World Watch
January 30, 2009 8:13 AM

U.S. May Forge New Ties With Syria

This story was written by CBS News' George Baghdadi in Damascus.

(AP)
A U.S. Congressional delegation was to arrive in Damascus Friday night in what could be the start to a new chapter in Syria – U.S. relations.

After years of disregard by George W. Bush, President Bashar al-Assad is hoping Barack Obama will bring Syria into the diplomatic fold, genuinely engaging Israel's neighbor in the effort to bring lasting stability to the Middle East.

Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wa., was heading the delegation of House Armed Services Committee members dispatched by the Obama administration, which seems keen to push the Mideast peace agenda, according to diplomats in Damascus.

They said the delegation was to hold talks with senior Syrian officials on how to further bilateral relations between the two countries in advance of a visit next month by Rep. Howard Berman, D-Ca., the chairman of the of House Foreign Affairs Committee.

The U.S. Embassy in Damascus confirmed that the delegation was to arrive Friday evening.

Syria, which has good relations with a broad range of actors in the Palestinian, Iraqi and Lebanese political arenas, could contribute a lot to any international push to build a stable peace in the region.

Syria's relations with the U.S. struggled under President Bush, who frequently accused Damascus of allowing people and weapons across their border into Iraq to fight American troops.

However, since the American change of power, Assad has shown cautious optimism, telling Al-Manar television (operated by the Lebanon-based Hezbollah militant group) that a "serious" joint dialogue has already been initiated.

(AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)
(Syrian President Bashar al-Assad attends the emergency Arab leaders summit on Gaza in Doha, Qatar, Jan. 16, 2009.)

"We have positive indications, but we learned to be careful. As long as there are no tangible results, we have to assume that things have not changed," he said.

Damascus suspended its indirect talks with Israel to protest the Jewish state's 22-day military operation in the Gaza Strip aimed at Hamas militants. The assault left about 1,300 Palestinians dead, half of them women and children, and many more wounded.

Neither side has ruled out a resumption of the talks, which focused on the future of the occupied Golan Heights, but they remained on hold Friday.

The Gaza offensive also brought increased calls from voices in the West to engage Hamas, which has the backing of Syria, although that group still refuses to abandon its armed resistance or to recognize Israel. Those conditions must be met before the U.S. or the E.U. are even willing (officially) to speak to Hamas.

Syrian officials have indicated that the international community would need Syria's help if it wished to engage rather than shun the militant Palestinian group.

"It is true Hamas should be engaged; there are new realities on the ground. The Islamic group has managed to stick to its commitment to resist and clinch to its stances despite the apparent heavy losses it sustained, it is still able to fire rockets into south Israel and the Israeli soldier it kidnapped three years ago is still in captivity," says Syrian political analyst Ahmad Fathi.

France, in fact, has started the ball rolling. Former Foreign Minister Jean Francois-Poncet and another Parliamentarian recently met Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, behind closed doors, according to Western diplomats.
Tags:
syria ,
u.s. ,
congress ,
congressional delegation ,
house armed services ,
israel ,
mideast ,
iraq ,
lebanon
Topics:
World Watch
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 69 Comments
by lopezf11 January 31, 2009 2:50 AM EST
There never was a ''''real reason'''' to not talk to Syria.

Now that Druggie Limbaugh and his side-kick Sean Hannity are out of the White House, we can go back to sane foriegn policy.

Posted by whitemale08

And it wasn''t the Syrians who allow jihadis to cross their borders into Iraq that killed our soldiers and Marines. . . right pissant sissy boy?
Reply to this comment
by whitemale08 January 31, 2009 1:37 AM EST
There never was a ''real reason'' to not talk to Syria.

Now that Druggie Limbaugh and his side-kick Sean Hannity are out of the White House, we can go back to sane foriegn policy.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica January 30, 2009 11:43 PM EST
This is a good idea.
Reply to this comment
by ajmarine111 January 30, 2009 11:18 PM EST
Iran''s president has responded to an overture by the new US president by demanding an apology for past US "crimes" committed against Iran.

The US "stood against the Iranian people in the past 60 years", Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said during an address in the western region of Khermenshah.

"Those who speak of change must apologise to the Iranian people and try to repair their past crimes," he said.

The US president has offered to extend a hand if Iran "unclenched its fist".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7855444.stm
Reply to this comment
by pepperwood2 January 30, 2009 11:06 PM EST
Somehow the World''s Leaders are completely taken by the anointed one. So Sad!

President Obama on Tuesday, in an interview with Arabic television, called for more dialogue with Iran to express difference and see "where there are potential avenues for progress."

Without mentioning President Barack Obama by name, Ahmadinejad Wednesday repeatedly referred to those who want to bring "change," a word used often in Obama''s election campaign, and indicated that Iran would be looking to see if there would be substantive differences in U.S. policy.

"We welcome change but on condition that change is fundamental and on the right track," Ahmadinejad said. "When they say ''we want to make changes'', change can happen in two ways. First is a fundamental and effective change... The second ... is a change of tactics."
Reply to this comment
by timinphx January 30, 2009 10:59 PM EST
"After years of disregard by George W. Bush"

News or opinion? I guess with the media now, there really isn''t any difference.

And how mean of ole Dubya to hold Syria accountable for their terrorism and their treatment of Lebanon.

But the Messia with his smile alone will make them instead love Jews and Apple pie.
Reply to this comment
by shrubblows January 30, 2009 10:31 PM EST
Truthin2009 , So when the U.S. was Defeating Native americans it was also Defeating Evil?
***..
Reply to this comment
by truthin2009 January 30, 2009 10:19 PM EST
who wish to prop up their views based
on us agains them good against evil, who see the world through
prehistoric ideals,

from the bottom of my heart.
FVCK, off.

amen


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by biblethumpar at 02:12 PM : Jan 30, 2009


Good vs Evil is a historical reality that has always been. In WWII, the USA defeated the evil NAZIS, for example. The USA has defeated evil in other wars, most recently the violent tyranical evil of Saddam Hussein, the butcher of Baghdad.

Good vs Evil has always existed. You''ve just chosen to side with evil, that''s all.
Reply to this comment
by voidmaster-2009 January 30, 2009 8:56 PM EST
Obama parted the Republican Red Sea, and yea did the Children pass on to the Other side, and were safe from the armies of the Christian Pharaohs.

amen.

Posted by biblethumpar
***
LMAO! Love it.
Reply to this comment
by biblethumpar January 30, 2009 8:06 PM EST
Obama parted the Republican Red Sea, and yea did the Children pass on to the Other side, and were safe from the armies of the Christian Pharaohs.

amen.
Reply to this comment
by biblethumpar January 30, 2009 7:25 PM EST
earth5621 , EffingKIKELover.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 January 30, 2009 7:08 PM EST
Micheal Steele of Maryland, African American, this is the way the republican dogs think the republicans who have done nothing to help the democratic blacks have just elected there leader, can anyone believe they really wanted this man. He is a pawn in there party.These republicans are so transparent
Reply to this comment
by berchesgaden January 30, 2009 7:07 PM EST
If God is a Republican he really
screwed this country up. If prayer
works so well how come Obama
wiped you RepubliCONS OUT!
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 January 30, 2009 7:02 PM EST
That money was not from the US Treasury - it was from Republican contributions...

Posted by IOWEIGN at 02:49 PM : Jan 30, 2009


Palin is back in town and the republicans are voting for a new leader. Palin came to town just in time to update her spring wardrobe.The republicans are down to there last vote and they believe it will be a African man Steele. If the republicans think we voted for Obama because he is black, some did I am sure but far from what Americans thought when we voted for Obama, his ability to speak English something we haven''t heard well, for 8 yrs,,say a sentence that is right in tune with the way America is,and he recognized it, The obstructionist just don''t understand how we think and feel anymore.
Reply to this comment
by frogprophet January 30, 2009 6:57 PM EST
It was Gods will that got Obamba into Office too, huh? By your thinking that''s a fact.

Not bad, having God on your Godless side.
Reply to this comment
by docpeter1953 January 30, 2009 6:29 PM EST
I did not vote for Obama. I voted against him and his socialist, antiGod policies.
-----------------------------
------And, I guess it was God''''s will for Bushto attack the Iraqis, for no reason? I guess it''''s "God''''s will'''' that he was unable to locate bin Laden as well. Republicans have been the mot ungodly political party in this planet in recent years.

Posted by tj217 at 02:58 PM : Jan 30, 2009
___________________

It could be all of the plan to bring about Armegeddon. Fullfilling the Book of Revelations.
Reply to this comment
by ioweign January 30, 2009 5:49 PM EST
The RNC not only dressed her but the dude, their kids and even Levi the Dropout got a suit out of it...

Now lets hear about those people on welfare, no job and they are getting a stimulus check...


----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------

Posted by IOWEIGN at 01:36 PM : Jan 30, 2009

and Democrats haven''''t bilked from the US TREASURY in the past 8 years or do you believe that only one side of the aisle are angels and unblemished ?

Posted by earth5621 at 01:50 PM : Jan 30, 2009

That money was not from the US Treasury - it was from Republican contributions...
Reply to this comment
by biblethumpar January 30, 2009 5:45 PM EST
Earth,
How is the ducking going for ya?
land grabber.
Reply to this comment
by biblethumpar January 30, 2009 5:30 PM EST
So Fvck oh FAKE CHRISTIAN!!!!!!!!!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by CBS_is_worth ...

Dont confuse me with a Christian
JewLover....
Reply to this comment
by closethippy1 January 30, 2009 5:16 PM EST
Truthin2009 - your point is well-taken, but you seem to forget that the liberals don''''t care what the Bible says. They see the Bible in the same light the see the Constitution - just an old document that should be abandoned in favor of ''''progression.''''
Posted by bobmarisol at 02:07 PM : Jan 30, 2009

"GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

%u201CI don%u2019t give a *******,%u201D Bush retorted. %u201CI%u2019m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.%u201D

%u201CMr. President,%u201D one aide in the meeting said. %u201CThere is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.%u201D

%u201CStop throwing the Constitution in my face,%u201D Bush screamed back. %u201CIt%u2019s just a ******* piece of paper!%u201D

Reply to this comment
See all 69 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR