Political Hotsheet
May 3, 2009 7:49 PM

Edwards' Good News: He's Not Prez

(AP )
Like any politician with higher ambitions, John Edwards naturally was disappointed to abandon his quest to become the Democratic presidential nominee in 2008. But sometimes, you win by losing. How so? Well, consider what an Edwards administration would be dealing with right now.

To be sure, Iraq, Afghanistan and the economy would remain high on the agenda. But had history turned out otherwise and Edwards been installed as the nation's 44th President, his administration would today be scrambling to ward off the political version of DEFCON 1.

In August 2008, Edwards, who by then had dropped out as a contender for his party's top prize, acknowledged having conducted a 2006 affair with Rielle Hunter, a video producer who worked with his campaign. But on Sunday, the Charlotte News and Observer reported that federal prosecutors are investigating whether any of Edwards' campaign funds wound up getting used as hush money. The federal probe reportedly focuses on money donated to the campaign by nonprofit organizations, as well as whether Edwards used some of the funds to hide his affair.

In a statement, Edwards acknowledged having knowledge of the investigation, but insisted that everything had been above board.
"I am confident that no funds from my campaign were used improperly," Edwards said in a statement to the newspaper. "However, I know that it is the role of government to ensure that this is true. We have made available to the United States both the people and the information necessary to help them get the issue resolved efficiently and in a timely matter."

Still, this story is going to prove irresistible for the 24 x 7 bloviation-fest that is cable television. And it would be even more so were Edwards inhabiting the Oval Office. Consider the following elements in the Reporter & Observer piece:"A review of Edwards' campaign money will turn up a cluster of nonprofits, some not subject to the same rules of transparency as official campaign organizations. Records of one that does disclose donors, the Alliance for a New America, show that Edwards' 2008 campaign got a huge boost from a single source: $3.48 million from a holding company for Rachel "Bunny" Lambert Mellon, a 98-year-old matriarch of the late industrialist Andrew Mellon's family."

"Records show that Hunter was paid by a political action committee aligned with Edwards. She received $114,000 to film Edwards as he hopscotched the nation to rally crowds in the fight against poverty. She followed him to Uganda, where he met with starving children orphaned by attacks by rebel forces. Her "webisodes" live still on the Internet."


"The investigation is being conducted by the office of U.S. Attorney George Holding, and a federal grand jury could consider evidence. Holding, a Republican based in Raleigh, declined to comment on Edwards. Holding has helped prosecute several prominent Democrats."


What's more, next week, a memoir, "Resilience: Reflections on the Burdens and Gifts of Facing Life's Adversities," by Edwards' wife, Elisabeth, who is terminally ill with cancer, will go on sale. Among other things, Edwards recounts her reaction to her husband's admission that he had an affair.

Even if ultimately, there's no "there" there, this story was punctuated by sex, politics, money and spousal betrayal. Recall that when the Monica Lewinsky story broke in January 1998, the major U.S. media outlets, which were in Cuba to follow the Pope's historic visit, abandoned Havana to rush back to Washington. Is there any reason to believe that it wouldn't behave similarly again?

Tags:
Edwards ,
Presidency ,
Clinton ,
Lewinsky
Topics:
In The News
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by tibu987 May 4, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
What?

Edwards is a cheat, corrupt to the heart, pro-entitlement politician, egotist, whose only goal was his self-aggrandizement.

Sounds like all the other Washington pols to me.
Reply to this comment
by banders6 May 4, 2009 1:11 PM EDT
Why would the media write about Edwards affair if he was prez, they don't write about BO and Vera Bakers affair.
Reply to this comment
by dagrandma May 4, 2009 12:51 PM EDT
"And how many libs wanted this man to be vice president 4 years ago? "
Posted by jwind1 at 7:57 AM : May 4, 2009

I certainly did. And I'd still take him as vice president in lieu of Dick Cheney.
Reply to this comment
by flreason May 4, 2009 12:48 PM EDT
Perhaps some of you conservatives who are gloating should recall Newt Gingrich's sanctimonious railing against Clinton while he was having his own affair. Or his failure to pay child support. Not to mention Vitter and Craig. Sex scandals and politics are reliable bed-fellows, no matter which political ideology you subscribe to...almost as predictable as political payola by business-labor interests. Power corrupts...you know the rest of that truism.
Reply to this comment
by Riteaidbob3 May 4, 2009 12:17 PM EDT
Hypocrit thy name is LIBERAL Democrat...
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 May 4, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
An practice Obama has continued in his Appointment's he seeming has an preference for being surrounded by crooks!
Posted by american_11-2009 at 7:06 AM : May 4, 2009


Most lawyers do. to them, crooks are not criminals...they are colleagues, raison d'etre...and financial opportunities.

Would an oil man hate gas stations or not want to hang around---be surrounded by sheiks? LOL
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 May 4, 2009 11:46 AM EDT
here is a difference between Bill Clinton's affair and Edwards. Hunter followed Edwards to Uganda whereas Lewinsky didn't follow Clinton. It was a one time affair. Lewinsky did not get herself pregnant because it happened to be oral sex. But Edwards was keeping this woman and paying her big sums of money. His wife had known about the affair before the public and should have left him then.
Posted by mariannpepit at 5:45 AM : May 4, 2009


You really don't know much about the Lewinsky scandal now do you? It was not a one time affair...Monica and Bill had numerous trysts and yes, Monica did follow Bill to rallies and other events (though it appears not out of the country) the trial hinged on a lie about ONE of the events and that events evidence, but it was more than one time and not all just oral of the former Prez. As for Edwards--this is a non story--news cycle must be pretty lame when real journalists are reduced to "yeah..but what if " stories.

and we have no idea who the baby daddy is. If Hunter won't demand it and Edwards does not question it--then like Bristol and Levi and baby Trig--there will always be questions on who the baby's parents really are.
Reply to this comment
by biggcheese1 May 4, 2009 11:33 AM EDT
I always thought John Edwards was as phony as a 3.6 dollar bill. Hey, I was right. I also believe Barack Obama will go down in history as one of the two or three greatest presidents. Time will tell. Rock on!
Reply to this comment
by Sam3300 May 4, 2009 11:32 AM EDT
The value in getting to the bottom of this narcissist's betrayal is to send a message that contrary to the ego maniac's mind set, they must be accountable and they should think before they cheat. Perhaps getting caught in public will remind others of the pain and destruction they cause and that is if the spouse doesn't have cancer! This guy is a pig, pure and simple as is Hunter.
Reply to this comment
by goosfraba2 May 4, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
Brownermustgo at 5:31 AM : May 4, 2009

LOL. Excellent post, Brownermustgo.
Reply to this comment
by jwind1 May 4, 2009 10:57 AM EDT
And how many libs wanted this man to be vice president 4 years ago?
Reply to this comment
by pensacola8-2009 May 4, 2009 10:54 AM EDT
The problem with accepting campaign donations by a PAC that is evangelical or idealist based, is they expect their candidate to be able to talk their talk and walk their walk.

Human behavior can not be legislated into compliance. Morality can not be legislated. Walking the narrow road for an evangelical and accepting campaign contributions is asking too much.

Frankly, I love our system where anyone can take money from evangelical interests. It's free money and easier thank taking candy from a baby.

For every good heart ready to hand out a dollar, there is a wicked one with a hand ready to take the dollar.

When will the evangelicals ever learn and stop trying to influence our politics?

I don't thnk they could ever learn. Edwards is proof of that.

Giving and taking an evangelical dollar guarantees that a campaign will include the most naive minded voter possible.
Reply to this comment
by jenkins501 May 4, 2009 10:43 AM EDT
This is last years news. Could we all move on now. It is between Edwards and his wife, period. I really don't care what they do. Edwards is not the first man to do this nor will he be the last. Men love the chase............................
Reply to this comment
by ramos1129 May 4, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
Does anyone remember how John announced his candidacy? His people rounded up a number of NO young folks and hired them for a day long photo-op. When John arrived in his limo, he was wearing new jeans and new workshirt with new work shoes. He was shown, with the youngsters, moving boards. He stopped to talk about poverty and how to eliminate it. Not one hair on his bushy mane was out of place. This in a very humid day. Once the networks had their pieces, the youngsters were paid off and John hopped into his limo for the airport.

Does anyone remember Elizabeth's emotional statements of support even to the point of bracing Ann Coulter. Elizabeth swore that John was the most wonderful of husbands. But, she already knew about John's affair as she testifies to in her book.

John and Elizabeth deserve each other.
Reply to this comment
by drputt45 May 4, 2009 10:21 AM EDT
Move along folks, nothing to see here. This man is not a Republican, therefore, we cannot burn him.
Reply to this comment
by american_11-2009 May 4, 2009 10:06 AM EDT
Well voters have scrapped the bottom of barrel in having anyone worthy of voting for as President. The choice between McAmnesty and someone that made an habit of hanging around racist hate preaching preachers, terrorist, crooks and other low life's, was not much to choose from...An practice Obama has continued in his Appointment's he seeming has an preference for being surrounded by crooks!
Reply to this comment
by mariannpepit May 4, 2009 8:45 AM EDT
I cannot understand her reason for not leaving him since he has a child out of wedlock that Hunter won't acknowledge. And Edwards is not the first man she went with only this time she got pregnant. He endorsed Obama because he thought he would be chosen as the VP. Thank goodness he is out of the political field and I am sure he will not be acceptable to make speeches again. There is a difference between Bill Clinton's affair and Edwards. Hunter followed Edwards to Uganda whereas Lewinsky didn't follow Clinton. It was a one time affair. Lewinsky did not get herself pregnant because it happened to be oral sex. But Edwards was keeping this woman and paying her big sums of money. His wife had known about the affair before the public and should have left him then.
Reply to this comment
by Brownermustgo May 4, 2009 8:31 AM EDT
All of this is looking in the past. It could even be vindictive, or partisan. We need to be looking forward, not backward. What if we look into all this stuff and find out that Edwards waterboarded Hunter, as part of some good old kinky fun, or if he slammed Elizabeth's head against the wall 30 times a day after he found out she had breast cancer, of if we found out that the punishment he doled out to his kids for not getting an A on a math test was to deny them sleep for 11 days straight? Would we, as a country, really want to go there? Wouldn't it be better to have some blue ribbon panel, with, I don't know, maybe Gary Hart, and Bill Clinton, look into this?
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt May 4, 2009 8:29 AM EDT
We never know what people hide from us, only that which comes to light.
Reply to this comment
by zeitmin77 May 4, 2009 8:07 AM EDT
John Edwards,who soulfully talked of the travails of poverty and two Americas,epitomizes the criminally treacherous politics of America and the betrayal of its people.
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER