Political Hotsheet
September 16, 2009 2:22 PM

ACORN Sting Lands Housing Group in Conservative Crosshairs

(biggovernment.com)
It began, ridiculously enough, with two young conservatives dressed in "pimp" and "prostitute" costumes that looked like they had been picked up on the cheap for a Halloween party. And it could end with anti-poverty group ACORN, the scandal-prone longtime Republican target, seeing its government support evaporate.

ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is finding itself under fire thanks to conservative activists James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles, who dressed in less-than-convincing outfits and headed to ACORN offices around the country with a hidden camera. What they found, in some locations, was ACORN workers who offered tips on how to hide money and falsify taxes for a prostitution operation.

ACORN hit back after the videos emerged, arguing that the clips were doctored and pointing out that the filmmakers were rebuffed in many of their attempts. (In Philadelphia, the group noted, ACORN workers called the police.) In the most recently-released video, ACORN said, the worker did not take the filmmakers seriously and "matched their false scenario with her own false scenarios." (Liberal group Media Matters suggested "journalistic malpractice" had been committed by Fox News in its coverage of the story.)

ACORN did acknowledge some wrongdoing, however, and fired employees who earnestly gave advice to the filmmakers. It also announced an independent investigation Wednesday. But the group vowed to sue the filmmakers, the Web sites where the video was posted, and Fox News, which repeatedly showed the clips, arguing that the undercover filming was illegal in some locations.

(CBS)
The ACORN story might have stayed relatively below the radar had it not been for the efforts of conservative media, which pushed the story hard. Conservative talk radio, Fox News personalities like Glenn Beck, and right-leaning Web sites like the Drudge Report and the new Big Government aggressively promoted each video, the leaked of which over a series of days kept ACORN in the headlines.

Conservatives, such as Beck, have repeatedly complained that the mainstream media, by contrast, has ignored the story, including in comments on this site. Conservative commentator Michelle Malkin, Politico notes, pointed her audience to a radio clip of ABC "World News" anchor Charles Gibson acknowledging that he hadn't heard about the tapes.

ACORN has long been a target of conservatives -- prior to this scandal, the group was harshly criticized because some workers falsified voter applications in the 2008 election, a situation that prompted arrests last week in Florida. But the groundswell around the video seems to have spurred lawmakers into action, and on Monday, the Senate voted 83-7 to deny the group new housing and community grant funding.

That was just the beginning: The following day, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith, citing the voter registration fraud allegations, called for an FBI and Department of Justice investigation of the group. Top Republicans, meanwhile, moved to make sure ACORN gets cut off from taxpayer money altogether: House Republican Leader John Boehner introduced the Defund ACORN Act; 130 House Republicans signed a letter asking President Obama " to use his authority to end all funding to and break all government ties with ACORN;" and Boehner, House Republican Whip Eric Cantor and Rep. Dave Camp urged the IRS to cut off contact with the group. (Boehner also released this video.) The census bureau severed ties with ACORN on Friday.

(biggovernment.com)
It's unclear how much ACORN actually gets from the federal government. One insider told Politico that the figure is $1 million to $2 million per year, while Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, an ACORN critic, found the group received $53 million since 1994, plus block grants. ACORN told Politico most federal money has gone to first-time homebuyer counseling and foreclosure prevention efforts.

ACORN suggested it would not be hobbled by the Senate's action Monday, since it "derives most of its income from its members and other supporters, so the decision will have little impact on overall operations," in the words of CEO Bertha Lewis.

But the group now finds itself out of favor in Washington. It has long been a target of Republicans who loathe it because they feel it pushes a liberal agenda, but now it can no longer count on Democrats to come to its defense. On Wednesday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said "the conduct that you see on those tapes is completely unacceptable." And just seven senators voted for the group not to have its housing and community grant funding cut, a decision they've taken some heat for.
Tags:
ACORN
Topics:
In The News
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 276 Comments
by Keith_Richard_Radford_Jr September 19, 2009 1:41 PM EDT
Getting to maters that mater is something we seem to be able to get down to humbly, I would like to share this with you. This from my life experience is a true connection to the ties of races through our own sex laws which have been built on misconceptions and myth.

The Supreme Court just ruled on sex offender laws where some factions of our government think by some inert reasoning that sex offender should be quarantined like some virus steaming from draconian/Islamic law sex offenders should be executed. I have seen for myself, video taken in another country where a sex offender is placed on a pole much like the Catholics use to use a pyramid shaped object and have them sit on it and spin, the pole travels through the body looking for the throat but if not found its ok cause the sharpened end of the pole will come out somewhere. The heritage of the act is in its self a throwback to troglodyte?s who are so obsessed with sex they can find that the way to deal with the issue is as revolutionary, as war, and two wrongs don?t make a right but has in fact called up deep rooted issues of people who have had to put up with this kind of "hierarchy" of historic hysteria far to long. A word taken from hysterectomy, hysteria is tied to castration used to make animals less threatening right? Good old Monty Hall. Well no wonder it?s wrong, right?

Anyway we are supposed to be the most advanced nation and we still have a death penalty when the rest of the world except for nations we are still warring with, {think!} While other nations went home our weapons dealers and torture lovers delighting in support for the death of people they don?t know or want to simply because they don?t know how to get money with out taking it from someone by force, is that supposed to includes mutilations? In my humble opinion that alone are terrorist activities as much as severed hands, ears, heads, or making a case with nothing more than an obsession justified by lies.

The truth about the sex offender registry will come out soon enough. When it does, People will see how the use of the registry was created, and by exactly who and why and the devastation it has created and the worthlessness of the use of it. It?s origin in the Crow laws that brought disgrace to our nation allowing thieves and murderous societal bigots who have trashed any shot at making good of a program in its design to make money destroying our nation and its people. We can not play god and we can not survive using this behavior model because you are compounding the problem.

It's a ruse designed by people who are getting rich off the castration/hysterectomy/health care/physic care of people thrusex laws that have gone bonkers. What about the people who are being used by the Medicare programs that requires these mutilations for both men and woman after they take their means of support? Can't you see? You have created the model and it is worthless! Why don't you just indiscriminately kill people you don't know that?s statically the next sex offender because over 90% of all new offences are people not on the sex offender registry and the numbers are increasing not decreasing so as a behavior model the chumps put together is really screwed up and they were told before they tried it. So what is the use of such laws as the sex offender registry other than to terrorize people?

In a nation where a statement may have a double or triple meaning and our entire linage can be traced through mud, guts, and beer it?s nice once in a while to get the picture of what is meant instead of what some thinks someone may have implied. So it is from the trenches to the hill. Remember the game where someone says something in someone?s ear then passes it the same way to the next; well this can be applyed to sting ops, and the reality of our existence.

Best regards
Keith Richard Radford Jr
Reply to this comment
by FamilyInCT September 17, 2009 2:38 PM EDT
If CBS did its jobs, the majority of the public would not have to watch FOX to get the real news. There is so much political corruption going on that is "IN YOUR FACE" that I don't know where this will end. CBS, NBC and ABC ignore most of this until it is uncovered by other sources. Why is that ? The public sees this biasness and now feels that the media is Not doing its jobs. CBS, NBC and ABC have NO reporters, they have people who "read" news which they can get from the office desk. All I see is government pushing things down our throats and the taxpayers will end up paying for this in the end. The corrupt politicians and businessmen love that CBS, NBC and ABC are ignoring everything. I cannot beleive how obvious it is. It's scarry ! What is this country turning into ?
Reply to this comment
by tennstrike September 17, 2009 11:49 AM EDT
Please read the Cynthia Bowers piece as a tutorial on how to appear unbiased.
Reply to this comment
by pasmalltown September 17, 2009 11:11 AM EDT
I apologize for getting sucked into a debate over the "right or wrong" media approach. I am human and made a mistake by saying it more than once.
Back to my original point, look at all news sources then decide WITH YOUR OWN MIND which makes better sense. CBS, CNN, Fox, and countless others have covered all the ACORN "scandal" - judge for yourself - it's all that I meant to say and I'm sorry for the rest of my "meanless" remarks.
Reply to this comment
by IntheTank September 17, 2009 1:11 PM EDT
What makes you think that we haven't already judged for ourselves WITH OUR OWN MIND. Yes, I watch Fox, I also watch Lou Dobbs on CNN and when my stomach can handle I switch to Keith Olbermann just to hear what kind of hatred he is spewing at the moment so don't be so patronizing. I assume everyone on this blog is keeping up with events of this country, you on the other hand are assuming we are all idiots and need your guidance to make educated decisions.
by pasmalltown September 17, 2009 10:05 PM EDT
by IntheTank September 17, 2009 1:11 PM EDT -
"...you on the other hand are assuming we are all idiots and need your guidance to make educated decisions."
______________________________

Again I assumed nothing and I don't believe I used the word "idiots" in any of my posts, I perhaps inferred it once or twice but directed it to some inane comments about David Letterman and a suggestion that being from Brooklyn, NY was somehow related to the author of this article's polictical pinnings.. I did say "believe what you will" more than once and listen to what you can "stomach" or are comfortable with. If you believe this is "patronizing" you, or questioning your intelligence I apologize. I do however believe that your assumption that everyone on this blog "is keeping up with events of this country" is not true and you can't blame it on CBS, NBC, CNN or FOX. AND endrorob's quick assumption that I was on the CBS payroll is evidence that emotions, not facts cloud people's judgement, thus my "spew" remark. Please do not try to read into my remarks and assume I was talking about ALL, or in your words "we are ALL idiots" and need guidance, unless you're feeling guilty about something you fail to mention. Don't try to drag "we", or "all" into the comments I've made where I was critical of just a few - it clouds the issue. Never once did I make a claim that "ALL" on this blog specifically needed my "..guidance to make educated decisions.", but if that's the way you read it I wouldn't dare to change your "educated" mind, it's already made up.
by pasmalltown September 17, 2009 10:27 PM EDT
by IntheTank September 17, 2009 1:11 PM EDT
"What makes you think that we haven't already judged for ourselves WITH OUR OWN MIND."
_____________________________

If you posted this statement without the "we" word my original apology (above) would have applied to you. But you went on with some additional assumptions about my comments which, unfortunately, are not true. I'm glad to see you have a well rounded approach to your educated decision. But don't try to speak for everyone who agrees with your views about media outlets other than FOX. What I am saying is you are an idiot if you listen to one only news source and based on SOME of the comments on this post it appears some are....
by hungry1968-16 September 17, 2009 10:16 AM EDT
by endurorob_4 September 17, 2009 10:06 AM EDT

That must have been a very large jug of koolaid tghis morining.







Really?

Tell me:

Where do they stand on health care reform?

Our recession, the stimulus, and the unemployment rate?

Abortion?

The death penalty?

Re-instituting the banking and insurance company regulations, that the conservatives removed?

Tell me all about ACORN's "liberal" policies.





OR you can go here, and find the information yourself:

http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=12378
Reply to this comment
by bubbadubba September 17, 2009 10:13 AM EDT
"This is bad for Obama since Obama founded ACORN, he was the head of ACORN, he controlled everything ACORN did, and he is still running ACORN and makes all the decisions for everything they do. Obama should be impeached for stealing government money and being a criminal"

This is what Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck will spew for the next month as their pathetic listeners eat it up like starving hyenas.
Reply to this comment
by pasmalltown September 17, 2009 9:58 AM EDT
For all those critical of what CBS news does or does not cover:
How about just listening to both FOX and CBS(left or right viewpoints) and some middle-of-road news organization, then deciding with your own mind which is presenting a fair picture? You know get a well rounded picture of things BEFORE spewing forth. Everyone's got an opinion, should be able express that opinion, but arguing, cheerleading(saying things like "Yeah right, Letterman is a news show") over which outlet has the "best" coverage serves no meaningful purpose. Discuss the issues, but leave the "witty remarks" about news coverage out of the "diss"cussion". Here is a CBS article about ACORN, if you don't like it or don't agree with the author's presentation, fine, say it and get on with your opinions about ACORN -And don't say CBS doesn't have enough coverage or this or that. CBS has covered the ACORN issue, if you don't like how they covered it that's fine, say it and go back to FOX or whatever makes you feel the "most comfortable".

Oh and by America_Lover September 17, 2009 9:16 AM EDT - What does living in Brooklyn, NY have anything to do with your assessment of "Bri-Bri"'s political leanings? Is this an example of your ideas about "OBJECTIVE" journalism? Really, sounds like you are in "cult" of your own making. END.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 September 17, 2009 9:54 AM EDT
by endurorob_4 September 17, 2009 9:50 AM EDT

So since this has to do with a very negative aspect of a very liberal, and very large orginization supported in part by tax payer money and a pet orginization of Obama we should just ignore this. You, and anyone else that trolls these pages knows if this was a conservative orginization it would be headline news and the liberals would be filling the pages with comments.







ROFL!!!

Now ACORN is Obama's "pet organization"?!?!

LOL!!!

Does Obama know about this?!?!





I have EXTREMELY bad news for you - ACORN doesn't have ANYTHING to do with "liberalism", "progressives", "democrats" or anything else that Fox News told you to oppose.

Their primary focus is "the inner city". They don't care about liberalism, any more than they care about conservatism.
Reply to this comment
by rightbehind September 17, 2009 9:51 AM EDT
Acorn should be collecting all videos of this if they plan to sue so that all can be looked at in the full context.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 September 17, 2009 9:50 AM EDT
by endurorob_4 September 17, 2009 9:44 AM EDT

The birht certificate thing that the birthers talk of is basically on par with the 9/11 truthers and FOX would not ask him about that. His associations however should be discussed but I doubt FOX would aske about Ayers, Rezko, Wright at this time. They would likely question him on his support of health care reform and you o=know he does not want to answer hard questions about that. And considering ACORN is a big news item they would likely ask him questions about that. Of course you wold likely prefer questions from MSNBC about who gets stuck cleaning up after Bo.







They are THE STATION OF CHOICE for "birthers", "deathers", and any other weirdo "____ers" that you fringe extremists keep on hand, so I'm sure they would ask him about that, just to appease their audience.

On health care reform, they would ask him why he hates capitalism, why he wants to pull the plug on grandma, why he wants to eliminate medicare, and any other question that will stoke the fire against reform, even though NONE of those things are true.

And Obama has NOTHING to do with ACORN, so yes - I'm sure they would ask him about that to try and create an association, where one does not currently exist.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 September 17, 2009 9:44 AM EDT
by endurorob_4 September 17, 2009 9:39 AM EDT

So what do you have against exposing the criminal activities of orginizations subsidized by tax payer money?






I don't have anything against it. I'm asking "WHY is it so important, that it is taking over EVERY other issue facing our nation?"

This is nothing but a distraction, created by two conservatives with an agenda to try and bring ACORN down.

Good for them. Mission Accomplished.

Now what does this have to do with ANY of the important issues facing our nation today?
Reply to this comment
by pickaguitar1 September 17, 2009 9:30 AM EDT
This is silly! ACORN is fine.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 September 17, 2009 9:30 AM EDT
by endurorob_4 September 17, 2009 9:18 AM EDT

Or maybe he just doesn't have the courage to answer critical questions.







You mean like Rev Wright, his birth certificate, Ayers, and Rezko like Fox news asked him about several times last year?

I don't blame Obama - I'd refuse to answer questions created by smears and rumors too.

Maybe that's why he's sticking with ACTUAL news organizations, and is ignoring Fox - the "National Enquirer" of broadcast journalism.
Reply to this comment
by ItsaMindTrip September 17, 2009 9:30 AM EDT
I just dropped in and finally see CBS caught up with the news,,
But how disappointing...only 280 comments and many are from the same persons...I get 10-15 hits a day,,on my web pages..and I'm just a Joe It goes to show you that CBS and CBS new is in tank..and I have to wonder why any business would pay to advertize on CBS..
Maybe they should get out of thier hole and do some investigative reporting..
Im laughing and smiling, to read that A-corn..is going to sue.. Never will the day come..when they open themselves up to discovery, that they would be required by law to do if they did sue.. Finally the reality is out..A-corn..has been getting MILLIONS of tax payer monies
to promote themselves and .You can guess who else they promoted and would have promoted.. For those who argue, and say it was a set up.
Eat your heart out.. the facts are out and now they wont be getting the money.. and CBS wont get advertizing dollars if they dont deliver ALL the news.. Good luck to both A-corn and CBS
Reply to this comment
by pasmalltown September 17, 2009 10:11 AM EDT
by ItsaMindTrip September 17, 2009 9:30 AM EDT
"..I get 10-15 hits a day,,on my web pages.."
________________________

How many do you take in the arm?
by hungry1968-16 September 17, 2009 9:27 AM EDT
by endurorob_4 September 17, 2009 9:15 AM EDT

A handful of employees in 4 different cities. The fac that the liberals on here are attacking those that exposed ACORN says they suport the actions of those exposed. And don't be silly. You know there are no actual children these two were prostituting but the ACORN reperesentatives did not know the underage girls were fictitous and were more than willing on giving advice on how to prostitute them and still claim them as dependents on their taxes. Open your eyes to reality.







Open YOUR eyes.

These two "undercover" _____, (whatever they are), had an agenda to expose ACORN.
PERIOD.

Good for them. Mission Accomplished.

Now what does this have to do with anything important?
Reply to this comment
by magoo2u1 September 17, 2009 9:19 AM EDT
I can't believe CBS is admitting that unless it was for Fox this story would not have been covered. Talk about being in the tank for Obama and the liberals."
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Are you brain dead? Credible news organizations aren't covering the obvious setup/misrepresented story. NOW they are covering the credible story- Fox news malpractice. Fox is childish. Face it.
Reply to this comment
by America_Lover September 17, 2009 9:16 AM EDT
About the author of this article from the CBS website, who we'll call Bri-Bri:

Brian Montopoli has been a political reporter for CBSNews.com since Sept. 2007. Previously, he was editor of Public Eye, the CBS News blog that goes inside CBS News and the rest of the press. Before coming to CBS News, he covered press coverage of the 2004 campaign for Columbia Journalism Review. Montopoli has contributed to The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, Slate, Legal Affairs, and The Washington Monthly, and has appeared on National Public Radio, "This American Life," and MSNBC. He lives in Brooklyn, New York. End.

Ok, Bri-Bri. So, you are and always have been COMPLETELY submerged in the baptismal waters of the religion of the church of Liberal Media. Just so we (the readers of your assessment of the ACORN situation) understand who your are and your perspective, is it fair to say that you are a True Disciple of your media-based religion? I think it is.

Why don't you try being OBJECTIVE in journalism and maybe you'll understand that your "religion" is really a cult!

Many Americans aren't stupid. I think your slanted writings fall under the category of fooling "some of the people, some of the time". You, and all of CBS News for that matter, need to understand that objectively-minded Americans will continue to dismiss liberal biased media outlets.

Good day, Bri-Bri.

America Lover
Reply to this comment
by taxxedtodeath September 17, 2009 9:12 AM EDT
Wow,
Any other org would be looked at under the RICO act.
Follow the money.
shame on CBS and its libral views
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 September 17, 2009 9:09 AM EDT
by IntheTank September 17, 2009 8:53 AM EDT

I find it laughable that OUR President has decided to do 5 interviews this Sunday...but not on FOX News. So I guess he doesn't consider himself President to every American citizens, only the ones that agree with him.







Maybe the president thinks that his position is so important as leader of the free world, that he should only appear on ACTUAL news programs?
Reply to this comment
by IntheTank September 17, 2009 8:53 AM EDT
The lame stream media only cares about protecting this administration. I find it laughable that OUR President has decided to do 5 interviews this Sunday...but not on FOX News. So I guess he doesn't consider himself President to every American citizens, only the ones that agree with him. Chris Wallace was lambasted by the lame street media when he did his interview with Dick Cheney. Evidently they felt he didn't ask the "hard" questions. I can't wait to hear what kind of hard questions the lame "journalists" ask. How is Bo, your golf game and the most important question, when are you and Michelle going to have another date night?
Reply to this comment
by IntheTank September 17, 2009 9:19 AM EDT
Yeah right, Letterman is a news show
See all 276 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Can the Postal Service be Saved?

    (301 recent comments)

HOTSHEET ON TWITTER