World Watch
November 6, 2009 5:32 AM

Report: Iran Experimented with Advanced Nuclear Warhead

(CBS/iStockphoto)
Iran has experimented with a nuclear warhead design so advanced, it's still a secret in both the U.S. and Britain, according to a report in Friday's Guardian.

The British newspaper reports that intelligence suggesting the isolated Islamic regime tested components of a "two-point implosion" warhead has been handed over to Iran by the U.N. nuclear watchdog as part of a dossier of matters requiring explanation.

Parts of the International Atomic Energy Agency's dossier has been published in the past, but this is the first claim that Iran has sought such advanced weaponry — a claim nuclear experts called "breathtaking" when asked by the Guardian.

The IAEA has asked the Iranian government to explain all the activities in the dossier, which come, in part from Western nations' intelligence services. The Guardian reports that, despite frequent IAEA scepticism over Western claims about Iran's nuclear program, the agency's chief, Mohamed ElBaradei, has said the dossier focused on nuclear weapons pursuits, "appears to have been derived from multiple sources over different periods of time, appears to be generally consistent, and is sufficiently comprehensive and detailed that it needs to be addressed by Iran."

It wasn't immediately clear whether ElBaradei was referring in that comment to the "two-point implosion" element of the dossier.

Two-point implosion devices, the paper says, are easier to develop than conventional nuclear warheads and are designed to fit onto much smaller missiles.

"It is breathtaking that Iran could be working on this sort of material," said a European government adviser on nuclear issues.

James Acton, a British nuclear weapons expert, told the newspaper: "It's remarkable that, before perfecting step one, they are going straight to step four or five ... To start with more sophisticated designs speaks of level of technical ambition that is surprising."

Tags:
iran ,
nuclear ,
warhead ,
cbsiran ,
IAEA ,
sanction
Topics:
Iran
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
by YrStillWrong November 9, 2009 10:45 AM EST
The Iranian regime should be pushed into the sea.
Reply to this comment
by manobakh November 8, 2009 1:48 PM EST
Obama is NOT going to stand to Iran. Obama is giving time to Iran to develop nuclear weapon. Obama will not support the people in Iran, because his Muslim conviction is in the way. Iran earns 70 Billion Dollars a year from oil exploration and needs to buy almost 2.7 million tons of gasoline annually to import. Most of exports and imports go through strait of Hormuz. It is clear to everybody that Iran is buying time for their nuclear warhead development. Actually majority of Iranians and in particular the youth in Iran are against this. If truly the Obama administration wants to stop nuclear development and support the people of Iran to have a democratic government, USA with the help of European countries can easily close the strait of Hormuz to Iran's gasoline imports. In no time the Islamic government of Iran will fall.
I know it can be done, because I am a retired Navy Captain serving under the Shah and miraculously escaped the Khomeini's militants.
Mano Bakh
Author of the book Escaping Islam
www.EscapingIslam.com
Reply to this comment
by Logical123 November 8, 2009 9:16 PM EST
Mr. Bakh: I watched all three of the interviews at your Web site. I am sorry to say that you are grossly misinformed about many current Iranian issues, even though you grew up in Iran. I am not a Muslim and I agree that Islam can be dangerous, just as other religious have been dangerous throughout history (e.g., the Spanish Inquisition). You are completely misinformed about what Ahmadinejad has said about Israel. Please see:

http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/news/rumor-of-the-century/

Also, despite all the right-wing pronouncements there is ZERO evidence that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. If you have a specific piece of information, please produce it. All the so-called "evidence" is based on pure speculation. Also, closing the Strait of Hormuz is an act of war. The consequences will be very serious. In addition, Iran is building or expanding seven refineries that will make is self-sufficient as far as gasoline is concerned in the near future. So, this whole idea that the Iranian government will fall because of lack of gasoline is ridiculous. The final point is that the assumption that Iran will build one bomb and commit suicide by attempting to shoot it at Israel is preposterous. People in Iran are not stupid or suicidal. There is no guarantee that a single bomb is going to hit its target. Besides, Iran will be "obliterated" whether the bomb hits the target or not (as Hillary Clinton has said). So, please just relax. Nothing is going to happen. The only solution is to end all the sanctions and stop trying to push Iran around.
by YrStillWrong November 8, 2009 3:30 AM EST
Yeah. Private property is bad. A regime of old mystics is good. NOW we understand. It's so simple.
Reply to this comment
by YrStillWrong November 7, 2009 8:33 PM EST
There were many reputable Germans alive during the Nazi regime. The post-WW2 government was led by them. A German-American was in charge of the D-Day landing. But as long as a lunatic dictator was in charge of the German government, none of this mattered.

The same holds true for Iran today. When they are out of power, the new leadership will be more rational, and will deserve American cooperation. The current regime needs to be ruined as quickly as possible. Any moral compromise is suspect.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 November 7, 2009 10:23 PM EST
Failing that, we can hope that the Bomb goes off prematurely while it is still in Iran. I really wish no ill on the Iranian people but if they are going to explode Nuclear stuff on our soil, I do feel they should experience the effects of such a weapon first.
by worldcitizen1 November 8, 2009 8:29 PM EST
There is no comparison to the superpower of the late 30's and early 40's, Germany, and Iran. They are no threat to the US . They only way they will be a threat is if they are attacked by Israel or the US. All of this "Iran crisis" mentality is being pushed by Israel, which already has hundreds of "advanced" nuclear weapons. How "rational" was the war inflected on Iraq, which did nothing to the US.
by YrStillWrong November 8, 2009 10:02 PM EST
Iran is a theocratic dictatorship for 30 years. Meanwhile the US has had a constitutional government for 222 years. No secular republic should tolerate such a fanatical regime or its supporters.
by Logical123 November 7, 2009 6:32 PM EST
El Baradei is not impartial. He is easily influenced by the Western powers. What is going on now is not negotiation anyway. The Western powers proposes a draft agreement and told Iran "Take it or leave it!" Iran would be stupid to give away its enriched uranium since it will never get anything back in return. Ahmadinejad may be willing to take a chance but cooler heads know that all kinds of additional demands will be made before Iran gets its 20% uranium. As far as "two point implosion technology" is concerned, we had much bigger threats from the Soviet Union and we survived. If Iran build one bomb, how accurate do you think its delivery mechanism is going to be. It is ridiculous to think that Iran is going to make one bomb and is going to blow up Jerusalem (where some of holiest sites of Islam are located) and just wait to be "obliterated." Anyone who believes the "mad mullahs" theory does not know anything about Iran.
Reply to this comment
by YrStillWrong November 7, 2009 2:53 PM EST
The Iranian regime and its supporters belong in the mass grave of history. CBS News board agit-prop notwithstanding.
Reply to this comment
by Mwatch November 7, 2009 12:52 PM EST
Great!! Iran has the right to continue the Nuclear development and for Nuclear Weapon.
Reply to this comment
by YrStillWrong November 7, 2009 9:27 AM EST
Yeah, I know, it's always about GWB and Israel. No matter what. Even when Iran theocratic facists are going nuclear. Pathetic agit-prop.
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 November 7, 2009 11:44 AM EST
Israel has nuclear facilities it does not allow international inspection of and has refused to join the IAEA.
It is very hypocritical of Israel and the US to accuse Iran of doing what the US and Israel has done already.
As for the terrorist threat, that threat has been there since our evil CIA's interference of that countrys' internal matters since 1950's when oil became the important fuel source it is now.
We have it coming.
I suggest we either make peace with them or get on with an invasion.
Keep in mind that it will cost us big time either way.
by YrStillWrong November 7, 2009 7:24 PM EST
The Iranian regime is a theocratic police state that finances more of the same throughout the globe. It supports itself by "nationalizing" (stealing) oil fields that were discovered and developed by private investment. They and their supporters belong in prison. Moral equivalence, so popular on the CBS New board, is a lie.
by gunnyh1 November 7, 2009 9:13 AM EST
This is sort of like raising a pet python...eventually when it is big enough it WILL try to eat you. It is time to take the head off the snake.
Reply to this comment
by worldcitizen1 November 8, 2009 8:38 PM EST
What an ignorant analogy, is the US responsible of the creation and advancement of Iran? The US is much more militarily aggressive in the middle east than Iran is anywhere in the world. A surrounded and threatened country seeks to create a nuclear deterrence and someone should be surprised? Americans are so gullible and narrow minded.
by jwesel1 November 7, 2009 7:12 AM EST
How can it be a secret if a British tabloid is reporting it.
Reply to this comment
by Ms_enza November 7, 2009 6:30 AM EST
Yeah, but the real question is, "Are they buying yellowcake... from Africa."

This is only an indication of one of two things: Oppenheimer's genie is at work, or the CIA has gotten better at forging information.
Reply to this comment
by 1notrub11 November 6, 2009 8:31 PM EST
"Iran has experimented with a nuclear warhead design so advanced, it's still a secret in both the U.S. and Britain, according to a report in Friday's Guardian. "
AND
The dossier... "appears to have been derived from multiple sources over different periods of time, appears to be generally consistent, and is sufficiently comprehensive and detailed"

Well, I guess it's not so secret anymore - for Britain or the US either.
AND
No comment from El Baradei about his "past skepticism"? Figures.

Besides, who says they skipped from step one (before perfecting) to step four or five? Maybe their status for step one is a smoke screen. There hasn't been too much verifiable truth to much else the Iranians have said about their program thus far.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10000 November 7, 2009 6:00 AM EST
NO COMMENT UNTIL COMMENT IS DUE

1notrub11 said, "No comment from El Baradei about his "past skepticism"? Figures."
---

You misunderstand the role of a negotiator. ElBaradei deserves his Nobel for the difficult task of bringing Iran and the US to nuclear talks.

Largely because of Obama and ElBaradei, the US and Iran met last month in a session ElBaradei considers very promising of progress, after years of delay on a variety of issues.

All this, a persuasive demonstration the negotiator must be regarded as impartial to all parties. ElBaradei must be skeptical of all claims, unless and until evidence indicates otherwise.

Accordingly, once ElBaradei got the Western claims, he evaluated the evidence as a trained nuclear scientist, and brought the matter to the Iranians for an explanation.


UNDIPLOMACY

In contrast to ElBaradei's skill, consider the abortive pretense of diplomacy with Iran during the eight years of G.W. Bush. Few Americans paid attention when, in 2001, Iran said it was willing to negotiate the entire nuclear weapons issue-- with no preconditions.

In 2002, however, Bush gave his infamous "Axis of Evil" speech that set both Iran and North Korea on a hostile path, and effectively ended negotiations on the very issue that demands resolution with both states, today.


THE IRANIAN CONTRIBUTION

Had negotiations been pursued with Iran back in 2001, it is likely Iran would have played a moderating and constructive role in bringing peace to the MidEast.
And we almost certainly would not have the nuclear issue over our heads, today.

With Iranian cooperation as a regional power, the US can have much greater confidence Afghanistan policy will succeed. Again, few Americans realize Iran made it clear to this country in 2001 it would not impede our efforts to reach the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Iran also secured assent from chieftains in its region of influence in western Afghanistan, which contributed to the victory of the Northern Alliance in 2001.


PRESCRIPTION FOR PEACE

In essence, ending hostilities with Iran and promoting regional cooperation is the key to resolving a wide variety of MidEast conflicts, from Iraq's bitter factional warfare, to Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, to al Qaeda in Pakistan and the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Part of solving any problem is realizing ignorance only compounds collateral damage and delay. Not to mention, the horrendous, continued expense of a massive US military presence in the MidEast.

Deficit hawks should be among the first to promote a greater and more constructive Iranian role, for that reason, alone.
by YrStillWrong November 6, 2009 7:46 PM EST
I'm certain this is pleasing to the CBS News Jihadists. What a pathetic bunch of anti-American lunatics post here.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10000 November 7, 2009 6:16 AM EST
"Anti-American" means opposed to American interests, among other meanings. That description matches GOP bozos who hoped even national economic recovery would fail.

The same GOP bozos refuse to recognize the current non-system of health care screws every American family's budget to the wall.

The litany of their ignorance is endless-- it took eight years of G. W. Bush to go through most of it.

Talk about being anti-American.
by YrStillWrong November 8, 2009 7:49 PM EST
It's always about GWB until the thorazine kicks in.
by imnho November 6, 2009 12:51 PM EST
Two point implosion technology imply that there warhead could be easily transported and we make quite a leathal car bomb.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 November 6, 2009 6:29 PM EST
And everybody thought they were just kidding, RIGHT!!!!!
Israel didn't, better put on your lead lined underwear...
by mav547166 November 6, 2009 7:13 PM EST
Its ok, nothing to worry about. I guess the third NYC bombing will be a doozie.
by Anti-Zionist_115 November 6, 2009 11:56 AM EST
lol this is just great.
Reply to this comment
by babooph November 6, 2009 9:21 AM EST
Israel,threatening its neighbors with nuclear attack-& gerrymandering itself into being a nuclear target,is very unnerving-US policy has helped create this mess ,adding to it over the years -hope the result is a lot better than it appears....
Reply to this comment
by worldcitizen1 November 8, 2009 8:52 PM EST
Billions of $'s of our taxes go to the unconditional support of Israel, which has no respect for us or our desire for peace in the middle east. They have no incentive to seek peace, knowing whatever they do the US will support them.
See all 29 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (324 recent comments)