Castro, Obama Pave The Way To Negotiation
This story was written by CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk, reporting from the United Nations.
Earlier this week, President Obama announced that he was lifting curbs on travel and money transfers for Cuban exiles living in the United States, and he challenged Cuba to make improvements in the areas of human rights and freedoms.
Thursday, from a summit in Venezuela, Cuban President Raul Castro made a bold response: "We have sent word to the U.S. government in private and in public that we are willing to discuss everything — human rights, freedom of the press, political prisoners, everything."
The Venezuelan summit was called by President Hugo Chavez as an alternative to the Summit of the Americas, which Mr. Obama is to attend in Trinidad and Tobago, but to which Cuba was not invited. (In photo, Chavez on right, Raul Castro on left.)
The dialogue-in-soundbites was an unusually direct exchange between an American president and a Castro. It's a poker game between a young, popular president and an old fox; President Obama called out Raul Castro with an offer to negotiate, and Castro upped the ante by putting everything on the table.
The U.S. policy change and offer to negotiate was the Obama Administration's first proverbial toe in the rough waters of the Florida Straits. Any major change, however, will depend on the less certain possibility of actual democratic reform in Cuba.
Curiously, retired Cuban leader Fidel Castro and the Miami exile community agree on one thing; the new U.S. policy does not change much about the trade embargo on Cuba.
And President Obama, speaking in Mexico on Thursday, challenged reporters, asking how they could question the U.S. travel restrictions when Cuba restricts its own citizens from leaving the island.
But, by offering negotiations, Mr. Obama and Castro are clearly trying to pave the way to better relations.
To understand what's next in this poker game between Mr. Obama and the old fox, just look at history. Each time an American president opens the door to Cuba, the Castro brothers have found reason to shut it — and between Fidel and Raul Castro, the regime is now facing its eleventh U.S. president.
The Carter administration went the farthest, opening a quasi-embassy, called an Interests Section, in Havana. (Havana opened an Interests Section in Washington as well, and both remain active today.) But then Cuba sent troops to Ethiopia, putting an end to rapprochement. When President Clinton began lifting parts of the trade embargo, the Cubans shot down two civilian planes.
The changes that President Obama announced include allowing U.S. telecommunications companies into Cuba. It is the most interesting part of the new policy because that change could go a long way toward breaking Cuba's isolation, in terms of access to cell phones and the internet. Cuba has 11 million people and only a half million cell phones.
If Fidel and Raul Castro allow it, it may be the de facto opening of Cuba — at least in terms of information going in and out.
Earlier this week, President Obama announced that he was lifting curbs on travel and money transfers for Cuban exiles living in the United States, and he challenged Cuba to make improvements in the areas of human rights and freedoms.
Thursday, from a summit in Venezuela, Cuban President Raul Castro made a bold response: "We have sent word to the U.S. government in private and in public that we are willing to discuss everything — human rights, freedom of the press, political prisoners, everything."

(AP Photo/Fernando Vergara)
The dialogue-in-soundbites was an unusually direct exchange between an American president and a Castro. It's a poker game between a young, popular president and an old fox; President Obama called out Raul Castro with an offer to negotiate, and Castro upped the ante by putting everything on the table.
The U.S. policy change and offer to negotiate was the Obama Administration's first proverbial toe in the rough waters of the Florida Straits. Any major change, however, will depend on the less certain possibility of actual democratic reform in Cuba.
Curiously, retired Cuban leader Fidel Castro and the Miami exile community agree on one thing; the new U.S. policy does not change much about the trade embargo on Cuba.
And President Obama, speaking in Mexico on Thursday, challenged reporters, asking how they could question the U.S. travel restrictions when Cuba restricts its own citizens from leaving the island.
But, by offering negotiations, Mr. Obama and Castro are clearly trying to pave the way to better relations.
To understand what's next in this poker game between Mr. Obama and the old fox, just look at history. Each time an American president opens the door to Cuba, the Castro brothers have found reason to shut it — and between Fidel and Raul Castro, the regime is now facing its eleventh U.S. president.
The Carter administration went the farthest, opening a quasi-embassy, called an Interests Section, in Havana. (Havana opened an Interests Section in Washington as well, and both remain active today.) But then Cuba sent troops to Ethiopia, putting an end to rapprochement. When President Clinton began lifting parts of the trade embargo, the Cubans shot down two civilian planes.
The changes that President Obama announced include allowing U.S. telecommunications companies into Cuba. It is the most interesting part of the new policy because that change could go a long way toward breaking Cuba's isolation, in terms of access to cell phones and the internet. Cuba has 11 million people and only a half million cell phones.
If Fidel and Raul Castro allow it, it may be the de facto opening of Cuba — at least in terms of information going in and out.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 72 CommentsPosted by enjoylife63 at 3:15 AM : Apr 18, 2009
Of-course you can't, You are a republicant that only sees other Republicants or the rest of the world.
Posted by Aldymac at 6:27 AM : Apr 18, 2009 "
If you wish to win your battles, then 'understand' your enemy. That means understand his 'root values"
Posted by Trust_me_ at 3:42 PM : Apr 17, 2009
Obama did not 'bow subserviently, A bow in America is a sign of friendship,. (The lowering of the eyes from a 'potential' foe is PC) If he had kissed his feet, THAT would have been a sign of subservience. If this is all you unsophisticates can find on Obama, then you are walking 'on' a rice paddy
it was like a football highlight, views from all angles, slow motion cam and the call was made, Yep the big O? himself groveled at the feet of some one else?s king.
What a shame he doesn?t understand how to be a man is this harsh world!
Posted by Trust_me_ at 3:49 PM : Apr 17, 2009
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Yeah, you just proved my point how Ignorant (AND disrespectful) the right-wing extremists are.
Even if you're the president of the United States, it's a sign of respect to bow, kiss the hand, of a queen or king or emperor or empress of a Foreign dignitary. Unless you're an assh*le you'll just pass them by like they're not in the room. (You copy that? RESPECT, spell it for me) NOT A SIGN OF INFERIORITY.
It's also understandable since Obama was raised in a Muslim community when he wasa child. Am I disturbed by it? No. I traveled around the world so I know how to deal with people without getting smacked or kidnapped. Unlike you trashes who's stuck in your trailer in some remote desert in Texas or whatever.
But to top all your whining and ********, you just like to demonize what the guy does. From talking about Puppies to bowing down to foreign Monarchs.
As I originally said, I don't give a damn. 70% of America doesn't give a damn, so if you want to continue to whine amongst yourselves, be my guest.
Right Wing extremists can do nothing but whine amongst themselves, or plan an assassination. They got nothing good to contribute.
Posted by vm7488-2009
Fack :]
My lying eyes told me he bowed!
it was like a football highlight, views from all angles, slow motion cam and the call was made, Yep the big O? himself groveled at the feet of some one else?s king.
What a shame he doesn?t understand how to be a man is this harsh world!
And if it was such a right to do, then why did the WH lie about it?
Posted by CLoverNYC1
Why would the king bow to his servent?
Posted by talaan77 at 10:00 AM : Apr 17, 2009
-------------------------------
talaan,
Respect is one thing and it is mutual. Bowing down to someone is another story.
The Saudi King did not bow to President Obama.
And if it was such a right to do, then why did the WH lie about it?
Posted by CLoverNYC1
God forbid that we show any signs of respect for anyone else.
President Obama bowed deeply before the Saudi King at the G20. The WH spokesman lied about it.
Does anybody care besides the members of the Republicon Southern Party?
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Not. A. Single. Fack.
Right Wing extremists can do nothing but whine amongst themselves, or plan an assassination. They got nothing good to contribute.
And throw America and Israel under the bus in the process.
I don't get why trying to having a relationship with Muslim countries mean that we have to be throwing anybody under the bus.
Check it out, unless flickr is too RIght Wing for you.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/59013527@N00/3408694656/
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 72 Comments