World Watch
January 1, 2009 4:48 AM

U.K. To Adopt Guantanamo Detainees?

(AP Photo)
One of Britain's biggest newspapers says the U.K. may volunteer to take in terror suspects currently penned up at America's Guantanamo Bay prison camp in Cuba.

President-elect Barack Obama wants to shut down the controversial military detention facility which has long been a lightning-rod for criticism by humanitarian groups. To do that, he needs to figure out what to do with about 250 prisoners still held there.

According to the Thursday article in The Times, Britain's leaders weren't willing to help out President Bush by taking "cleared-for-release" prisoners off his hands, but they are eager to start their relationship with Mr. Obama on a high-note, and that may mean adopting some terror suspects.

"Of course the Foreign Office wants to do it, they want to get off to a good start with Obama," the article quoted one government source as saying.

(AP Photo/Shaun Curry/Pool)
It is, however, important to keep in mind the political muscle-power wielded by the British leaders who are considering this option. Prime Minister Gordon Brown (at left) is about as popular in his own country right now as warm flat beer is in the United States.

He's not done badly in recent polls against the opposition Conservative party, thanks to his perceived sound handling of the economic crisis (ironic, as he was Tony Blair's finance chief during the years of boom which preceded this bust), but if an election were called anytime soon, he'd lose.

(AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)
If the Conservative party were to come to power, it's very unclear whether would-be Prime Minister David Cameron (at left) would share Brown's apparent enthusiasm for helping Obama out of his jam.

Here's a thorough analysis of Obama's Guantanamo prisoner predicament by CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen.

Brown's government has been embarrassed by a seemingly endless series of gaffes this year, and telling the good people of Britain that some new neighbors are on the way... after extended stays at a "camp" in sunny Cuba, may not go down well. Particularly when they mention, possibly as an afterthought, that these folks were arrested as suspected terrorists.

One of the first comments left by a reader on The Times' Web site seems to sum up the likely British public reaction succinctly: "This is so crazy I don't believe it."

But hey, maybe nobody else will notice the news. Most of Britain is sleeping off its collective New Year's Eve hangover today.
Tags:
britain ,
uk ,
guantanamo ,
terrorist ,
detainee ,
obama
Topics:
World Watch
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by mrjoshcan January 3, 2009 2:10 AM EST
Count the already numerous americans with bond for deceptive credit issues set under unrealistic interest. How to "lock up any guilty ones again but set the unconvicted free to live in the US, which after all arrested them in the first place", in which bradosol, British living in Wales proposed. This harbors fugitive bail initiatives that can never get paid back. Could a better public American campaign for releasing Gitmo prisoners, be to receive these initiatives as gift grants from "a haven as undesirable as Britain" - "or perhaps Wales." Doug - supplesoft@twlakes.net
Reply to this comment
by bradosol January 2, 2009 4:30 PM EST
I reckon the current British government might take in a few Gitmo alumni, and then boast about how humane and fair-minded the British are. But it won''''t be so much to please Barack Obama, as to please the Muslim fascist subculture of the UK. Britain already harbours and supports numerous terrorists who are wanted elsewhere.

Posted by larryhammick at 03:26 AM : Jan 02, 2009
___________________________________

I''m British, living in Wales. You may well be right - I''m no expert on these matters. But I do know that, like every government, ours manages to annoy a lot of its citizens.

Assuming you''re right, it follows that it''s only fair for the US to keep these Gitmo prisoners - maybe even put them on trial to see if they''re innocent or guilty. Then lock up any guilty ones again but set the unconvicted free to live in the US, which after all arrested them in the first place.

That way, the US can avoid pandering to the "Muslim fascist subculture" of my country, which "harbours and supports numerous terrorists".

I''m amazed there isn''t a public campaign in America to keep these people far away from a haven as undesirable as Britain - or perhaps there is.
Reply to this comment
by larryhammick January 2, 2009 6:26 AM EST
I reckon the current British government might take in a few Gitmo alumni, and then boast about how humane and fair-minded the British are. But it won''t be so much to please Barack Obama, as to please the Muslim fascist subculture of the UK. Britain already harbours and supports numerous terrorists who are wanted elsewhere.
Reply to this comment
by mrjoshcan January 2, 2009 4:00 AM EST
Why should not Great Britain, while the Guantanamo americana experience with London Israeli leaders, currently holding power over Foreign Office, whos Europia fear should or should not accept past judgement of Great Britian''s future peoples as a way to stop conflict over oil. Most Americans feel that the United States roll in sunny Cuban detention nothing different, as to say closing an South Africa Cambodian paradise. Doug - supplesoft@twlakes.net
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot6 January 1, 2009 4:55 PM EST
Not only should the UK accept these criminals but they should give them jobs in their Homeland Security Dept.

Posted by JackP32

Except that they''re not "criminals". You''re kinda missing the point: these people have been denied any kind of due process or justice and have never been convicted of ANYTHING.

Reply to this comment
by jackp32 January 1, 2009 4:01 PM EST
Not only should the UK accept these criminals but they should give them jobs in their Homeland Security Dept.
Reply to this comment
by inventagod2 January 1, 2009 1:45 PM EST

''U.K. To Adopt Guantanamo Detainees?''

The headlines should read:

''U.S. Lapdog Continues Whitewash of Bu$h 9/11 Atrocities''
Reply to this comment
by liberty4you January 1, 2009 1:34 PM EST
The U.K. is so amusing.

Their elected officials are preparing to implement a database of every internet user''s emails and web searches.

I find it ironic as to how many Pakistani and Afghan Iranian English based terrorists that come out of England. Even Iranian spies.

The North London Mosque is renowned for training radical ideologies that has been supported by the Prince of Wales. (Charles).

The RIIA should spend more time following radicals than the people''s web searches in the UK.

Perhaps the may need to relocate to Zambia.
Reply to this comment
by weigherman January 1, 2009 8:59 AM EST
I personally have no problem with Gitmo detainees coming to the UK,the only problem I have is the landing of the US aircraft bringing them, so may I suggest that the best option would be to parachute them in, one chute between them should be more than adequate.
Reply to this comment

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn