Couric & Co.
September 18, 2008 4:44 PM

Capitol Hill's Bailout Blame-Game

Jill Jackson is a Capitol Hill field producer for CBS News.
It's not easy to figure out whom or what, exactly, is to blame for the current financial crisis. But the latest hit this week when the Federal Reserve bailed out AIG, the largest insurance company in the world, got members of the House ready to point fingers. It was the final straw in a series of economic rescues and interventions by the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve that put tax payers on the line for possibly hundreds of billions of dollars. In an election year, lawmakers do not want taxpayers – otherwise known as voters – to think they put them there.

Last night, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi started pointing her finger directly toward the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. "The most recent bailout initiated by the Bush Administration is just another example that George Bush is a failed manager," Pelosi said after announcing hearings to investigate fraud and look at what new regulations will be needed in the future. And today, the speaker threw numerous punches at Sen. John McCain calling the presidential candidate the "greatest deregulator."

House minority leader John Boehner was confident that he could identify the source. "The root of the problem started with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," Boehner said referring to the giant mortgage finance companies taken over by the Treasury Department last week. Then Boehner blamed the Democratic Chairmen in charge of market oversight in the House and Senate, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. "Everyone in this town knew the regulator for Fannie and Freddie were weak," Boehner said. "But Barney Frank and Chris Dodd stood in the way of anything moving."

Fiscal conservatives in the House backed up Boehner's assertion that Fannie and Freddie are responsible. And they also blamed Democrats. But they're clearly not trusting the Bush Administration these days either. Members sent a letter to both Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson asking for assurances that there would be no more government bailouts. Rep. Michelle Bachman of Minnesota ticked off the major companies that the financial world insists are too big to fail. "What's next?" Bachman asked. "Starbucks?"

The only thing lawmakers in the House seem to agree on is that they want to know more from the Bush Administration. Why did they decide to bailout AIG when there was some kind of offer on the table? Will there be any more massive saves of financial giants? Republicans wanting answers to those questions had to cancel two meetings because no one from the administration would come to brief the lawmakers.

And they want answers fast. Hearings examining the latest decisions to let Lehman Brothers go bankrupt, but to rescue AIG begin next week. And while those hearings will continue into October, most lawmakers are scheduled to go back to their districts, campaign hard and assure voters before Election Day that they are not to blame.
Tags:
jill jackson ,
bailout ,
aig ,
government ,
congress
Topics:
Capitol Notes
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by hwhitealltel September 21, 2008 8:05 AM EDT
"No Job Left behind" - Is one Bush policy McCain will continue. The same people who argued for electing the Bush - worst leader in the history of any country are now advocating for McCain. The GOP needs to be punished for their failed policies. Elect Obama/Biden because it''s a no brainer.
Reply to this comment
by laughinthru September 19, 2008 9:36 PM EDT
When the lying management at Ebay get done destroying the company, I wonder if the Feds will be so quick to bail out the millions of sellers who will be put on the unemployment line. Seems unlikely because they''re not bankers, just ma, pa, the handicapped and home schooling moms.
Reply to this comment
by shylove2 September 19, 2008 9:34 PM EDT
It is no problem seeing that the blame is reaganomics and non-regulatory excess. There has been savings & loan bailouts, leveraged buyout scandals, dot.com busts brought on by easy money from Greenspan, enron, katrina, ike, and subprime credit crunching. There was a reason for regulations of finance, of food, of pollution, and for taxes to support them. And taxes for bailouts, maybe taxes to rebuild and harden hurricane zones and health care for the general public good. And without the profit motive getting in the way ans siphoning off a good part of the money. Less money should be going into advertising, lawyers, CEO''s and more for actual service.
Remember Reagan also said "Trust BUT Verify"!!!
And the National Guard should NOT be a standing army forr this country. It was meant for emergencies include defense but no where does it say they should be used for foreign fiascos over and over again. Someone needs to stand up for them, they are the most stressed of all in times like this.
Reply to this comment
by cappeet September 19, 2008 7:59 PM EDT

I am quite ignorant when it comes to stocks, the Federal Reserve and the banking system. However, I do know that my tax dollars are paying to bail out so many failing financial institutions and I am very concerned with these Lenders not approving short sales that are being asked for by their defaulting borrowers.

Let me give you my background. I have been in the real estate industry for twenty plus years. For almost a year now, I have been helping sellers process short sales with their existing lender in the Coachella Valley of California. Countless times, I have presented an offer to a lender, only to be told that they want more money for the home and then they end up foreclosing. They will put the home back on the market for LESS than the offer we presented to them as a short sale. These lenders are losing anywhere from $50,000 to $100,000 more on these homes because they won%u2019t co-operate and accept our fair market value offer of the property. We, as taxpayers, are paying the price for their non-cooperation. If you multiply that $50,000 by 100 homes, that is $5,000,000 more in losses that we tax payers have to pay for. That is only when considering 100 homes; Imagine the dollar amount if you calculate the thousands of homes that are being declined on a monthly basis.
Reply to this comment
by shadowplay13 September 19, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
Who''s to blame for THIS? Would the answer cause a "crisis of confidence"?

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/the-ghost-in-the-machines-the-mystery-of-the-wtc-hard-drive-recoveries/
Reply to this comment
by mike88i September 19, 2008 2:07 PM EDT
Why is it so fast (a matter of hours) and easy for the government to bailout big corporations and banks, but help for the middle class takes complicated legislation and months (if not years to come along)?
Reply to this comment
by mike88i September 19, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
Why is it so fast (a matter of hours) and easy for the government to bailout big corporations and banks, but help for the middle class takes complicated legislation and months (if not years to come along)?
Reply to this comment
by kight67i September 19, 2008 2:07 AM EDT
Ah Yes, Pelosi, So many critize Sarah as being " a heart beat" away from the Presidency and yet this nut-job is two. If my memory hasn''t failed me , wasn''t it Bill who pledge homeownership for all. Didn''t he de-regulate the mortgage industry to the point where" If you have a job and any job , plus $199. dollars down, you too can own a home." Don''t worry about it Bill, when these mortgage institutions, handed out mortgages like it was an online prescription. (comission up front) no worries, The whole reason America used to plunk 20% down was to make the consumer vested in their home. Another little trick of the trade had to do with debt ratios, this is what you really can afford, but if we tweak these numbers, we can get you into a much bigger house ( commission upfront much bigger) So middle America start emptying your pockets it''s not enough that you did follow the rules, live within your means, Obama,Pelosi, and Bill needyou to fix everyone else''s American Dream
Reply to this comment
by mccain081 September 18, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
The government should not be bailing out these big companies. The AIG is a big mistake. You know whose money it is that is bailing out AIG and other big companies, it''s ours!!! the taxpayers! us!! AIG got themselves into this they should get thhemselves out of it. We should''nt have to et them out of it. That money could be going to something better. Such as national peace or even reducing taxes. The reason this is happening is because of the democrat controlled congress. the only way we can get out of this problem and others is to vote McCain and Pailin to the White House and to vote in a republican congress.
Reply to this comment

About Couric & Co.

Go for a look behind the scenes at The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric for stuff we like and for surprises. It's also a place for you to post comments and join our conversation about the news.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Kennedy: Bishop Barred Me From Communion

    (337 recent comments)