Obama Signs Anti-Smoking Bill Into Law

(AP)
"Each day, 1,000 young people under the age of 18 become new regular, daily smokers, and almost 90 percent of all smokers began at or before their 18th birthday," Mr. Obama said before signing the legislation. "I know; I was one of these teenagers. And so I know how difficult it can be to break this habit when it's been with you for a long time."
The bill puts tobacco under the authority of the Food And Drug Administration, which will now regulate tobacco as a drug. A new entity within the FDA – the Center for Tobacco Products – will oversee the regulation, and it will have the power to mandate lower nicotine levels in tobacco products.
The legislation also bans candy-flavored cigarettes by October 2009, requires the full disclosure to the FDA of all ingredients and additives in cigarettes by January 2010, bans youth-focused marketing of cigarettes (including sponsorship of sporting events and clothing and cigarette giveaways), prohibits the use of misleading terms like "light" and "mild" on tobacco products by July 2010, and mandates new and stronger warning labels on tobacco products by July 2011.
"Kids today don't just start smoking for no reason," the president said Monday. "They're aggressively targeted as customers by the tobacco industry. They're exposed to a constant and insidious barrage of advertising where they live, where they learn, and where they play. Most insidiously, they are offered products with flavorings that mask the taste of tobacco and make it even more tempting."
"Today, thanks to the work of Democrats and Republicans, health care and consumer advocates, the decades-long effort to protect our children from the harmful effects of tobacco has emerged victorious," he added. "Today, change has come to Washington."
The president noted that the legislation does not ban tobacco products, thus allowing "adults to make their own choices." But he said it would mean a reduction in "the number of American children who pick up a cigarette and become adult smokers."
Still, he said, "our work to protect our children and improve the public's health is not complete."
"Today, tobacco is the leading preventable cause of death not just in America, but also in the world," said Mr. Obama. "If current trends continue, 1 billion people will die from tobacco-related illnesses this century. And so the United States will continue to work with the World Health Organization and other nations to fight this epidemic on a global basis. But no matter how long or how hard this fight may be, what's happening today gives us hope."
He added that the bill passed "despite decades of lobbying and advertising by the tobacco industry."
"We're taking another big and very important step, a step that will save lives and dollars," said Mr. Obama.
A Gallup poll released in conjunction with the bill finding found that a majority of Americans oppose the new law. Fifty-two percent said they oppose the legislation while 46 percent support it, with disapproval particularly high among smokers. (For more on the debate over tobacco regulation, check out this "hot topic" post.)
Mr. Obama's predecessor, George W. Bush, opposed such legislation. Critics suggest the embattled FDA is not equipped to effectively regulate tobacco.
The secrets of tennis legend
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 55 CommentsNo-I don't smoke.
OBAMA IS INSANE! Just saw on the news, he is giving AMNESTY TO MILLIONS OF ILLEGALs! Unemployment is at it's highest and this idiot is doing this. This guy is a nut case from the word go, he is damaging this economy left and right.
Actually it isn't him that has damaged the economy. It's Bush and whoever else who allowed the illegal immigrants to enter the country in the first place. They already have your jobs and health care. Because there are so many, to try and hunt them down and deport them now, is going to take billions of dollars. You would be better off to maybe focus on stopping the flow. Stop anymore illegals from coming in.
His hippopotomus makes him obligated.. professionally.. to lack personal opinion.
______
ROTFLMMFAO!!!
Eddie's in rare form.
Tobacco is marketed to teenagers, because a rational thinking adult is not stupid enough to pick up such a nasty habit. Once they're hooked, tobacco companies have a customer for life. This is not a case of government making choices for citizens, but a case of the people fighting the power of companies who market a deadly product. Regulations are introduced in best practice to protect consumers, and in this case to keep young people from becoming consumers of this dangerous product, and to inform consumers of ingredients added to it.
What is the benefit of this product? Can anybody name just one true benefit? We can justify the existence of most products, but this is one that doesn't make sense. There is no defense for such a product, nor the advertising tactics of the companies that market it.
I can't wait until the Republicans are out of money to pay their bloggers. I'm tired of reading the comments left by these morons.
Since when does the majority NOT rule?
Welcome to Communism 101.
You are indeed the biggest hypocrite living on the face of the earth. But than again, we all know that all you care about is yourself and your desire to rule. Well Adolf Maobama, hopefully the voter starts getting you and will take appropriate actions in 2010 and 2012.
===================
Dude, you can STILL feed your kids cigarettes. Just keep them away from mine.
It was in the article. Did you bother to read it or just glance at the headline.
I don't smoke where non-smokers are. I understand but I ask where does it stop ?
I don't drink and later drive home. Am I asking for Big Brother to impose heavy taxes and new laws to make a six-pack go up to $ 20.00 ?
Am I asking the goverment to impose heavy dutys on wine or liquor ?
Just as many or more people get killed or maimed by drinking and I won''t even get into the family matters it poses.
Will we impose a perfume tax because you know....I have been in elevators where the guy is wearing enough musk to kill flys or that women is wearing enough cheap perfume to cause an explosion if I lit up.
The ones who are happy with this new law obviosly want the nanny state to get bigger and bigger because they want to feel like they know better.
I have a problem with this bill, it doesn't go far enough! I want to see all Cigerettes 100% tabacco, I think this is one reason it was easy for me to quit, Chantix was the other. Tabacco is bad for you but all the additives are even worse for you.
In the perfect world you would be able to do anything you want and it wouldn't harm you but it's not a perfect world but we can require companies to not add more harm to us by using additives to keep their costs down and keep people addicted.
This bill should be more comprehensive and should have happened a long time ago. And for the people that say your taking my rights away, your right is to smoke real tabacco not the crap they are selling in the name of tabacco. This should not be a "R" VS "D" Bill and I am tired of politics always being thrown in, this is a human issue and what is good for your body and our kids bodies.
Stop hiding behind your political party's name and start caring for what's right and wrong!!!
To me, ANYTHING anti-smoking is welcome.
A right is not a right when it impinges upon the rights of others. I have a right to love without someone's second-hand smoke constantly invading my lungs. I can't even sit on my patio without their second-hand smoke dropping down onto me, reminding me that they have the "right" to do whatever they want.
This bill is not saying people cannot smoke; it's limiting the types of marketing, and deceptive and addiction promoting practices of Big Tobacco. Oversimplifying the truth of this bill into an excuse to rant about your rights being taken away is just as destructive as the cigarettes themselves.
How many people addicted to smoking, if they were offered an alternative (and harmless) "out" to smoking wouldn't take it? DO smokers REALLY enjoy being addicted to smoking? The only people that really benefit from smoking are the employees, shareholders, and principals of Big Tobacco.
In point of reality, this bill probably won't positively affect those of us who don't smoke, or have no kids, except maybe, 40 years from now, there might be less people sucking insurance dry from having health problems directly related to smoking, or second-hand smoke.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 55 Comments