Iran's One-Two Punch to Reset Reality
Iran's state-controlled media are waging an all-out propaganda assault to cast post-election unrest in the Islamic Republic as a futile attempt by "the West" to interfere.
From news stories alleging a British Embassy staffer was a ring-leader of the dramatic street protests, to editorial columns deriding a "West that imagined that supporting chaos in Iran would reduce the Islamic Republic's power," the message is clear.
Iran's Fars news agency reported Wednesday, citing unnamed officials, that one of three U.K. Embassy staffers (eight were arrested, five have been freed, all were Iranian nationals) still in detention, "had a remarkable role during the recent unrest in managing it behind the scenes."
Even if Fars, described as a "semi-official" news agency, had named its source in the government, the staffer's role in the protests would be impossible to verify, as Iran has kicked almost every foreign journalist out of the country.
With the street demonstrations largely squashed under the foot of security forces, more energy is being focused on painting Iran's leaders as protectors of the society, under threat from Israel and its alleged surrogates in Washington.
Iran's Press TV has an "exclusive interview" Wednesday with the man who ran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's election campaign. He told the network that President Obama, "originally took a soft stance on the results of Iran's presidential election but then was forced by the Zionists and the U.S. neoconservatives to make tough comments about Iran."
Many editorial columns discuss the election upheaval as if it ended weeks ago. One writer declared the United States the primary loser in the aftermath of the protests.
Hamdollah Emadi-Heydari wrote in the newspaper Siyasat-e Ruz that, "The West, under America's leadership, which, nervous of Iran's hazy election climate put all its eggs in [Iranian] rioters' basket, is being considered the main loser in the recent events as the political climate is gradually becoming clearer."
"What is significant now after the unrests have calmed down in Iran is that the West has put all its eggs in the rioters' basket," writes Emadi-Heydari.
CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer was one of the last Western journalists to be forced out of Iran and she maintains contact with sources inside the country, who paint a different picture.
At left: Reformist presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi attends a rally in Ghoba Mosque in Tehran, June 28, 2009.
Despite dramatically increased police presence on the streets of Tehran, the opposition movement continues to try and rally against the June 12 election results, which they claim were heavily rigged in favor of Ahmadinejad.
On Sunday, some 5,000 people gathered in central Tehran — they were reportedly met with batons and tear gas.
One man who joined an effort Monday to form a human chain on one of Tehran's main thoroughfares, in defiance of the regime, described what they were up against:
"As soon as more than five people tried to huddle, the groups were broken up. In downtown and midtown I heard people tried to walk in unison but they were beaten by batons and clubs."
Palmer points out that Iran's election has already fallen from the headlines of most Western media, and she says opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi lost his opportunity to try and force real change.
It has been a classic one-two punch from Iran's hard-line rulers: first they hit on the streets with batons, tear gas and arrests of opposition leaders. Now, in the newspapers and television broadcasts, they're striking with their own version of the truth.
If their version is repeated often enough, and dissenting voices are kept silent, it will quickly become the accepted reality for many Iranians. In this manner, the Islamic establishment which has ruled the country for 30 years may be able to sweep this "revolution" under the carpet.
From news stories alleging a British Embassy staffer was a ring-leader of the dramatic street protests, to editorial columns deriding a "West that imagined that supporting chaos in Iran would reduce the Islamic Republic's power," the message is clear.
Iran's Fars news agency reported Wednesday, citing unnamed officials, that one of three U.K. Embassy staffers (eight were arrested, five have been freed, all were Iranian nationals) still in detention, "had a remarkable role during the recent unrest in managing it behind the scenes."
Even if Fars, described as a "semi-official" news agency, had named its source in the government, the staffer's role in the protests would be impossible to verify, as Iran has kicked almost every foreign journalist out of the country.
With the street demonstrations largely squashed under the foot of security forces, more energy is being focused on painting Iran's leaders as protectors of the society, under threat from Israel and its alleged surrogates in Washington.
Iran's Press TV has an "exclusive interview" Wednesday with the man who ran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's election campaign. He told the network that President Obama, "originally took a soft stance on the results of Iran's presidential election but then was forced by the Zionists and the U.S. neoconservatives to make tough comments about Iran."
Many editorial columns discuss the election upheaval as if it ended weeks ago. One writer declared the United States the primary loser in the aftermath of the protests.
Hamdollah Emadi-Heydari wrote in the newspaper Siyasat-e Ruz that, "The West, under America's leadership, which, nervous of Iran's hazy election climate put all its eggs in [Iranian] rioters' basket, is being considered the main loser in the recent events as the political climate is gradually becoming clearer."
"What is significant now after the unrests have calmed down in Iran is that the West has put all its eggs in the rioters' basket," writes Emadi-Heydari.
CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer was one of the last Western journalists to be forced out of Iran and she maintains contact with sources inside the country, who paint a different picture.

(AP Photo)
At left: Reformist presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi attends a rally in Ghoba Mosque in Tehran, June 28, 2009.
Despite dramatically increased police presence on the streets of Tehran, the opposition movement continues to try and rally against the June 12 election results, which they claim were heavily rigged in favor of Ahmadinejad.
On Sunday, some 5,000 people gathered in central Tehran — they were reportedly met with batons and tear gas.
One man who joined an effort Monday to form a human chain on one of Tehran's main thoroughfares, in defiance of the regime, described what they were up against:
"As soon as more than five people tried to huddle, the groups were broken up. In downtown and midtown I heard people tried to walk in unison but they were beaten by batons and clubs."
Palmer points out that Iran's election has already fallen from the headlines of most Western media, and she says opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi lost his opportunity to try and force real change.
It has been a classic one-two punch from Iran's hard-line rulers: first they hit on the streets with batons, tear gas and arrests of opposition leaders. Now, in the newspapers and television broadcasts, they're striking with their own version of the truth.
If their version is repeated often enough, and dissenting voices are kept silent, it will quickly become the accepted reality for many Iranians. In this manner, the Islamic establishment which has ruled the country for 30 years may be able to sweep this "revolution" under the carpet.
The secrets of tennis legend
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 29 CommentsAny move to control or prohibit demonstrations would lead to violence. That would lead to sensational and often inaccurate reporting, which would lead to more violence and demonstrations, which would lead to government control of media, massive arrests, deaths, destruction, dispair... We are no different than any other nation when it comes to civil unrest.
------------------------------------------
<a href="http://filmgu.ru">?????? ??????</a>
Now we have the "crooked Iranian elections" and Neda.
More BS.
Most Americans are truly gullible.
affairs of this sort.
(Lebanon, Palistinian elections)
When the option of killing a bunch of people to claim
"victory" isn't available to military we turn to
dreaming up tactics to get our way.
The entire article and not even a hint of a question
that America had the slightest "intreast" in
Iran's election.
These election terrorists are getting what
they asked for.
I voted for Ahmadinejad and I am proud of that.
You would have voted for Bush too, and would still be proud of that too!
Combining church and state has always corrupted both.
Altering reality and selling it to their brainwashed lemmings, who then run around like the American republican version of Ahmadinejhad's supporters.
If the people of Iran are not willing to rise up and fight for their freedom they don't deserve it.
Freedom isn't free.
Let's move on shall we?
If the Iranians are right about this. They should break off diplomatic relations with the English immediately and kick out all the western media operations. Rounding up and executing a few high profile, activists and foreign "journalists" would be nice too.
Wow, does it get any better than this? A confession that none of this was about the election or the election results, it was all about a 'grass-roots uprising' quashed by the government of Iran. This was the story they were following, all the GARBAGE about a MINORITY uprising of students and elites with cell-phones, texting and twittering all geared towards an English speaking audience being cheated out of an election was just that, GARBAGE. It's like this was planned out from day 1... (1) the opposition loses the election obviously, because they actually do represent less than a third of the population (2) we LIE, MIS-REPRESENT and MIS-INFORM, CULLING the REPORTING on their behalf and make the world believe they have been cheated (3) we segue into a 'grass-roots uprising' that really has nothing to do with the election, but liberty and freedom itself.
George W. Bush couldn't have done it better with Iraq.
Yes, I would read some of Ms. Palmer's earlier 'work' in the days PRIOR to the election even starting, to get a 'different picture' on her objectivity.
As a citizen of the U.S. bombarded and plastered with this incredibly obvious western propaganda campaign, I'm reminded again just how "free" we are here in the U.S. and who the real losers are -- and losing ground every day.
Well, I guess I should say, in fact he did do it much better with Iraq -- considering the cost in human life, suffering, massive debt and America's place in the world all while trashing the U.S. Constitution to commit war crime and crimes against peace -- did I mention the cost in HUMAN LIFE AND SUFFERING AND MASSIVE DEBT FOR FUTURE TAXPAYERS for this ATROCITY, I mean we're talking about thousands including Americans, Iraqi's women... children, INSANE amounts of human suffering that is LITERALLY AN ASSAULT ON GOD HIMSELF while this filthy piece of human garbage that finally left the White House and America with a plague of ills beyond human comprehension at this point, still walks free... this was an INCREDIBLE achievement which seemed practically effortless in the face of any credible challenge by the American 'free press'.
So, I guess George W. Bush did better with Iraq, but he couldn't have done it without the American 'free' press... that's for sure.
Iran hanging2
"I've made it clear that the United States respects the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran and is not interfering with Iran's affairs." Obama day before yesterday
I would suggest Obama should to watch these hangings bit that bloodless fiend wouldn't blink an eyelash.........
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/07/iran-uprising-day-19-supporters-of-opposition-hanged.html
Resetting reality?
The hand of the English and The U.S and their media outfits seemed real enough in all this as soon as we started hearing the whines of these well-to-do election losing anglophonic Iranians. Line'em up and shoot'em I say.
Those old Clerics do not represent the young people in Iran anymore. It is time for them to retire.
The whole world saw Neda's eyes.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 29 Comments