World Watch
January 20, 2009 2:21 AM

Cubans Look For "Change" To Believe In

Portia Siegelbaum is CBS News' producer and reporter in Havana.


(AP)
Expectations are almost as high among Cubans as they are among Americans as the countdown to the inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama speeds up.

Obama's "transparency" and emphasis on change resonates with Milagros Diaz, a 60-year-old cigar maker. It gives her hope that "friendship not war" can exist between the United States and Cuba. "No problems of the type that always end up hurting the people."

Despite the cautious tone taken by their government and 50 years of rocky relations, the average Cuban is feeling optimistic as the first black U.S. president is to be sworn in — his youth and race having caught their imaginations from the beginning.

While Americans face a major economic meltdown, Cubans also are living in a struggling economy — slammed by two devastating hurricanes last year which caused an estimated $10 billion in damages.

Cindi Manuel, 25, says she expects "something positive" to come from Obama, even if "it's not the end to the blockade." That's how Cubans refer to the U.S. economic and trade embargo on their nation.

"There will be economic improvements, openings and an end to some of the restrictions," she says, adding that if the country improves, individuals will also see their living standards rise.

A report the Cuban Government will submit to the United Nations Human Rights Council next month estimates that Washington's nearly five-decade-old embargo has cost the island more than $93 billion in economic losses.

(AP Photo/Javier Galeano)
Cuban President Raul Castro (at left), like his brother Fidel before him, has successfully blamed many of his country's problems on the embargo, and almost all Cubans believe life would be easier and shortages would disappear if relations with their large neighbor to the north were normalized.

Most of the world seems to agree. At a Latin American summit in Brazil at the end of December, 33 Caribbean and Latin American nations called for an end to the embargo and for the past consecutive 17 years the United Nations General Assembly has weighed in against it — the most recent vote was 185-3.

On a human level, U.S. policy has meant dividing families.

For Felicita Rodriguez, a 55-year-old Havana shop clerk, the fundamental problem is "travel and remittances." Both were severely restricted in May 2004, when outgoing President George Bush limited Cuban American visits to one, two-week visit every three years, and only if they had immediate family living on the island. The policy blotted out aunts, uncles and cousins with the stroke of a pen.

The new regulations limited the amount of money Cuban Americans could send to their relatives, a maximum of $300 every three months, and that's to the immediate family as a whole, not $300 to each individual.

Obama has said he will do away with those restrictions, while maintaining the embargo until Cuba releases all political prisoners and takes steps toward democracy.

The Center for Democracy in the Americas recently released a document entitled, "Nine Ways for Us to Talk to Cuba and for Cuba to Talk to Us".

In short, the individual authors, including retired U.S. Army General and former commander of United States Southern Command, Gen. James T. Hill, urged cooperation and engagement with Cuba as best for the Cuban and American people. The essays suggest the two countries could work together in everything from drug interdiction to disaster management, to medical research.

The U.S. embargo also keeps American business locked out of any participation in Cuba's economy. U.S. agricultural sales to Cuba are a one-way street. Tight controls make it difficult for U.S. businesses to sell to Cuba, and force the Cubans to pay cash in advance of delivery. The embargo does not allow the U.S. to import any Cuban products.

Marvin Lehrer of the USA Rice Federation has repeatedly said that without the embargo Cuba could easily become the largest importer of U.S. rice, a position it formerly held.

Throughout his election campaign President-elect Obama defended a position of diplomacy and speaking to U.S. enemies, including the Castro brothers.

