Econwatch
February 18, 2009 5:00 PM

FAQ: How Will Obama's Housing Plan Work?

(AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

President Obama announced a $75 billion plan on Wednesday that he said would help as many as 9 million Americans avoid foreclosure.

As EconWatch previously noted, not all of the details are public, and we're expecting to hear more on March 4. For now, though, the below list of Frequently Asked Questions reflects what we've been able to find out so far.

Q: Which mortgage borrowers qualify?

The Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan is limited to loans held or securitized by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, which as of January 1, 2009 have been capped at $417,000 for most areas of the United States and $625,500 for what are called "high cost" areas. There are higher limits for Alaska, Guam, Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Mortgages that are linked to Fannie and Freddie are known as "conforming" loans.

Q: If I'm current on my mortgage but my home has decreased in value since I bought it, can I benefit by refinancing?

Perhaps. First, you have to hold a Fannie or Freddie conforming loan. Second, your house can't be too far underwater. The Treasury Department says: "Eligible loans will now include those where the new first mortgage (including any refinancing costs) will not exceed 105 percent of the current market value of the property."

Translated: If you owe more than $210,000 on a house that's now worth $200,000, you're out of luck.

Q: Couldn't I already refinance a Fannie and Freddie mortgage?

Yes, but there was a specific loan-to-value ratio that was required. A senior administration official who did not want to be identified said on Wednesday that the loan-to-value criteria would be waived.

Q: Okay, let's say I meet those qualifications -- what does this get me?

The idea is to shift home-buyers (really home-debtors) from riskier adjustable-rate mortgages into traditional 15-year or 30-year fixed-rate mortgages without prepayment penalties. This means that your current payments could actually increase if you refinance, especially if you have a "teaser" rate, so choose wisely.

Q: If I'm current with my mortgage and use this program to refinance, will this reduce how much I owe?

Nope. It's just designed to aid refinancing -- meaning that if you have a 7 percent or 8 percent mortgage and haven't been able to refinance, you now stand a better shot of doing it. You'll still owe the same amount in debt. (Actually, because of refinancing costs, you'll probably owe a few thousand dollars more.)

Q: So if my house has fallen by more than the approved amount, or I don't have a confirming mortgage because I live in a more expensive area, and I'm not having trouble making payments, where does that leave me?

Unless the March 4 announcement contains some surprises, you're left with the same options that you had before Wednesday's announcement.

Q: The above answers are interesting, but they don't apply to me because I'm behind on my mortgage or struggling to make payments. How am I affected?

This is a bit more complicated. If you're behind on your payments or at risk of imminent default, you may qualify for a payment reduction. You need to (a) have a conforming mortgage; (b) have a monthly mortgage payment greater than 31 percent of your monthly pre-tax income; (c) live in the property as your primary residence.

Also, borrowers with "high debt levels," meaning 55 percent of their pre-tax income including mortgage payments, car loans and credit card debt, will be required to enter a government-approved counseling program.

Q: If my monthly mortgage payment is less than 31 percent of my gross income, and my house is badly underwater, do I qualify?

Apparently not.

Q: If I meet those three conditions and I'm behind or struggling, then what?

There's no one-size-fits-all rule. Mortgage lenders can choose to -- but, as of the time this was written, are not legally obligated to -- reduce interest rates or even lower the amount owed. If you think you qualify, the Treasury Department says you should wait until early April to see if you're contacted automatically by your mortgage lender. If you're not, call them directly.

Q: How does this idea of payment reductions work?

Details are still unclear, but it seems as though lenders that choose to participate in the program are supposed to reduce interest rates so monthly payments do not exceed 38 percent of gross income. Then the Treasury Department will kick in taxpayer dollars to bring the payments down to 31 percent of income, and those rates will last for five years.

Q: What happens after five years?

After five years, according to the Treasury Department, the "mortgage payment will adjust upward at a moderate, phased-in level."

Q: What information will I need when I talk to my lender?

You'll need information about the monthly gross income of your household including recent pay; stubs if you receive them or documentation of income you receive from other sources; your most recent income tax return; information about any second mortgage on the house; payments on each of your credit cards if you are carrying balances from month to month; and payments on other loans such as student loans and car loans.

Q: Does this create an incentive for homebuyers to run up large balances on credit cards or under-report income before contacting their lender?

Yes. This is what economists call "moral hazard," which risks rewarding behavior that should be discouraged.

Q: If I understand this right, if I'm current on payments, I don't qualify for a reduction in the amount owed (a principal reduction). But if I'm behind on payments or claim default is imminent, I do. Is that right?

Yes. The caveat is that it appears that borrowers who remain current get an "incentive payment" of $1,500 if they remain current through their loan modification. They also qualify for a bonus of $1,000 a year for five years if they keep up with payments (the lender gets $1,000 a year too).

Q: You said above that only owner-occupied homes qualify, but how will banks verify this?

Different banks are likely to use different techniques. Some banks may send a certified letter, and others may make a physical visit. There seems to be no requirement that you live in the property today, so it's reasonable to expect some vacant homes to be quickly reoccupied in the next few weeks or months.

Q: What incentive do lenders have to participate?

Foreclosure is a lengthy and expensive process; a front-page article in Wednesday's Wall Street Journal profiling judges hearing foreclosure cases in Lee County, Fla. noted that many cases have been pending for months or longer. Banks may decide they'll lose less money on a property -- especially if home prices eventually rise -- by renegotiating the terms of the mortgage rather than taking it to foreclosure.

This is already happening. An analysis by Alan White, a Valparaiso University law school professor, showed that half of the voluntary mortgage modifications already result in lower monthly payments -- and that the average foreclosure loss on a first mortgage in November 2008 was $145,000. The new incentives from the Feds may be enough to convince more banks to agree to reductions in interest or even principal.

Q: Will this new government program aid housing speculators?

Perhaps. If a speculator claims that a house with an underwater mortgage is his primary residence, he'd obviously benefit. Unless the final rules specify otherwise, a speculator could shift primary residences every few months and try to reduce payments on each property. Also, multiple-unit homes with up to 4 units qualify for the program.

Q: How long will this program last?

After three years from now, no more homeowners will be eligible.
Tags:
housing ,
foreclosure ,
barack obama ,
treasury ,
bank ,
mortgage ,
lender
Topics:
Housing Crisis
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 165 Comments
by bander2586 April 12, 2009 9:31 PM EDT
This plan will NOT work. People are over-extended plain and simple. Home values will not stabalize until home values reach historical affordable levels. We have too much supply (foreclosures, short-sales, etc..) and not enough demand (loss of jobs, financing, securitization, etc..).
Reply to this comment
by philabias March 6, 2009 3:32 AM EST
Before you ask how it will
YOU SHOULD ASK WILL IT WORK
EVERYTHING ELSE HE'S DONE HAS WORKED LIKE BLEACH, Everytime he stimulates the market loose 200-500 points
much more and the domino effect will take over and it all comes undone
his ideal of change is from messed up to broken completely broken. Just the change America needs
Reply to this comment
by r0ch3113 March 3, 2009 11:28 AM EST
My mortgage was recently modified earlier this year, but it didn't help at all. It increased our payment and we were already struggling to make to previous payments. We were originally on a 15yr loan and they only extended it out to 25yrs, but increased the payment. We are behind due to my husbands job loss last year. Do we qualify to go back to our Mortgage Company to re-work our loan again? We are doing everything we can to save our home and get caught up. Can we get help?
Reply to this comment
by cama4664 February 21, 2009 5:49 PM EST
What about Veteran's? My son has a VA mortgage and is now 'under water'. The house is no longer worth what he paid for it, and that was through no fault of his. How can he refinance if this program is not available to VA Loans?
Reply to this comment
by zyoumans February 21, 2009 11:29 AM EST
There was some talk on your show this morning about how people don't feel like they want to pay for other people's mistakes, and that is understandable. But, what these people fail to realize is that the majority of people are having legitimate financial problems due to the outrageous amount of job loss that this country is experiencing. Even people that act responsible have lost their job. These comments add insult to injury for people that have done everything right and are in situations beyond their control. I thank God that my family is not in this situation, yet. Hopefully it will remain that way. But if my husband lost his job due to cutbacks and we faced forclosure, its sad to know that we could be blamed for the loss of our livelihood and home. Now that's very American, to know that people would not even care and blame us, much less want to help.
Reply to this comment
by swin5 February 19, 2009 11:25 PM EST
How will Obama's housing plan work?

It won't.
Reply to this comment
by pluma44-2009 February 19, 2009 10:38 PM EST
Everyone can blame someone, but we all have some blame, We as voters has elected the one (President) who has the overall rersponsibility to fix the problem. Can we (Americans) at least, NOW pull our resources together and make these plans work; if not neither the new nor old plan (Doing nothing) will work. We all have been tricked by someone pitching something (mortages, stocks, quick rich schemes, gas prices, etc.) and it has us all in the same boat (U.S.A.) We have the right to be upset at those who caused this, but not at the who's tring to solve this problem; we must pull together and make our choice to stay in the boat paddle or get out and swim.
Thanks for listening to my opinion. God Bless us all.
Reply to this comment
by far_point200 February 19, 2009 3:38 PM EST
There is a lot of support for raising taxes to fund universal health care, rebuild America''s infrastructure, and help the poor.

Posted by rhs648

Ok rhs648, please put your crack pipe down and try to get some sleep.
Reply to this comment
by rhs648 February 19, 2009 2:53 PM EST
If they payoff anyones mortgage or any portion of it...anyone who does not receive the same benefit should do a class action suit for discrimination....

-----------------------------------

Posted by guad07rg

This is all part of redistributing wealth. Because the middle class pays most of the income taxes, this will redistribute middle income wealth the most. This concept has been around for many years. Example, raise cigarette taxes to fund healrth care for children. It is a slippery slope. When is emough, enough? There is a lot of support for raising taxes to fund universal health care, rebuild America's infrastructure, and help the poor.
Reply to this comment
by guad07rg February 19, 2009 2:41 PM EST
If they payoff anyones mortgage or any portion of it...anyone who does not receive the same benefit should do a class action suit for discrimination....
Reply to this comment
by guad07rg February 19, 2009 2:38 PM EST
They should change hail to the chief to...Back in the USSR
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings February 19, 2009 2:35 PM EST
Let's just all quit paying our mortgages.
Let's have another Boston Tea Party with our mortgages.
Why should I have to pay my mortgage and my neighbor's mortgage?
Reply to this comment
by ajmarine111 February 18, 2009 11:46 PM EST
If you don''t have enough money to go out to eat for lunch, you bring a sandwhich from home, and the restuarant you didn''t go to doesn''t get your trickle down.

Posted by HawkSprings at 08:32 PM : Feb 18, 2009



Oprah told people not to eat out for a month to save money.


The restaurant people didn't like it much.
Reply to this comment
by notfooled February 18, 2009 11:27 PM EST
I can hear the Soviet National Anthem playing in my head for past 6 months with all of these "bailout"
(Government buying up our rights and land!)

Posted by republic76 at 08:18 PM : Feb 18, 2009

You should be hearing the theme song from the "Godfather" as our scumbag lying politician leaders sold our jobs to the multinational corporations through traitorous backroom free trade programs like NAFTA sending our jobs elsewhere, giveaways to their rich corrupt elite co-conspirators, and turning America into a 3rd world country.

It''s not a DEM nor REP problem at all.

It''s a greed problem and our leaders sell us out daily to line their own pockets.

No wonder not a single Rep voted to bail out the average citizen, it''s exactly backwards to their enslave the American public program.
Reply to this comment
by republic76 February 18, 2009 11:25 PM EST
TI_3VOM,
Well ***, when push comes I will have my 7.62!
Reply to this comment
by jon_mccain February 18, 2009 11:25 PM EST
jon_mccain
Trickle down is the way the world works, baby.
If I got more money, I spend it on more things and it trickles down the economy.
If I don''''t, I do without, or do it myself.

Democrats can''''t seem to grasp that truth.
Of course, they also don''''t pay taxes.

Posted by HawkSprings


We''re living it now......
Reply to this comment
by jon_mccain February 18, 2009 11:24 PM EST
The Government is buying up our rights and land....
With OUR Money...
Our taxes.
Why do we allow this?

Posted by republic76 a

Big whoop, better OUR government than China''s or Dubai''s.
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings February 18, 2009 11:23 PM EST
jon_mccain
Trickle down is the way the world works, baby.
If I got more money, I spend it on more things and it trickles down the economy.
If I don''t, I do without, or do it myself.

Democrats can''t seem to grasp that truth.
Of course, they also don''t pay taxes.
Reply to this comment
by republic76 February 18, 2009 11:21 PM EST
The Government is buying up our rights and land....
With OUR Money...
Our taxes.
Why do we allow this?
They are buying us out with OUR TAXDOLLARS!
America has been watching Amerian Idol too long!
Reply to this comment
by jon_mccain February 18, 2009 11:20 PM EST
POST OF THE HOUR:

Posted by HawkSprings

LOL!! Got anything espousing the greatness of trickle down or deregulation? I love the way it ends!
Reply to this comment
See all 165 Comments

About Econwatch

News and analysis on the state of the economy from CBS News.

E-Mail EconWatch

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn