From The Road
May 20, 2008 7:30 AM

Bill Clinton Blames “Slanted Press Coverage” for Obama's Delegate Lead

(CBS)
From CBS News' Ryan Corsaro:

LOUISVILLE, KY. -- If it wasn't the night before the Kentucky and Oregon primaries, it would have been a standard Hillary Clinton speech. She talked about health care. She talked about jobs. She talked about bringing broadband to communities that don’t have it. She talked about all of the issues she’s talked about for the past nine months -- everything you can read about on her website or see her say on YouTube.

She had all of the lines the crowd loves to hear. Getting the “two big oilmen out of the White House.”

“I don’t understand what people didn’t like about the 90’s, was it the peace or the prosperity?”

And the other crowd favorite, not being able to wait for “the day when that moving van pulls away from the White House and heads back to Texas.”

However, the Clintons know that their audience isn’t just the crowds of voters hearing these lines for the first time – it’s national media who have heard her speeches hundreds of times, some of whom travel for months with the campaign and report anything new about what Clinton says on the road.

But the only new thing the Clintons had to say on primary eve came from her husband, who accused the press of not caring about the needs of voters and favoring other candidates over his wife.

Bill Clinton echoed statements Hillary herself made in the past few days, verifying that attacking the media has now become a Clinton campaign talking point.

“Every time you turn on the television and you listen one of those people dissing her, they all have a college degree, they’ve all got a new job, they’ve all got healthcare, and they're not going broke putting filling up their gas tank," said Bill Clinton.

Just two days before, Hillary Clinton told a crowd in Mayfield, Ky., “All those people on TV who are telling you and everybody else that this race is over and I should just be, you know, graceful and say ‘Oh it’s over’ even though I’ve won more votes. Those are all people who have a job. Those are all people who have healthcare. Those are all people who can afford to send their kids to college. Those are all people who can pay whatever is charged at the gas pump."

Around 1,300 supporters – mostly women – came out to see Hillary Clinton speak last night in Lexington on the eve of the Kentucky primary when her husband came out to give her introduction, which he called "the easy job."

"Just remember, all these people who are telling you it's over..." instructed the former president as several women began to scream "No!" in protest.

"First of all, by their own admission, this has been the most slanted press coverage in American history. Secondly, they declared her dead more times than a cat’s got lives."

He went out to point at poll numbers in New Hampshire, which many media outlets reported early on to show Clinton could lose the race. In the end, the polls were proven wrong, with Hillary Clinton winning that state's primary in early January.

Clinton said the same thing had happened in West Virginia, claiming the "people on television" had told voters in that state to stay at home.

"People in West Virginia didn't appreciate being talked to like that," he said.

Bill Clinton finished his introduction of his wife with an anecdote he has used on the road while campaigning for during the past few weeks, saying his daughter Chelsea called to tell him she told a questioner "yes" when the person asked if her mother would be a better president than her father.

"She said, 'They asked me a direct question and I gave them a direct answer,'" Bill Clinton recounted.

Hillary Clinton later hugged her husband after his remarks, calling him her "number one campaigner in chief."

While he does not have any version of such a title officially with her campaign, it appears Bill Clinton has had an influence on Hillary's new volleys at the media. On May 10th, ABCNews.com reported that Bill Clinton had began taking shots at the media while visiting Ripley, WV.

"They make a lot of fun of me because I like to campaign in places like this, they say I have been exiled to rural America, as if that was a problem. I don't know about you, but I'd rather be here than listening to that stuff I have to hear on television, I'd rather be with you. There is a simple reason: You need a president a lot more than those people telling you not to vote for her."

The Clintons seem to think attacks on the media gave a big boost to Clinton's double-digit win over Obama in West Virginia, and they're trying to make the same case in rural parts of Kentucky with the same voters as those who put them way over the top last Tuesday.

Hillary Clinton made similar statements about television critics in Mayfield, Prestonsburg, and Loretto, Ky. - all with large populations of blue-collar, white working families. She also ran a television ad in Kentucky going after members of the media including Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Tim Russert, and one of Bill Clinton's former staffers, George Stephanopoulos.

Hillary Clinton will hold an event tonight in Louisville after the results of Kentucky's primary, which she is expected to win over Obama.
Tags:
Clinton
Topics:
Hillary Clinton
Add a Comment See all 158 Comments
by jack3213 May 20, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
Obama will lose to McCain because he has dangerous plans and has no experiance. He is a senator for all of two years- did not vote on many many things- and has been in hiding- why are people so naive and want such a dangerous leader? Wishful thinking on their part- that is what is most dangerous when you don''''t know how much experiance is valued. Would you hire him to teach your children or someone much more experianced? Simple question. Simple answer


OH BILLY GO BACK TO ARK- WE DON''T WANT YOU EITHER
Reply to this comment
by Lai K W May 20, 2008 9:01 AM PDT
Did anyone see things that happened since Rev Wright stuff. Even before that, the Rhode Island primary, BO was atumbling and show signs that he was not knowledgeable and lack of common senses.

He lost Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, possibly Kentucky, Puerto Rico, Montana and South Dakota.

He shall end his campaign in losing streaks and he constantly was dismissed by the low income earners, the poor, the middle class where the party is standing for.

On the contrary, he is supported by the affluent. What is wrong with the nomination of the party? They seemed to pay more attention to race then the class issue. Millions and millions of voters are having difficulties with their living standard.

The party is selecting a candidate for elites to be the nominee with party pundits stumping for him after landslide losses.

I call this pathetic and mockery of democracy in a grand scale.

Selecting BO who is out of touch of the middle class, the working class and the poor just won''t work. They are just trying to please the black community and getting rid of the Clintons at the cost of people.

Shame to the democratic party.
Reply to this comment
by Lai K W May 20, 2008 9:03 AM PDT
forget to mention, BO was bombed out in West Virginia too in the primary by 41 points.

His lead was history.

However BO''s big losses and gaffe are recent and imminent.
Reply to this comment
by wwsword May 20, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
First, the media coverage of this campaign is horribly slanted, not just in favor of Obama, but against Clinton. Put racist things in the mouths of the talking heads in place of the sexist things they have said and draw your own conclusions.

Second, the Democrats, if they pick Obama, which they almost certainly will, are running a candidate who will lose big time. McCain won''t just win the White House; he will win a mandate. Obama is an awful candidate. This must be payback for something; I have trouble believing so many people could lose their heads all at once.
Reply to this comment
by johngaltwho May 20, 2008 10:13 AM PDT
What is with these women? When did estrogen become hallucinogenic?

Hillary lost not because of the media and not because of sexism. Hell, much of her support came from frustrated feminists, racists and meddling republicans. Despite her advantages, she lost because a better candidate ran a superior campaign and with considerable integrity, defeated her by any rational metric. With her appeals to racism, her silly math and typical political contant spin on everything from media to caucuses to popular votes to Mi and Fla... she lost the respect and the support to those of us who can add and/or look for integrity in a presidential candidate. I will happily support a woman for president but not because she''s a woman, I''ll do it when the best candidate, one that displays intelligence and integrity, happens to be a woman, and that is clearly not the case here.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews May 20, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
I thought that the "Lay off my wife" statements was Obama''s gig.
Reply to this comment
by mostlympc May 20, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
Thank God the Clintons will soon be out of the primaries cycle. They never understood that "the people" are sick and tired of negativity, bad news, constant whining and spinning. I look forward to the Clintons each finding a niche that is more compatible with their abundant talents. Meanwhile, it''s time to go.
Reply to this comment
by mostlympc May 20, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
Thank God the Clintons will soon be out of the primaries cycle. They never understood that people are sick and tired of negativity, bad news, contrived attacks, constant whining and spinning. I look forward to the Clintons each finding a niche that is more compatible with their abundant talents.

