World Watch
November 6, 2009 5:32 AM

Report: Iran Experimented with Advanced Nuclear Warhead

(CBS/iStockphoto)
Iran has experimented with a nuclear warhead design so advanced, it's still a secret in both the U.S. and Britain, according to a report in Friday's Guardian.

The British newspaper reports that intelligence suggesting the isolated Islamic regime tested components of a "two-point implosion" warhead has been handed over to Iran by the U.N. nuclear watchdog as part of a dossier of matters requiring explanation.

Parts of the International Atomic Energy Agency's dossier has been published in the past, but this is the first claim that Iran has sought such advanced weaponry — a claim nuclear experts called "breathtaking" when asked by the Guardian.

The IAEA has asked the Iranian government to explain all the activities in the dossier, which come, in part from Western nations' intelligence services. The Guardian reports that, despite frequent IAEA scepticism over Western claims about Iran's nuclear program, the agency's chief, Mohamed ElBaradei, has said the dossier focused on nuclear weapons pursuits, "appears to have been derived from multiple sources over different periods of time, appears to be generally consistent, and is sufficiently comprehensive and detailed that it needs to be addressed by Iran."

It wasn't immediately clear whether ElBaradei was referring in that comment to the "two-point implosion" element of the dossier.

Two-point implosion devices, the paper says, are easier to develop than conventional nuclear warheads and are designed to fit onto much smaller missiles.

"It is breathtaking that Iran could be working on this sort of material," said a European government adviser on nuclear issues.

James Acton, a British nuclear weapons expert, told the newspaper: "It's remarkable that, before perfecting step one, they are going straight to step four or five ... To start with more sophisticated designs speaks of level of technical ambition that is surprising."

Tags:
iran ,
nuclear ,
warhead ,
cbsiran ,
IAEA ,
sanction
Topics:
Iran
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
by YrStillWrong November 9, 2009 10:45 AM EST
The Iranian regime should be pushed into the sea.
Reply to this comment
by manobakh November 8, 2009 1:48 PM EST
Obama is NOT going to stand to Iran. Obama is giving time to Iran to develop nuclear weapon. Obama will not support the people in Iran, because his Muslim conviction is in the way. Iran earns 70 Billion Dollars a year from oil exploration and needs to buy almost 2.7 million tons of gasoline annually to import. Most of exports and imports go through strait of Hormuz. It is clear to everybody that Iran is buying time for their nuclear warhead development. Actually majority of Iranians and in particular the youth in Iran are against this. If truly the Obama administration wants to stop nuclear development and support the people of Iran to have a democratic government, USA with the help of European countries can easily close the strait of Hormuz to Iran's gasoline imports. In no time the Islamic government of Iran will fall.
I know it can be done, because I am a retired Navy Captain serving under the Shah and miraculously escaped the Khomeini's militants.
Mano Bakh
Author of the book Escaping Islam
www.EscapingIslam.com
Reply to this comment
by Logical123 November 8, 2009 9:16 PM EST
Mr. Bakh: I watched all three of the interviews at your Web site. I am sorry to say that you are grossly misinformed about many current Iranian issues, even though you grew up in Iran. I am not a Muslim and I agree that Islam can be dangerous, just as other religious have been dangerous throughout history (e.g., the Spanish Inquisition). You are completely misinformed about what Ahmadinejad has said about Israel. Please see:

http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/news/rumor-of-the-century/

Also, despite all the right-wing pronouncements there is ZERO evidence that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. If you have a specific piece of information, please produce it. All the so-called "evidence" is based on pure speculation. Also, closing the Strait of Hormuz is an act of war. The consequences will be very serious. In addition, Iran is building or expanding seven refineries that will make is self-sufficient as far as gasoline is concerned in the near future. So, this whole idea that the Iranian government will fall because of lack of gasoline is ridiculous. The final point is that the assumption that Iran will build one bomb and commit suicide by attempting to shoot it at Israel is preposterous. People in Iran are not stupid or suicidal. There is no guarantee that a single bomb is going to hit its target. Besides, Iran will be "obliterated" whether the bomb hits the target or not (as Hillary Clinton has said). So, please just relax. Nothing is going to happen. The only solution is to end all the sanctions and stop trying to push Iran around.
by YrStillWrong November 8, 2009 3:30 AM EST
Yeah. Private property is bad. A regime of old mystics is good. NOW we understand. It's so simple.
Reply to this comment
by YrStillWrong November 7, 2009 8:33 PM EST
There were many reputable Germans alive during the Nazi regime. The post-WW2 government was led by them. A German-American was in charge of the D-Day landing. But as long as a lunatic dictator was in charge of the German government, none of this mattered.

The same holds true for Iran today. When they are out of power, the new leadership will be more rational, and will deserve American cooperation. The current regime needs to be ruined as quickly as possible. Any moral compromise is suspect.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 November 7, 2009 10:23 PM EST
Failing that, we can hope that the Bomb goes off prematurely while it is still in Iran. I really wish no ill on the Iranian people but if they are going to explode Nuclear stuff on our soil, I do feel they should experience the effects of such a weapon first.
by worldcitizen1 November 8, 2009 8:29 PM EST
There is no comparison to the superpower of the late 30's and early 40's, Germany, and Iran. They are no threat to the US . They only way they will be a threat is if they are attacked by Israel or the US. All of this "Iran crisis" mentality is being pushed by Israel, which already has hundreds of "advanced" nuclear weapons. How "rational" was the war inflected on Iraq, which did nothing to the US.
by Logical123 November 7, 2009 6:32 PM EST
El Baradei is not impartial. He is easily influenced by the Western powers. What is going on now is not negotiation anyway. The Western powers proposes a draft agreement and told Iran "Take it or leave it!" Iran would be stupid to give away its enriched uranium since it will never get anything back in return. Ahmadinejad may be willing to take a chance but cooler heads know that all kinds of additional demands will be made before Iran gets its 20% uranium. As far as "two point implosion technology" is concerned, we had much bigger threats from the Soviet Union and we survived. If Iran build one bomb, how accurate do you think its delivery mechanism is going to be. It is ridiculous to think that Iran is going to make one bomb and is going to blow up Jerusalem (where some of holiest sites of Islam are located) and just wait to be "obliterated." Anyone who believes the "mad mullahs" theory does not know anything about Iran.
Reply to this comment
by YrStillWrong November 7, 2009 2:53 PM EST
The Iranian regime and its supporters belong in the mass grave of history. CBS News board agit-prop notwithstanding.
Reply to this comment
by Mwatch November 7, 2009 12:52 PM EST
Great!! Iran has the right to continue the Nuclear development and for Nuclear Weapon.
Reply to this comment
by YrStillWrong November 7, 2009 9:27 AM EST
Yeah, I know, it's always about GWB and Israel. No matter what. Even when Iran theocratic facists are going nuclear. Pathetic agit-prop.
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 November 7, 2009 11:44 AM EST
Israel has nuclear facilities it does not allow international inspection of and has refused to join the IAEA.
It is very hypocritical of Israel and the US to accuse Iran of doing what the US and Israel has done already.
As for the terrorist threat, that threat has been there since our evil CIA's interference of that countrys' internal matters since 1950's when oil became the important fuel source it is now.
We have it coming.
I suggest we either make peace with them or get on with an invasion.
Keep in mind that it will cost us big time either way.
by YrStillWrong November 7, 2009 7:24 PM EST
The Iranian regime is a theocratic police state that finances more of the same throughout the globe. It supports itself by "nationalizing" (stealing) oil fields that were discovered and developed by private investment. They and their supporters belong in prison. Moral equivalence, so popular on the CBS New board, is a lie.
by gunnyh1 November 7, 2009 9:13 AM EST
This is sort of like raising a pet python...eventually when it is big enough it WILL try to eat you. It is time to take the head off the snake.
Reply to this comment
by worldcitizen1 November 8, 2009 8:38 PM EST
What an ignorant analogy, is the US responsible of the creation and advancement of Iran? The US is much more militarily aggressive in the middle east than Iran is anywhere in the world. A surrounded and threatened country seeks to create a nuclear deterrence and someone should be surprised? Americans are so gullible and narrow minded.
by jwesel1 November 7, 2009 7:12 AM EST
How can it be a secret if a British tabloid is reporting it.
Reply to this comment
See all 29 Comments

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (692 recent comments)