From The Road
June 25, 2008 9:34 PM

Sharpton Calls Nader’s Comments “Most Troubling”

(CBS)
From CBS News' Ryan Corsaro:

(NEW YORK) Rev. Al Sharpton sent an open letter to consumer activist and independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader today following comments he made about Sen. Barack Obama, in which Nader claimed Obama "talks white" and ignores issues of poverty.

In the letter, Sharpton said he found Nader's comments divisive and "most troubling."

Nader's comments were published today in an interview with the Rocky Mountain News and quickly spread on the Internet, in which he said, "(Obama) wants to show that he is not a threatening . . . another politically threatening African-American politician...He wants to appeal to white guilt. You appeal to white guilt not by coming on as black is beautiful, black is powerful."

"I don't know how one "talks black or white," wrote Sharpton in an email which was emailed to members of the press.

"There are clearly different styles and speech cadences in every community."

In closing his letter, Sharpton wrote accused Nader's comments of being "beneath the respect many have had for you and more importantly below the level of political discourse we need at this point in history."

"Those of us that deal with real people in real pain in the black community every day need real answers and real change and that is more important than the volume or style in which it is presented."

Earlier today in Chicago, Obama dismissed the comments by Nader, who has announced earlier this year that he is running for president as a third party candidate.

"He's somebody who is trying to get attention and whose campaign hasn't gotten any traction," said Obama. "So what better way to get some traction than to make an inflammatory statement like the one that he made."
Tags:
al sharpton ,
ralph nader ,
white ,
black ,
barack obama
Topics:
Barack Obama
Add a Comment See all 33 Comments
by luckyhammer June 25, 2008 10:20 PM PDT
Ralph is right. Obama is now more "pro-Israel" than Israelis (Jerusalem), he bashed black fathers on Father''s Day, ala Clinton and Sister Soljah, and is now very comfortable with helping Wall Street and the Pentagon. Who needs this, Al??

Reply to this comment
by luckyhammer June 25, 2008 10:22 PM PDT
Ralph is right. Obama is now more "pro-Israel" than Israelis (Jerusalem), he bashed black fathers on Father''s Day, ala Clinton and Sister Soljah, and is now very comfortable with helping Wall Street and the Pentagon. Who needs this, Al??

Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 June 25, 2008 10:43 PM PDT

Nader''s is a useful voice, but sometimes he becomes tangled in his own rhetoric.

For example, he will admit economic issues are neither black nor white. Poverty, as John Edwards made clear, affects all Americans. So, why is Nader trying to persuade Obama to "talk black"?

Nader, of course, would insist he is not, but merely trying to direct election-year discourse to an area which needs attention.

But if Nader''s message is still useful, his expression is abortive-- it confounds the very effect he desires, to get prompt attention to economic injustice.

To adopt a racial usage in what might be a "post-partisan" and "post-racial" campaign royally confuses the issue, and is counterproductive to even Nader''s ambitions.

Obama, himself, defies glib description, but symbolizes a process of national unification and focus on the real issues of America-- in which there a future of hope for all Americans.
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher June 25, 2008 11:59 PM PDT
TruUSA - nice try, if misguided. Few will fall for such an amateurish attempt to dilute support for Senator Obama.

Especially given that Senator Clinton will be actively campaigning for him.

But don''t worry, regardless of your doubts, he will prove to be an effective leader, and you''ll probably benefit as a result.

Reply to this comment
by gaypastor June 26, 2008 12:58 AM PDT
Whatever Al. And you''re suppose to be one of my collagues! I''ve noticed you never said it was "divissive" or "troubling" for a woman running for President to be called "evil" or "Satan" or a "***." Are you capable of caring as much for your sisters as your brothers? Even your beautiful, intelligent, strong Black sisters? If so, I haven''t seen it from you yet? Run to "the man''s" help but ignore all the women who have helped to get you where you are now! How typical!
Reply to this comment
by seah5 June 26, 2008 1:43 AM PDT

Nader is right

Obama desperately needs the white vote. He is going out of his way to appeal to the white voter.

He does not have to appeal to the black voter at all, he united the in solidarity. He told them all he is giving them as he campaigned in church after church though out the country.That is a given with out a doubt and sworn to.

Obama divide the rest of the nation, he even divided the Democratic party, the broke it down some more by moving half to Chicago.

His mind conditioning works better on smaller groups than on vast masses. But it has been working. So he is taking his campaign into high gear to run with it strong between now and nov. that is why he need the money and opted out of the funding.

His mind conditioning is like what they do in the quit smoking & lose weight seminars The speech effect hypnosis and mind conditioning.
with his gift for speeches and able to be insured that they will play over and over again on the media and utube, with the reinforcement items in the ads and everywhere else. It will cost a lot of money, and be extremely time consuming. Money can buy him what he wants.

You would think Americans would be outraged, sad thing is they do not even know what is going on with it all.

Jim Jones did hundreds, Hitler did thousands, Obama does millions%u2026%u2026.

Eh, he needs your votes. will he get Americans to do more than that?
The odds are yes, if he needs to.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 June 26, 2008 3:34 AM PDT
I have always found sharpton more troubling than most other people. He only shows up for a cause when he can make a buck. Talk about a leach feeding off his own people.
Reply to this comment
by hhkeller June 26, 2008 8:26 AM PDT
Ralph calls it like it is.

Obama plays to right of center on critical issues and no one blinks because of his color. Either Obama has no backbone and posturing for votes or he''s actually less progressive than the Democrats.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb June 26, 2008 8:33 AM PDT
Sharpton Calls Nader%u2019s Comments %u201CMost Troubling%u201D

Maybe so, but its still early, we haven''t heard nothing yet!
Reply to this comment
by nativeeyes-2009 June 26, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
It''s so funny to see all the Obama haters talk about his strengths as being a bad thing.. lol!!

Hating someone this much just shows your lack of intelligence and education.

Obama has Elite, Rich, Young, Women, Educated Middle Class and Minority supporters that have donated $260 mil to his campaign.

You haters haven''t donated squat to McCain, hmmm why is that?

You are just as Flawed and out of touch with a Progressive America as Republicans are.

EVOLVE PEOPLE, IT DOES THE MIND GOOD...
Reply to this comment
by tonit1920 June 26, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
Nader''s comments need to be taken for what they are...to call attention to his campaign.

We in America are having to take a good look at our roles in politics and in the leaders that we are going to elect and those leaders that we have elected.

If you are going to criticize a individual use his/her proper name. It is an indication of the type of individual you are and please use a dictionary. Also, if you are going to denigrate an individual''s character, use proper english.
Reply to this comment
by nativeeyes-2009 June 26, 2008 9:15 AM PDT
In the Words of a great Writer, who''s English are we speaking?

It''s not the Queen''s English.

Didn''t July 4th have something to do with not taking anything from England?

It''s America''s quote, unquote English. With America being the biggest Melting pot of Languages.


English to conversate and English to write are totally two different languages.

It''s silly to say, you talk proper, when English is a *** language from it''s roots.

It forms new words every year to be included into our dictionaries.

So if Nader wants to really say something silly and meaningless to appeal to whomever, at least say something worth while and intelligent.

If not, then Hush.. It''s a word..
Reply to this comment
by bfjones666 June 26, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
Nader is and has been for some time irrelevant. Bob Barr may have some impact this year but Nader has been relegated to the trash bin of American politics. He''''s just saying anything he can to garner some attention. So sad.
Reply to this comment
by nativeeyes-2009 June 26, 2008 9:47 AM PDT
If you paint Obama as being very far left, what you are actually saying is, he is for the workers of America, not the Elite of America even though most of the Elites want him in office.

Conservatives don''t know what to make of Obama since they know they cannnot control his voting accord of cleaning up politics from the inside out. His Transparency Act was an out right move against Republicans and some Democrats to move away from Lobbysist and Special interest getting their teeth and hands into the pockets of Politicians.

His Proliferation Act was to stop us selling our Arms Surplus to Foreign Countries..

Since 1996 he has been active in cleaning up our Countries stalemate bills that needed ovehauling like Nafta and Lead paint.

If he was in office at the time he would have voted against the War in Iraq like (R)Sen Hagel and (D)Sen Webb.

If want to paint him as a Doer far left then do and he will win with it.

But to say he will raise our Taxes is a OUT RIGHT lie.

Yes he will raise taxes on those whom benefited and didn''t need or ask for it, the wealthy.

250k households pay less taxes than middle,lower and poor people..

If you think that is right, than you must be misinformed of who you really are, a HATER of American values and it''s system of the People first...
Reply to this comment
by nativeeyes-2009 June 26, 2008 10:06 AM PDT
Obama has and will always win over the White working Class of America.

It''s only a selected few States that have more ancestral racism and antipathy for those that are not like them, does he not get their votes.


If you look at the history of those voters, Bill Clinton, Gore and Kerry didn''t get their votes either..

Anybody Candidate that garnered more Minority support, didn''t get the Bubba vote if you would call it. That group mostly votes in the general election than the Primaries anyway.

Obama can win with out those states that have more Bubba votes because of the electoral college map.

It''s bad when those same folks are some of the biggest complainers of the economy with their sons and daughter over in Iraq wanting to come home and not die on Foreign soil for no reason than a Oil which is the only real reason why we are there now..

I don''t understand why anyone in this down market would keep supporting the Republicans.

They are killing our way of life, economy and children right before our eyes..

Democrats are awake and need to put a stop to this carefree attitude of another Republican will help get us out of this mess they got us into. when that actual Republican helped us get into this mess in the first place...
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 June 26, 2008 10:37 AM PDT
he''''s an actor in front of a teleprompter. like the newsmen that glorify him on every broadcast.
Posted by bswalker12


I%u2019ve always thought of Republican President George W. Bush as television%u2019s %u201CTed Baxter%u201D (from the Mary Tyler Moore Show). Bush seems to never know what he%u2019s talking about and it%u2019s been obvious that his handlers have to brief him on the issues.

John McCain will do likewise serving as the front man for the Right Wing Neo-Conservative Republican Fascists Regime (AKA Exxon/Mobil).
Reply to this comment
by nativeeyes-2009 June 26, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
McCain is the most flawed Presidential Candidate known to mankind. His voting record has and will always be puppetized. He is a born follower, never a leader.

The most affluent Republicans and Conservatives are not supporting McCain''s campaign and the Republican base knows this.
Conservatives know they have a flawed Candidate in McCain and vowed to stay home.

McCain has become the sacrficial lamb for the Republicans.

Why don''t you take a closer look at why not one well experienced Republican has thrown his name in the hat to become the VP?

They know that they have their own house to clean and their own States seats to win over in the next eletction.

Republicans are losing their seats at alarming rate.

Why do you think that is..

America has seen thru all the rhetoric and fear mongering coming from the right wing Media and it''s conservative base.

The America people have awaken to the REAL politics and won''t get duped again.

Independents are moving left center and don''t want another Republican in the Oval office no matter what it takes.

Reply to this comment
by nativeeyes-2009 June 26, 2008 10:46 AM PDT
Obama has won over 40% of Independents in the Primaries compared to 8% for McCain.

You can''t win an election with out the Independents support.

McCain only has a 58% Conservative approval rating.

The more you and others like you continue to bash Obama, you are actually giving him more support in view of Conservatives and Independents that are tired of this administrations missue of our Taxes and Values..


By the way, I am Native American and we only support a high intelligent Candidate that has shown time and time again, he or she is for the PEOPLE of America and not just for his own Resume'' into retirement..


bswalker12 you know what I am saying is true.. You just want your guy to win at all cost, even though you hate what the Republicans have done to our economy and this illegal War..
Reply to this comment
by June 26, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
What''s the problem, Al? The Black community talks like this all the time and you don''t seem to have a problem with it when they speak their minds. What we have here is another glaring case of racial hypocrisy. The more it happens, the more we are going to call someone on it. It''s called accountability; and even Al Sharpton is not immune.
Reply to this comment
by June 26, 2008 11:23 AM PDT
Hmm, let''s see. With JFK we had Camelot. What ''might'' we have with Oprahma? Oprahmalot?
Reply to this comment
by shiftpower June 26, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
Sharpton''s response is beneath him, because obviously he didn''t read Nader''s entire comments, or didn''t care that it was clear from the context that Nader wasn''t talking about speech patterns, he was talking about content. The content of Obama''s campaign courts the rich, white power structure, not poor and working class black voters. Not surprisingly Sharpton wants to shield the Democratic candidate because he buys into the "least worst" voting strategy which will ensure the continuing decay of our democracy where candidates and the press are bought and sold and voting one day becomes a meaningless tradition.
Reply to this comment
by gocubs58 June 26, 2008 1:32 PM PDT
Posted by bswalker12 - Remember when osamaobama wouldn''''t wear the flag pin? We didn''''t forget, nor will we come November.

-----

Obama did this to make a point, which of course all neocons will take out of context.

"The truth is that right after 9/11 I had a pin," Obama said. "Shortly after 9/11, particularly because as we''re talking about the Iraq war, that became a substitute for I think true patriotism, which is speaking out on issues that are of importance to our national security."

Reply to this comment
by smoothrn June 26, 2008 1:44 PM PDT
"Most troubling" is that Al Sharpton advocates for poor and mostly urban blacks yet has the tenacity to criticize Mr. Nader over his misunderstood comments.

Ralph, in so many words, said that Obama should be advocating more for cracking down on subprime mortgages scams and fighting for universal healthcare - which he is not.

Should any group act in a particular way? No. Nader''s point was that Obama would be more inclined to support aggressive and progressive policies toward issues that haunt much of the African-American community (since Obama identifies with that community).
Reply to this comment
by smoothrn June 26, 2008 1:50 PM PDT
"Most troubling" is that Al Sharpton advocates for poor and mostly urban blacks yet has the tenacity to criticize Mr. Nader over his misunderstood comments.

Ralph, in so many words, said that Obama should be advocating more for cracking down on subprime mortgages scams and fighting for universal healthcare - which he is not.

Should any group act in a particular way? No. Nader''s point was that Obama would be more inclined to support aggressive and progressive policies toward issues that haunt much of the African-American community (since Obama identifies with that community).

www.votenader.org
Reply to this comment
by smoothrn June 26, 2008 1:51 PM PDT
"Most troubling" is that Al Sharpton advocates for poor and mostly urban blacks yet has the tenacity to criticize Mr. Nader over his misunderstood comments.

Ralph, in so many words, said that Obama should be advocating more for cracking down on subprime mortgages scams and fighting for universal healthcare - which he is not.

Should any group act in a particular way? No. Nader''s point was that Obama would be more inclined to support aggressive and progressive policies toward issues that haunt much of the African-American community (since Obama identifies with that community).

www.votenader.org
Reply to this comment
by smoothrn June 26, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
"Most troubling" is that Al Sharpton advocates for poor and mostly urban blacks yet has the tenacity to criticize Mr. Nader over his misunderstood comments.

Ralph, in so many words, said that Obama should be advocating more for cracking down on subprime mortgages scams and fighting for universal healthcare - which he is not.

Should any group act in a particular way? No. Nader''s point was that Obama would be more inclined to support aggressive and progressive policies toward issues that haunt much of the African-American community (since Obama identifies with that community).

www.votenader.org
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca June 26, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
Obama has won over 40% of Independents in the Primaries compared to 8% for McCain.

First of all, that''s not true...the independents are split in half, just like the democrats were in primaries...read some more besides Obama''s lying website.
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca June 26, 2008 1:56 PM PDT
Just like Al Sharpton and ilk...a person doesn''t have a right to speak out and voice an opinion...it might offend his delicate little sennnn saaa biilities!
Reply to this comment
by smoothrn June 26, 2008 2:04 PM PDT
"Most troubling" is that Al Sharpton advocates for poor and mostly urban blacks yet has the tenacity to criticize Mr. Nader over his misunderstood comments.

Ralph, in so many words, said that Obama should be advocating more for cracking down on subprime mortgages scams and fighting for universal healthcare - which he is not.

Should any group act in a particular way? No. Nader''s point was that Obama would be more inclined to support aggressive and progressive policies toward issues that haunt much of the African-American community (since Obama identifies with that community).

www.votenader.org
Reply to this comment
by Mr_Technical_Dude June 26, 2008 3:17 PM PDT
Both Nader and Sharpton have missed the point by equating poverty to Black. Next thing you know they will be equating it to alcoholism. While I agree that Obama comes off as a White man with Black skin (a mockingbird) I agree that his view of poverty is no clearer than Nader''s or Sharpton''s.
Reply to this comment
by Mr_Technical_Dude June 26, 2008 3:17 PM PDT
Both Nader and Sharpton have missed the point by equating poverty to Black. Next thing you know they will be equating it to alcoholism. While I agree that Obama comes off as a White man with Black skin (a mockingbird) I agree that his view of poverty is no clearer than Nader''s or Sharpton''s.
Reply to this comment
by reunionpi June 26, 2008 6:31 PM PDT
Read page 11 of the income tax return of Al Sharpton''s tax exempt
Line 65 - Payroll taxes and related interest and penalties $ 1,879,278. Cash Overdraft 74,922

www.webofdeception.com
Reply to this comment
by jennrich2 June 26, 2008 11:50 PM PDT
Rev. Sharpton and Senator Obama get over it. Ralph Nader has worked tirelessly for the disenfranchised in America, both black and white. Spin this all you want, Nader is a great man.
Reply to this comment
See all 33 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road

  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented