Political Hotsheet
November 11, 2009 5:46 PM

Obama Talks Afghanistan With National Security Team

(White House/Pete Souza)
President Obama met Wednesday with his national security team, the latest in his series of meetings on the best way forward in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

This is the eighth in the series of meetings Mr. Obama has had on drafting a new strategy in the turbulent region – a decision that includes how many additional U.S. troops to send to Afghanistan.

Those taking part in today’s meeting include the usual members of the war council: Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike Mullen, National Security advisor James Jones, and the top U.S. officials in Afghanistan – Gen. Stanley McChrystal and Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, who participate in the meeting by way of a secure video teleconference.

Also taking part was Gen. David Petraeus, who, as head of U.S. Central Command, oversees military operations in Afghanistan.

Petraeus said on CNN today that the president is "nearing a decision on this very important topic." He said he thinks the process – though lengthy – has been very productive and very useful.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, meanwhile, told parliament that he expects Mr. Obama to announce a decision in a few days.

But a senior White House official tells CBS News an announcement is still a ways off, since Mr. Obama leaves tomorrow on a 9-day trip to Asia and will not announce his decision till after he returns.

Here's a readout on the meeting from the White House:

"The President and his team discussed the length of time that it would take to implement the options he’s been presented.

The President believes that we need to make clear to the Afghan government that our commitment is not open ended. After years of substantial investments by the American people, governance in Afghanistan must improve in a reasonable period of time to ensure a successful transition to our Afghan partner.

Resources were discussed at the meeting. Contrary to published reports, the President has not made a decision about the options presented.

The meeting went from approximately 2:30-4:50pm today."

(Photo: President Barack Obama meets with his national security team to discuss Afghanistan in the Situation Room of the White House on Nov. 11, 2009.)


(CBS)
Mark Knoller is a CBS News White House correspondent. You can read more of his posts in Hotsheet here. You can also follow him on Twitter here: http://twitter.com/markknoller.
Tags:
Afghanistan ,
meeting ,
Obama ,
cbsafghanistan
Topics:
Afghanistan
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
by Joutue November 12, 2009 12:23 AM EST
By joutue november 11,2009 11:04 PM

If, Prez Obama was a very wise man, he'd stop these illegal wars,
that George Bush started. And he should of replaced all those crooked
commanders and generals, and Robert Gates, that were Bushes HINGE MEN
and done his dirty corrupt work for him.
Obama should have started out clean with Honorable Generals,and honest person over the pentagon.
Gates has sold weapons to our enemies, Patraeus has prolonged these corrupt wars for the gain of oil resources being sold to foriegn countries, while our own country had to pay high prices for it.
McChrystal stirred up trouble between the sunni's and shiites at night
to keep the turmoil going in iraq.
The money being wasted on these illegal wars can help put our country back on the right track, and help create jobs for the american people.
And then our economy would become strong again. And there wouldn't have to be cuts in education for children, or cuts in other programs.
And healthcare could be made more affordable
Reply to this comment
by wdh3007 November 11, 2009 10:59 PM EST
Why are we even in that country to begin with what is the mission there. This fraud in chief should not wait 9 days or even 9 minutes to make a command decision it's simple and you don't even need a full staff to help you figure it out pull the troops out & bring them home in time for Christmas. No need for any more american deaths due to a lack of incompetance on the part of a unqualified president.
Reply to this comment
by BeckieBest November 11, 2009 11:07 PM EST
Does whining all day long make you feel better?
by jgg000015 November 11, 2009 9:53 PM EST
that's all obama does is "talk"
Reply to this comment
by BeckieBest November 11, 2009 11:07 PM EST
What do you do when you're not whining?
by jgg000015 November 11, 2009 11:10 PM EST
I pull the pigtails of obnoxious girls who's heads are up their arses
by BeckieBest November 11, 2009 11:26 PM EST
And then you go back to whining again?
by jgg000015 November 11, 2009 11:43 PM EST
hey, beckie, don't forget it's your turn to bring cupcakes to the ACORN meeting.
by verycold November 11, 2009 9:04 PM EST
I just read a piece in my local paper about the many more soldiers coming home injured as compared to a year ago. So clearly things have gotten much worse in Afghanistan. The great new plan has been a dismal failure and Obama gets to own that failure.

He hired his own military, keeping only a couple from the Bush years, and so he can't complain they had the wrong strategy. He can't complain that he was saddled with the Afghan war because he called this one the "good" war, or the "necessary" war.

So he was going to ratchet up the boots on the ground even as a candidate back in 2008. This war didn't suddenly go bad. It has been struggling for a couple years. What I find incredibly lacking was the fact that until late this summer, this administration was certainly NOT having daily, weekly, or monthly meetings on Afghanistan with those that have 1st hand knowledge of the situation. Until the request for 40,000 more boots and the increased number of dead, the media and this administration purposely kept this issue buried.

Now we have endless meetings, all sorts of leaks, and toe dragging like I have never seen in my lifetime.

Either take the advice of the military that is actually familiar 1st hand with the situation, or fire those advisers because unless Obama fills their requests, they have all lost credibility. It is no different than a board of directors refusing to let the new CEO run the company. Much like Jimmy Carter, Obama is going to now micro-manage every aspect of government suggesting he knows best. Jimmy thought that same thing and we know how that turned out.
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 November 11, 2009 9:36 PM EST
verycold
You are right on. Nothing is more similar than the Carter and Obama administrations. Carter one term and Obama as well will be one term.
by stn_sage November 11, 2009 7:18 PM EST
Folks, it really DOESN'T matter HOW MANY meetings he has about this if he's decided to escalate the war!

The only reason for having all these meetings would be to have some foolproof plan for winning it PRIOR to escalating it!

Does anyone in America REALLY believe that's likely?!

IF there was such a plan...and it was within the Geneva Conventions...the rules of war...I believe they would have already employed and implemented it!

So, the meetings are more about building up belief in the American public that 'thoughtful consideration' is at work in order to get the public to go along with the escalation...and wasteful spending it represents...not to mention the needless lost lives!
Reply to this comment
by mav547166 November 11, 2009 8:03 PM EST
He has to figure out how to take out Iran without endangering US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
by AJMarine12 November 11, 2009 6:56 PM EST
"I have argued for years that we lack the resources to finish the job because of our commitment to Iraq. That's what the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said earlier this month," Obama proclaimed in a major foreign policy address on July 15, 2008. "And that's why, as president, I will make the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban the top priority that it should be. This is a war that we have to win."

In the early days of his administration, Obama seemed determined to make good on his pledge. Three weeks after his inauguration, he added 17,000 U.S. soldiers to the 36,000 already in the country. The White House had not yet completed its comprehensive Afghanistan policy review, and the fact that Obama was not waiting to send reinforcements gave heart to those advocating a more robust strategy for the troubled country. But there were also signs that Obama was sensitive to the potential political backlash he faced from the left. He made the move without fanfare, announcing it with a written statement rather than with a Rose Garden ceremony or a major speech.

On March 27, however, Obama announced a new strategy for Afghanistan that included another 4,000 troops and, importantly for a president who places so much emphasis on his rhetoric, a speech in which he unequivocally stated his commitment to defeating "the greatest threat to our people."


As president, my greatest responsibility is to protect the American people. We are not in Afghanistan to control that country or to dictate its future. We are in Afghanistan to confront a common enemy that threatens the United States, our friends and allies, and the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan who have suffered the most at the hands of violent extremists.


He punctuated his explanation with a blunt assessment of the consequences of failure. "The safety of people around the world is at stake."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/820nkztg.asp
Reply to this comment
by bajajohn1 November 11, 2009 6:37 PM EST
This administration is not rushing headlong into war without proper input from all sources. Unlike the Bush Administration penchant for invading wrong countries and letting the real targets of terrorism off-the-hook, we now have a President who is carrying his duties as Commander-In-Chief with the proper solemnity and intelligence required to protect our national security.
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage November 11, 2009 7:10 PM EST
To bajajohn1:
Your first sentence is wrong, buddy! I think it's more accurate to say:
...This administration is not ESCALATING Bush's mistaken war without proper input from all sources...THIS, is more accurate of reality.

And,having said this...we should all be asking the OBVIOUS question!

WHY...in God's name, is he doing this?! Because it DOESN'T make sense!

And, on the basis of this, while I would concede he is acting with proper solemnity, I strongly question whether or not he is applying the due intelligence necessary in this case?!

In closing, I've read many of your posts, I tend to agree with you approximately 70% of the time...but on this...we have differing opinions! Take care!
by AJMarine12 November 11, 2009 6:26 PM EST
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, meanwhile, told parliament that he expects Mr. Obama to announce a decision in a few days.

But a senior White House official tells CBS News an announcement is still a ways off, since Mr. Obama leaves tomorrow on a 9-day trip to Asia and will not announce his decision till after he returns.




I guess we will have to wait at least 9 days before we find out what he is going to do.
Reply to this comment
See all 16 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER