Will Congress Read Bills Before Voting?

(CBS)
Various grassroots organizations are blasting Congress for not taking the time to properly consider the energy bill or health care reform -- two very significant pieces of legislation.
Let Freedom Ring, a non-profit, grassroots organization that supports a conservative agenda, announced an initiative today urging members of Congress to sign a pledge to read and give citizens the opportunity to read any health care reform legislation before voting on it.
"For something as significant as health care reform, which influences 16 percent to 17 percent of GDP, I think it is important for legislators to know what they're voting on, and not have lobbyists and staff members be the only ones who know what's in there," said Colin Hanna, Let Freedom Ring president.
The pledge was distributed to members of Congress on Tuesday, and Hanna has so far received signatures from Senators James Inhofe (R-Okla.) and Jim DeMint (R-S.C.). Certainly, Hanna said, it would be in the members' best interests to sign it.
"I can assure you, legislators will be held accountable if there are parts in there their constituents find objectionable," he said.
Meanwhile, the Sunlight Foundation, a non-profit with the goal of increasing government transparency, is raising similar concerns about the energy bill that the House of Representatives is slated to vote on Friday.
With a full House vote just days away, the authors of the deal are still negotiating the details, the New York Times has reported. In a measure as complex as the energy bill -- which consists of around 1,000 pages -- the details can make a big difference.
"The fastest speed-readers and the most intelligent minds can't make informed decisions with that much time. How can Congress?" Sunlight Foundation Engagement Director Jake Brewer said today in a statement. "The problem here is the bill wasn't developed in the open in a committee, so no one -- including those members of Congress not on the Energy Committee -- knows how this latest version was created."
The foundation points out that while the bill, formally called the American Clean Energy and Security Act, was 946 pages long last week, it has ballooned to 1,201 pages in recent days with little explanation for how or why. The group is supporting a bill introduced last week that would require the House to post all non-emergency legislation online 72 hours before debate begins.
Hanna said Congress could benefit by keeping legislation simpler.
"Legislation has become so complex, you can really make the arugment the system the framers devised is broken," he said. "Most bills are voted upon without those voting understanding much of what's in it."
That's when members are forced to resort to speed readers. "It makes a mockery of the process," Hanna said.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 59 CommentsIf you are intellectually honest with yourself you must admit that neither party represents the country we grew up in (I'm 45). Our government is out of control, and we lack the courage and fortitude to take the power back... Step up, speak out and send all of these criminals home!
----------------
by tyrsfury June 25, 2009 6:42 AM PDT
Now? They've been in control of Congress for almost 3 years. Gimme a break 'now'....
--------
by ur_u_nuts June 25, 2009 7:36 AM PDT
What a dim bulb you are there was no whining from Bush like the chicken in charge in the WH today that everything needs to be passed yesterday, don't read it just sign off on it. Whatta' dolt!
--------
by nottellin1 June 26, 2009 7:04 PM PDT
I guess you didn't notice that the only two signatures on the bpledge thus far are Republicans.
--------
Replies:
First, ' Now' as in control of the White House, too! That, WANTS to get something done on this! Bush just got out, remember?! The Dems in Congress couldn't make GB do much of anything, could they?!
Second, you better think again! Bush & Co. were the ones that perfected the 'bum's rush'! Rush to WAR!
Rush to No Child Left Behind! Rush to sign the Energy Bill! Rush to stay in Iraq! Rush to bailout! On and on...
Third, yeah, well--it's easy for those two to 'take this pledge' because they're from HIGHLY conservative states, many citizens in these states are content to be lead into oblivion! When things get worse there,
they won't be! So, their agreement is political in nature and not philosophical or ethical. Big diff, friend!
DO YOUR JOB AND READ THE BILLS THAT ARE PLACED ON YOUR DESK TO VOTE ON, THAT IS ONE OF THE THINGS YOU WERE HIRED FOR!!!!!!!!!! THEN YOU CAN KEEP YOUR JOB!!!!!
I also believe there should be no such thing as a "must-pass" bill. That simply should not exist.
And I also also believe that off-topic riders or earmarks should be forbidden. If a topic cannot survive into law on its own, maybe it just should not be. Dont' go sticking RIAA sponsored stuff into war spending bills and other such tomfoolery.
And the people should be able to have access to what their laws and bills say. None of this international copyright is too secret for anyone to see what it is crap.
"The ignorance of the people", is how corrupt polititions live off the "fat of the land", if they don't know what is in what they are voting for they feel like they aren't responsible for what happens, as long as it doesn't bother their conscience.
Ok, let me explain the concept of a "representative". The idea is that the "representative" "represents" the interests of his or her constituents. Are you with me so far? Am I moving too fast for you?
Therefore, we, the citizens of the United States, expect that our representatives actually read and understand the legislation they are voting on. LetFreedomRing absolutely has the right to read and review the legislation Congress votes on, just like any other citizen or group of citizens. Why don't you get real?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 59 Comments