Cuban President Raul Castro has on several occasions reiterated his willingness to meet Obama, but warned not to expect prior concessions from Cuba, instead calling for "gesture for gesture," and direct contacts without intermediaries. "But we are in no rush, we are not desperate," he said on Cuban TV.
Tags:
obama ,
inauguration ,
cuba ,
castro ,
latin ,
diplomacy
Topics:
World Watch
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by barryconnoll January 23, 2009 12:44 AM EST
I sincerely hope that President Obama will have the courage to end the illegal embargo on Cuba. Not even Russia was off limits to Americans wanting to travel there during the Cold War. The time is now to get in line with the other democratic countries and trade with Cuba. The UN has consistently condemned the embargo, and it has damaged our image abroad for decades. We cannot let a small powerful lobby in Miami continue to sully our foreign policy with an ill-advised, failed approach.
Reply to this comment
by the_cen January 21, 2009 8:58 PM EST
That story in Investor''s Business Daily or London''s Sunday Times isn''t newsworthy of printing. There are many conservative papers in this country and many, many in other countries that could have ran that story. But none of them did because it wasn''t the Surge that brought any measure of success in Iraq. There are two factors that came into play. One is the Sunni Awakening and the related Sons of Iraq brigade where the US Army paid Iraqi''s a monthly salary to combat the terrorists and give intelligence about the terrorists to the Americans. The second factor is the assassination squads that were put into service by the US government. These small groups were tasked with going out and killing those known Al Qaeda members. Keep in mind, too, that when the Sunni''s turned against Al Qaeda, the terrorists found it more conducive to return to Afghanistan to operate there.
Now what any of this has to do with Cuba escapes me.
Reply to this comment
by the_cen January 21, 2009 8:55 PM EST
That story in Investor''s Business Daily or London''s Sunday Times isn''t newsworthy of printing. There are many conservative papers in this country and many, many in other countries that could have ran that story. But none of them did because it wasn''t the Surge that brought any measure of success in Iraq. There are two factors that came into play. One is the Sunni Awakening and the related Sons of Iraq brigade where the US Army paid Iraqi''s a monthly salary to combat the terrorists and give intelligence about the terrorists to the Americans. The second factor is the assassination squads that were put into service by the US government. These small groups were tasked with going out and killing those known Al Qaeda members. Keep in mind, too, that when the Sunni''s turned against Al Qaeda, the terrorists found it more conducive to return to Afghanistan to operate there.
Now what any of this has to do with Cuba escapes me.
Reply to this comment
by the_cen January 21, 2009 8:50 PM EST
That story in Investor''s Business Daily or London''s Sunday Times isn''t newsworthy of printing. There are many conservative papers in this country and many, many in other countries that could have ran that story. But none of them did because it wasn''t the Surge that brought any measure of success in Iraq. There are two factors that came into play. One is the Sunni Awakening and the related Sons of Iraq brigade where the US Army paid Iraqi''s a monthly salary to combat the terrorists and give intelligence about the terrorists to the Americans. The second factor is the assassination squads that were put into service by the US government. These small groups were tasked with going out and killing those known Al Qaeda members. Keep in mind, too, that when the Sunni''s turned against Al Qaeda, the terrorists found it more conducive to return to Afghanistan to operate there.
Now what any of this has to do with Cuba escapes me.
Reply to this comment
by the_cen January 21, 2009 8:49 PM EST
That story in Investor''s Business Daily or London''s Sunday Times isn''t newsworthy of printing. There are many conservative papers in this country and many, many in other countries that could have ran that story. But none of them did because it wasn''t the Surge that brought any measure of success in Iraq. There are two factors that came into play. One is the Sunni Awakening and the related Sons of Iraq brigade where the US Army paid Iraqi''s a monthly salary to combat the terrorists and give intelligence about the terrorists to the Americans. The second factor is the assassination squads that were put into service by the US government. These small groups were tasked with going out and killing those known Al Qaeda members. Keep in mind, too, that when the Sunni''s turned against Al Qaeda, the terrorists found it more conducive to return to Afghanistan to operate there.
Now what any of this has to do with Cuba escapes me.
Reply to this comment
by mytoosense January 20, 2009 6:55 PM EST
The Cubans want change?
Get rid of everyone in your government with the last name:

Castro
Reply to this comment
by jamster31 January 20, 2009 5:32 PM EST
We trade with Cuba. It''s a bigger country now, I believe it''s called Florida
Reply to this comment
by jamster31 January 20, 2009 3:30 PM EST
Is Castro dead yet? I wonder if his brother will carry on his policies. I''d like to see the embargo end. Maybe we can have Miami back and it become an English speaking city again.
Reply to this comment
by truthin2009 January 20, 2009 11:38 AM EST
If Cubans want true "CHANGE" they can believe in, they need to seek the LORD JESUS CHRIST!

John 14:6

John 3:16
Reply to this comment
by docpeter1953 January 20, 2009 11:19 AM EST
From the above article, ''Cuban President Raul Castro (at left), like his brother Fidel before him, has successfully blamed many of his country''s problems on the embargo, and almost all Cubans believe life would be easier and shortages would disappear if relations with their large neighbor to the north were normalized.

Most of the world seems to agree. At a Latin American summit in Brazil at the end of December, 33 Caribbean and Latin American nations called for an end to the embargo and for the past consecutive 17 years the United Nations General Assembly has weighed in against it %u2014 the most recent vote was 185-3.''
_________________

just so I understand, If the USA would start trading with Cuba, the Cubans would be better off, right?

I am not in favor of trading or an embargo with Cuba, I am neutral, BUT why is it that the UN is trying to tell the USA who they will and will not trade with?

The Castro Cubans are trying to blame the USA for all their woes, when all they had to do was change. It is/was up to the Cubans to change their policies and the USA would follow suit. They, Cubans, chose to ''stay the course'' and suffer.
Reply to this comment
by mrjoshcan January 20, 2009 10:46 AM EST
Would you also agree, Castro, that things are far worse than any mere holocaust, and see that this bishop-toned leader that is about to be seated inside the US White House is harboring case with you about your own identity. In our close nativity and sense that inside this bishops head is a destructive intellect deemed for this bishop''s future against all his worldly objectors good or evil. United States and German immigrants do not see an Castro that bargains at the table with the US''s newest blight on American passion that models only darker regime expenditure. Hey pepperdone, German shown did win the war! - unanimously Qur''an, Holy Bible, and blonde-blue. Better our respectful reasoning! from, Sir. Doug $ supplesoft@twlakes.net
Reply to this comment
by truthin2009 January 20, 2009 9:45 AM EST
If people truly want "change" in their lives, they should seek Jesus Christ, and come to know Him, not some politician.

Jesus will never leave you nor forsake you, He will always be there.

Come to Jesus, and live
Reply to this comment
by mihann January 20, 2009 7:38 AM EST
It''s sad the younger Cubans today aren''t aware of what the Fidel and Raul did to their fellow Cubans. Human rights violations, imprisonment, murder, etc.. are not minor issues to be forgotten. Will Barack forget them too?
Reply to this comment
by wvu74621 January 20, 2009 7:17 AM EST
What qualified Bush-boy to be President other than his pedigree? Bush-boy had a history of using his family ties to his advantage, as when he had daddy help get him into the Nat. Guard so that he could avoid the real war in Vietnam. Indeed, Bush-boys background was of a drug addict and a drunk, who failed in several business ventures, as well as the presidency. Without his family, Bush-boy would have been just another bum, instead of a rich-bum. Compare this to Obama who is truly a self-made man.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by mtee123 at 04:12 AM : Jan 20, 2009


Name one thing that he has done besides duping America.
Reply to this comment
by ramos937 January 20, 2009 7:16 AM EST
Obama''s "transparency" and emphasis on change resonates with Milagros Diaz, a 60-year-old cigar maker. It gives her hope that "friendship not war" can exist between the United States and Cuba. "No problems of the type that always end up hurting the people."
----------------------------

Mr. Diaz is joined by millions of Americans. The GOP, mostly at the insistance of a few old Cuban-Americans in Florida, always maintained the embargo, which penalied both Cuba and the USA. Obama should end this stupid policy ASAP.
Reply to this comment
by hissteps4u January 20, 2009 7:14 AM EST
I have got to be more careful when posting Cloce=close Gotmo=Gitmo
chould=should I will learn someday sorry folks
Reply to this comment
by hissteps4u January 20, 2009 7:12 AM EST
Cloce Gotmo and the Base! Give it back to the cubans and watch how fast relations normalize. We do not need it and the Cubans have suffered long enough they will eventually become democratic by their own devices and nothing we can force them into or chould. Time to change the world for the better....
Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR