Horserace
October 16, 2008 12:06 AM

Joe The Plumber's Chat With Couric

Joe Wurzelbacher – immortalized during tonight's presidential debate as "Joe The Plumber" – spoke with CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric shortly after the conclusion of the final debate between Barack Obama and John McCain.

To get a sense of just how central Wurzelbacher was to the debate, consider this: McCain and Obama mentioned Wurzelbacher 26 times during the 90 minute debate. By contrast, Iraq came up six times, and the word "economy" was used 16 times.

While still on the air, Couric asked Wurzelbacher what he thought of the debate. He said he wasn't swayed either way, though he seems to be leaning towards one of the candidates.

"I mean I have a pretty good idea who I’m going to vote for but you know that’s my - you know, the nice thing about going into the booth is only me and the lever knows," he said. "I think McCain did a fine job this evening, I think he brought up some good points. I do like his health care and I do like his, where he stands on taxes."

The conversation continued on Couric's webcast. Here's the full transcript of that exchange, along with video:

COURIC: We want to go to Joe the plumber, Joe Wurzelbacher from Toledo, Ohio, because Joe is telling me that he's got three live trucks parked outside his house - actually from Holland, Ohio, let me correct that, Joe. Was this a bit of a surreal experience, hearing your name mentioned not once, but twice, but almost half a dozen times during the course of this debate, Joe?

Mr. JOSEPH WURZELBACHER: Yeah, actually, surreal's a good word to use for it. It was - you know, I was glad I was able to act as some type of point, you know, to where they could sit there and hammer out what they both think, what they want to say. But ultimately, you know, the important part was the debate.


COURIC: And again, why don't you just reiterate quickly for us, Joe, because I want you to get back, get to your local news station where you are, how you felt about the statements made by the candidates vs. the statements you heard when they were out on the campaign trail talking to you.

WURZELBACHER: One thing I noticed that seemed like Obama changed his mind on offshore drilling, which I thought was a good move. I don't know how much he wants to do of it, I'd like to talk to - hear more about that. McCain I - made a solid - you know, McCain was solid in his performance.

Obama speaks well, but the one thing that's really important, that everyone in America really need to know is, you know, talk is talk. You know, he can speak pretty, but, you know, there's got to be action behind it. We've seen McCain, we know his actions. Even if you disagree with him, at least you know where he stands. McCain - or Obama, we're not sure where he stands yet, even after his debates. Like I said, he speaks eloquently, better than I do, but I honestly, I still don't know where he stands. He's said a lot, but none of his experience has backed it up. You know, the only experience I've seen or his actions are raising our taxes, so, you know, I'm middle class. I can't have my taxes raised anymore.

COURIC: Well, he supposedly will raise taxes only on people who make over $250,000 a year. Would you be in that category?

WURZELBACHER: Not right now at presently, but, you know, question, so he's going to do that now for people who make $250,000 a year. When's he going to decide that $100,000 is too much, you know? I mean, you're on a slippery slope here. You vote on somebody who decides that $250,000 and you're rich? And $100,000 and you're rich? I mean, where does it end? You know, that's - people got to ask that question.

COURIC: Could you just, Joe, explain quickly, and then we'll let you go, how you met both of the candidates?

WURZELBACHER: I've yet to meet John McCain. Obama came to my neighborhood and my son and I were outside tossing the football, and all of a sudden he showed up, and there went our football tossing for a while. And, you know, neighbors were outside asking him questions, and I didn't think they were asking him tough enough questions, so I thought, you know, I'll go over there. You know, I've always wanted to ask one of these guys a question and really corner them and get them to answer a question of--for once instead of tap dancing around it. And unfortunately I asked the question but I still got a tap dance. Do you - almost as good as Sammy Davis Jr.

COURIC: Joe Wurzelbacher, I mispronounced your last name earlier, Joe. Maybe you should fill in on "Meet the Press," Joe. Or "Face the Nation," I should add. I know they're looking for someone on "Meet the Press," that's why I said that. Joe, hey...

WURZELBACHER: Great. I've got opinions and I, you know, and that's it. But I - you know, everyone has opinions.

COURIC: Yeah, that's for darn sure. Well, Joe, thanks so much for talking with us. I'll let you get outside to your local news reporters. And really, I really appreciate your spending some time with us tonight. And now everybody knows your name, at least, right?

WURZELBACHER: I don't know if that's good or bad, but we'll see how, you know, the future brings.

COURIC: All right, Joe, thanks very much.
Tags:
Joe Wurzelbacher ,
Joe The Plumber ,
Katie Couric
Topics:
Debates
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 318 Comments
by pigboat2 October 18, 2008 4:39 AM EDT
Forget the character attacks, however deserved or not. Let%u2019s deal with the actual issue that was raised. Here%u2019s a relevant excerpt from the (very) conservative Wall Street Journal%u2019s article of OCTOBER 17, 2008, ''As Joe the Plumber Grows Famous, the Politics Get Murkier'':

"To reach a level that would be affected by Sen. Obama%u2019s proposed tax increase, Mr. Smither said, a mom-and-pop plumbing company like Newell would have to clear $5 million in annual sales. [Joe%u2019s company actually reports only $100,000 in sales.]

Even if Mr. Wurzelbacher reaped taxable income from his business of $280,000 a
year, he''d pay only about $900 more a year in taxes under Sen. Obama''s plan, which
would raise the tax rate on the income between $250,000 and $280,000 to 36%
from 33%.

[...]

If Mr. Wurzelbacher earns the wages of a typical Ohio plumber, $40,600, and holds a $90,000 mortgage, he would see a TAX CUT (emphasis added) under Sen. Obama''s plan of more than $1,000, compared with no tax reduction under Sen. McCain''s.

If he succeeds in buying the plumbing business where he works, he could see even more tax benefits, including Sen. Obama''s proposed elimination of capital-gains taxes for small-business investment, a 50% tax credit to purchase health insurance for employees and a $3,000 tax credit for every new hire over the next two years."

Yep %u2026 facts are pesky things.
Reply to this comment
by ilovejoethep October 18, 2008 1:31 AM EDT
G.G.L. terrorist?
Reply to this comment
by mlr_08 October 17, 2008 7:42 PM EDT
Playing the played out Ayers card. Yawn.

Try playing with the G. Gordon Liddy one for awhile. Not likely, right?

Reply to this comment
by ilovejoethep October 17, 2008 7:32 PM EDT
Conspiracy Theorist fbla1825:

1."McCain''''s extensive use of "Joe the Plumber" (the man''''s real first name turns out to be Samuel)"
---He goes by his middle name GASP! That''s worse than hanging out with William "Bill" Ayers, an admitted, unapologetic terrorist!

2."the man is neither a licensed plumber...
---Shows what you know about businsess, dip wad. Every single member of a crew need not be licensed; they work under the license of the plumbing contractor.

3. "nor a business owner, and also doesn%u2019t earn anywhere near $250,000"
---Pay attention. He said he was hoping to buy the company he works for currently. He just wonders if it will be worth his effort if Barry''s Robin Hood scheme will eat up his profits. A fair question to ask, no?

4. "Samuel is now hiding out incognito somewhere"
---No, likely he has stopped giving interviews because HE HAS A JOB SO HE CAN SUPPORT HIMSELF & HIS FAMILY; unlike the bunch that are collecting beer money by standing on a street corner as an interim solution until they get their handouts.

5. "95% of the public won%u2019t learn the facts."
---The only 95% in play here is the 95% of Americans who will "get a break". I noticed that NOW, AFTER MUCH CRITICISM, Barry has changed his tune to "WORKING" Americans. Bada Bing! That changes everything - NOT! It is smoke and mirrors, guy. Just you wait and see (God forbid).

6. "the Republicans will again try to steal this election"
---CAN YOU SAY "ACORN?"
Reply to this comment
by nilofc October 17, 2008 6:21 PM EDT
I went to college and worked hard for my money and the guy sitting at the bar next to me, who%u2019s as lazy as a rock will get my money just because he has a pulse.

The dumbing down of America.
Reply to this comment
by nilofc October 17, 2008 6:21 PM EDT
I went to college and worked hard for my money and the guy sitting at the bar next to me, who%u2019s as lazy as a rock will get my money just because he has a pulse.

The dumbing down of America.
Reply to this comment
by ilovejoethep October 17, 2008 5:08 PM EDT
Oh, PLEASE! You people who think Joe the Plumber is a "plant" are ridiculous. Don''t you think if the Republicans were going to "plant" someone, they would "plant" them in a much higher profile event - not the suburbs of Holland, Michigan? I would not be surprised to find that you are also the kooks that believe OUR GOVERNMENT HIRED BROUGHT DOWN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER!

Conspiracy theorists, indeed.PFFFFFT
Reply to this comment
by mlr_08 October 17, 2008 4:39 PM EDT
Undecided voter? ORLY? He''s SUCH a plant! How convenient, his question to Obama. How "suprisingly" well that has worked into the McCain campaign. And for an undecided voter, seems decidedly right-wing. And now -

"Joe the Plumber, the star of tonight''s debate, may have a very interesting connection to John McCain. In fact, Joe the Plumber (Joe Wurzelbacher) of Cincinnati, Ohio may be related to one Robert Wurzelbacher of Cincinnati, Ohio, who happens to be Charles Keating''s son-in-law. Robert Wurzelbacher was implicated in the Keating 5 scandal, and sentenced to 40 months in prison in 1993. Wurzelbacher is also a huge Republican donor."
Reply to this comment
by ilovejoethep October 17, 2008 3:13 PM EDT
WIWC

The PRIMARY advice Joe the Plumber gives is get educated about the candidates.

Why are you people trying to assassinate this guy''s character? Hew was out playing ball with his kids when the caravan came ''round. He asked a valid point. Should government really have a say in how much is too much? To tax success?

Actually I may be one of those who would benefit financially from Obama''s proposed tax scheme. Yeah, I could use a little relief - you see, I am still paying for a couple years'' worth of taxes (but that is my bad and I don''t expect a bailout). But for me, it is NOT about ME. It is first and foremost about ideals and the opportunities that are available to those who will do more than sit on their *** with their hand out. Yeah, I believe we need tax reform, but this scheme is destined to blow up in everyone''s face. The person who pockets their "tax credit" will then have very good reason for a change to cry "I can''t get a job!" Companies will not be able to grow and create more jobs, and many companies will have to cut back jobs due to the increase in their tax burden. So what does the government then do to rescue us from that scenario?

Again, for me it is about ideals. Obama is an socialist/marxist extremist, the likes of which this country has never seen in a race to the presidency. He covers that fact so effectively that there are many, many intelligent that have been duped. Very sad for our future. Very, very sad.

Reply to this comment
by ilovejoethep October 17, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
morphicweb - see this series of articles:

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/series8.aspx
Reply to this comment
by ilovejoethep October 17, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
morphicweb -
You are correct that corporations are responsible for voting these nefarious power mongers. The most powerful in $ and influence combined are the media!

It is precisely because the so-called unbiased media is in fact left-leaning that the details about Obama''s RADICAL Soclialist views are not widely known. Think about this: Obama could not even get a job as his own bodyguard because of past ties to Ayers. And we''re gonna give him the keys to the White House? I would rather see Paris Hilton paint the White House pink! We know more about Paris'' associations that Barry''s.

With regard to the mortgage crisis - greed is as greed does. But just because a corporation puts a slick package on the proverbial shelf does''t mean we should put it in our cart. Just because a corporation is prepared to send it''s highest independent producers on a junket to Jamiaca doesn''t mean that these independent representatives should push people to buy a product that is questionable. Just because a Real Estate or Mortgage Broker has access to a 125% of value loan doesn''t mean...well you get my drift.

It is remarkable to me that Obama was so in favor of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (a.k.a the McCain-Feingold act - how about that?) that he vowed to accept public campaign dollars - a provision of which limits spending and there for limits corporate influence - the decided against it. Why the turn-around, Barry? Corporations sending YOU on a junket to the White House?
Reply to this comment
by wiwc October 17, 2008 1:22 PM EDT
Call me optimistic, but I hope that "Joe the Plumber" or "Joe Sixpack" is not your average American Joe. I consider myself and my family to be about as average of an American family as there is - middle class, middle income, middle America, hardworking, etc. John McCain and company''s comparison of "Joe the Plumber" and "Joe Sixpack" to average americans is VERY insulting to our intelligence. To everyone else - what are we even doing, taking advice on the most important election of our time, from "Joe the Plumber" who isn''t even licensed in to do work in his field? Why isn''t he licensed? Is he not competent or reliable enough to get his license? Is he not paying the taxes he should be, jilting the rest of us that do? Is he not trustworthy enough to have in your home? In this interview, Joe is questioning Obama''s character, motives and qualifications, comparing him to "Sammy Davis Jr". Joe should put his own values up on the table for everyone to review. I''m certain we would see that he is not as average of a guy that McCain believes he is. Or, does John McCain actually think Joe the Plumber is average?
Reply to this comment
by hottishan October 17, 2008 5:34 AM EDT
quit your crying America. We are punished we are punished.. Poor poor pittiful me.People take responsibility. We vote these morons in.If you ask me since tax payers are the ones paying their salaries we should beable to fire these jerks. Any other job in this country they would get fired. You think if ol Barny Frank pi*&ed away that much of Johnson and Johnsons money he would still have a job. Heck no.
Reply to this comment
by morphicweb October 17, 2008 4:30 AM EDT
ilovejoethep

Fair enough. The socialist leaning Dems may have had a particular interest in spreading the wealth via the housing industry but wasn''t this pursued just as heavily by predatory lenders who saw immense opportunity to cash in on an idea that ''eventually'' became manipulated by greed? The original intent was to help those on the cusp...but something went wrong.

The relationship with big business and government must change. I think that''s the fundamental problem.

Let me just ask this honestly and I realize that there may be a fundamental difference of opinion here but who''s really at fault for the mortgage crisis?

The lower to middle class?

The government?

Or the corporations who put the government in power?

The government afterall merely audition to the public to get into office (sponsored heavily by big business.)


Either way, I can''t help but feel as I''m sure many others do that Capitalism governed improperly has serious and potentially devastating possibilities.

Not that Socialism will solve all the problems, I''m not saying that -it just seems that a nice balance between both ideals would probably save us all a lot of serious headaches in the future.

Reply to this comment
by fakejoe October 17, 2008 4:29 AM EDT
http://fakejoe.blogspot.com/

I don''t work for McCain.
I don''t work for Obama.
I just want to do what''s right for me and America.
Reply to this comment
by ilovejoethep October 17, 2008 3:48 AM EDT
Hi, morphicweb

"It''''s [Socialism] not a perfect idealogy but shouldn''''t we fear the corporations of Capitalism more than we fear elected officials? At least they can be replaced."

You are very thoughtful in your response. I respect that.

Let''s face it, it was government that allowed the downfall of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I think Mae and Mac started out as an ideal most could have lived with. But it was GOVERNMENT (ahem - the Democrats) that pushed these entities to lower their standard of acceptable risk. They were in effect ramping up their policy to "spread the wealth" by providing the ability to obtain equity in real estate to unqualified people. Only then did corporate - and I might add individual - greed kick in. HEY... everybody''s doing it and the government condones it!

In this case, Republicans saw the train wreck coming and advised oversight. Democrats - pandering to special interests and in many cases low income constituency - were the ones who said "Oh, no, we don''t have a problem here!" Do you really think they were protecting their constituency? Noooooo...they were protecting their political careers, their stature in the community, and their POWER! See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

Our government is set up to have checks and balances of power. WE CANNOT RISK, AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME TO PUT ALL BRANCHES OF POWER IN THE HANDS OF SUCH RADICAL DEMOCRATS AS PELOSI, READ AND OBAMA?!?!!!
Reply to this comment
by morphicweb October 17, 2008 1:27 AM EDT
ilovejoethep:

I''ve read the article and here''s an honest assesment. The fear of socialism appears to stem from the belief that one''s individual liberties will be taken away and that the state will control every aspect of the individuals life. Thinking outside the state is tantemount to criminal and in extreme cases - resulting in death.

It seems a bit paranoid on some level to me. Canada, Australia, Sweden...socialist governments in general terms...the standard of living is high, low violence, freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - it''s all there.

It''s not a perfect idealogy but shouldn''t we fear the corporations of Capitalism more than we fear elected officials? At least they can be replaced.



Reply to this comment
by ilovejoethep October 17, 2008 12:44 AM EDT
morphicweb - here is a good article on the subject of Socialism:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/why_obamas_socialism_matters_1.html
Reply to this comment
by pmeech1 October 17, 2008 12:19 AM EDT
Amazing.... People automatically think Joe the Plumber is a plant because he exposed Barack''s tax plan. Maybe he''s just a curious guy. Who cares..... At least now we got the truth.
Reply to this comment
by morphicweb October 17, 2008 12:18 AM EDT
kcsteak2

I understand the line of thinking but aren''t those who have worked so hard being punished right now? Aren''t they actually punished more by being held down by the wealthy?

Will the poor cause more damage to us then the rich?

Haven''t we been mislead by the ideals of Capitalism in this way?

They''ve told us for years that our tax dollars will go to the weak and incompetent in a socialist society...but is this really true?

With people loosing their houses, their 401k''s, their healthcare, their jobs...their lives...doesn''t capitalism appear to have been a complete failure for the vast majority of Americans?

I''m just wondering but in a socialist society wouldn''t we have a better chance at mutual success instead of a very select few who reap all the rewards?




Reply to this comment
See all 318 Comments

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR