Political Hotsheet
June 5, 2009 11:33 AM

"Wise Latina" May Still Be A Problem For Sotomayor

(AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
While the White House has insisted President Obama's Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor simply chose her words poorly when she said in a 2001 speech that a "wise Latina woman" would make "better" judicial decisions than a white male, records of her past show that her language on the subject has been consistent throughout the years.

The White House on Thursday turned in boxes of Sotomayor's speeches and other materials, along with a 172-page questionnaire she filled out, to the Senate. The documentation of the judge's remarks may prolong the debate over her take on "identity politics." Sotomayor made a number of similar statements to her now well-known comment from a 2001 commencement speech between 1994 and 2003, Congressional Quarterly reports.

Some senators have said this week they are still questioning Sotomayor's judicial approach to race, even as some of her strongest detractors have backed down from their harshest criticisms of her.

After meeting with Sotomayor on Thursday, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said he hopes to hold respectful confirmation hearings for her, though he could not rule out a filibuster of her nomination, according to the Dallas Morning News.

"My own view is that I hope that will not be necessary, but we won't know that until we get farther into the process," he said.

Cornyn told the Dallas Morning News he was still concerned with her "wise Latina" comments, as well as her 2008 ruling against a group of white firefighters from New Haven, Conn. who were denied a promotion.

"That begins to concern me and that raises legitimate concerns about identity politics and whether justice is truly colorblind, or whether people really do believe that judges – based on their sex or ethnicity or their race – can render better decisions than others," Cornyn said. "There will be more questions about that."

Concerns about Sotomayor's comments are coming from the left side of the aisle as well. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Thursday said he "dared" any of his fellow Democrats to vote against Sotomayor's nomination, Roll Call reported; moderate Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) recently said her comments are "troubling."

"What I want to do is have her explain to me what she meant by that and give her an opportunity to satisfy me that she doesn’t intend to take an agenda to the bench," Nelson said.
Tags:
Sonia Sotomayor ,
rac
Topics:
Sonia Sotomayor
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 217 Comments
by Quiana50 June 12, 2009 10:40 PM EDT
Sotomayor never flat out and said she was better or wiser than white men! Out of fear and hate, the twisted minds of her critics misinterpreted and misconstrued her statement. Some probably lived relatively normal lives and didn't have to struggle and sacrifice and therefore don't fully understand and appreciate different people or feel their pain and suffering. Because of their lack of empathy, they should only be looking at her education and experience on the bench and not be ignorantly stereotyping her gender and race. But I must say, her being a double minority should add a fresh perspective and more insightfulness (wisdom) to the U.S. Supreme Court. It's only natural that our challenging experiences affect our lives and decisions and shape our uniqueness. Even though I find her somewhat conservative, I will be happy to finally see a brown face on this high court! President Obama did promise us diversity (and fairness), didn't he?
Reply to this comment
by number1GI June 8, 2009 5:29 PM EDT
I dont like anybody very much
Reply to this comment
by jedi0849 June 7, 2009 4:38 AM EDT
God I love Reverse Racism. Thats how we ended up electing Obama's teleprompter. Now were stuck with it for the next four years.
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 June 6, 2009 9:44 PM EDT
If Latinos / Latinas are so wise, how come all the countries they are in charge of are such sheeyitholes?
Posted by johnb8888 at 4:08 PM : Jun 6, 2009
============================

Not all the countries.

Spain is doing fairly well.
Reply to this comment
by ralpherus June 6, 2009 7:14 PM EDT
With all the fuss about needing to appoint latinos or blacks, or women- of any race but white- to the bench- I have to ask- do you all think that a latina will pass judgments on cases thus: You are innocent! You are not white! GO free Amigo! Or: you, being white, cannot prove a damned thing to this court that would justify being compensated for the alleged crime against you...???? Really- if that is your mindset, you need to sober up! That, even if tried, would not last long.
Reply to this comment
by funslideds June 6, 2009 7:06 PM EDT
They've stricken the phrase "wise Latina woman."

Grammatical shame on Sonia Sotomayor for employing such a redundancy.

"Latina" is the female counterpart of "Latino."
Posted by erb0087 at 2:05 PM : Jun 6, 2009

-----------------------------------

If this comment, whatever the exact words were, is the worst thing about her, then she doesn't seem too bad to me.
Reply to this comment
by ramos1129 June 6, 2009 7:05 PM EDT
OK.....so she made the remark. Never mind that the remark is mischaracterized when a rational person reads the entire speech. If this is the worse, she has done, then she is a soo in for confirmation.

Now for a shocker......I am very very pleasantly surprised as to the position of the GOP Senators. Each one of them has committed to a fair hearing for Judge Sotomayer. None of them have been listening to the wishes of Rush/Hannity/Nwet/ other right wring nut cases.

Bravo.....
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 June 6, 2009 5:09 PM EDT
"Wise Latina woman"...

That's like saying, "I hope the male man brings my package today."
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 June 6, 2009 5:05 PM EDT
"Wise Latina" May Still Be A Problem For Sotomayor
================================

They've stricken the phrase "wise Latina woman."

Grammatical shame on Sonia Sotomayor for employing such a redundancy.

"Latina" is the female counterpart of "Latino."
Reply to this comment
by funslideds June 6, 2009 4:56 PM EDT
It's better that if she was an "UN-wise Latina"!
Posted by funslideds at 1:14 PM : Jun 6, 2009

Maybe she isn't so wise?
Posted by alanrobisch at 1:32 PM : Jun 6, 2009

My point, yes, point, is that the whole "Wise-Latina" REmark is like, who cares?? It's kinda funny, I think.
Reply to this comment
by randomlybanned June 6, 2009 4:36 PM EDT
Dr. Dan, that is the reason that the rhetoric against her has become so much louder these past few days. The state-run media do not know if she is pro-abortion so they are no longer content to sit idly by during the confirmation process. God forbid if she is pro-life!
Reply to this comment
by funslideds June 6, 2009 4:14 PM EDT
So, she's a "Wise Latina".

It's better that if she was an "UN-wise Latina"!
Reply to this comment
by Dr Dan 123 June 6, 2009 3:49 PM EDT
If she is pro-life let her serve
Reply to this comment
by HolyVoice June 6, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
Sotomayor's remarks are most definitely sexist and racist, by sheer definition of those words. Those remarks, made several times over a long period of years, would easily be construed by a jury as a belief pattern.
Posted by gunndee3 at 7:59 AM : Jun 6, 2009

And there's the point, that remarks made several times can be considered part of the institutional bias that still plays a part in our American ways. Can you imagine, in certain parts of the Western States where the use of "dumb mexican" is commonly used to characterize anyone with dark skin? Why would it not be good to reverse this bias with a counter of "wise Latina," which would balance an insult with a compliment?

In context of the diversity for which the speech was designed, building one's position seems to be a more than wise approach.
Reply to this comment
by 1notrub11 June 6, 2009 2:25 PM EDT
The focus on whether the nominee is latino (or any other particular race or creed) is misguided. Nominations should be made based on qualifications and performance. The political influence on nominations is, unfortunately, unavoidable - except in the ideal.
Both the nominee's words and deeds have undermined her potential appointment. We should move on to a better vetted candidate - maybe the administration's vetting team should be reconfigured, based on their success record. And regardless of whether there is undue depth of focus on a candidate for any office, it should have been anticipated and nominees selected accordingly.
Reply to this comment
by rbstrcklnd June 6, 2009 1:55 PM EDT
Sotomayor would be disqualified as a juror.
Reply to this comment
by SAMTORRES66 June 6, 2009 12:55 PM EDT
Limbaugh for supreme court justice..........
Reply to this comment
by myopinionpal June 6, 2009 11:59 AM EDT
My question is are thease the same people on this message board that attended campaign rallies for Sarah Palin, Hillary Clinton in which racist words were spoken towards Pres. Obama. Now who is racist!!!
Reply to this comment
by gunndee3 June 6, 2009 10:59 AM EDT
Sotomayor's remarks are most definitely sexist and racist, by sheer definition of those words. Those remarks, made several times over a long period of years, would easily be construed by a jury as a belief pattern. Throw in the firefighter ruling and you have a belief pattern manifested in a ruling from the bench that is patently discriminatory and destined for unanimous overturn by the Supreme Court. Obama's nominees since taking office have certainly come to the court of public opinion in dirty clothes. The nomination of Sotomayor is another unfortunate reflection on the administration's poor vetting. Other, highly qualified, centric latinos and latinas could have and should have filled the nomination slot that Sotomayor now occupies. She'll be impeached within 3 years of being seated, because her underlying beliefisms are racist and sexist. Sen. Reid needs to stop threatening his equals with "I dare yous". It's not a mature, respectful statement for a leader to make.
Reply to this comment
by sdemaggie June 6, 2009 10:38 AM EDT
Considering her comments with regard to considering herself above whites and males is consistent over several years the conclusion is she is both a racist and anti-male. Her past comments show she is a bigot. She is not a suitable candidate for the Supreme Court. The sooner she withdraws her nomination the better.
Reply to this comment
See all 217 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER