Political Hotsheet
January 15, 2009 8:52 AM

George Bush's Farewell Address

Peter Maer is a CBS News White House Correspondent.

Tonight's farewell address will be George W. Bush's final opportunity to put his own imprint on his legacy before he leaves office. The White House says it will be his last major appearance before power transfers to Barack Obama on Inauguration Day.

(CBS)
In the nation’s the first farewell address (actually a written message published in newspapers) George Washington issued "warnings from a parting friend." George W. Bush has already offered cautionary advice to Barack Obama. Mr. Bush said, "The most urgent threat he will have to deal with and other presidents will have to deal with is an attack on our homeland."

The nation and the world have changed dramatically since President Washington's 1796 call for "a careful foreign policy of friendly neutrality that would avoid creating implacable enemies or international friendships of dubious value..."

While Mr. Bush has repeatedly said historians will have to define his years in office, he has clearly tried to shape the retrospective with his final news conference, speeches and a series of interviews conducted in the closing days of his White House tenure. He has boasted of keeping the country safe from terror attacks since 9-11. He is proud of cutting taxes. Despite the worst economy in decades, he has pointed with pride to 52 months of job growth while he was in office. While he has admitted to mistakes and disappointments, his own list of accomplishments includes freeing the people of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Critics of course have a different view. They believe the moment the U.S. invaded Iraq, Mr. Bush lost the international goodwill and sympathy that was generated by the 9-11 attacks. On the home front, there are strong memories of the botched federal response to Hurricane Katrina.

Veteran Republican strategist Ed Rollins told the CBS News Early Show that through the years Mr. Bush has been "overly confident about a lot of things." The former Reagan advisor said, " There was no humility" as Mr. Bush appeared as a "conquering hero" when he wore a pilot's outfit on a flight to the carrier Abraham Lincoln where he stood under the banner that read " Mission Accomplished" long before major combat ended in Iraq. The president has since admitted that placing that banner was "a mistake."

Mr. Bush will certainly voice self confidence tonight. He recently told reporters, "I leave town with a great sense of accomplishment and my head held high."

CBS News will provide live radio and television coverage of the Bush speech at 8:00p.m.eastern time.
Tags:
George W. Bush ,
Farewell Speech
Topics:
George W. Bush
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 69 Comments
by treknutz January 16, 2009 8:27 PM EST
Now Boys and Girls, it''''s time for a story!

Once upon a time, on a planet in a distant solar system, there lived an Evil Emporer Warlord whose plan was to destroy the resistance. The Evil Warlord had an assistant whose name was Darth Cheney. But the force was not with them, and after 8 years,they were blown up by the forces of the resistance who fired explosive Hushpuppy shoes at them.....


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by raflin0010

And may the Schwartz be with you!
Reply to this comment
by treknutz January 16, 2009 8:24 PM EST
I will speak my mind briefly.

Posted by jlayneca

Speaking your mind doesn''t equate to any factual record. Just more hearsay and conjecture on your part. Either put up the source of the FACTS or shut up. Bush was a complete and total sociopath in office who is in complete denial about his so called greatness. The man needs some real medication other than Jim Beam or Boone''s Farm Strawberry Hill.
Reply to this comment
by jlayneca January 16, 2009 6:30 PM EST
My main point is that there is plenty of blame to go around for the mess that this country is in. That blame belongs to Democrats and Republicans. However, a disproportionate amount of it is being aimed at the President simply for the fact that he is one man in charge of a whole branch of government. He is the face that people see most often on the news. He is the one who, fairly or not, gets the blame when things go wrong.

Liberals are blaming tons of stuff on Bush that he had nothing to do with or even tried to prevent. An example is the whole bank melt down. Bush warned Congress (starting in 2001 under the Republicans) that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac needed more regulation to prevent a crisis. He was ignored. The Democrats even held hearings wherein they ridiculed the suggestion that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac needed more regulation. But oh yeah, it''s the President''s fault? I don''t think so.

Reply to this comment
by jlayneca January 16, 2009 6:26 PM EST
For Hakori:

You wrote: "AverageAmer1, oh..one more thing. We liberals were right about bush from day one. Why is it that we''''re ALWAYS ahead of the crurve? I think I know the answer...we think rationally."

What a bunch of nonsense. 95% of the statements by liberals in the comments for this story are so irrational that they make you look foolish. And I would say that a similar percentage of attacks on the President have been unfair.

Bush''s Presidency is not nearly as bad as his critics argue. Many of the things that they blame him for were out of his control as President. For example, the fact that the economy is collapsing has little, if anything, to do with Bush''s policies. There are much deeper factors at work.

Iraq liberals blame Bush for, and that''s one he deserves, and yet it is a mix of good and bad (mainly, I think, bad).

But no, the discourse from the liberals has not been very rational in the past eight years. It has been vocal, rash, ad hominem and extremely disrespectful.
Reply to this comment
by enviro_wacko January 16, 2009 5:23 AM EST
"Bush seeks to reshape his legacy."

Right now, it''s the shape of a_penis.
Reply to this comment
by hillarynow January 16, 2009 4:06 AM EST
Stupid people obsessed with guns did this, stupid people obsessed with war did this, stupid people with the "sit down and have beer with him" mentality did this, stupid people obsessed with abortion did this, stupid people who hate people of color, ***, foreigners and peaceful thinking people did this, stupid people who think putting the USA 10 trillion dollars in debt to China and the Arabs somehow empowers America did this, stupid people who think protecting the natural environment around us is not important did this, stupid people who voted for him did this.. it''s up to the rest of the intelligent people in this world to make sure it never happens again.

Good Riddance President Idiot, you did not keep us safe, you endangered our lives and crippled our nation and our people while you wasted our money on your greedy self and wife, lived in style in our White House on our money while you let America fall into poverty and then patted yourself on the back for it all, and that is how you will be remembered.
Reply to this comment
by johngress January 15, 2009 10:16 PM EST
Legacy
It is apparent that the intelligence leading up to the war was cherry picked, spun and selectively chosen to support the basis for war. Based on statements made recently by the President it is clear that he planned on attacking Iraq regardless of the intelligence. Yes, congress and the senate voted for it, but the vote was based on the before mentioned erroneous intelligence.

Over four thousand American soldiers have been killed, thousands more wounded, tens of thousands of Iraqi%u201Ds have died. And by the time it is all said and done, it is estimated 3 TRILLION dollars will be spent on the war, replacing military hardware and short and long term health care costs for the Veterans. THIS WAS A BUSH LED WAR OF CHOICE.

Look at his appointments to important jobs such as the head of FEMA to see how asleep at the switch he truly was. In 2003, Bush nominated, and the Republican led Senate confirmed, Michael Brown to be director of FEMA. This was even though he had no experience in disaster relief, but was previously the Judges and Stewards Commissioner for the International Arabian Horse Association. Giddy Up. Another words, he was a disaster waiting to happen, and happen it did.

Bush was flying around New Orleans, proudly proclaiming "Brownie, you''re doing a heck of a job." All while thousands were going without food, and water due to the failure of Bush/FEMA to comprehend the totality of the situation.

Bushy, you have got a heck of a Legacy
Reply to this comment
by johngress January 15, 2009 10:09 PM EST
One thing the Bush Administration can always find peace in, his approval ratings are much better than the Democrat Controlled Congress! Those are the true idiots who need to be tarred and feathered!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by AverageAmer1 at 05:48 PM : Jan 15, 2009

It is that the Republicans have had both houses for 75% of his term. And lest you forget that they still make up a significant portion of those so called "True Idiots"
Reply to this comment
by bmlott27 January 15, 2009 8:49 PM EST
I saw on a recent episode of "Mythbusters" that it is in fact possible to polish a ***.

Do you think Bush will be able to polish this ***? (I doubt it...)
Reply to this comment
by AverageAmerican January 15, 2009 8:48 PM EST
One thing the Bush Administration can always find peace in, his approval ratings are much better than the Democrat Controlled Congress! Those are the true idiots who need to be tarred and feathered!
Reply to this comment
by AverageAmerican January 15, 2009 8:48 PM EST
History will show several things the shortsighted people of today chose not to see.

9/11: The person most directly responsible for the success of this attack was Bill Clinton. He allowed the terrorist to live in peace, unmolested, while planning and putting into motion their extensive plans which subsequently propelled us into the war on terror in earnest. 9/11 provides a simple lesson, either we stay proactive and take the fight to the terrorist or we become reactive and fight them on our own soil.

Hurricanes: They happen, they are always bad. The local democrats failed the people of New Orleans, not the Federal Government. Just look as how Texas has dealt with Ike, a storm as bad or worse than Katrina.

Economy: Our current economic crisis was set off by a failed Democrat Policy of social engineering they called the "Fair Housing Act". When you force banks to make bad loans, as Bill Clinton did, it is only a matter of time until collapse. The most unbelievable part of this whole event is the way the democrats blamed it on Bush! How blind are the idiots who voted for the Party Puppet Obama? Hell, Bush even tried to take action to stop this housing market collapse but Nancy Pelosi and her clowns stopped him, thanks a lot!
Reply to this comment
by enviro_wacko January 15, 2009 7:26 PM EST
Woo hoo! Worst president EVER! It will be a long time before a lot of these people who were polled ever vote for a repigletard again -- especially a so-called Christian fundamentalist one.
Reply to this comment
by jlayneca January 15, 2009 7:13 PM EST
For raflin0010:

That you are correct on. That''s something that Bush had the power to do, and he did. I have always thought that the Iraq invasion was a mistake.

But as an overall part of the President''s term, I don''t think that this historically will be as significant as it is to us right now. Many Presidents, the good, the bad, the great, and the in between, have launched wars, sometimes unnecessarily. Bush reacted to the attacks on 9/11 with a strong, military and intelligence response, so strong that many were claiming that he was trampling the Constitution to do so.

But there hasn''t been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11. Will history remember that? Very likely it will, especially if civil liberties concerns moves the Obama administration to drop many safeguards and halt military offensives against the war on terror, and a terrorist attack then occurs on U.S. soil.

How will Bush be remembered? None of us knows for sure, but I would venture to guess that it will not be with the passion that we judge him with now, while these things are fresh in our minds.
Reply to this comment
by jlayneca January 15, 2009 7:04 PM EST
Now for Solarrays247:

You wrote: "I wonder whatever happened to ''the buck stops at the top'' integrity and honor in our society?"

Obviously, that''s a good question, but let''s think about it. The statement "the buck stops here" doesn''t mean that you can blame the President for everything that happens during his presidency.

Take an example: If you get drunk and wreck your car while Bush is in office, can you blame it on him? Less outlandish example: If GM outsources jobs to China or Mexico because the auto workers union refuses to work for less benefits while Chinese workers will, and the President tries to fix this but Congress (who has the power to do so) refuses, can be blame the President? No. That would be unfair and silly.

So what the saying means is that when the President has the power to do something, he has the responsibility for what happens from the use (or abuse) of that power. It doesn''t mean that we can blame him for every bad thing that happens along the way.

So a good place to start is to look at the executive''s power as laid down in the Constitution.
Reply to this comment
by chillout57 January 15, 2009 7:04 PM EST
Everyone keeps saying that the President this or the President that, the real issue you are commonly side-stepping is the fact that there are 535 people in Congress (thats 435 in the House of Representatives and 100 in the Senate in case you don''t know) between the scenario of the President initiating and the President signing whatever. Besides, by the time something gets back to the President it usually is hardly close to what was really necessary in the first place.
Now I know that everyone wants to blame Bush, he is an exiting 8-year sitting President and they make the easiest targets. However most of the financial ills that has crippled our society were the ones cooked up by the programs instilled during the Clinton Administration. Not that Clinton did these himself, but the blame points to his administration. Bush was just the person on the point when all of that collasped. You would be hard pressed in the modern era and find a President who has had more things happen during his administration that W.
Obama will get his four years and he''ll be done, and at the end of his administration, the same naysayers will sound similar to what they are saying now. Chillout
Reply to this comment
by enviro_wacko January 15, 2009 6:56 PM EST
"Bush seeks to shape his legacy."

Right now, it''s shaped like a_penis.
Reply to this comment
by jlayneca January 15, 2009 6:56 PM EST
Oh yeah, one more thing antoniof123, the budget process is not started by the President. Again, if you''ll read the Constitution, Article I specifies that all spending legislation must originate in the House of Representatives. That''s where the budget process begins, not with the President.

The President simply submits a budget to Congress, which they are then free to completely disregard, modify, etc. The President always faces the very difficult and unenviable choice (damned if you do and damned if you don''t) of either signing it with all of the wasteful pork barrel spending, or vetoing the whole thing (throwing out the baby with the bathwater).

So no matter what happens, someone is going to blame the President. When this becomes excessive and outlandishly person, like it has at Bush, it''s time to step back and take a look at reality.
Reply to this comment
by jlayneca January 15, 2009 6:52 PM EST
By the way antoniof123, the budget is not "voted on and signed by the President." Read Articles I and II of the Constitution.

You''re arguing without knowing what you''re talking about.
Reply to this comment
by jlayneca January 15, 2009 6:50 PM EST
antoniof123, sorry but that''s nonsense. I asked how Bush is responsible for the economic collapse, and here%u2019s how you %u201Canswered%u201D my inquiry:

"Okay here it is 2.5 million people this year alone losing their jobs budget is set by the administration presented to congress and then voted on and signed by the President. Did you notice the President starts and ends the process."

Ummmm... and this answers my question how? Without going into the budget question (because it%u2019s largely irrelevant), it will suffice to say that the President has a minimal role in the budget process (except insofar as he signs or vetoes), especially with the Democrats in power in Congress.

But that process aside, HOW DOES THIS ANSWER MY QUESTION? I asked about the ECONOMY, NOT THE GOVERNMENT. The President DOES NOT start and end THAT process.

You people seem to have the idea that government and the economy are the same thing, or that the government is the head of the economy or something, which isn''t true. The government regulates abuses, etc, but the overall thrust of the economy is the private sector, not the government.

So 2.5 million jobs being lost isn''t a federal budgetary question. It has to do with credit markets, pay rates, oil prices, discretionary spending, GNP, and a thousand, nay a million other tiny little factors that are in the private sector!

Obviously, you''re just looking to blame Bush for something that he has little, if anything, to do with.
Reply to this comment
by solarrays247-2009 January 15, 2009 6:25 PM EST
Because you CAN''''T. It isn''''t his fault. It happened on his watch though, and you can better believe people will give him the blame, but it''''s out of ignorance.
Posted by jlayneca at 02:47 PM : Jan 15, 2009

The "buck still stops at the top" no matter how YOU want to wrap it! Let''s see if Bush is man enough to step up to the plate? I seriously doubt it...I wonder if he has any sense of reality?

Reply to this comment
See all 69 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER