Donald Rumsfeld's Holy War

(GQ)
In what appears to be a callous effort by Rumsfeld to cater to President George W. Bush's religious fervor, the fiery Pentagon leader sent the president daily briefings on the war's progress headlined Worldwide Intelligence Update, which often included Bible passages on the cover paired with striking images.
In one report, a brilliant orange sun beams down on a U.S. tank in the desert beneath a passage from the Book of Ephesians reading, "Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand."
The majority of the article, however, depicts a man fiercely territorial of his turf, employing a "my way or the highway" attitude. That was sometimes to the detriment of the U.S. military and the country, and included a week-long hesitation to release troops to Louisiana in order to keep order amid post-Hurricane Katrina chaos.
"No one," a former official told GQ, "threw sand in the gears like Rumsfeld."
Rumsfeld "was cynically playing the religious angle to seduce and manipulate a president who frequently quoted the Bible," said liberal commentator Frank Rich in the New York Times in response to the story. "But the secretary’s actions were not just oily; he was also taking a risk with national security. If these official daily collages of Crusade-like messaging and war imagery had been leaked, they would have reinforced the Muslim world’s apocalyptic fear that America was waging a religious war."
To read the full article by Robert Draper, click here.
To view more of Rumsfeld's daily war briefings, click here.
And here are two more briefing covers, via GQ:

(GQ)

(GQ)
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 14
- next
See all 277 CommentsI know Cheney misses military command as a civilian, after all he served many years as DoD Secretary.
The cruelty of the enhanced interrogations will be something this nation will have to live with forever.
Obama's refusal to advance with any form of a prosecution towards Cheney does serve very effectively to keep the GOP stuck in the political mud. Going forward with prosecution will allow the GOP to free itself from a trap they don't enjoy.
Probably the worst thing that historians will say about Bush and Cheney is that there is agreement that their conduct was no better than their opponent - Osama Bin Laden. In WW-II, the world saw Stalin square off against Hitler, but Churchill was in a different class with a leadership that was iconic. The USA lost its chance to produce a leader who would match Churchill, until Obama arrived. Obama just might pull it off.
Christian dominated politics is something most citizens of this nation doesn't want. They don't want Muslim, Jewish, or any other religion dominating the political steering wheel.
I am in favor of shutting down all forms of religion who speak out politically and demonize anyone.
THEIR actions will---hopefully---go down as America's lowest point in history!
The second lowest will be the failure to prosecute them for all the terrible things they have done!
IF we cannot have justice in America any more, then let us record their evil deeds, but forget them---and their presence amongst---for the remainder of their unholy, evil lives!
****************************************
Bush is mentally unstable and these guys, Cheney, Rumsfeld, played him like a violin. Very, very, scary, stuff.
Posted by raflin1
And did ya ever notice that his suits didn't fit him?
Posted by jonesjep at 11:57 AM : May 18, 2009
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sure, elected officials enjoy the same rights, but they also *voluntarily* assume additional restrictions on those rights when they agree to accept an elected position to a public office.
So says the US Constitution.
Elected politicians are expected (and obligated) to put the needs and desires of their constituents ahead of their own personal religious beliefs or agenda, without exception, when it comes to official business. They are elected to serve the people, not some religion.
They are certainly entitled to "Free Expression of their Religion" -- but *only* on their own time, and *only* on their own dime, NOT while "serving the public" in their capacity as an elected official, and certainly not while punched-in on the government pay time clock.
I have no complaints about an elected official practising his or her religion on their own time, but if they are proselytizing their personal religious beliefs while performing their elected duties, we, the people, can invoke the protections against such activities that are clearly written into our Constitution to put an end to it.
The Constitutional prohibition against attempting to establish or promote a "State religion" ALWAYS trumps the individual's right of freedom of religious expression once that individual voluntarily agrees to accept a position in government and is working on the taxpayers tab.
In other words: you're required to "check your personal religious views at the door" before you enter the halls of government for the purpose of conducting official government business in your capacity as an elected representative of the people.
In fact, that fundamental restriction applies to everybody working on government time, elected or not, including members of the military, etc.
If you don't like that restriction then simply don't run for public office, or attempt to preach your religious views while working on government time, and it won't apply to you.
.
"Fun"? Nobody's laughing.
"Bush and Rumsfeld only won the Iraq war and defeated al-qaeda because of their faith in GOD."
This is "winning"? Over 4,000 needlessly dead Americans, perhaps a million dead innocent Iraqi civilians, and a price tag that may ultimately exceed 3 TRILLION dollars.
The only real "defeat" we've had in this war was SELF defeat.
Posted by BaghdadsHere_16 at 12:16 PM : May 18,
Since when? That's right, you just make it up as you go because, after all, you're not very good at this.
How many times have you been banned?
I give you the Constutution which is DEVOID of religious endorsement.
And your "blistering" comeback is about speed limits.
Not very bright are you? ----------------- Posted by formrusmcsgt
No, if I were bright, I never would have gotten into a conversation with a flaming idiot such as yourself.
Posted by BaghdadsHere_16 at 12:16 PM : May 18, 2009
Being illiterate must be a challenge.
The currency doesn't say "We believe in God", it says "In God We Trust".......
Thanks, all.
As always, a pleasure.
Would you care to make a point about the way in which OUR U.S. Government conducts itsself TODAY ? ? ?
Posted by DaVicar5 at 12:14 PM : May 18, 2009
You cite rituals as proof that our government is not secular.
I give you the Constutution which is DEVOID of religious endorsement.
And your "blistering" comeback is about speed limits.
Not very bright are you?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 14
- next
See all 277 Comments