Political Hotsheet
February 24, 2009 11:25 PM

Obama Previews His Budget, Talks About Taxes

(AP)

President Obama will release his first full budget on Thursday, but he previewed parts of it during his speech tonight to Congress.

One of the main headlines from this section of the speech is his call to change the way the budget deficit is counted.

"I am committed to restoring a sense of honesty and accountability to our budget," he said. "That is why this budget looks ahead ten years and accounts for spending that was left out under the old rules – and for the first time, that includes the full cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. For seven years, we have been a nation at war. No longer will we hide its price."

He also said his team is going to "go line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs." He said the administration has found "two trillion dollars in savings over the next decade."

Lastly, in this section of the speech, Mr. Obama addressed taxes and his campaign promised most often mentioned by Republicans – to raise taxes on the wealthy.

"Let me perfectly clear, because I know you’ll hear the same old claims that rolling back these tax breaks means a massive tax increase on the American people: if your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime," Mr. Obama said. "I repeat: not one single dime. In fact, the recovery plan provides a tax cut – that’s right, a tax cut – for 95% of working families. And these checks are on the way."

Here is the prepared remarks from the president on the budget, as released by the White House:


There is, of course, another responsibility we have to our children. And that is the responsibility to ensure that we do not pass on to them a debt they cannot pay. With the deficit we inherited, the cost of the crisis we face, and the long-term challenges we must meet, it has never been more important to ensure that as our economy recovers, we do what it takes to bring this deficit down.

I’m proud that we passed the recovery plan free of earmarks, and I want to pass a budget next year that ensures that each dollar we spend reflects only our most important national priorities.

Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. My administration has also begun to go line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs. As you can imagine, this is a process that will take some time. But we’re starting with the biggest lines. We have already identified two trillion dollars in savings over the next decade.

In this budget, we will end education programs that don’t work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don’t need them. We’ll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq, and reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use. We will root out the waste, fraud, and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn’t make our seniors any healthier, and we will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas.

In order to save our children from a future of debt, we will also end the tax breaks for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. But let me perfectly clear, because I know you’ll hear the same old claims that rolling back these tax breaks means a massive tax increase on the American people: if your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime. In fact, the recovery plan provides a tax cut – that’s right, a tax cut – for 95% of working families. And these checks are on the way.

To preserve our long-term fiscal health, we must also address the growing costs in Medicare and Social Security. Comprehensive health care reform is the best way to strengthen Medicare for years to come. And we must also begin a conversation on how to do the same for Social Security, while creating tax-free universal savings accounts for all Americans.

Finally, because we’re also suffering from a deficit of trust, I am committed to restoring a sense of honesty and accountability to our budget. That is why this budget looks ahead ten years and accounts for spending that was left out under the old rules – and for the first time, that includes the full cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. For seven years, we have been a nation at war. No longer will we hide its price.


More CBSNews.com Coverage Of President Obama's Address To Congress:
Tags:
barack obama ,
taxes ,
budget ,
state of the union
Topics:
Obama's Speech To Congress
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by jvandewoude February 26, 2009 1:39 PM EST
What a surprise? President Obama?s health care plan is going to be funded by letting the Bush tax cuts expire for those individuals or families making more than $250,000 per year effectively increasing taxes on those taxpayers by 5% (35% goes to 39.6%). The plan will also be funded by reducing the tax deduction for mortgage interest and charitable deductions on those in the same income category.

The latest release of Internal Revenue Service data on individual income taxes from calendar year 2006 (http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/indtaxstats/article/0,,id=133521,00.html) show that the top 1 percent of tax returns paid 39.89 % of all federal individual income taxes. Moreover, the top 5% of tax returns paid 60.14% of all federal individual tax returns.

When are we going to acknowledge that hard-working, successful individuals already pay more than their fair share of taxes? The mantra that the wealthy are getting a free ride has to stop? How many of you are paying 35% (soon to be 39.6% under Obama) in federal income taxes? Where is my family?s stimulus check? Not only are we taxed at a higher rate, but we are not eligible for any of the hand-outs that are funded by our hard-earned tax dollars. We pay into the system! More than anyone else! For someone to make a unilateral assumption that we (and those like us) don?t need a break is outrageous!

From a personal perspective, my wife and I both started at the proverbial bottom many years ago. In my own case, a $10,700 per year job working in Operations for Merrill Lynch in 1982. We both suffered many economic hardships over the years (e.g., divorce, child support, family crisis, job loss, high credit card debt, etc.). Nonetheless we worked hard, saved, paid down our debt and ultimately purchased a home (note: we provided the bank with a hard-earned 30% down payment and did not borrow more money than we could afford to pay back). Today, after many years of fiscal responsibility where we sacrificed vacations, skimped on gifts, etc. we are successful to the point that our combined income exceeds $250,000 per year.

Now, in most areas of the country a combined income that exceeds $250,000 per annum would beget a sumptuous lifestyle. However, in the New York City area, we are considered upper middle class. In fact, accounting for the high cost of real estate, expensive property taxes, costly local taxes, a deteriorating public infrastructure and a general high cost of living we certainly do not live a lavish lifestyle. Factor in child care, tuition for our college son and other collateral expenses; every dollar we earn is important if not essential. Lastly, please note that the majority of our disposable income was/is invested in our retirement (decimated as of late) based on the practical realization that Uncle Sam may not provide much by the time we are ready to withdraw from the workplace.

Consequently, the prospect of an increase in the top marginal tax rate for families in our income category has us extremely angry (at a time when we are still peeved that we were not eligible to receive a stimulus check like many of our neighbors mirthfully received because they were in the appropriate income category). Does this mean that we do not care about our less fortunate neighbors? That we don?t believe in affordable health care, after-school programs and the concept of providing a ?leg up? for those struggling to make it. No, nothing could be farther from the truth.

What it does mean is that we are tired of being financially castigated for our success. That we believe it is fundamentally unfair for the government to reach into our pocket given that the 35% Federal tax bracket we are currently in means we already pay a much higher freight than most Americans. Enough is enough!

Mr. Obama talks about change! However, the concept of ?redistribution of wealth? (in our case the redistribution of needed income) is not change. Rather, it is a policy that has been touted and put forward by the Democratic Party for years.
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (490 recent comments)

HOTSHEET ON TWITTER