Political Hotsheet
June 8, 2009 1:12 PM

GOP Senators Send Letter Opposing Public Plan

(AP/CBS/iStockphoto)
A letter sent to President Obama on Monday from a key group of Republican senators highlights the seemingly intractable differences Republicans and Democrats will have to overcome to achieve bipartisan health care reform.

Nine of the ten Republicans from the Senate Finance Committee, one of the two panels responsible for health care legislation, wrote to Mr. Obama to express their opposition to a government-sponsored health insurance plan -- or a "public option." The only Republican senator from the committee who refrained from signing the letter is moderate Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine).

"At a time when major government programs like Medicare and Medicaid are already on a path to fiscal insolvency, creating a brand new government program will not only worsen our long term financial outlook but also negatively impact American families who enjoy the private coverage of their choice," the letter says. "Forcing free market plans to compete with these government-run programs would create an unlevel playing field and inevitably doom true competition."

The letter conveyed a concern of many conservatives -- that a public option would utlimately lead to a "federal government takeover of our healthcare system."

The senators cite a recent Lewin Group study, which showed that a public plan using Medicare payment levels could result in a shift of coverage -- private coverage could decline by 119.1 million as people voluntarily move from private to public coverage. The letter says the plan would "result in 119.1 million Americans losing their private coverage."

The senators also cite the recent Milliman study, which estimated that the cost-shifting from government payers (specifically Medicare and Medicaid) costs families with private insurance nearly $1800 more per year. The study was prepared at the request of America's Health Insurance Plans, the American Hospital Association, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and Premera Blue Cross.

The public option is one of the most contentious pieces of the health care legislation currently under discussion; Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, began circulating a draft last week of his committee's bill, which includes a public plan, among other significant changes to the nation's health care. President Obama last week said he "strongly supports" the public plan.

While Republicans are strongly opposed to the proposal, the leaders of four prominent Democratic groups in Congress have said their support for health care legislation hinges on the inclusion of a public plan.

The goals of health care reform -- expanded access, improved quality and reduced costs -- are shared by both Democrats and Republicans. In their letter, the senators say "ensuring access to affordable, quality and portable health care for every American is not a Republican or Democrat issue - it is an American issue."

As lawmakers work out the details of the legislation, however, cooperation may prove difficult, as evidenced by the impassioned remarks on Twitter from Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, regarding President Obama's leadership on the issue.

"Pres Obama you got nerve while u sightseeing in Paris to tell us 'time to deliver' on health care. We still on skedul/even workinWKEND," Grassley tweeted.
Tags:
health care ,
Senate Finance Committee ,
public option
Topics:
Health Care
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 73 Comments
by OregonJames June 15, 2009 7:28 AM EDT
Yep, nine out of ten republicans are against ANYTHING Obama supports. What a surprise!
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 10, 2009 7:41 AM EDT
The Institute of Medicine estimates that one-third of all medical care is pure waste, such as duplicate X-rays, repeat lab tests and procedures to fix mistakes.

"Most Americans don't understand how bad health care in the United States is," said Michael F. Cannon, head of health policy at the libertarian Cato Institute. "We need big reforms."
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 10, 2009 7:40 AM EDT
If you want an example of government run health care, just look at the VA system, look at the medicare mess.

Posted by jsd330
-----------------------

Typical republican't argument pointing out the symptoms of the health care debacle we've let the for-profit health care industry run for years, giving us the over-priced poorly-ranked current system, but never giving us any SOLUTIONS on fixing the huge problem. It's been the republican't obstructionists keeping us from any reform of our health care mess, and protecting the for-profit insurance companies that have increased health care costs by 130% in just the past 10 years, while denying coverage to those in need.
Reply to this comment
by eroosevelt08 June 9, 2009 11:23 PM EDT
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, regarding President Obama's leadership on the issue:

"Pres Obama you got nerve while u sightseeing in Paris to tell us 'time to deliver' on health care. We still on skedul/even workinWKEND," Grassley tweeted.

Iowa Senator Charles Grassley should be ashamed of himself.

As a Senator who has run on family values Senator Chuck Grassley should not begrudge a President who is working so hard for the people of this country some fun time with his family.

Did Senator Grassley miss all of the work our President did on the other parts of his trip? Does he honestly expect any of us to believe that President Obama is lazy?????

Maybe Grassley has been in the Senate too long. He has had his entire Senate career: since 1980 to fix the health care mess.


He should resign and make way for somebody else with the stamina to do the job to sit in his place.
Reply to this comment
by jsd330 June 9, 2009 3:45 PM EDT
If you want an example of government run health care, just look at the VA system, look at the medicare mess. You will be paying for your so called free Government healthcare in higher taxes. Nothing is free somebody is going to have to pay one way or another.
Reply to this comment
by bajajohn1 June 9, 2009 2:39 PM EDT
I heard the news conference in opposition from those Republican's Senators who sleep with insurance executives. The most striking aspect of their comments were to quote," We have not seen the plan yet." but, they are unanimous in their opposition. Can anyone believe those Republican Munchkins when they oppose a health plan they have not even seen? Is it it any wonder they are disliked by the vast majority of Americans?
Reply to this comment
by inesje88 June 9, 2009 2:08 PM EDT
Our elected officials, including the Republicans, are on a government health plan. If they do not like a government option , let them buy it in the free markets know as the health insurance corporation cartel. They work for us . Since when does the employee have a more comprehensive health plan than the employer. There is no divine right of elected American politicians to enjoy platinum health care at very little cost to themselves and family while hard working Americans forgo care because their employer had to drop their coverage to stay in business or they can not afford the ever increasing deductables.

Every American deserves the same coverage as the elected officials in DC do. May of them have received large donations from health care corporations and they don't want the gravy train to derail.

Single payer is the only way to acheive everybody in nobody out. This includes you elected officials.
Reply to this comment
by steeepe June 9, 2009 12:53 PM EDT
Of course they oppose it -- there's no profit for them or their business cronies in any government plan. It's all about money. Health has nothing to do with it.
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 12:38 PM EDT
There's only one solution to our problems... vote the rest of the obstructionist republicans out of office.
Posted by wogerwabbit
--------------------------

Actually, for them to continue to rail against any and all reform of the for-profit health care debacle, I can think of other things I'd like to do to these obstructionist republican'ts well past just voting them out of office! <big grin>
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 12:34 PM EDT
My business is being destroyed by health insurance costs. My premium just went up 13%... which I must admit is better than the 20% it went up each of the previous 3 years. Health Insurance companies are just useless, paper pushing middlemen. Get rid of them and our premiums would go down at last 30%.

Posted by wogerwabbit
----------------------------

Why exactly does the party of NO continue to fail to see the 130% increase in health care premiums just over the past 10 years?

It's not just the huge profits and huge CEO pay, benefits and golden parachutes as well as huge administrative costs, but the huge amount of MONEY that the health care industry is spending on lobbying against any reform or competition including all the congresscritters getting a nice piece of the pie to keep the status quo!

This is and has been totally disgusting for decades, and anyone that continues to support our high cost of very poor health care delivery is just a scuumbaag!
Reply to this comment
by wogerwabbit June 9, 2009 12:14 PM EDT
But the ONE thing he IS interested in is destroying US businesses...you can bet your bottom boots that's what motivating him so as to put insurance companies out of business.
Posted by IThoughtItWasFunnyAgain at 8:46 AM : Jun 9, 2009

My business is being destroyed by health insurance costs. My premium just went up 13%... which I must admit is better than the 20% it went up each of the previous 3 years. Health Insurance companies are just useless, paper pushing middlemen. Get rid of them and our premiums would go down at last 30%.
Reply to this comment
by wogerwabbit June 9, 2009 12:06 PM EDT
There's only one solution to our problems... vote the rest of the obstructionist republicans out of office.
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 12:03 PM EDT
The Institute of Medicine estimates that one-third of all medical care is pure waste, such as duplicate X-rays, repeat lab tests and procedures to fix mistakes.

"Most Americans don't understand how bad health care in the United States is," said Michael F. Cannon, head of health policy at the libertarian Cato Institute. "We need big reforms."
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 11:56 AM EDT
He doesn't give a flip about your health care

Posted by texassanna
--------------------------

Nah.....it's the GOP that doesn't care about reforming the health care debacle, where the for-profit insurance companies have increased costs 130% in 10 years!
Reply to this comment
by Oregon_State_OSU June 9, 2009 11:30 AM EDT
What does GOP Stand For ?

Got Zero Plans = Got NO Plans = G0P !

Got No Plans, NO PLANS & NO PLANS !
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 11:24 AM EDT
(Lewin Group is) part of Ingenix, which is owned by United Healthcare Group, the insurance behemoth that has been buying up insurance companies left and right, expanding its reach into just about every segment of the health-insurance market. Its flagship, UnitedHealthcare, helps make it the largest health insurer in the country. It's a safe bet that United is not too keen on a public plan that might shrink its business.

-------------------------------

United Health CEO earned $124.8 million in 2005

Forbes magazine reports that William W. McGuire, CEO of UnitedHealth Group) received compensation of $124.8 million in 2005. Managed Care Magazine also says that the average executive compensation (excluding unexercised stock options) for an executive of a ?top 10 for profit health plan? was $11.7 million and that was back in 2000.

Are these high salaries good for the welfare of American citizens, especially knowing that health care costs have risen a whopping 130% in the past 10 years?
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 11:10 AM EDT
"The (GOP) senators cite a recent Lewin Group study, which showed that a public plan using Medicare payment levels could result in a shift of coverage -- private coverage could decline by 119.1 million as people voluntarily move from private to public coverage."

-------------------------------

Of course the GOP senators would use the Lewin study done by the largest health insurance company -- United Health Care -- the most biased information available.

----------------

Lewin group linked to private insurers

In the Columbia Journalism Review, Trudy Lieberman, president of AHCJ?s board of directors, scolded journalists for not mentioning that Lewin Group, the consultants who released a recent study claiming that a public insurance option would cost doctors and hospitals money, is ultimately part of a major insurance company.

(Lewin Group is) part of Ingenix, which is owned by United Healthcare Group, the insurance behemoth that has been buying up insurance companies left and right, expanding its reach into just about every segment of the health-insurance market. Its flagship, UnitedHealthcare, helps make it the largest health insurer in the country. It?s a safe bet that United is not too keen on a public plan that might shrink its business.

The relationship is disclosed in the study and Lieberman turned up evidence indicating that there may be no formal protections in place for Lewin Group?s editorial independence. She wondered why journalists, particularly those behind a widely used AP story, did not provide readers with any information or context on Lewin?s insurance industry ties and called on reporters to remedy their error next time Lewin Group comes up.
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 11:03 AM EDT
On average, Americans receive the recommended, proven care 55 percent of the time, according to Rand studies. Sometimes, doctors or nurses overlook a basic but critical step, such as prescribing a beta blocker medication to patients after a heart attack, a therapy shown to significantly reduce the risk of a fatal attack. At other times, patients undergo procedures when there is no evidence that they are any better than a simpler, cheaper alternative.

Ten years ago, in its landmark report "To Err is Human," the Institute of Medicine estimated that 44,000 to 98,000 people die each year from medical mistakes, highlighting the need for improvement. Since then, the tally has risen, said Janet Corrigan, president of the National Quality Forum, a nonprofit membership organization that promotes quality standards.

"We now know estimates of those who die from hospital-acquired infections is upwards of 100,000," she said. "Many of those, if not most, are avoidable and preventable."

www.washingtonpost.com
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 11:01 AM EDT
gop senators oppose obama's plan: now that's newsworthy! republicans stand solely for obstruction. they have no new ideas to offer.

Posted by bigsk8fan
------------------------

Said Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.): "What's tragic is that so much of this spending is on duplicative or unnecessary care that doesn't improve health outcomes."

Simply put, the goal of health reform is to finally get our money's worth, say industry leaders, policymakers, consumers and business executives.

They envision a health-care system that guarantees a basic level of care for everyone, shifts the emphasis to wellness and prevention, minimizes errors, and reduces unnecessary and unproved treatment. Such a system would coordinate care, track patients and doctor performance electronically, and reward good results. The high-value system of the future would be organized "so that people get the care they need and need the care they get," said Elizabeth A. McGlynn, associate director of the health research division of Rand Corp.

Nowadays, that is often not the case.

www.washingtonpost.com
Reply to this comment
by cydygitt1 June 9, 2009 10:56 AM EDT
I would like GOP supporters to tell me what the GOP is for regarding health care reform. So far, they opose a single payer plan and a public option.

Posted by joe1963v
-----------------------

The party of NO is just against everything and any type of reform, yet cannot offer any viable plans to help in our health care debacle. The GOP has NO NEW IDEAS or SOLUTIONS for anything -- especially for health care.

Health care costs have risen 130% in the past 10 years, yet the GOP doesn't see a problem with their profits!

-------------------------

Yet more care rarely translates into better health. Extensive research by Dartmouth College has found the exact opposite: Health outcomes are often best in communities that spend less compared with cities such as Boston and Miami where the medical arms race of specialists and high-tech gadgets often leads to greater risks and injuries.

The Institute of Medicine estimates that one-third of all medical care is pure waste, such as duplicate X-rays, repeat lab tests and procedures to fix mistakes.

"Most Americans don't understand how bad health care in the United States is," said Michael F. Cannon, head of health policy at the libertarian Cato Institute. "We need big reforms."

www.washingtonpost.com
Reply to this comment
See all 73 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER