to not be her own person or to not have her own style, but rather to put NEWS first, not personality. That's what I admire about the NewsHour of which he was a part and why I like Bob Schieffer's version of the CBS Evening News today.
Reply to this comment
by one_american May 19, 2006 4:18 PM EDT
rmichem- Your advice to Katie sounds strangely similar to Darth Vader's lines to Luke Skywalker from a Star Wars Movie. (Vader: "You do not yet realize your importance. You have only begun to discover you power. Join me and I will complete your training. With our combined strength, we can end this destructive conflict and bring order to the galaxy. Now release your anger.") Heh heh.
Reply to this comment
by jaguar0 May 19, 2006 1:48 PM EDT
Terence,I totally disagree with you, on the direction, Katie should take with the evening news? Katie, "DON'T LISTEN TO WHAT TERENCE OR ANYONE ELSE SAIDS". CBS wanted you to do the news, because of "YOUR OWN STYLE". "Katie", look inside yourself for direction. Your own feeling will guide you> Katie, be you> by being you, the CBS's evening news and you will become one. When that happen, CBS's evening news will become a success.
Reply to this comment

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye