Political Hotsheet
June 22, 2009 2:35 PM

Obama Signs Anti-Smoking Bill Into Law

(AP)
In a move hailed by anti-smoking advocates as a major victory in the fight to reduce tobacco-related fatalities, President Obama on Monday signed into law legislation giving the U.S. government broad powers to regulate tobacco products.

"Each day, 1,000 young people under the age of 18 become new regular, daily smokers, and almost 90 percent of all smokers began at or before their 18th birthday," Mr. Obama said before signing the legislation. "I know; I was one of these teenagers. And so I know how difficult it can be to break this habit when it's been with you for a long time."

The bill puts tobacco under the authority of the Food And Drug Administration, which will now regulate tobacco as a drug. A new entity within the FDA – the Center for Tobacco Products – will oversee the regulation, and it will have the power to mandate lower nicotine levels in tobacco products.

The legislation also bans candy-flavored cigarettes by October 2009, requires the full disclosure to the FDA of all ingredients and additives in cigarettes by January 2010, bans youth-focused marketing of cigarettes (including sponsorship of sporting events and clothing and cigarette giveaways), prohibits the use of misleading terms like "light" and "mild" on tobacco products by July 2010, and mandates new and stronger warning labels on tobacco products by July 2011.

"Kids today don't just start smoking for no reason," the president said Monday. "They're aggressively targeted as customers by the tobacco industry. They're exposed to a constant and insidious barrage of advertising where they live, where they learn, and where they play. Most insidiously, they are offered products with flavorings that mask the taste of tobacco and make it even more tempting."

"Today, thanks to the work of Democrats and Republicans, health care and consumer advocates, the decades-long effort to protect our children from the harmful effects of tobacco has emerged victorious," he added. "Today, change has come to Washington."

The president noted that the legislation does not ban tobacco products, thus allowing "adults to make their own choices." But he said it would mean a reduction in "the number of American children who pick up a cigarette and become adult smokers."

Still, he said, "our work to protect our children and improve the public's health is not complete."

"Today, tobacco is the leading preventable cause of death not just in America, but also in the world," said Mr. Obama. "If current trends continue, 1 billion people will die from tobacco-related illnesses this century. And so the United States will continue to work with the World Health Organization and other nations to fight this epidemic on a global basis. But no matter how long or how hard this fight may be, what's happening today gives us hope."

He added that the bill passed "despite decades of lobbying and advertising by the tobacco industry."

"We're taking another big and very important step, a step that will save lives and dollars," said Mr. Obama.

A Gallup poll released in conjunction with the bill finding found that a majority of Americans oppose the new law. Fifty-two percent said they oppose the legislation while 46 percent support it, with disapproval particularly high among smokers. (For more on the debate over tobacco regulation, check out this "hot topic" post.)

Mr. Obama's predecessor, George W. Bush, opposed such legislation. Critics suggest the embattled FDA is not equipped to effectively regulate tobacco.
Tags:
tobacco ,
smoking ,
barack obama
Topics:
Domestic Issues
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 55 Comments
by johninpennsyl June 23, 2009 6:46 AM EDT
Another crusading hypocrite.
No-I don't smoke.
Reply to this comment
by ladypirate2 June 23, 2009 6:05 PM EDT
I'm not sure if you are calling me or President Obama a hypocrite but call me what you want but every word I said is true! I am not a smoker myself. I've never smoked a cigarette in my life but even to this day I suffer from the effects of my parents' smoking. Also every word that I said about losing my parents and grandparents and my cousin and friend to heart disease, asthma, emphysema, lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer due to years of smoking is true! Not one word that I've said is a lie and I'm NOT a hypcrite because I DON'T SMOKE! I'VE NEVER SMOKED A CIGARETTE IN MY LIFE!
by ladypirate2 June 23, 2009 5:38 AM EDT
Smokers claim that they have a right to smoke but I also have the right to be healthy and to breathe clean air! I suffer from asthma which in my case was not caused from smoking, or at least not my smoking anyway. It's a condition that I was born with that was made worse by the fact that my parents smoked. I am an adult now but to this day I can't be in an enclosed space with someone who is smoking. I also know immediately when I walk in a public building where someone is smoking. My throat and my lungs just close up and I can't breathe! In my opinion smoking should be banned in all public buildings everywhere!
Reply to this comment
by ladypirate2 June 23, 2009 4:59 AM EDT
I think if people could see the results of smoking as I have they would support any bill that discourages smoking. I lost my beloved grandmother to heart disease caused by smoking. She was a chain smoker who smoked for years. Her husband, my grandfather, who also smoked for many years, died from heart disease and emphysema. My mother started smoking as a child. She died from pancreatic cancer that is linked to smoking. She also suffered from heart disease. My father was also a smoker for many years. He quit several years before he died but it was too late. The damage was already done. He died from lung cancer. He also suffered from heart disease and asthma and emphysema. I also lost a cousin and a dear friend to lung cancer caused from smoking. I think if people could see what I've seen, someone that they love dying from years of smoking, they would think twice before lighting that first cigarette! They would also support any legislation that discourages or outlaws smoking!
Reply to this comment
by daisyjingles June 23, 2009 12:12 AM EDT
I saw Iowa Senator Tom Harkin was smiling broadly behind the President as this law was singed. He has long helped the underdog. Thanks President Obama and thanks also to Senator Harkin!
Reply to this comment
by keyneswaswrong June 22, 2009 11:03 PM EDT
Choosing to smoke cigarettes is stupid...so is eating too much sugar, believing in the power of crystals, maxing out your credit cards, or tatooing your body from head to toe. Yet all these stupidities have something in common: such decisions are none of the business of government.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 June 22, 2009 10:07 PM EDT
by goodusa June 22, 2009 5:18 PM PDT
OBAMA IS INSANE! Just saw on the news, he is giving AMNESTY TO MILLIONS OF ILLEGALs! Unemployment is at it's highest and this idiot is doing this. This guy is a nut case from the word go, he is damaging this economy left and right.

Actually it isn't him that has damaged the economy. It's Bush and whoever else who allowed the illegal immigrants to enter the country in the first place. They already have your jobs and health care. Because there are so many, to try and hunt them down and deport them now, is going to take billions of dollars. You would be better off to maybe focus on stopping the flow. Stop anymore illegals from coming in.
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat3000 June 22, 2009 9:31 PM EDT
by charlie257 June 22, 2009 3:59 PM PDT
His hippopotomus makes him obligated.. professionally.. to lack personal opinion.

______

ROTFLMMFAO!!!

Eddie's in rare form.
Reply to this comment
by saturn05 June 22, 2009 8:00 PM EDT
I wish instead of wasting taxpayer money on this, we would expect and demand personal responsibility in this matter. I grew up with cigarette ads on TV and in print; my father smoking and even chewed candy gum cigarettes and the hard candy kind. Guess what, I never have smoked. I am real tired of paying for everyone else's personal decisions. If they smoke, they pay higher insurance premiums or whatever, but I do not want my money to go to education about the sins of smoking. In this day and age if people, including kids don't know cigarettes can kill yourself and others, no amount of money is going to make a difference.
Reply to this comment
by fred-mertz June 22, 2009 7:47 PM EDT
Reading the comments of those who are complaining about Obama being "like Mao-Tse Tung", or being a "socialist", or whatever else they think will make people hate him as much as they apparently do, just because he signed a bill to allow the FDA to regulate an incredibly addictive drug which has killed more Americans than every war we have ever fought, the only response I can think of is: *********, those imbeciles are just so full of shiiiiiiiiiiiite!
Reply to this comment
by mje222 June 22, 2009 10:09 PM EDT
Your candy your chips and your beer will be next.
by jrmnw1 June 22, 2009 7:31 PM EDT
I'm really surprised that anybody thinks this is a bad thing. My dad is 61 yrs old and is on oxygen 100% of the time, has COPD/emphysema, can barely walk through a grocery store without keeling over, and he still smokes a pack a day. He started smoking when he was 13 and only quit once for 6 months. It seems silly that he still smokes, even though he admits that his health problems are the result of smoking for most of his life.

Tobacco is marketed to teenagers, because a rational thinking adult is not stupid enough to pick up such a nasty habit. Once they're hooked, tobacco companies have a customer for life. This is not a case of government making choices for citizens, but a case of the people fighting the power of companies who market a deadly product. Regulations are introduced in best practice to protect consumers, and in this case to keep young people from becoming consumers of this dangerous product, and to inform consumers of ingredients added to it.

What is the benefit of this product? Can anybody name just one true benefit? We can justify the existence of most products, but this is one that doesn't make sense. There is no defense for such a product, nor the advertising tactics of the companies that market it.

I can't wait until the Republicans are out of money to pay their bloggers. I'm tired of reading the comments left by these morons.
Reply to this comment
by mje222 June 22, 2009 9:57 PM EDT
My dad had the same and never smoked. We do not need the gov to control if we smoke or not. Alot has to do with what line of work your in so go after the nasty jobs pepole have to do!
by ladypirate2 June 23, 2009 5:20 AM EDT
jrmnw1: I am a republican and a Christian and a conservative, too, but I'm just as anti-smoking as you are! Don't class all of us republicans with the idiots in this blog!
by phwtb June 22, 2009 7:04 PM EDT
Quote: "A Gallup poll released in conjunction with the bill finding found that a majority of Americans oppose the new law. Fifty-two percent said they oppose the legislation while 46 percent support it..."

Since when does the majority NOT rule?

Welcome to Communism 101.
Reply to this comment
by jrmnw1 June 22, 2009 10:39 PM EDT
I saw a poll where 70% supported it. Don't ever trust a poll, because it's all in the way the subject is presented.
by -Lawyers-Guns-n-Money- June 22, 2009 7:04 PM EDT
by Volksstimme June 22, 2009 12:03 PM PDT

You are indeed the biggest hypocrite living on the face of the earth. But than again, we all know that all you care about is yourself and your desire to rule. Well Adolf Maobama, hopefully the voter starts getting you and will take appropriate actions in 2010 and 2012.
===================

Dude, you can STILL feed your kids cigarettes. Just keep them away from mine.
Reply to this comment
by -Lawyers-Guns-n-Money- June 22, 2009 7:10 PM EDT
What's up, Stu? It appears I'll be heading out in the next day or two. I'll try to check in once I get to where I'm going.
by salmoc44 June 22, 2009 6:30 PM EDT
If you're not a addict of nicotine, this won't hurt you in any way. It's aimed at the drug addicts that feel they need to smoke tobacco. To Republicans that object, remember, "Just say no."
Reply to this comment
by debinok1 June 22, 2009 6:07 PM EDT
Once again the politicians do not listen to the people who put them in office. 52% do not want this bill, it was signed into law anyway. Just like the bailouts, we the people did not want it, but the high and mighty in office did not listen. We the people have been ignored time and time again, and we stand by and allow this to continue. Either we take back our country and our constitution or we will continue to be ignored.
Reply to this comment
by debinok1 June 22, 2009 7:56 PM EDT
"A Gallup poll released in conjunction with the bill finding found that a majority of Americans oppose the new law. Fifty-two percent said they oppose the legislation"

It was in the article. Did you bother to read it or just glance at the headline.
by rushlimpdrug June 22, 2009 5:56 PM EDT
When did Obama quit smoking?
Reply to this comment
by earth562 June 22, 2009 5:58 PM EDT
He probably doesn't "inhale" either
by earth562 June 22, 2009 5:53 PM EDT
Yes I smoke and I know its bad for me..OK

I don't smoke where non-smokers are. I understand but I ask where does it stop ?

I don't drink and later drive home. Am I asking for Big Brother to impose heavy taxes and new laws to make a six-pack go up to $ 20.00 ?

Am I asking the goverment to impose heavy dutys on wine or liquor ?

Just as many or more people get killed or maimed by drinking and I won''t even get into the family matters it poses.

Will we impose a perfume tax because you know....I have been in elevators where the guy is wearing enough musk to kill flys or that women is wearing enough cheap perfume to cause an explosion if I lit up.

The ones who are happy with this new law obviosly want the nanny state to get bigger and bigger because they want to feel like they know better.
Reply to this comment
by jt92202 June 22, 2009 5:45 PM EDT
I'm an EX smoker of 2 years this last time, smoked 7 years. The first time I quit I quit for 18 years. Addiction can retake you with one puff, and the addiction is not just to the tabacco but from the additives that the companies put into it. The first time I quit I did it cold turkey, that was tough. The second time I got help from Chantix, Much easier for me but my family thought I was horible, they said I was cranky but remembering back to the first time they didn't have it bad at all. Cold Turkey was cheap, a few sunflower seeds (2 lbs a day for 2 weeks) vs Chantix at 107.00 a month for 3 months (was told I should take it for 6 months). My insurance didn't pay for any of it so that was out of pocket, didn't have a problem paying it cuz I was paying more than that a month for smokes (I was a 1/2 pack a day but I did smoke Nat Sherman which are more expensive but are 100% tabbaco).

I have a problem with this bill, it doesn't go far enough! I want to see all Cigerettes 100% tabacco, I think this is one reason it was easy for me to quit, Chantix was the other. Tabacco is bad for you but all the additives are even worse for you.

In the perfect world you would be able to do anything you want and it wouldn't harm you but it's not a perfect world but we can require companies to not add more harm to us by using additives to keep their costs down and keep people addicted.

This bill should be more comprehensive and should have happened a long time ago. And for the people that say your taking my rights away, your right is to smoke real tabacco not the crap they are selling in the name of tabacco. This should not be a "R" VS "D" Bill and I am tired of politics always being thrown in, this is a human issue and what is good for your body and our kids bodies.

Stop hiding behind your political party's name and start caring for what's right and wrong!!!
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 June 22, 2009 5:21 PM EDT
Meanwhile back at the ranch Obama is about to make another "historical" moment. Double didget inflation and the highest unemployment in history. "I inherited it" is not making the cut anymore, your polls are falling day by day.
Reply to this comment
by Volksstimme June 22, 2009 6:19 PM EDT
Just another way to get people of the real problems..............
by ronjay June 22, 2009 5:05 PM EDT
I am a person who has neighbors who are a couple of chain smokers. I am a person who lived a year in an apartment where the former occupant chain-smoked for 11 years straight, so much so that the smell was permanently stuck in the walls and ceiling, and the smell thus transferred to my clothes and bed. I am a person who grew up in the East Coast, taking public transportation daily to go to school, who personally experienced the constant barrage of second-hand smoke on a daily basis.

To me, ANYTHING anti-smoking is welcome.

A right is not a right when it impinges upon the rights of others. I have a right to love without someone's second-hand smoke constantly invading my lungs. I can't even sit on my patio without their second-hand smoke dropping down onto me, reminding me that they have the "right" to do whatever they want.

This bill is not saying people cannot smoke; it's limiting the types of marketing, and deceptive and addiction promoting practices of Big Tobacco. Oversimplifying the truth of this bill into an excuse to rant about your rights being taken away is just as destructive as the cigarettes themselves.

How many people addicted to smoking, if they were offered an alternative (and harmless) "out" to smoking wouldn't take it? DO smokers REALLY enjoy being addicted to smoking? The only people that really benefit from smoking are the employees, shareholders, and principals of Big Tobacco.

In point of reality, this bill probably won't positively affect those of us who don't smoke, or have no kids, except maybe, 40 years from now, there might be less people sucking insurance dry from having health problems directly related to smoking, or second-hand smoke.
Reply to this comment
by June 22, 2009 4:57 PM EDT
It is a shame such a corrupt organization like the FDA has to get involved with a big problem like tobacco. Posted by Baileyccc
Reply to this comment
See all 55 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER