Political Hotsheet
November 12, 2009 6:38 PM

RNC Offers Insurance Coverage for Abortions

(CBS/AP)
Updated at 10:45 a.m. ET with reaction from RNC Chair Michael Steele.

The Republican National Committee offers its employees insurance coverage for elective abortions, the Politico reports. That’s a seeming contradiction to the party platform and the GOP’s current position on an abortion amendment added to the House health care bill.

The GOP platform calls elective abortion "a fundamental assault on innocent human life," according to Politico.

RNC spokeswoman Gail Gitcho reportedly said the policy has been in effect since 1991, long before current RNC Chairman Michael Steele assumed his leadership role. Upon learning of the coverage in their insurance plan, Steele instructed the RNC to opt out of any coverage for elective abortion services.

"Money from our loyal donors should not be used for this purpose," Steele said in a statement. "I don't know why this policy existed in the past, but it will not exist under my administration. Consider this issue settled."

Originally, the RNC chose not to opt out of abortion coverage, Cigna representatives told Politico.

Almost every single Republican in the House of Representatives voted in favor of an amendment to the Democrats' health care bill, offered by Reps. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) and Joe Pitts (R-Penn.), that explicitly prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for plans that cover abortion. It also effectively limits private insurers from being able to offer abortion coverage within the proposed national health insurance exchange. The amendment passed with some Democratic support.

The only Republican who bucked the party and voted "present" on the amendment did so in an attempt to foil the overall health care bill's chances of passage.

"We believe in the sanctity of life, and the Stupak-Pitts Amendment addresses a moral issue of the utmost concern," House GOP leaders John Boehner (R-Ohio), Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and Mike Pence (R-Ind.) said in a statement after the vote. "It will limit abortion in the United States. Because of this, while we strongly and deeply oppose the underlying bill, we decided to stand with Life and support Stupak-Pitts."
Tags:
health care ,
abortion ,
GOP ,
Republicans ,
RNC
Topics:
Health Care
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 23 Comments
by MiddleClassWorker November 13, 2009 3:44 PM EST
They Larry Craiged themselves! HA!
Reply to this comment
by thebob-bob November 13, 2009 2:12 PM EST
"The current policy has been in effect since 1991".
Steele sounds like Obama here. Blame it on Bush.

Republicans don't want healthcare reform because it will help Obama. Principled stands on abortion or deficits or government regulation??

They've been paying for elective abortion (donations to the Republican Party) and Bush racked up monster deficits without a word from Republicans.

Ha Ha Ha! What shameless political pandering and hypocrisy.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 November 13, 2009 12:17 PM EST
"We believe in the sanctity of life, and the Stupak-Pitts Amendment addresses a moral issue of the utmost concern," House GOP leaders John Boehner (R-Ohio), Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and Mike Pence (R-Ind.) said in a statement after the vote. "It will limit abortion in the United States. Because of this, while we strongly and deeply oppose the underlying bill, we decided to stand with Life and support Stupak-Pitts."



L I A R S !!!!!!!!!! If this was the true position of the RNC they NEVER would have had the option in the first place. To have it all of these years and to only opt out AFTER it was revealed publicly further underlines the hypocrisy of the Republican party. Wonder how many "Christian Republicans " within the party actually exercised that option when they felt the need. This also explains WHY...when both the house and senate were Republican under Bush an attempt to address Roe v WAde occurred ZERO times....

Let the so called "far right" wake up--they want your votes and pander to them by pretending to support and agree with your views--but under the covers--its an entirely different story.
Reply to this comment
by SSBlakeley November 13, 2009 10:48 AM EST
To endurob5: Ya tell that to all the people who donate money to the RNC which, in this case, the funds were used!! May not be tax dollars but was private donations from people who are pro life! The same people who stand and protest outside abortion clinics! Little did they know their contributions were paying for the abortions too!! So tell me, still ok with you?
Reply to this comment
by SSBlakeley November 13, 2009 10:45 AM EST
Also, it turns out that the RNC didn't choose to opt out of abortion coverage when given the opportunity, as told by several CIGNA employees!! I LVOE IT!!! Nothing like a red two faced elephant!!!
Reply to this comment
by Cattzen November 13, 2009 9:35 AM EST
The RNC always USES this issue to gain political support or in this case obstruct the majority. Affordable and Comprehensive HealthCare for every American is the issue not the right to life vs. the privacy of choice for women.
Reply to this comment
by SSBlakeley November 13, 2009 9:12 AM EST
This just proves the continuous hypocracy of the RNC! I hope the loony left leaning media jumps on this and blasts it in every media outlet there is!! I have no doubt that many of these RNC workers knew about this coverage and still went out and protested at abortion clinics. The RNC is toast baby!!!
Reply to this comment
by lami987 November 13, 2009 12:21 AM EST
Same thing with publicly funded health care. All members of congress get publicly funded health care but almost all republicans member of congress object to even public option in health care choices for Americans. They just want we the people pay for theirs while they protect their beloved private health insurance companies.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 November 13, 2009 6:58 AM EST
There is a difference between publically funded for all and publically funded for those who work for the government. If you work for the government and your employer provides health care how else would it be funded other than from tax dollars.
by retm-w November 13, 2009 9:14 AM EST
It's not just the repubs, the dems don't want to go on the public option either. Does that tell you something, it's their bill.
by actornaught November 12, 2009 10:31 PM EST
Oh, and let me throw another hypocrite log on the fire.

Just like their favorite entertainers, the phony conservative representatives don't believe their own spew and have nothing but contempt for their audience/constituents.

You're ALL food...
Reply to this comment
by actornaught November 12, 2009 10:25 PM EST
Republican and Bluedog input for the Healthcare overhaul will never be anything but sabotage. Even with the vile lobbyist influence, the dems by themselves more closely represent the overall will of the electorate.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 November 13, 2009 6:56 AM EST
The majority of the dems more represent the looney left of the country.
by stn_sage November 12, 2009 8:12 PM EST
WHAT?! The party which makes such a HUGE show of standing AGAINST abortion offers it's own workers abortion insurance?! That's outrageous!

There you have it, GOP rank-and-file members! What do you think about 'them apples'?! Are you going to blast your leadership? Or, make up one hundred excuses about why it's OK for them to do that?!
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 November 12, 2009 7:51 PM EST
It's funny how Republicans always feel that they have the right to demand how their tax money is spent by the government. No tax dollars for abortion, because their personal beliefs are against abortions. Well, how about No tax dollars for wars, because MY personal beliefs are against wars...funny you never hear these anti-abortion churches fight for that cause.......
Reply to this comment
by velma179 November 12, 2009 8:09 PM EST
It is hypocritical, isn't it...

I never thought the "you shall not murder" didn't count if it applies to an innocent caught in a war zone.
by endurorob_5 November 13, 2009 6:55 AM EST
You are comparing apples to sledge hammers. A pretty useless argument.
by toldyouso21 November 13, 2009 12:20 PM EST
by endurorob_5 November 13, 2009 6:55 AM EST
You are comparing apples to sledge hammers. A pretty useless argument."

sorry.. but DEAD is DEAD and while a baby or fetus may or may not be cognizant of their life and is allowed by law to be killed--illegal wars are not allowed they are endured due to the power of the country that does it. But in either case, show us the place in the bible, OT or NT which says, if you commit murder or kill people in a war and God did not specifically tell you to do it--there is a "Get out of hell free" card.
by us_1776 November 12, 2009 7:30 PM EST
This is so typical of authoritarian "control freak" Republican types. Always wanting to tell other people how to live; but yet finding escapes for themselves. And these Republicans have more skeletons in their repressed closets than Jeffrey Dahmer.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 November 12, 2009 7:20 PM EST
If the health care they have is not funded by tax money I don't care what it covers. I personally am pro choice but am completely against using tax money to cover elective abortion. If the abortion is to protect the life of the woman or is do to rape or incest then I am fine with that but not elective abortion.
Reply to this comment
by retm-w November 12, 2009 8:30 PM EST
I agree, elective abortion if it's privately funded fine, but not funded by tax dollars.
See all 23 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Kennedy: Bishop Barred Me From Communion

    (310 recent comments)

HOTSHEET ON TWITTER