Horserace
May 24, 2008 1:32 PM

Did Hillary's RFK Remark Doom Her?

Following Sen. Hillary Clinton's statement that presidential nominating contests have historically lasted late into the calendar year, citing the June 1968 assassination of Robert F. Kennedy as one example, an observer said the comment probably dooms any chance that she would be picked for the number two position by frontrunner Sen. Barack Obama.

"This probably means the end of her campaign," said David Mark, senior editor of Politico.com, on The Early Show. "She was already treading on pretty thin ice. To raise the specter of a tragic event like an assassination, this probably ends any vice presidential hopes she had."

Clinton was quick to apologize for the statement, saying Friday, "I regret that if my referencing that moment of trauma for our entire nation - and in particular the Kennedy family - was in any way offensive. I certainly had no intention of that whatsoever."

However, Mark doesn’t believe the retraction will work.

"She trying to walk this back as furiously, as quickly as she possibly can," he said. "But yes, the damage is essentially done. There's no way of taking it back. It's right there in black and white, on videotape. And whatever she meant, it will be taken a certain way."

What does this mean for talk of the "dream ticket," which has been building in part as a means to allow a graceful and perhaps productive way to end the standoff between the two presidential hopefuls?

Mark believed the chances of an Obama-Clinton pairing were slim before her comments on Friday. "I don't think he particularly gains much from having her on the ticket," he said. "I don't think he particularly needs her. Yes, half the Democratic Party is with her, but most Democrats are not going to go over and vote for John McCain" if their candidate doesn't get the nomination.
Tags:
hillary clinton ,
rfk ,
assassination
Topics:
Hillary Clinton
Add a Comment See all 498 Comments
by pagabas May 24, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
Thanks for writing this excellent article. Your analysis is correct. I can''t understand why she will use something as tragic as the assassination of Robert Kennedy in a month of June to justify her staying in the race. She doomed not only her chances to be VP, but potentially of winning a re-election in the senate because people now know her true colors. All she cares about is becoming a President at any cost, asking to re-write the rules in the middle and after the game-
Reply to this comment
by suzyku May 24, 2008 2:48 PM PDT
I hope the main stream media keeps reporting this story as they did on Obama''s reverend! It''s time that the people of this country see hillary for what she really is-so blinded by her own ambitions that she has no perspective, do anything, say anything to get herself elected! Hopefully it''s finally backfired on her!!!
Reply to this comment
by vanesa4 May 24, 2008 3:19 PM PDT
There is a subliminal message in Hillary'' slip... Being the second time she goes this route when speaking in public, I dread the thought of was goes on in her mind when not in public...
We don''t want such devious person in the White House, not as #1 and not as #2. In fact, many of us are sick of seeing her on the campaign trail! She should be more respectful of her own sympathizers, not wasting their donation money to satisfy her personal ambitions.
Reply to this comment
by blondchic May 24, 2008 3:21 PM PDT
You have got to be kidding me? Is this the best CBS can do to join the witchhunt against Hillary. Once again, the media is trying to pick the next President. I wonder...does the media want McCain or Obama???
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 24, 2008 3:23 PM PDT
OF COURSE DAVID MARK OF POLITICO.COM WOULD SAY THIS.

HE IS AN OBVIOUS, BIASED OBAMA SUPPORTER. WHICH PLACES HIM THE CATEGORY OF ALL THE OTHER "OBAMA IDIOTS" THAT THINK CLINTON''S STATEMENT WAS ANYTHING OTHER THAN DRAWING ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT THIS WOULD NOT BE THE ONLY RACE THAT HAS LASTED THROUGH JUNE.
RFK''S ASSASSINATION WAS A HISTORICAL EVENT AND ON THIS FORTY YEAR ANIVERSARY PEOPLE WOULD MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT IT. EVEN TED KENNEDY SAID IT WAS NOT MENT IN A HARMFUL AND DISREPECTFUL TONE.

GET OVER IT. STOP WHINNING AND CRYING. GO MAKE MICHELLE HAPPY. BUY HER A PUPPY. MAKE HER PROUD OF HER COUNTRY AGAIN.

GOD "BLESS AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
Reply to this comment
by sandycat2 May 24, 2008 3:24 PM PDT
If you listen to what she said, she was using her husband''s June nomination win and RFK''s death in June as a timeline to show the media and others who have been unmericiously hounding her to get out of the primary that primaries in the past did not end before June. Unfortunately, the use of RFK''s death was a bad choice. She did not as some of these terrible media people say, hope that death wopuld happen to Obama. I just want fairness in a compaign and Clinton did not get any fairness from the media. The media constantly picked on and smeared everything she said and did. Unlike Obama who has been given a free pass until the Wright issue. Obama has lied so many times it makes my head spin, but the Obamamedia refuses to in bring it up as an issue. This sickens me.
Reply to this comment
by ttdd3 May 24, 2008 3:26 PM PDT
Mention that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said they were not offensive
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 24, 2008 3:32 PM PDT
THE MEDIA WILL CONTINUE TO FLUFF OBAMA''S PLLOWS AT EVERY CAHNCE.

OBAMA''S LIES WILL CATCH UP TO HIM, AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL VOTE ACCORDINGLY.

"PROFESSOR OBAMA" WILL HAVE TO GO BACK TO HIS FANTASY JOB AS "A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR" AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO. A JOB WHICH HE LIED ABOUT BEING A PROFESSOR. HMMMMMM

GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
Reply to this comment
by rational_1 May 24, 2008 3:37 PM PDT
The RFK reference is an unconscious slip-up on Hillary''s part. She''s probably already thinking of how to Vince Foster poor Obama if she becomes the VP. LOL - this woman''s inability to control her mouth is matched only by her husband''s inability to control his ***.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 24, 2008 3:42 PM PDT
PUT A SOCK IN IT HILL,
For the first time (maybe in a long time) the Democratic Party had a Presidential Candidate front runner to unite behind such as the Republicans always do, far before the election process even began.

WHAT HAPPENED???

I now shutter to think of what is going to come out of that woman''s mouth next!
Reply to this comment
by opedanderson May 24, 2008 3:43 PM PDT
I think HRC should leave the race, but I dont see how her comments were infering that she was waiting for BO to be killed. That''s a stretch. Keith Obama-man on MSNBC was way over the top to imply that......
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 3:44 PM PDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 3:45 PM PDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by micmacarac May 24, 2008 3:45 PM PDT
This comment has doomed HILLARY. She will wake up Monday Morning and be 180 delegates behind OBAMA.
.....oh!.......nevermind.........
Reply to this comment
by gaiaschild-2009 May 24, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
YES her remark doomed her and then again, her apologists are smoothing it over. Even David Brooks, the best conservative God ever made, says he just can''t believe she meant it that way. But more, her entire slippery slide out of leadership into reactivity, meanness, manipulation, deception, denial, cheap shots and dirty tricks and pandering ... those things have tarnished her once enviable position as Chief Female. Maybe for her soul, a good learning experience. But I don''t want any more of it until she rehabilitates herself. Might take about a year of deep reflection. Read all 7 Harry Potter books. Learn from your mistakes.
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 3:51 PM PDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca May 24, 2008 3:51 PM PDT
Absolutely NOT! And anybody that supports such an assanine idea needs to sign up for the goofball prize!
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 24, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
She''s a brave lady but I think it clearly show''s she needs to step aside. Her nation needs her and her followers right now and IF she steps aside and steps up for those things she believes in, she could be the next Majority Leader of the US Senate. President.. No! But it sure ain''t bad in the right hands, with all we have facing us. She can control the agenda and move much needed change along.
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 3:53 PM PDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 24, 2008 3:53 PM PDT
THE OBAMA SUPPORTERS WILL CONTINUE TO WHINE.

OBAMA, "IF ELECTED THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE," WILL BE BEGGING FOR THE HILLARY SUPPORTERS, HE ONCE CALLED RELIGIOUS FANATIC''S, GUN WAVING AND RACIST REDNECKS, TO VOTE FOR HIM SO THE DEMOCRATS CAN UNITE AND BEAT THAT "MEAN AMERICAN" JOHN McCAIN. HIS PLEAS WILL FALL ON DEATH EARS, AND WILL SEAL HIS DEFEAT IN NOVEMBER.

POETIC JUSTICE.

GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 24, 2008 3:54 PM PDT
I think HRC should leave the race, but I dont see how her comments were infering that she was waiting for BO to be killed. That''''s a stretch. Keith Obama-man on MSNBC was way over the top to imply that......


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by opedanderson at 03:43 PM : May 24, 2008
+ report abuse

I think you missed the point he was trying to make. Those of us who have BELIEVED in Obama and what he has to say have been scared to death from day one about some Klan Member in a crowd could very well do to Obama what was done to Kennedy. YOU must remember that those who Republican''s, especially their "base" are people who hate very deeply.
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 3:54 PM PDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 3:54 PM PDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by rhunter10 May 24, 2008 3:55 PM PDT
It was the unguarded musing of a consummately political mind, but it is hard to see how HRC could seriously think that anyone would be comfortable with her in the VP slot on their ticket. Once you publicly invoke the horror of political assassination elevating your political fortunes you''''ve crossed a line in the collective conscious of this nation. That whiff of Lady MacBeth will hang in the air every time you enter the room.
All you have to do is read the frothing-at-the-mouth rantings of posts on CBS''s boards to realize you''''ve thoughtlessly pulled out a pack of matches in a room full of gasoline. The wingnuts are rolling their eyes and salivating. For the rest of us, you''''ve touched a wound that opens to our richest horror.
Reply to this comment
by nbrdknkldgr May 24, 2008 3:56 PM PDT
Hillary presidential material...NOT!
Reply to this comment
by shanev137 May 24, 2008 3:57 PM PDT
I still don''t get the parallel she was trying to draw between RFK getting assassinated and her dropping out of the race.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 24, 2008 3:57 PM PDT
Absolutely NOT! And anybody that supports such an assanine idea needs to sign up for the goofball prize!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by RowdyWicca at 03:51 PM : May 24, 2008
+ report abuse

Man you people are NUTS!! This lady has been running now for how long. Do you know the schedule she''s been keeping in an effort to SOMEHOW win? I know how it must feel for her supporters but the facts are there. She got some very bad advice in the beginning, never had a plan after Super Tuesday and has been running up hill ever sense. She has a future and a very strong future IF she plays it right.
Reply to this comment
by randynason May 24, 2008 3:59 PM PDT
Both Clintons have made repeated attempts at inserting both feet into respective mouths at the same time. I guess it''s all or nothing, with those two. Go figure-
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 24, 2008 3:59 PM PDT
I still don''''t get the parallel she was trying to draw between RFK getting assassinated and her dropping out of the race.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by shanev137 at 03:57 PM : May 24, 2008
+ report abuse

What some think she had in her mind was that there could be a chance that Obama could have something really bad happen...thus she would have to step in. She say''s it was to show that the race has gone on much longer for the Dems. Regardless it was a very bad slip from a very tired lady.
Reply to this comment
by juliemd May 24, 2008 4:00 PM PDT
Blah, blah, blogs...if a tenth of the people on this and other blogs got off their pissy-ant, judgmental, disrespectful, critic-pots and thought about what they were saying they''d shut up. Now I''ll shut up. You do the same, okay? Disrespectful, undignified a''s.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 24, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
THE OBAMA SUPPORTERS WILL CONTINUE TO WHINE.

OBAMA, "IF ELECTED THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE," WILL BE BEGGING FOR THE HILLARY SUPPORTERS, HE ONCE CALLED RELIGIOUS FANATIC''''S, GUN WAVING AND RACIST REDNECKS, TO VOTE FOR HIM SO THE DEMOCRATS CAN UNITE AND BEAT THAT "MEAN AMERICAN" JOHN McCAIN. HIS PLEAS WILL FALL ON DEATH EARS, AND WILL SEAL HIS DEFEAT IN NOVEMBER.

POETIC JUSTICE.

GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by crater7 at 03:53 PM : May 24, 2008

That''s uncalled for!! We''re all democrats and IF you think it makes us feel better to KNOW that that word "Assinate" is out there in the mind of some gapped tooth Trailer Dweller who WOULD do it. No one is trying to deny Hillary anything... she had bad advice in the beginning and she''s been running UP HILL ever sense. She''s GOT to be tired and YOU, her supporters should have enough common sense to see it.
Reply to this comment
by guadalcanal3 May 24, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
I don''t think she said anything that was "out of line"...She merely stated the facts...She didn''t lie...so what''s the big deal?...We should be able to talk about RFK anytime we want...The memory of him should not be a "taboo" subject...Is this the best the Obama camp can come up with to try and discredit her??
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 24, 2008 4:13 PM PDT
skyk,

YOUR RESPONSE IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE REASON I WROTE THE COMMENT YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE A POINT ABOUT.

YOU COMMENT IS RACIST AND USING THE TERM GAPPED TOOTH TRAILER DREWLER, ONE WOULD ASSUME YOU ARE REFERING TO WHITE PEOPLE, REDNECKS.

THERE ARE NO THREAT''S FROM ANYONE TO ASSASSINATE ANY CANDIDATE. WHY WOULD ASSUME THERE IS? NO ONE HAS SAID THAT ESPECIALLY HILLARY.

YOUR RESPONSE CONFIRMS MY COMMENT. JUST ANOTHER RACIST SLUR FROM AN OBAMA SUPPORTER.

GET OVER IT.

GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
Reply to this comment
by jgunther7 May 24, 2008 4:16 PM PDT
Hillaries explanation of why she is staying in the race is no less than a fatwa, a vielded call to arms to her followers.

Those who still support her after this revalation must share her same hope. Thay should be condemed.
Reply to this comment
by blondchic May 24, 2008 4:18 PM PDT
LOL, I still can''t wrap my mind around this one...Obama can have personal ties to a white hating, racist, angry bigot, and then basically lies about knowing the man%u2019s views on white America. He calls reporters %u201Csweetie%u201D and then dismisses it as, I do it all the time, it%u2019s just a bad habit! He uses his wife to campaign about the reason%u2019s she is now proud of America (for the first time in her adult life) and then when her comments come under attack he threatens people to %u201Cback off his wife%u201D. This guy is arrogant and way too immature to be President. Even though I%u2019ll end up voting for him, many will not. I doubt that he can ever beat McCain especially once McCain exposes him and his religious beliefs in a light far more evil then Hillary ever thought too.
The problem with America is no one gives a sh it, people vote because of color, gender, and religious beliefs and candidates run for power and money. Until people can begin doing things for the good of their country instead of themselves and money it will never turn around.
Reply to this comment
by pvperson May 24, 2008 4:22 PM PDT
"but most Democrats are not going to go over and vote for John McCain" if their candidate doesn''t get the nomination"......wrong-o

Obama has a chance WITH Hillary and NO chance withOUT her.
Reply to this comment
by pvperson May 24, 2008 4:27 PM PDT
I''m not sure what a fatwa is........jgunther7, could an extremist muslim follower like yourself explain it to me?
Reply to this comment
by May 24, 2008 4:30 PM PDT
Anybody trying to defend Hillary for this inexcusable comment must be sharing the same hope for assassination with her. The best any Hillary supporter should do is to keep mum and pray that this fury dies down. Defending it amounts to fanning the embers of the controversy. Please my fellow Hillary supporters, be quite!
Reply to this comment
by alves8444 May 24, 2008 4:30 PM PDT
In four words, "WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? If you cannot think on your feet better than this you don''t deserve my vote! Obama you can wrap it up, it is in the bag!
Former Hilary supporter----
Reply to this comment
by pvperson May 24, 2008 4:30 PM PDT
rharrin1....Your wasting your type, those that WANT to believe Hillary was calling assassination will believe that no matter what. Reality doesn''t enter into it.
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 24, 2008 4:31 PM PDT
IF YOU DON''T THINK VOTERS WILL CROSS OVER, JUST SEE THE POLLS. THERE ARE OVER A 1.5 MILLION VOTERS IN FLORIDA, THAT HAVE SPOKEN WITH THEIR VOTE. IF THEY ARE NOT COUNTED THEY WILL BE VERY UNHAPPY.

GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D"AMERICA.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 24, 2008 4:33 PM PDT
Senator,
YOU ARE NO HUBERT HUMPHREY!
Reply to this comment
by octoberxs May 24, 2008 4:35 PM PDT
Strange that HRC supporters went on and on about "sweetie" and about Rev. Wright but act like her saying she is staying in the race just in case he should be assassinated is alright. I would rather have someone at work call me "sweetie" than come into my office and start removing things "just in case I should die and they get my office". Think about it. And whining? Obama said he had no problem with her statement and understood how it could have been made. How many HRC supporters have showed that kind of understand, oh that''s right you lost it over "sweetie"
Reply to this comment
by rant3000 May 24, 2008 4:36 PM PDT
blondchic - first of all, Hillary''s statement is inapporporiate anyway you look at it. Furthermore, you dare to call Obama a sexist for saying the word sweetie? I''m a woman, i lve being called sweetie and honey and hun, i say it to others (men and women) i receive it back from both genders - who cares! ALSO, you''re saying Obama is a racist - newsflash, this is physically and mentally impossible - being that Obama is half white! Does he hate his white DNA? Or with his white DNA he''s gonna join the Klan and kill his black DNA? You''re crazy as Hillary''s Bosnia lie, her white blue-collar race card tactic and now her assination wishfull thinking.
Reply to this comment
by fmrdem May 24, 2008 4:36 PM PDT
None of this matters anyway. The DNC decided back in January that Obama was going to be the nominee. However, not to worry, the GE in November will be a repeat of the one in 1968 and John McCain will be President. Barak Hussein Obama has too many negatives and is unelectable.
Reply to this comment
by octoberxs May 24, 2008 4:41 PM PDT
Also before any women get their votes ready for McCain you best visit the sites for planned parenthood and the National Organization for Woman (NOW). McCain will set the women''s back at least 50 years. McCain is against pro-choice and equal pay. He supports laws that keep women making 77, 61, and 50 cents on the dollar to men. He is also against *** education (he follows Bush''s lead) and has called women a lost worse in public than "sweetie".
Reply to this comment
by pvperson May 24, 2008 4:42 PM PDT
I can''t stand how we democrats are tearing at each other rather than our real enemy. Remember the republicans, they''re the ones we need worry about. They want the war to continue, they want high oil prices and high deficits, they don''t want health care, they are killing our country. I no longer care who gets the nomination, I care who gets the white house. Don''t play into the neo-cons plan and don''t let McCain win. Please!
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 24, 2008 4:44 PM PDT
After what we have had to put up with for the last 7+ years, it would be nice to listen to honest people for a change.

Posted by rharrin1 at 04:41 PM : May 24, 2008

Are we losing sight of what this election is all about?
Reply to this comment
See all 498 Comments

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented