World Watch
July 1, 2009 3:58 AM

Iran's One-Two Punch to Reset Reality

Iran's state-controlled media are waging an all-out propaganda assault to cast post-election unrest in the Islamic Republic as a futile attempt by "the West" to interfere.

From news stories alleging a British Embassy staffer was a ring-leader of the dramatic street protests, to editorial columns deriding a "West that imagined that supporting chaos in Iran would reduce the Islamic Republic's power," the message is clear.

Iran's Fars news agency reported Wednesday, citing unnamed officials, that one of three U.K. Embassy staffers (eight were arrested, five have been freed, all were Iranian nationals) still in detention, "had a remarkable role during the recent unrest in managing it behind the scenes."

Even if Fars, described as a "semi-official" news agency, had named its source in the government, the staffer's role in the protests would be impossible to verify, as Iran has kicked almost every foreign journalist out of the country.

With the street demonstrations largely squashed under the foot of security forces, more energy is being focused on painting Iran's leaders as protectors of the society, under threat from Israel and its alleged surrogates in Washington.

Iran's Press TV has an "exclusive interview" Wednesday with the man who ran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's election campaign. He told the network that President Obama, "originally took a soft stance on the results of Iran's presidential election but then was forced by the Zionists and the U.S. neoconservatives to make tough comments about Iran."

Many editorial columns discuss the election upheaval as if it ended weeks ago. One writer declared the United States the primary loser in the aftermath of the protests.

Hamdollah Emadi-Heydari wrote in the newspaper Siyasat-e Ruz that, "The West, under America's leadership, which, nervous of Iran's hazy election climate put all its eggs in [Iranian] rioters' basket, is being considered the main loser in the recent events as the political climate is gradually becoming clearer."

"What is significant now after the unrests have calmed down in Iran is that the West has put all its eggs in the rioters' basket," writes Emadi-Heydari.

CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer was one of the last Western journalists to be forced out of Iran and she maintains contact with sources inside the country, who paint a different picture.

(AP Photo)

At left: Reformist presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi attends a rally in Ghoba Mosque in Tehran, June 28, 2009.

Despite dramatically increased police presence on the streets of Tehran, the opposition movement continues to try and rally against the June 12 election results, which they claim were heavily rigged in favor of Ahmadinejad.

On Sunday, some 5,000 people gathered in central Tehran — they were reportedly met with batons and tear gas.

One man who joined an effort Monday to form a human chain on one of Tehran's main thoroughfares, in defiance of the regime, described what they were up against:

"As soon as more than five people tried to huddle, the groups were broken up. In downtown and midtown I heard people tried to walk in unison but they were beaten by batons and clubs."

Palmer points out that Iran's election has already fallen from the headlines of most Western media, and she says opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi lost his opportunity to try and force real change.

It has been a classic one-two punch from Iran's hard-line rulers: first they hit on the streets with batons, tear gas and arrests of opposition leaders. Now, in the newspapers and television broadcasts, they're striking with their own version of the truth.

If their version is repeated often enough, and dissenting voices are kept silent, it will quickly become the accepted reality for many Iranians. In this manner, the Islamic establishment which has ruled the country for 30 years may be able to sweep this "revolution" under the carpet.
Tags:
iran ,
election ,
mousavi ,
ahmadinejad ,
democracy ,
media
Topics:
Iran
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
by OregonJames July 6, 2009 8:48 AM EDT
Suppose for a moment that US citizens had taken to the streets after the Bush/Gore election. Imagine if you will tens or even hundreds of thousands in great protests around the country. Consider how evenly split the election was and how such protests could evolve into extreme violence or even civil war. How would the US government react?

Any move to control or prohibit demonstrations would lead to violence. That would lead to sensational and often inaccurate reporting, which would lead to more violence and demonstrations, which would lead to government control of media, massive arrests, deaths, destruction, dispair... We are no different than any other nation when it comes to civil unrest.
Reply to this comment
by film-guru July 1, 2009 3:22 PM EDT
Before, they controlled because the people were blindly ignorant that change was possible. Now they know.



------------------------------------------
<a href="http://filmgu.ru">?????? ??????</a>
Reply to this comment
by film-guru July 1, 2009 3:23 PM EDT
it's intresting
by johninpennsyl July 1, 2009 2:50 PM EDT
Propaganda got us involved in Iraq the first time,partially because of the false testimony of the Kuwait ambassador's daughter.
Now we have the "crooked Iranian elections" and Neda.
More BS.
Most Americans are truly gullible.
Reply to this comment
by ajjaxtheleast July 1, 2009 11:14 AM EDT
We're not at our best involving ourselves in
affairs of this sort.

(Lebanon, Palistinian elections)

When the option of killing a bunch of people to claim
"victory" isn't available to military we turn to
dreaming up tactics to get our way.

The entire article and not even a hint of a question
that America had the slightest "intreast" in
Iran's election.

These election terrorists are getting what
they asked for.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-15 July 1, 2009 10:49 AM EDT
by fariborzzak July 1, 2009 7:29 AM PDT
I voted for Ahmadinejad and I am proud of that.







You would have voted for Bush too, and would still be proud of that too!
Reply to this comment
by YerSoWrong July 1, 2009 12:42 PM EDT
Pathetic screed.
by fariborzzak July 1, 2009 10:29 AM EDT
I voted for Ahmadinejad and I am proud of that.
Reply to this comment
by BeckieBest July 1, 2009 9:48 AM EDT
This is the kind of government you get when you let religious nuts run your country.

Combining church and state has always corrupted both.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-15 July 1, 2009 9:47 AM EDT
Sounds just like what Fox News did for the GOP for YEARS.

Altering reality and selling it to their brainwashed lemmings, who then run around like the American republican version of Ahmadinejhad's supporters.
Reply to this comment
by YerSoWrong July 1, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
Anti-American dweeb nonsense.
by rocketjl July 1, 2009 9:27 AM EDT
Trust Me!! The fox has counted and recounted all the chickens in the hen house and has verified that there really are 5 less chickens in there, than we thought. The excess number is most likely a ploy by some store clerk who wrote down a false and inflated number when the chickens were originally purchased. Trust me, says Mr. Fox.
Reply to this comment
by zonkzilla July 1, 2009 7:15 AM EDT
We have a saying in the US "freedom isn't free" we know the never served tough talking right wingers are saying the US should go into Iran and get a bunch of our guys and gals killed so the Iranian people won't have to do it but still get freedom (like Iraq) but it ain't gonna happen folks.
If the people of Iran are not willing to rise up and fight for their freedom they don't deserve it.
Freedom isn't free.
Let's move on shall we?
Reply to this comment
by summarex July 1, 2009 7:13 AM EDT
One more thing.
If the Iranians are right about this. They should break off diplomatic relations with the English immediately and kick out all the western media operations. Rounding up and executing a few high profile, activists and foreign "journalists" would be nice too.
Reply to this comment
by woeisme1 July 1, 2009 7:50 AM EDT
By chance, you're not an activists or foreign correspondent are you?
by YerSoWrong July 1, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
They could eat the hearts to obtain the power of their enemies. The more disgusting parts they could feed to their cattle as a reward for online services rendered.
by prometheus21 July 1, 2009 7:03 AM EDT
CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer was one of the last Western journalists to be forced out of Iran and she maintains contact with sources inside the country, who paint a different picture.

Wow, does it get any better than this? A confession that none of this was about the election or the election results, it was all about a 'grass-roots uprising' quashed by the government of Iran. This was the story they were following, all the GARBAGE about a MINORITY uprising of students and elites with cell-phones, texting and twittering all geared towards an English speaking audience being cheated out of an election was just that, GARBAGE. It's like this was planned out from day 1... (1) the opposition loses the election obviously, because they actually do represent less than a third of the population (2) we LIE, MIS-REPRESENT and MIS-INFORM, CULLING the REPORTING on their behalf and make the world believe they have been cheated (3) we segue into a 'grass-roots uprising' that really has nothing to do with the election, but liberty and freedom itself.

George W. Bush couldn't have done it better with Iraq.

Yes, I would read some of Ms. Palmer's earlier 'work' in the days PRIOR to the election even starting, to get a 'different picture' on her objectivity.

As a citizen of the U.S. bombarded and plastered with this incredibly obvious western propaganda campaign, I'm reminded again just how "free" we are here in the U.S. and who the real losers are -- and losing ground every day.
Reply to this comment
by prometheus21 July 1, 2009 7:31 AM EDT
George W. Bush couldn't have done it better with Iraq.

Well, I guess I should say, in fact he did do it much better with Iraq -- considering the cost in human life, suffering, massive debt and America's place in the world all while trashing the U.S. Constitution to commit war crime and crimes against peace -- did I mention the cost in HUMAN LIFE AND SUFFERING AND MASSIVE DEBT FOR FUTURE TAXPAYERS for this ATROCITY, I mean we're talking about thousands including Americans, Iraqi's women... children, INSANE amounts of human suffering that is LITERALLY AN ASSAULT ON GOD HIMSELF while this filthy piece of human garbage that finally left the White House and America with a plague of ills beyond human comprehension at this point, still walks free... this was an INCREDIBLE achievement which seemed practically effortless in the face of any credible challenge by the American 'free press'.

So, I guess George W. Bush did better with Iraq, but he couldn't have done it without the American 'free' press... that's for sure.
by fariborzzak July 1, 2009 10:26 AM EDT
wwooooo cool thanks for lovely comment.
by pauldia-2009 July 1, 2009 6:26 AM EDT
CAUTION GRAPHIC IMAGE , IRANIAN PROTESTERS HANGED: copied from atlasshrugs
Iran hanging2
"I've made it clear that the United States respects the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran and is not interfering with Iran's affairs." Obama day before yesterday

I would suggest Obama should to watch these hangings bit that bloodless fiend wouldn't blink an eyelash.........
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/07/iran-uprising-day-19-supporters-of-opposition-hanged.html
Reply to this comment
by fariborzzak July 1, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
how many satellite channels R broadcasting against IRAN from USA?
by summarex July 1, 2009 5:25 AM EDT
Hmmm

Resetting reality?

The hand of the English and The U.S and their media outfits seemed real enough in all this as soon as we started hearing the whines of these well-to-do election losing anglophonic Iranians. Line'em up and shoot'em I say.
Reply to this comment
by YerSoWrong July 1, 2009 12:38 PM EDT
Disgusting as always.
by daisyjingles July 1, 2009 4:44 AM EDT
The Iranian Clerics are fooling themselves. Because of cell phones and the Internet, the cat is out of the bag. Before, they controlled because the people were blindly ignorant that change was possible. Now they know.

Those old Clerics do not represent the young people in Iran anymore. It is time for them to retire.
Reply to this comment
by fariborzzak July 1, 2009 10:21 AM EDT
only some of them
by jwesel1 July 1, 2009 4:21 AM EDT
CBS knows how to play with words, calling Iranian government regime since it somehow knows the negative connotations of the word "regime". What about Israel's regime, Egyptian regime, etc but they are called governments since they are in the good books of the US "regime"
Reply to this comment
by fariborzzak July 1, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
BINGO
by CLoverNYC1 July 1, 2009 11:40 AM EDT
Not only is it a regime, it's a bloodthirsty religious terrorist dictatorship that thinks nothing of slaughtering innocent civilians.

The whole world saw Neda's eyes.
by YerSoWrong July 1, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
Republics are legitimate. Street gangs are not legitimate, even if they hold religious services. Iran is ruled by a regime (apparently a regime with internet access).
See all 29 Comments

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn