Econwatch
April 6, 2009 6:30 PM

Poll: 74 Percent Support Higher Taxes On The Rich

(iStockphoto)
Almost three-quarters of Americans think it is a good idea to raise taxes on people making more than $250,000 per year, according to the latest CBS News/New York Times poll.

In fact, two-thirds of Americans think the tax code should be changed so that middle-class Americans pay less than they do now, while "upper income" people pay more.

As for President Obama's overall budget plan, a majority - 56 percent - say it sets the right priorities for the country. Thirty-two percent say it doesn't, and twelve percent don't know.

The poll also finds that Americans are more likely to say the spending proposals in the budget will help the economy (37 percent) rather than hurt the economy (23 percent). Twenty-nine percent aren’t yet sure.

Read The Complete Poll (PDF)
Similarly, 32 percent of Americans say they think Mr. Obama's proposed tax plan will help the economy, while 21 percent think it will hurt. Again, a significant portion – 37 percent – are unsure.

Fifty-six percent of Americans say they approve of Mr. Obama's overall handling of the economy. (Read more on Obama's approval ratings here.) His marks on specific economic policies, however, are not so high.

The poll shows that fewer than half support the Obama administration's recent plans for either the auto or banking industries – though there is more support for the administration’s proposals for automakers.

(CBS)

Forty-seven percent approve of the administration’s proposals for the automakers, while 38 percent disapprove.

Eight-two percent say it is important to provide money to the auto companies in order to save jobs, including 49 percent who say it is very important. Seventeen percent say it is not important.

Meanwhile, a majority of Americans – 58 percent - disapprove of the administration providing financial aid to the banking industry. Only 33 percent approve.

Americans are divided over who will benefit from the plans help to the banking system: Forty-seven percent think all Americans will benefit, while nearly as many – 40 percent - say only bankers will.

Here are some more economic highlights from the poll:

  • Americans are split when asked to choose between more stimulus spending and deficit reduction – 45 percent prefer spending while 46 percent prefer reducing the deficit. There are sharp partisan differences mirroring the division in Washington: Six in ten Democrats see the need for spending, while six in ten Republicans would prioritize the deficit.


  • In the long term, the national debt looms as a concern. An overwhelming 91 percent of Americans today worry that it will create hardships for the next generation.


  • A solid majority – 71 percent - thinks government regulation of banks and financial institutions should be increased in order to help prevent future financial crises. Both Democrats and Republicans agree.


  • Sixty-four percent think in order to receive money from the federal government companies should have to accept instructions from the government on how to run their businesses. Twenty-seven percent the companies should still be able to run themselves as they see fit.


  • Twenty-eight percent say they are enthusiastic about Mr. Obama's handling of the economic crisis, and another 40 percent says they are satisfied. On the flip side, 22 percent say they are dissatisfied and nine percent say they are angry.


  • Just 11 percent of Americans think the economy is in good shape now, while 89 percent say the economy is in bad shape - about the same percentages that felt that way three weeks ago. However, the public’s outlook for the economy is improving. While only 20 percent think the economy is getting better, 34 percent think it is getting worse – the lowest percentage in two years.


  • Few Americans see a quick end to the current recession. One in 10 thinks the recession will last another six months, and 38 percent think it will last a year. Forty-nine percent envision it lasting two years or more.


  • Many Americans have cut back on their day-to-day spending. Forty percent have eliminated some luxuries and another 10 percent have cut back spending on necessities; thirty one percent have cut back on both. Just one in five says they have not made any spending cutbacks.



More CBS News Polls Released Today:

Poll: Obama Approval Hits New High - 66%

Poll: Majority Would Pay Higher Taxes For Universal Health Care

Poll: Support For Free Trade On The Rise
Tags:
obama ,
poll ,
tax ,
rich ,
cbs
Topics:
Polling
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 84 Comments
by hungryman9 April 20, 2009 5:22 PM EDT
By the way France has a better health care system (best in the world), more freedom and a happier citizenship. And Yes We Can have it here. It is the right wing corporatists who should find another country.
Posted by noloyalisti
=============================
You don't know what you are talking about. Also you better hope and pray that this country never gets a system of healthcare the same as France. From experience spending time over there and having many friends that spent years in France, I can tell you that this country has the best healthcare in the world and it is not great. If you go to the emergency room, they have to treat you. In France they don't and often you get to see a doctor days later. Research it buddy. I know.
Reply to this comment
by oursidephilip April 18, 2009 9:26 PM EDT
@noloyalist If you think France is so great then move your liberal rear over there...France is despicable and this country is going to stay free.
Reply to this comment
by oursidephilip April 18, 2009 8:28 PM EDT
If Obama and others want those who make over 200k a year to pay higher taxes then lets see them eat their own dog food. Mr President, lets first see you pay 90% of your income to taxes like you want Executives to do. And all of the other liberal supports of the "share the wealth" effort, stop being hypocrites and show us that you will do what you expect others to do. The press release on Wednesday saing that they paid their taxes from last year, no kidding, so did everybody else. That shows nothing, every president and citizen in the country does that, show us that you are willing to pay 90% before you FORCE others to!
Reply to this comment
by ianlou April 12, 2009 4:07 PM EDT
74 Percent Support Higher Taxes On The Rich

The other 26% are the rich or the delusional gonna-be- rich.

I guess that settles it...
Trickle-down-economics is DEAD.
Reply to this comment
by babooph April 11, 2009 5:04 PM EDT
A couple lobbyists are going to be ,[as usual] ,the main factor in the new tax code -the US voter has little more value than sewage to the bribed politicos-that is how the rich got rid of their tax in the 1st place.
Reply to this comment
by ianlou April 10, 2009 11:35 PM EDT
A straw broke a camels back.
The Rich held that straw and now they look shocked and aghast.

go figure...
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti April 9, 2009 2:37 PM EDT
I am an entrepreneur (a French word by the way), who is more than happy to build my business and others. I am also smart enough to know that voting for Republican to build huge corporations is the problem.

By the way France has a better health care system (best in the world), more freedom and a happier citizenship. And Yes We Can have it here. It is the right wing corporatists who should find another country.
Reply to this comment
by samthewill April 9, 2009 2:10 PM EDT
it is unbelievable how short sighted people are. many of my contacts at www.affluence.org have told me they are going to stop putting so much time and money into building companies because taxes targeting entrepreneurs take away any incentive to create or compete. it's a joke. if you are so selfish you want somebody else to pay your bills, move to france. or at least realize that by being a parasite you hurt the whole country.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti April 9, 2009 1:54 PM EDT
It seems to me the richer people become, they less they care about other people or their countries. They will never do the right thing and must be forced.

Time to seize assets we need for We the People. And have severe government regulation by We.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 April 8, 2009 11:59 AM EDT
chitlins said: "General Electric is so completely wrapped up in the OBAMA administraton, it's ridiculous. To allude to them that they lean right is ludicrous! "

I alluded that they hide their ridiculously high earnings using hedge funds overseas, so that they don't have to pay their fair share of taxes. I didn't allude that they lean right. I have no idea what their corporate political leaning is, or even that ANY corporation should necessarily have a leaning.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 April 8, 2009 11:57 AM EDT
T Boone Pickens: "The first billion is the hardest"
Warren Buffet: "There's class warfare, all right. But its my class, the rich, that is waging it. and we're winning"

I think what these guys are saying is that its much easier to make money if you already have it, than to make it from scratch. And that's why we have a progressive tax structure. These people don't EARN their extra billions, but it accrues to them anyway. Its proper that they pay a higher tax rate on the marginal amounts they make over the first half-million or so.
Reply to this comment
by Henri_Rochard April 8, 2009 11:54 AM EDT
Personally, I'd like to see the Social Security tax income ceiling removed.

Keep the ceiling as is for the employer-contributed portion, so as not to put a further burden on employers.

But remove the Social Security tax income ceiling on the paycheck-earner's side.

One group of people who wouldn't like this would be professional athletes, TV, radio, and movie stars and personalities, and recording artists.
Reply to this comment
by bmirarck2 April 8, 2009 11:26 AM EDT
Tell me oh water bearers of the rich, what is wrong about EVERYONE paying their fair share of taxes? No loopholes, no deductions, just a much lower tax rate for EVERYONE since EVERYONE will have to pay their taxes! Why do you people persist in making it easy on the richest segment of our population? I am not against wealth, just against a stacked deck!
Reply to this comment
by Razzl April 8, 2009 10:48 AM EDT
The $250k number seems to be one that the Congress and media are stuck on, perhaps because it serves the interest of the right to alarm more people who fall into that category, but most of us I think would be fine to pick a higher number, say $1mil, and then not tax incomes under 20k at all. The right will fight every step of the way against making the economic order more fair; they will fight allowing workers to bargain collectively (attacking "unions" without reference to what they do), fight health care plans on the bizarre ground of "choice" (as though people who can't afford health care have any choice), fight enhancing shareholder rights and more control of executive compensation (showing that they really side with the privileged managerial class rather than the plebeian shareholders who "own" the companies). In the end, though, American needs to become a European-style social democracy where certain economic needs like retirement (Social Security), child care, health care, and infrastructure are handled by the public sector without persistent ideological interference from movement conservatives. Business will fluorish in such an environment, and everyone will wonder why conservatives fought so hard against it...
Reply to this comment
by chitlins April 8, 2009 10:36 AM EDT
Actually, I'm all in favor of not taxing businesses on their income at all! Taxes should be on the individuals' income. Unlike spending ourselves out of control without the tax revenue to cover the expenditure, that would promote the growth of small business and agriculture here in the US.

Hear me our here...

Make it illegal for anyone to put money in off-shore banks (note: not foreign stocks), business or individual. The only reason anyone would do it is to protect themselves from LEGAL tax or seizure of their (probably ill-gotten) gains. If corporations weren't allowed to stash funds overseas and weren't taxed on their gains, people would actually have a reason to start and maintain a business here.

With regards to individual taxes, the government needs to discourage people from immediately capitalizing their businesses' gains. There's no reason someone needs to have income (note: not assets) greater than $1B/yr. Most of these people make their livings off of the suffering of the little people, anyhow. That's the upper echelon of big business I'm talking about here. People that make decisions about mass lay-offs of blue-collar workers, how much to over-charge for junk goods & services (software), how to embezzle/pillage their company's assets, etc. from their ebony desks in their marble-lines offices.

I'm in favor of PERSONAL INCOME tax scale that more closely represents a logarithmic graph. If you don't make anything, you don't pay anything in. If you make $100k/yr, you pay 15% back in taxes. If you make $1M/yr, you pay 30% back in taxes. If you make $10M/yr, you pay 45% back in taxes. After $100M/yr, you pay in 60%. After $1B/yr, you pay in 75%. After you make $10B/yr, the government investigates how you can live with yourself for robbing the populace of their hard-earned income, then taxes 90% of you income.

Oh, and I consider myself a right-wing republican. I'm in favor of people having a chance at living a decent life without having to work themselves into the ground trying to get by. If there's no incentive to make excessive personal gains, people will work harder to invest more effort into what they do for a living. If you work hard, you'll still make more as your skills warrant, but you'll increasingly fund the social programs that care for the little people you trampled on your way to the top.

Nobody needs to make a billion dollars a year and someone making barely enough to get by shouldn't be paying anything close to the taxes that a billionaire should have to pay.
Reply to this comment
by chitlins April 8, 2009 9:56 AM EDT
ubrew12,

FYI General Electric is so completely wrapped up in the OBAMA administraton, it's ridiculous. To allude to them that they lean right is ludicrous!
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 April 8, 2009 9:16 AM EDT
American corporations pay some of the highest taxes on earth.

However, as with all business statistics in America, all is not what it seems. American corporations have SO MANY LOOPHOLES to avoid paying taxes they ACTUALLY pay some of the lowest taxes on earth. The purpose of loopholes is to make it SEEM as though they pay high taxes, to give GOP bloggers talking points.

Why do you think General Electric maintains 60 different accounts in Cayman Islands hedge funds, offshore and out of the jurisdiction of the US government? And did you know that when you pay a sales tax at Walmart, it goes to Walmart and not your local utility? That's because Walmart got a deal from your local government on their property taxes to locate there (Walmart is famous for making local governments beg to get them to locate there). The deal is so high, it robs the local government so much, that when you shop at Walmart its as if your sales tax went into PURE profit for Walmart, and not into local schools, etc, as it should be going.
Reply to this comment
by rwassel April 8, 2009 8:47 AM EDT
Amen, elz523! What the rich don't understand is that they benefit much more from the civilization that taxes pay for. Banks have to insure their massive savings accounts, law enforcement has to protect their large estates, etc.

How convenient that they forget that it is our system, paid for by taxes, that allows them to succeed.
Reply to this comment
by rwassel April 8, 2009 8:41 AM EDT
I love all the right-wing neo-cons on here trying to make excuses. Even when presented with data, they still ignore reality. Maybe instead of b**ching about how biased CBS is, or how this is some sort of left-wing conspiracy, maybe you should start to realize the majority of the nation is NOT with you, and that you need to start thinking about how to get more voters to your side.

Otherwise, you'll be out of the political arena for many years. Not that I have a problem with that...
Reply to this comment
by xray206 April 8, 2009 2:30 AM EDT
The top 10% earn 47% of the income yet pay 70% of the tax burden, the top 25% earn 67% of the income and pay 85% of the tax burden.

Those who say the rich should pay their fair share are nuts, what should the top 25% pay 125% of the tax burden so you can get a check.

This country is down the tubes anyway, anyone with the means should close their business, fire all their employees, or give it away to the employees as business is doomed anyway, sell everything and leave the country and let the bottom 50% see what its like without their gravy train anymore.

The political class has taken over and they are using the so called rich as their reason, the real rich like Buffet and Gates cheat the tax system every year, Buffet makes cash off the backs of families who must sell their business because of estate taxes by selling them his crappy insurance or buying their company when they can't come up with 50% for the tax man.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/22652.html
Reply to this comment
See all 84 Comments

About Econwatch

News and analysis on the state of the economy from CBS News.

E-Mail EconWatch

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Senate Health Bill Faces Crucial Vote

    (264 recent comments)