Meanwhile, it''s time to go.
Reply to this comment
by kman821 May 20, 2008 10:45 AM PDT
Once again ... Bill is whining and lying through his teeth! He has on many many occasions vividly reminded so many of us as to why we were so very glad to see the Clintons leave the White House. We have had nearly 16 years now of presidential (serial) lying to the American people. It%u2019s time we had a person with enough character in the WH to provide us a decent role model for our nation%u2019s children ... and that person is Barrack Obama!
Reply to this comment
by zji8bek May 20, 2008 10:49 AM PDT
Before Wisconsin we had constant coverage of the "plagarism" scandal and Barack won by 17%.

Before Indiana and South Carolina we had constant coverage of Rev Wright and Barack overwhelmingly won in SC and performed way better than expected in Indiana.

I don''t think the media has the impact Bill thinks it does.
Reply to this comment
by gaypastor May 20, 2008 10:52 AM PDT
Women and African-Americans! Are we REALLY surprised we%u2019ve arrived to this level of analysis? I, for one (as a liberal white man), stand by my sisters. If you review the website for the leading organization for women (National Organization of Women) you CLEARLY see their choices to fight not only for women%u2019s rights, but against racism, homophobia, economic injustice, etc. (the sections are easily seen and identified). If you visit the leading African American organization%u2019s website (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) you do NOT find clear choices that support women%u2019s rights, gay rights, etc. Their subsections speak of youth, education, economics, etc. but they don%u2019t seem to care for women or *** (not even black women or ***). The choice, while quite regrettable, is simply clear%u2026women simply appear to more broadly fight for a range of oppressed peoples while the leading African Americans have not. As a pastor who cares about ALL people (and especially all people suffering from oppression) I must stand by the one who represent the hopes and dreams of women%u2026and all oppressed peoples. I stand by Hillary%u2026Hillary for President for %u201908! May God be with us all during this difficult time of discernment.
Reply to this comment
by twotraps May 20, 2008 10:54 AM PDT
My goodness...someone posted the media is against Clinton....please. Has ANYONE seen a news article on the Clinton campaign fraud case going on now...thats right....now. Depositions were to begin on 5/13/08. Hillary was allowed by Judge Munoz to testify after the election. I know its a stupid case brought by an ex-con...but why is a presidential candidate involved at all with a civil case? Google is pretty good for that stuff look it up.

Clintons quote in the article ''the 90''s were great''...oh yeah, when you shamed, disgraced and dishonored the Presidency of the United States and made a mockery of the nation in front of the world.

The Clintons are losing, and again making a mockery of the process by telling the Dem Nat Comm that they don''t know how to count! I don''t support any other candidate, and I don''t support a second chance to mock the Presidency again with lies and scandal.

Any Hillary supporters want to have a go at that? Or do you really not care that much.
Reply to this comment
by pizzabox37 May 20, 2008 10:54 AM PDT
Its true that after the first four caucuses and through Ohio/Texas the media was easier on Barack than Hillary... however, if it wasn''t for the media, Hillary would have lost LONG ago.

Two of the points where Hillary was almost knocked out were New Hampshire and Texas/Ohio. That endless loop of teary eyed Hillary in the 11th hour erased a 10 point advantage for Barack that would have made her curtains in this race. Also, that 11th hour FAKE story about Obama''s campaign telling Canadian officials that the NAFTA stance was just electoral pillow talk (along with the media diarrhea over the 3am ad) gave her another life.

Also, I don''t think that anyone can argue that the media has been brutal on Obama the past few months. Hillary never went through anything quite like what Obama did with Rev. Wright... and the "bitter" comments were perceived to be worse than her outright lying about Bosnia if you based it on media output.

Finally, she actually told voters in NC that they could "vote for someone based on whatever reason they want... they could vote base on, say, hairstyle". This was worse than anything else she or Bill had said in my opinion on race and this got very little coverage (I think Countdown was the only one that covered it).

At the end of the day, I think at times both sides survived because of the media and Hillary would have been gone as early as New Hampshire if it weren''t for the media.
Reply to this comment
by notopennshut May 20, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
It is a joke when Clintons with their over 100 million claim to know how the folks in KY and WVA live. They are the ones with law degrees, lived the lives of lawyers, governors, presidents and they claim to live our lives. GIVE ME A BREAK? That''s the "real" fairy tale told. It''s not the media, but they who have tried to inject the race card, destroy your adversery, win at any cost attitude that has driven many of us away. We were and still are the staunchest of democrat supporters, but will not be fooled by the Clintons. We may not have degrees like theirs, but we are not the stupid folks they try to characterize us as. Many will believe the lies they are broadcasting, but even ordinary folks like us know when to stop believing in fairy tales.
Reply to this comment
by docadams3 May 20, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
The slant has her on the slipper slope to oblivion! Wonderful!

Can''t we find a better woman to run? From a different family? Americans should oppose dynasties out of pure principle.
Reply to this comment
by allamr18 May 20, 2008 11:14 AM PDT
What happened to if you cant take the heat get out of the kitchen? and i think bill really insulted the people of kentucky. those people on tv who have jobs and degrees dont have to worry about gas prices. um so now people with jobs and degrees dont have to worry about increasing gas prices?
Reply to this comment
by minnick8-2009 May 20, 2008 11:15 AM PDT
What I can''t believe is that so many people have been duped by Obama. It is because the left-wing liberal press is in love with him--the most left-wing Marxist candidate to ever run for President of the United States. My objection to Obama has nothing to do with race. I would feel the same way about such a left-wing, Marxist candidate if he or she was white, Asian, American Indian, Hispanic, Polynesian, or purple with green stripes.
Reply to this comment
by rjmcbs May 20, 2008 11:17 AM PDT
Sen. Clinton now is the time,just go away
Reply to this comment
by dnsallday May 20, 2008 11:17 AM PDT
Well, you can''t expect the Clintons to take responsibility for their failed campaign. Blame it on the media. If it wasn''t for the media pretending that Hillary had any chance to win after Super Tuesday, she would have been gone in February, so they should be thanking the media for giving them all this national exposure and treating everything they say as something meaningful.
Reply to this comment
by olandug-2009 May 20, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
Obama- an Antichrist We Can Believe In

Consider his sexual rockstar status among young voters, his ability to continuously lie without impunity, his connections to mob members and terrorist both real and wannabes. His strong and unscrupulous desire for raw power, at any cost, regardless what it does to others, (he became senator simply by disqualifying his opponents). His empty words and changing promises, his desire to be friends with those who wish to destroy us. His wife Michele has expressed her hatred for this country and has publicly announced her husband as the messiah.

The voodoo of this all is that Teflon Obama remains unscathed by all his nefarious connections and thug like history. He is worshiped not only blindly by the mindless masses, but by the fearful media.

I am not very religious, but I think Nostradamus got it right again. What is God going to think of all the lemmings that follow a man of darkness?
Reply to this comment
by nbrdknkldgr May 20, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
Arrogance has proved to be a powerful tool and the downfall of Hillary. My biggest issue with her, and I previously supported her and Bill, is that she unlike most politicians, refuses to apologize for her vote on the Iraq war and for me, remains a mystery as to why she hasn''t. Hillary was a great first lady, and then she became a politician as evidenced by her refusal to explain and/or apologize for her Iraq vote...for me, that was her undoing as she now represents the "more of the same" status quo!
Reply to this comment
by ozonmojo May 20, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
Bill is absolutely right.The media has played a treacherous role in this election cycle and successfully subverted the democratic provisions of the constitution.This should be a wakeup call for all Americans about the dangers of unrestrained freedom of expression,which has become the holy grail of the corrupt,dishonest media.A manipulative media can very well steal elections as efficiently as any branch of the government.This election is going to prove it to the hilt.
Reply to this comment
by rebal71 May 20, 2008 11:37 AM PDT
This is the reality - from Blake Fleetwood, an Obama supporter, on the Huffington Post an article on "Hillary and Sexism ... "http://www.huffingtonpost.com/blake-fleetwood/powerful-video-of-ugly-se_b_102310.html" He says to watch the video without any political leanings and you should all be surprised.
Yes, we are all mad. I am a democrat but I will not vote for him because I feel that Obama is naive and his wife, Michelle, arrogant and spoiled. Hillary is simply amazing and I pray she will win.
Reply to this comment
by concorde5 May 20, 2008 11:37 AM PDT
Obama has not had a free ride in the press. People still beleive he is a muslim, they believe lies that he won''t salute the flag, they believe that he has ties to terrorists. All lies that have been reported on mainstream news outlets.

If Obama was behind in delegates, votes, number of states won, everyone would be yelling for him to get out of the race.

Hillary has lost and she refuses to admit it. She is her own worst enemy. She turned blacks against her with race-baiting and now she is paying for it.

It''s time for her to pack it up and move it out!
Reply to this comment
by briannorwood May 20, 2008 11:40 AM PDT
Winstrv:

Be careful. Remember, Cindy McCain is an adulterer. This is a known fact.

You wanna pick on a candidate''s wife, there''s plenty of "there" there on Cindy "Scarlet Letter" McCain!
Reply to this comment
by faith_in_w May 20, 2008 11:43 AM PDT
Oh he has to go along with his liberal wife. Liberal women never do anything wrong. All the carnage they cause is blamed on others. Otherwise they have hissy fits.
Reply to this comment
by concorde5 May 20, 2008 11:48 AM PDT
Republicans had the presidency, and both houses of congress and they ran this country into the ground.

The public has absolutely no confidence left in the republicans to solve any of our problems. The country is ready for change.

Go to the O!!
Reply to this comment
by twotraps May 20, 2008 11:58 AM PDT
let me get this straight....Clintons are losing and they blame it on the media?

They cry because Obama has more money and can spend more...because more people gave them money.

They cry because the Dem Nat Comm can''t count properly.

They cry because the MI and Fl problem does not suit them....

The Presidential campaign is too big for them to FIX. All the support they were quietly counting on was just not there. Now she is down to technicalities and how unfair the process is. Because you cry foul and demand to be seen in the special light you cast for yourself, and demand exceptions be made for you...that does not make you strong, it does not make you a fighter. It makes you desperate.
Reply to this comment
by craigh9 May 20, 2008 12:02 PM PDT
WHAT SNIVELING WHINNING BABY!

GET OVER IT BILL - THE USA SPOKE, NOTHING ELSE - YOU AND HILLARY ARE NOW OFFICALLY OUT OF THE PRESIDENT BUSINESS!!!
Reply to this comment
by geneonlbk May 20, 2008 12:10 PM PDT
If the Feds nationalized natural gas and oil, the price of domestic product could vastly offset imported products. But instead the feds are allowing the average, stupid, greedy, environmentally unconcerned, SUV loving, apathetic, unlearned American to slowly bleed to economic death putting gold into a car that gets eleven miles to the gallon while it is choking humanity on our gluttony. I say we deserve to go down as the shorted lived great society in the history of civilization.
Reply to this comment
by twotraps May 20, 2008 12:12 PM PDT
craigh9, thank goodess, another clear thinker!

Notice the recent change in tone of the Clinton campaign...soft and nice...getting along with everyone, talking about issues...talking to people in small towns that might not otherwise be heard! All excellent, seriously, and its working, she has been gaining momentum. Funny thing is, its too late. She tried being distant, and started losing....she tried attacking, she got the whole country talkingn about how ''bitter'' they were...and she kept losing....she even wanted to bomb Iran...and kept losing. Now that she is down to the sympathy vote...its working.


Too late darling, I agree, you are now out of the President Business.
Reply to this comment
by hinnis May 20, 2008 12:24 PM PDT
Obama has developed a strategy to con Hillary supporters into voting for him using various ploys, including: 1. The "Supreme Court" card, i.e. if Obama doesn''t win, McCain will appoint conservative judges. 2. The "Roe v. Wade" card, i.e. if Obama doesn''t win, the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade. 3. The "race card,", i.e. if you are against Obama, then you are a racist. 4. The "real Democrat" card, i.e. "real Democrats" will vote for the Democratic nominee whether they like him or not. 5. The "Hillary would want you to vote for Obama" card, which is self-explanatory.
Obama, his supporters, the DNC, the party elite, and the mainstream media have conspired to marginalize the millions of Democrats who have voted for Hillary, and they will now be using every trick in the book to "bring the party together" to further their ruthless ambitions. They will want you to forget all about the months of biased press, the biased party elite, the insults, and the race-cards. They will want you to forget that the Democratic Party now is the party that stands for disenfranchisement and the rationalization of racism. They will use any method to persuade you to vote for the man who they have preordained as the Democratic nominee. DON''T FALL FOR IT!
Whether you write-in Hillary, if possible, vote for John McCain, or sit out the election, remember that your action or inaction could result in the election of the inexperienced, deceptive, ruthless and divisive Obama.
Reply to this comment
by shawnp1968 May 20, 2008 12:31 PM PDT
Hey Bill...... check this out "Bubba" The media are dissing Hillary because she can''t win, and she isn''t smart enough to get out and accept defeat with some honor and grace.

Oh.... by the way.... it''s not just the media.... most of America is tired of listening to her!!!
Reply to this comment
by latinovoter1 May 20, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
I agree, Obama managed his campaign, finances, strategic rallys and overall ran a much better campaign than the Clintons. I mean really, the last thing you want to say on the stump is to complement or agree with Karl Rove. I now agree, Hillary is destroying the Democratic Party.
Reply to this comment
by vote4thebest May 20, 2008 12:35 PM PDT
Remember, one choice in the general election is to continue to vote for Clinton as a write-in vote. Every American has the right to vote the candidate that they think best, even if their name is not on the ballet. You do that by write-in the name of your choice.

We should never have to hold our nose and vote for Obama, a weak, sexist, divisive, fear inducer, and unethical candidate.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 May 20, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
We need to see how all the primaries turn out after June 3rd and THEN the uncommitted ans super delegates can make their decisions.

I am not sure Obama could win in November. I think Hillary Clinton has a better chance of beating McCain.
Reply to this comment
by hinnis May 20, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
WE WISH TO GO ON RECORD AND STATE THAT WE SUPPORT BARACK OBAMA. He is our lord and savior, and he shall deliver the world from sin.

Signed,

Louis Farrakhan
The Nation of Islam
Hamas
The New Black Panther Party
Rev. %u201CGD America%u201D Wright
William "the bomb" Ayers
Al Sharpton
Tony Rezko
Oprah %u201CI used to go to Obama%u2019s church but got out just in time%u201D Winfrey

And various other racists, terrorists and indicted individuals.
Reply to this comment
by hinnis May 20, 2008 12:51 PM PDT
nokoolaid: No, you are the pinhead, for believing that all those who oppose Obama are Republicans. Recent polls show that between 28% to 40% of Hillary Clinton supporters WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA, under any circumstances. Myself, my family and my friends are proud to count ourselves among their numbers.
Reply to this comment
by gaiaschild-2009 May 20, 2008 12:56 PM PDT
Oh the analysis after this entire drama will be endless. At what point did this or that Clinton depart from, repudiate former allies in the media and the electorate. This has been such a march into insanity but of a rational, normal, American kind. The only thing that matters is to win. There is no ally or friend that one hesitates to throw under the bus. There is no moral principle, no ethic, no Immanuel Kant, no psychology, no self-actualizing values, no system of thought that one will not trample to win. No rules meant to maintain balance. Everybody''s making history for sure. But not everybody gets to win when the structure is a contest for one prize. This is going to provide great reading for years to come.
Reply to this comment
by nobamkoolaid May 20, 2008 12:56 PM PDT
Are any of you in Florida going to protest at any of the Florida rallys that Obama is having??? He is too much of a chicken chit to come to my area. But I know he will be in Tampa, and a few other stops, he is keeping his schedule hush!!!! Probably because he know Floridians really do not want him in our state, After all he did state Hillary%u2019s Win in Florida (by a landslide) was %u201CNothing More Than A Beauty Pagent%u201D. This is one scorned woman voter that will never vote for that scumbag. If I knew where he would be I would have taken the week off to protest at all his rally%u2019s.

I am suggesting Friday June 13th to be the Florida Dems Day to change to Republican Party. This Friday the 13th will be a very unlucky day for the Dem Party!!!!! Anybody else like the idea????
Reply to this comment
by gaiaschild-2009 May 20, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
O yes, please everybody send money to Clinton so the Obama donors don''t have to pay her way.
Reply to this comment
by lucyinbuford May 20, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
Bill is right again. The media is running (or is that ruining?)this campaign. I am a staunch Democrat, 100% behind Hillary but I''ll be first in line to vote for McCain if Obama gets the nomination...which he may NOT.
Reply to this comment
by lucyinbuford May 20, 2008 1:01 PM PDT
Oh yes...and in response to NOKOOLAID...yes, it would make absolutely more sense to vote for McCain than Obama if Hillary loses the nomination. I believe Obama would do more harm to/for this country than McCain so he would be the lesser of two evils.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 May 20, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
Effendi Snob-oma doesn''t like debate. It''s distracting. So he''s cushioned himself with anyone who challenges him is a racist. Anyone who brings up demographics is a racist. That''s his platform. You are all racists and I''m not.
Reply to this comment
by May 20, 2008 1:12 PM PDT
Media coverage of Clinton has been horrible practically the whole primary season. Despite all this, she has managed to win the big ones and the swing states. It is outrageous the way the media have shown Obama''s red state victories to be a valid reason for making him the nominee. For the last two weeks, the press have performed last rites over Hillary even when she beat the pants off Obama in W.Virginia. And the DNC?...they haven''t got a clue about electability. The whole thing is sickening!
Reply to this comment
by indigogrrl May 20, 2008 1:15 PM PDT
here''s a thought....where is Rev. Wright? I mean --- ummm -- he was all over the place making himself heard and then one brief denunciation later --- he has nothing to say? nada. zip.
after a 20 year mutually recognized "close" relationship was severed so ruthlessly and so publicly. Methinks this was oh so cleverly staged ~ not.
Reply to this comment
by obamasgranny May 20, 2008 1:16 PM PDT
Posted by latinovoter1 at 12:32 PM : May 20, 2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by SHAWNP1968 at 12:31 PM : May 20, 2008
___________________________________
How''s that Kool-Aid working for you?
Reply to this comment
by hinnis May 20, 2008 1:17 PM PDT
nokoolaid said: Haaa - yeah, right. A staunch Democrat. Sure you are. You, hinnis and Rowdy should start a support group - GOP Hacks Who Wasted Their Summer Pretending To be Democrats.
_______________________________

NICE TRY, BUT WE ARE NOT MINDLESS OBAMA ZOMBIES, OR PERSONS WHO WOULD PLACE PARTY LOYALTY ABOVE THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY. I''VE VOTED DEMOCRAT IN EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN MY LIFETIME, BUT IF OBAMA IS THE NOMINEE, I, LIKE MILLIONS OF OTHER DEMOCRATS, WILL VOTE FOR JOHN McCAIN. I''D RATHER HAVE A CENTRIST REPUBLICAN, THAN AN INEXPERIENCED, DECEPTIVE, RUTHLESS, DIVISIVE OBAMA.
Reply to this comment
by obamasgranny May 20, 2008 1:18 PM PDT
So god gave Kennedy a brain tumor for supporting Obama? I wonder what punishment is coming for Richardson!!
Reply to this comment
by tomanyt May 20, 2008 1:18 PM PDT
Bill is right. Media coverage has been slanted toward Obama.
Reply to this comment
See all 158 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road

  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented