Taking Liberties
October 8, 2009 3:36 AM

Dollar Woes + Gold Spike = Political Opportunity

(AP Photo)
The price of gold is up, the value of the dollar is dropping, and some conservatives are blaming it on President Obama and congressional Democrats.

A Heritage Foundation blog post calls the news a warning to Obama and Congress "that they are spending too much money." On Facebook, former VP candidate Sarah Palin wrote: "We can see the effect of (out-of-control debt) in the price of gold, which hit a record high today in response to fears about the weakened dollar." RedState.com recently quipped that "The Dollar is the New Peso," while RightSideNews.com (which describes itself as fending off "threats against Western civilization"), worries about the dollar becoming a second-rate currency.

They have a point. The U.S. dollar index has been slipping continuously since March 2009, and gold on Wednesday closed at a record high of $1,043.30 an ounce (not adjusting for inflation). When the dollar falls, of course, imports and commodities including gold and oil tend to become more expensive.

This comes as the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the federal government's budget shortfall has increased a remarkable 3.1 times from fiscal year 2008 to 2009. In a report released on Wednesday, the CBO says that the Feds' annual budget deficit will grow from around $450 billion ($4,044/household per year) to $1,409 billion ($12,414/household per year), thanks to a combination of reduced tax revenue and increased government spending.

And those are annual figures. When that kind of deficit spending takes place over multiple years, the sums add up quickly. The Heritage Foundation says that the public national debt -- $5.8 trillion as of 2008 -- will nearly triple by 2019, the largest increase in history. A decade from now, taxpayers will be paying an estimated $774 billion on interest to creditors, which is over half of what the IRS currently collects each year in individual income taxes. (Put another way, without such a huge debt, we could cut personal income taxes by over 50 percent.)

If the United States government is living beyond its means, including spending $1.4 trillion a year more than it collects in taxes, then it's small surprise that the once-mighty U.S. dollar is sliding as fast as Congress' approval ratings. Why would Japan and China be as eager to buy dollar-denominated bonds if our whopping national debt, not counting the unfunded mandates of Social Security and Medicare, means they're likely to get paid back in a devalued currency?

Then there was the report this week in the U.K. Independent, which rattled financial markets by reporting:
In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning -- along with China, Russia, Japan and France -- to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar... It is China's extraordinary new financial power – along with past anger among oil-producing and oil-consuming nations at America's power to interfere in the international financial system – which has prompted the latest discussions involving the Gulf states.

If this trend continues, then the president's conservative critics will be proven correct: the dollar's fall is a message to the White House and congressional Democrats to rein in spending. Though I wonder where those same critics were when a Republican administration wanted expensive wars and new agencies (Homeland Security) and entitlements (Medicare prescription drug benefit) and increased the national debt by roughly 2.5 times in eight years. With consistency, perhaps, comes greater credibility.

Declan McCullagh is a correspondent for CBSNews.com. He can be reached at declan@cbsnews.com. You can bookmark the Taking Liberties site here, or subscribe to the RSS feed.
Tags:
dollar ,
gold
Topics:
Economics
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
by babooph November 23, 2009 2:30 AM EST
The rich give us jobs-our chidren will be their maids ,lawnmen,poolboys,nannies& wash their cars-the new world order will have them require a college education to serve them....they like everything nice when they get back to the States from their holidays...maybe I can be a waiter at the club,or....
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti October 28, 2009 3:53 PM EDT
What do you expect when we had the corporate Bush Crime Family for 8 years. They didn't have ANY of the money for the tax cuts for the rich, the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, and Medicare Part D, all welfare for the filthy rich GOP donors. How infantile and childish and ignorant to blame Obama. Of course that is EXACTLY what I expect from Palin, the Heritage Foundation and the GOP.
Reply to this comment
by korg12 October 10, 2009 12:32 AM EDT
maybe the nobel prize was a conselation gift to obama for losing out on the olympics.. these things now are about a valuable as a cracker jack gift now...
Reply to this comment
by korg12 October 10, 2009 12:27 AM EDT
Well there is just a wealth of intelligence in theses comments if nafta was so bad why did bill clinton sign it??? and give free trade too the chinese??? dems if they think its a good idea they run with it but if it fails they look for someone to blame... this is why they are having so much trouble passing a health care bill they're afraid if it fails and the republicans are not on board they won't have anyone to blame!!!!
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti October 9, 2009 1:17 PM EDT
Where were these loser, GOP/conservative/neo con/corporate part of death and spending shrills when the Bush Crime Family was giving trillions to the already rich?
Reply to this comment
by beeker252 October 8, 2009 9:38 PM EDT
The Heritage Foundation like to use biased argument without mentioning the Reagan and Bush tax cuts coupled with the drive for deregulation, fighting two wars and enacting a prescription benefit without paying for it all contributed to the rising deficit.
The actual deficit is 1.4T which came from 459B from FY2008, $245B from TARP both inherited from Bush, $200B from ARRA, then you have declining revenues which amount to $420B.
Obama is responsible for a small part of the deficit while he inherit the rest.
Source:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/106xx/doc10640/10-08-mbr.htm
Reply to this comment
by republicanright October 8, 2009 7:24 PM EDT
Put this perspective, the price of gold less than 30 years ago was under $40.00 an ounce. The value of the American dollar has been whittled to nothing by congress, the senate and the past Presidents inability/unwillingness to face the true and stark economic realities. Even now, the US government has shown it is in a deep state of denial just by the size of its bail out packages to the very companies and economic practices that drove this great nation into this recession.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti October 8, 2009 5:26 PM EDT
Time to tax the rich. And if they don't like that we can eat them. Seriously it's time for the bottom 99% to unite to overthrow the plutocrats (top 1% who own 95% of the wealth). This has gone too far already.

Unless we win the class War on the Rich, we will have airheaded bimbos like Quaylin spouting their propaganda for the stupid.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 October 8, 2009 2:12 PM EDT
And now, a short break from our regularly scheduled programming of rightwingers wailing about the return of COMMUNISM in America. A simple statistic:

Since 1980, the share of the nations income going to her richest 1% tripled, while the share going to her poorest 90% fell by 20% (or one-fifth). This means that in order for the wealthiest 1% of Americans to triple their income in the last 30 years, the ordinary working American gets paid, on average, $10,000.00 less a year today than he would have been paid in 1980 proportions.

And now, back to the dangers of COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND ALL THOSE OTHER -ISMS rightwing America works overtime to save us from!!

Warren Buffet: "There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning."
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 October 8, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
"The Heritage Foundation says that the public national debt -- $5.8 trillion as of 2008 "

The national debt was $11 trillion in 2008. Bush doubled it during his eight years, from $5.6 trillion to $11 trillion. He also handed an economy in FREEFALL off to his successor.

McCullagh is playing games with the debt, hoping people won't see that Bush is the bad guy here, and Obama is just the sap delivering the bad news. Its time we stopped pulling the wool over everyone's eyes, and call a spade a spade. Bush destroyed the economy AND the federal budget. Blaming it on the delivery boy doesn't solve the central problem: Supply side economics has been a disaster for the nation, especially when coupled with deregulatory fervor.
Reply to this comment
See all 29 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

About Taking Liberties

Declan McCullagh's iconoclastic take on politics, the economy, and individual rights. (Iconoclast: From Medieval Latin "iconoclastes," and from Middle Greek "eikonoklast's," meaning image destroyer.) Sample topics: economy, politics, interviews, free speech, property rights, gun rights, lessons in economics, individual rights, interviews, technology, features.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn