Horserace
November 12, 2008 4:25 PM

Who Were Those Clinton-McCain Crossover Voters?

CBS News’ Election and Survey Unit’s survey analyst extraordinaire Jennifer De Pinto goes inside the exit polls from last week’s election and finds some interesting nuggets about those Hillary Clinton supporters who voted for John McCain:

As voters left the polls on Election Day, many were asked how they would have voted if the election match-up were between Hillary Clinton and John McCain rather than Barack Obama and McCain. 52 percent said they would have backed the former Democratic candidate; 41 percent would have voted for McCain, wider than Obama’s 7-point margin over McCain.

Interestingly, 16 percent of McCain voters said they would have voted for Clinton, the Democrat, if she had been her party’s nominee.

So who were these potential cross-over voters?

  • They were older: 61% of them were age 45 and above.

  • 53% were women; while 47% were men.

  • 43% of these voters who supported McCain but would have backed Clinton if she were in the race described themselves as Independents. 31% were Republicans; while 26% were Democrats.

  • 84% of them were white – higher than the electorate at large. 12% were Hispanic, compared to 9% of the total electorate.

  • 21% of McCain voters who would have supported Clinton said race was factor in their vote. 19% of McCain voters overall said race was factor in their vote.

  • 61% of these McCain voters who would have backed Clinton earned $50K or more annually. 39% earned less. 61% do not have a college degree.

  • These voters valued experience over change. 47% said experience was their top candidate quality and 32% said a candidate who shares their values. Just 10% picked change. But like voters overall, the economy was the top issue for these voters.

  • 58% of McCain voters who would have supported Clinton if she were a candidate said their candidate’s personal and leadership qualities was more important in their vote; 36% said it was their candidate’s positions on the issues.

  • Among McCain backers overall, voters were divided with 48% choosing issues and 49% picking qualities. But among the electorate at large, 58% said their candidate’s position on the issues was more important.

    While 85% of Obama voters said they would have voted for Clinton had she been the Democratic candidate, 13% would not have supported her including 6% who said they would have backed McCain and 7% who said they would not have voted.

  • 60% of these voters were under age 45.

  • They were mostly men. 59% were men; while 41% were women.

  • 41% of these voters who supported Obama but would not have backed Clinton if she were in the race described themselves as Democrats. 20% were Republicans; while 38% were Independents.

  • While most of these voters were white (74%); 17% were black – higher than the share of the total electorate. 5% were Hispanic.

  • 53% of these Obama voters who would not have backed Clinton earned $50K or more annually. 47% earned less. 58% do not have a college degree.

  • These voters were clearly looking for change – 57% picked it as their top candidate quality. This was followed by values (20%) and cares (12%). Experience ranked last with 8%.

  • 60% of these voters said issue positions were more important; 38% said it was leadership and personal qualities.
  • Tags:
    Clinton ,
    McCain ,
    Obama ,
    exit polls
    Topics:
    Exit Polls
    Share:
    • Share
    • Yahoo! Buzz
    • Mixx
    Add a Comment See all 150 Comments
    by express-talk November 15, 2008 12:25 PM EST
    This is not realistic ! Obama went through more scrutny and charges of harsh swift boat of the GOP. His performance in debates and handling of the economic crises were all factors! McCain could have chosen a different candidate if Clinton were to be nominee. These are all real factors that were not in play in this poll. Those racist voters may still have been swayed by the GOP ticket if Hillary have conducted and ran a less smart campaign like she did in primary against Obama. I disagree with this imperfect poll!!
    Reply to this comment
    by babooph November 14, 2008 1:43 PM EST
    If Bush could have ran again ,almost all the Mc Cain voters would have voted for him again.
    Reply to this comment
    by differnet November 14, 2008 12:59 PM EST
    The facts in this column will be exactly why the Obama supporters will never forgive Cliinton. She is smarter and stronger than Obama. Oh well, this country tends to get the government it deserves.
    Reply to this comment
    by maxund November 14, 2008 11:50 AM EST
    Coulda, woulda, shoulda. It doesn''t matter but at least it keeps pollsters employeed and that helps reduce the rising unemployment rate. Considering the number of pollsters out there, they may account for 5% of all workers, based on the number of polls we had in the last election.
    Reply to this comment
    by intheshade-2009 November 14, 2008 9:49 AM EST
    John McCain would have won over Clinton, because he had more respect as a person and represented more of a change than Clinton.
    Reply to this comment
    by chika6 November 14, 2008 7:08 AM EST
    This report is too childish. If Mrs Clinton had such support, how come she lost to Sen. Obama? The simple reason why she lost to Obama is the same reason she would have lost the presidency. Lets just agress that Sen. Obama is the better candidate, period!
    Reply to this comment
    by farouk7 November 14, 2008 3:28 AM EST
    I hate to see that Obama is buttering up to the Zionists Jews. It was not enough that he selected Joe Biden, a notorious pro-Israeli proponent as his running mate. It is also the fact that he saw fit to name as his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. This man is so in love with Israel that it''s hard to believe he''s not a Sabra. Not urging that Lieberman immediately be sent packing is more evidence of his extreme pro-Israel stance.
    Reply to this comment
    by noahsark10 November 14, 2008 12:51 AM EST
    I was going to vote for Hilary also. McCain and Hilary views were very similar and Obama was just too unknown for me and too far to the left.
    Reply to this comment
    by zurdeee November 13, 2008 11:38 PM EST
    TexwLove: Thanks for being the narrowminded pinhead that you truly are. I would have voted for Condoleeza Rice in a heartbeat, had she been in the running, so the reason I didn''t vote for Barack had nothing to do with his race. I chose not to vote for him because he''s a socialist. As I stated earlier, hold on to your wallet (or what''s left of what''s in it - if you haven''t yet learned how to save).
    Reply to this comment
    by chuckamok November 13, 2008 11:24 PM EST
    Whatever plagues we may suffer through in the future ... a reinfestation of the White House by the Clinton Slime is NOT one of them.

    Thank God, Zeus, Buddah, Gaia, your sainted ancestors.
    Reply to this comment
    by karela33 November 13, 2008 11:12 PM EST
    Two Words: Ground Game! Hillary didn''t have the ground game to pull the voters out in numbers like these. Obama won many, many states that Hillary didn''t even bother campaigning in during the primaries and caucuses.

    Hillary didn''t go through the battering negative ads--and there would have been plenty. The repubs had actually made a negative feature length movie that they planned to release because, like everyone else, there was a time when they assumed that she would win the primary. They had lots and lots of time to plan and prepare the ugly campaign they planned for poor Hill.

    Obama won in many states that Hillary could not have competed in.
    Reply to this comment
    by dburfears November 13, 2008 10:49 PM EST
    People who conduct and analyze a poll like this are as stupid as those who believe it.

    Clinton did not suffer the last months of heavy negative advertising and personal attacks that Obama did. NATURALLY her positives would be higher and negatives lower by election day.

    So OF COURSE Clinton did better against McCain. If Clinton had won the nomination then Obama would have polled better than Clinton after the election.

    This is a meaningless and embarrassingly stupid poll.

    Reply to this comment
    by diogeron November 13, 2008 10:43 PM EST
    The fallacy here is that exit polls always oversample Democrats. Ask John Kerry. While Hillary might have run better than Obama among Ds, many of these people polled many not have been registered to vote as first time voters because Obama''s team did that and, moreover, she would have not done as well among Independents as did Obama, so I take this with a grain of salt.
    Reply to this comment
    by pands93 November 13, 2008 10:29 PM EST
    Such clairvoyance, such political prescience, CBS%u2019s News Election and Survey Unit%u2019s %u201Csurvey analyst extraordinaire%u201D Jennifer De Pinto delivers.

    Ah, yes, CBS: locus of truth, of fair-minded politics, neither left nor right; free of politically tendentious management, reporters, TV newscasters; free of Dan Rather; . . . free of new contrivances and pre-structured, customized %u201Cpolls.%u201D
    Reply to this comment
    by TexGEOas November 13, 2008 10:27 PM EST
    Oh, please....

    Who believes any poll CBS cooks up!

    Reply to this comment
    by samia7 November 13, 2008 9:51 PM EST
    Pulling the racist card .Obama won deal with it.
    Reply to this comment
    by samia7 November 13, 2008 9:49 PM EST
    Pulling the racist card .Obama won deal with it.
    Reply to this comment
    by maxund November 13, 2008 9:41 PM EST
    Coulda, woulda, shoulda....
    All these exit polls really don''t matter now do they? I guess this just keeps pollsters employeed and in this economy I suppose that has value.
    Reply to this comment
    by noonh8 November 13, 2008 9:21 PM EST
    While this is very interesting, it really has no basis in reality. We have no idea what kind of campaign this would have shaped up to be. Many people dislike Mrs. Clinton because of sexism or just dislike of her husband, it is emotional not intellectual. I''m just glad we have a Democrat in the White House. I think we can all agree Mrs. Clinton was an affective advocate for President Obama (Love saying that!) and helped get him elected. I truly hate to see more of the racist ugliness that came from Obama supporters during the primary. They once loved Mrs. Clinton but since she got in the way of their entitlement they have to lie and make her a she-devil. She is not. While she would be a smarter and better president than Obama, there is no doubt he was the better candidate. And the best candidate wins. Which he did.

    My only wish about all this is that if Mrs. Clinton had been the nominee (and was within an inch of doing so) I don''t think the TERRIBLE PROP 8 would have passed in California. All polls have shown that black voters voted yes on 8 by 70% and made it law. Which is disgusting. And black people came in droves to vote for Obama because he was black. I don''t have a problem with that, only with people that deny it. Funny how people that have had so much discrimination put on them, turn right around and do it to others when they have the chance -- showing human nature can be ugly, it has nothing to do with the color of your skin.
    Reply to this comment
    by LostInaFog November 13, 2008 9:20 PM EST
    I think I''m missing something...

    If Obama won by 53% to 46% and Hillary would have won (theoretically), by 52% to 41%, that means that her entry into the race over Obama would have pushed many more folks to vote 3rd party? Up from 1% to 7%. And only a small number of those were Obama voters?

    I may be missing something here...
    David
    Reply to this comment
    See all 150 Comments

    About Horserace

    Description for Horserace

    Add to your favorite news reader
    google
    yahoo
    msn
    • MOST POPULAR