World Watch
April 14, 2009 11:37 AM

In War-Torn Somalia, No End In Sight For Piracy

(AP/ECPAD-French Defense Ministry)
Piracy off Somalia’s coast continues as the crew of the Maersk Alabama prepares to head home to the U.S., some telling their frightening tales to the media and others choosing to remain silent.

The incident on the Maersk Alabama was unprecedented. Never before in the piracy saga off Somalia’s coast has a crew managed to fend off attacking pirates while on board, lose their captain to a hostage situation and then end up victorious with their captain being freed and most of the pirates taken out by U.S. sniper fire.

Worrying is that some pirates have vowed revenge on U.S. ships and those Americans who sail on them, and Somali vengeance is nothing to take lightly; especially when the reality is that piracy will not be eradicated tomorrow. In all, 18 ships and more than 220 people are still held hostage by pirates.

On Tuesday, Somali pirates seized a Greek-owned ship in a nighttime attack, indicating they aren’t about to drop their very lucrative business just yet, even though a total of five pirates were killed by U.S. sharpshooters in the Maersk ship incident and in the raid by French forces on a yacht.

Last year these modern day pirates grabbed news headlines when they brazenly seized a Saudi Arabian supertanker – considered the world’s largest sea hijack – carrying about $100 million worth of crude oil. Another amazing hijack was the capture of a Ukrainian ship with a massive military cargo in its hold, including 33 Soviet-era tanks.

A country that has been without a solid government since Siad Barre was overthrown in 1991, Somalia has defied all odds and continued to limp along with continued fighting, an interim government that wields some - but not much - control and no infrastructure to speak of.

In a Somalia at peace, these pirates would be fishermen, dock workers or maritime workers. But this is not an option. Many figures are bandied about, but many believe a Somali pirate involved in a hijack with a ransom paid can walk away with about $100,000 for himself. This is a sum unheard of in a shattered country like Somalia.

Fighters wielding AK 47’s continue to wrangle over the debris left of much of Mogadishu. Pavement disintegrated a long time ago and especially along the city’s green line few walls remain in one piece. Everything has the telltale signs of battle pockmarks. At one stage Islamist fighters had control of the capital, that then fell to government troops backed by Ethiopian soldiers and now the Islamists have returned.

African Union troops numbering about 4,000 have the thankless job of trying to protect civilians and reign in infidels…and often become targets of bombings and sniper rifles themselves. There aren’t enough of them to have much of an impact nor are they equipped to deal with the war zone they patrol.

There is no hope for an end to piracy as long as Somalia continues in this vein. In order for piracy to be eradicated there needs to be a stable functioning government with legitimate forces to patrol the country and the seas around it. The need for piracy needs to be addressed. The country’s people need to be able to live in peace and find a way to sustain themselves without resorting to the gun. Children need to be able to go to school and find vocations, farmers need to be able to sow their crops and harvest them without interference. None of this will be possible without outside help.

Apart from those hijacked, those affected the most by the hijackings are the Somalis on the ground who have nothing to do with piracy or its monetary return. World Food Program supplies aboard the Maersk Alabama were destined for Uganda, Somalia and Kenya where the UN organization aims to feed a total of nearly 8 million people due to drought and high food prices in 2009.

Maersk says that the Alabama carried a total of 400 containers of food assistance for various humanitarian organizations including WFP.

Until 2 years ago many ships carrying food aid were seized, until naval escorts began traveling with the ships to Mogadishu. But the Maersk Alabama is a cargo ship meant to offload in Mombasa – the first such cargo ship carrying food aid to be hijacked. If these deliveries are affected it is those who are the most vulnerable who will suffer.

Refugee camps in northern Kenya continue to swell as brave families escape fighting in Mogadishu and its environs and walk for days to safety across Somalia’s southern border. Many children are so weak by the time they reach here, all the medical facilities available can’t help them and they die. A sad end to a very brave flight from anarchy.
Tags:
somalia ,
piracy
Topics:
World Watch
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by toldyouso29 April 17, 2009 12:43 AM EDT
They would let up if the sure end for them was death instead of prison and possible hero worship back home. america must be ruthless to those who come against her like this or forever fight mini battles which make us not only look weak but susceptible. Those in pirate ships should all be killed. The pirates are there for loot and money, when the trade off is more likely death than success, it will all end--but if Obama and the Dems start with the schmoozing, negotiations and rhetoric--then it continues.

The same is true with the war on terror--America never possessed what it took to win the war:

1. Avoid invasions into countries that had not attacked us.
2. Obliteration of countries that did attack us--every man woman and child, leaving none to mourn, remember or carry on in the names of terrorist martyrs. When terrorists found out that their singular act condemned their entire family, bloodline, village, country, people to death, then the idea of heroism would have stopped.

One has to know the Mideastern mindset:family, legacy, honor are more important than indiv life--but if they knew their acts meant no family, no legacy and none left to honor--very few would terrorize--but...America never had the guts or backbone to do what truly needed to be done in Afghanistan, nor did we have the honor, to leave Iraq be--while we did it.
Reply to this comment
by rowenravera April 16, 2009 3:11 AM EDT
The run-off affects of piracy are unexpected: http://bit.ly/3zlUoH

It's frustrating that the people who have nothing as it is, will be the most affected, again!
Reply to this comment
by rudedogatrest April 15, 2009 7:59 PM EDT
All USA ships moving through this area should congraite and form a convoy,in a safe area : once a sufficent amount are gathered ,move them with a escort of american warships capeable of moving fast enough to protect or lanching small craft with sufficent speed to respond to the threat. Stop all USA ships going to somalia.Put a team of seals onboard all usa ships in route around somalia and show the Thives you cant threaten AMERICA
Reply to this comment
by brady51h-2009 April 15, 2009 12:09 AM EDT
Are we stupid. Let me understand this. The American taxpayer who has been devastated by job losses to the far east is now supposed pay for the military to stop piracy which is hurting those people who have sent our jobs overseas. Let the people who are shipping the goods pay for protection. Maybe then our manufacturers who have sent these jobs overseas will find it cheaper to make and grow things in the US. This should not be another excuse for a big business bailout.
Reply to this comment
by janefondu April 14, 2009 7:43 PM EDT
Use the unmanned drones to patrol the sea. They can stay aloft an unmatched amount of time, more economical, offer real time video, they are quiet and can also be armed with missiles or a laser for precision guided bombs.
Reply to this comment
by April 14, 2009 7:38 PM EDT
So, the best approach would be to have proffessionals (trained military men) accompany the ship. You can't just have weapons on board for anyone to use. That could prove suicidal if one of the crew members went crazy for whatever reason.
Reply to this comment
by April 14, 2009 7:33 PM EDT
Quote "Perhaps all ship traffic should stop in this area indefinitely, even if it means that no charitable donations to the poor gets through." Unquote

The problem with this approach is that many innocent people would suffer. The pirates are out for themselves because if they REALLY cared about their people, their people would be in a lot better shape than they are now .. in view of all the millions of dollars that they have already collected.

Someone once suggested that the U.S. go in there and root the pirates out since we know their location. The problem with that is that they're like the "Talibans" who hide in the midst of innocent people. And if the U.S. or (another) country goes in there and starts killing the suspects, they could be charged with killing the innocent. Hard to prove otherwise especially if the suspected pirate that has been killed was NOT carrying any weapon at the time.

Keep in mind that most of these are young people under the age of 18.
Reply to this comment
by Libertarian1776 April 14, 2009 7:08 PM EDT
After you kill the Pirates
Cut the Pirates nuts off, and place them on display.
Problem solved.
Reply to this comment
by Libertarian1776 April 14, 2009 7:06 PM EDT
Kill more of them.
Torture them!
No Money for Pirates
Reply to this comment
by vietnamwar April 14, 2009 6:24 PM EDT
Predators A,B,C will be there in 5 minutes..
Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (710 recent comments)