Horserace
April 28, 2008 10:05 AM

Starting Gate: The Wright Stuff

(CBS)
Whether you think he’s right or wrong, the public speaking tour by Barack Obama’s former preacher Jeremiah Wright is going to dominate the political discussion heading into a very pivotal week in the presidential campaign. And there are few positives for Obama’s campaign to be found in that reality.

In a combative appearance at the national press club this morning, Wright provided more ammunition for critics who contend that his brand of theology is divisive at best, troubling at worst. In his prepared remarks, Wright contended that such criticisms were not an attack on himself or Obama’s campaign but on what he called the “black church.”

And he did nothing to distance himself from earlier comments that have been looped and replayed over and over again. He praised Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan as an important voice for black Americans while insisting that he did not agree with everything the controversial leader has said. Wright described Sunday mornings as the most segregated time in the nation, blasted the U.S. government and, asked whether he believes that it spread the AIDS virus within the black community, insisted, “I believe our government is capable of doing anything.”

Obama’s campaign says their candidate has said all he’s going to say about his former pastor but that’s not going to stop the questions he’ll get as he stumps in North Carolina and Indiana this week in advance of very important contests in those states.

Rev. Wright has made a point of insisting that his role is not that of a politician but of a religious and community leader. That’s not going to be of much comfort to Obama’s campaign. Whether he sees himself as a politician or not, Wright has thrust himself right back into the middle of the political conversation – and has done so in a very confrontational manner.

Wright insisted that he’s not Barack Obama’s spiritual adviser, but the two are linked in the minds of voters and provides an opening for political opponents to use in or out of context. “Maybe now an honest dialogue about race in this country will begin,” Wright said according to prepared remarks. “Just maybe now as that dialogue begins the religious tradition that has kept hope alive for a people struggling to survive in countless hopeless situations will be understood." The dialogue will certainly continue – and not in the way Obama’s campaign would like.


Worth More Than A Hundred: The DNC has produced a new ad using John McCain’s “100 years” line from the primaries in which he said that the U.S. might have some sort of presence in Iraq for that long if that’s what it takes to win the war. “What John McCain doesn't understand is that the American people aren't fine with being in Iraq for 100 years in any capacity," DNC Chair Howard Dean said in a release on the ad. "The American people want a President who will responsibly end the war, not more of the same failed policy in Iraq that continues to cost $12 billion a month. They want a President who will invest that money here at home to create jobs and ensure our kids have health care. The more voters learn about John McCain, we're confident they will recognize that he is the wrong choice for America's future." You can watch the ad here.


Debateable: The debate over debates. It’s about as predictable as B-list celebrities showing up at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner. The candidate looking for something to spur a comeback invariably wants more debate opportunities to do so and the front-runner wants to run out the clock. No surprise then that the Clinton campaign is calling for expansive, Lincoln-Douglass style debates. And no surprise that Obama is saying, no thanks. "We have participated in 21 nationally televised debates, the most in primary history, including four exclusively with Senator Clinton. Senator Clinton refused an earlier invitation that had been accepted to debate in North Carolina. Over the next 10 days, we believe it's important to talk directly to the voters of Indiana and North Carolina about fixing our economy, cutting the cost of health care and ending a war in Iraq that never should have been authorized in the first place," said Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs.


Around The Track

  • Elizabeth Edwards took aim at the media’s campaign coverage in a New York Times op-ed Sunday: “Did you, for example, ever know a single fact about Joe Biden’s health care plan? Anything at all? But let me guess, you know Barack Obama’s bowling score. We are choosing a president, the next leader of the free world. We are not buying soap, and we are not choosing a court clerk with primarily administrative duties.”

  • Former Bush strategist Karl Rove is giving some advice to Obama in the lastest issue of Newsweek. Rove’s bottom line: “You have talent, intelligence and tapped into something powerful early in your campaign. But running for president is unlike anything you've ever done. You're making mistakes and making people worry that you're an elitist. So while you'll almost certainly win the nomination, Democrats are nervous about the fall. You've given them reasons to be.”

  • Howard Dean says he wants one of the presidential candidates out of the race sometime in June but won’t be the one pushing anyone out of the race. “Either of these candidates, if it's time for them to go, they'll know it and they will go. They don't need any pushing from me. You know when to get in and you know when to get out. That's just part of the deal," Dean told ABC News.

  • In the midst of a primary campaign that seems to threaten party unity for the fall, Democrats should take some solace in articles like this pointing out that the party has added a million new voters to its rolls in just the past seven primaries.
  • Tags:
    Barack Obama ,
    Jeremiah Wright ,
    Rev. Wright ,
    Hillary Clinton ,
    John McCain
    Topics:
    Barack Obama
    Add a Comment See all 18 Comments
    by memekiller April 28, 2008 11:21 AM PDT
    The fact that the pastor McCain sought out for support says God drowned New Orleans because of their lax values, is no more an issue for McCain''s base than the fact the McCain doesn''t wear a lapel pin.
    Reply to this comment
    by riegel4 April 28, 2008 11:32 AM PDT
    I listened to Wright and I see nothing wrong with either the Moyers interview or the NAACP speech. What I do see wrong is the irresponsible way the media has reported this story. An unjustified and abusive assault on a man of religion. Yes, different than the way my priest ''preaches'' but in no way anti-American or anti-Christian. This is 2008, people! Let''s move forward and stop the hypocrisy. Obama seems to have a vision, the intelligence to move us beyond the stalemate of partisan politcs. We certainly don''t want those two old has-beens plus one husband to continue pushing our decline. No, we don''t. So get over Rev Wright. Please.
    Reply to this comment
    by memekiller April 28, 2008 11:36 AM PDT
    Just to reiterate: what these 400 words fail to mention, like all the other countless hours of reflecting on the views Mr. Obama has denounced, is that McCain sought the endorsement of a man who praised a loving God for drowning New Orleans, as she deserved.

    No wonder McCain shared cake with Bush the day he was filmed playing guitar as the city went under water.
    Reply to this comment
    by rjudy3 April 28, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
    Had ALL this stuff come out about Wright(WRONG),Rezco, Ayers, San Fran, Michelle before Iowa, Howard Dean and the rest of the traitors in the democratic party(Richardson,Kennedy (never missed a right turn after a few drinks), Dodd(Dudd),Leahy(Leach),Kerrey(actually voted for it before he voted against it)he never would have come out of Iowa with a lead and Clinton and Edwords would probabally be our President and vice-president nominees right now. Obama COULD have saved his future by graciously bowing out until he has some more of a record in the senate(He''s 46 for crying out loud!!)and puts that racist rev behind him, and give Michelle some more time to be "proud of America" maybe by HER going and reaching out to some dirt-poor white families in rural america and doing charitable things and basically change her image so she can be more genuine in her talks with white america instead of the phoniness that comes out of her when she speaks.
    Because if this does not happen and Obama is the nominee, we lose the WH! Hillary is the best choice right now, she will beat McCain and she wont need the black vote to do it. Bush did''nt need it and he was elected TWICE!!
    Reply to this comment
    by jack3213 April 28, 2008 12:47 PM PDT
    IT IS ALSO THE MEDIAS FAULT FOR TURNING WRIGHT IN TO A CELEBRITY- SHAME ON THEM. FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ONE THING- GIVING ATTENTION TO EVILNESS IS JUST PLAIN WRONG.-NOT WRIGHT.
    Reply to this comment
    by libh8er April 28, 2008 12:48 PM PDT
    Barry Ubama is a marxist. He has gravitated towards ''''black liberation theology'''', which is also a marxist philosophy, as well as to liberal, leftest professors.

    There is NO WAY Ubama can carry the main stream of society.....you know, the ones who cling to God and guns.
    Reply to this comment
    by mattcat25 April 28, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
    The Reverend Wright doesn%u2019t hate America and Americans. Unlike what Rush Limbaugh is doing today (and, everyday) on his Radio show by inciting people to riot.

    It%u2019s hate the (American) Media, hate the (American) Liberals, hate the (American former president, and current Presidential candidate) Clintons.

    Rush Limbaugh spews hate against Americans and America everyday.
    Reply to this comment
    by jack3213 April 28, 2008 1:04 PM PDT
    wow- there are far roo many people dumb as wood who post here
    Reply to this comment
    by jack3213 April 28, 2008 1:05 PM PDT
    wow- there are far too many people DUMB AS WOOD who post on CBS- gotta go- adios
    Reply to this comment
    by rjudy3 April 28, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
    To:jack3213,

    Yeah , your one of them
    Reply to this comment
    by mattcat25 April 28, 2008 1:14 PM PDT
    This may seem as an inharmonic equivalent but, think about it%u2026.Rush Limbaugh has the pulpit on radio everyday for 3 hours a day Rush Limbaugh sermonizes in complete favor of the Conservative Republican Party. Limbaugh attacks consistently Americans and America for allowing a Media and Political discussion of opposing view.

    In comparison to the Reverend Wright, Rush Limbaugh has done absolutely nothing to aid his fellow American, serve in the military, or give a fair and positive depiction of actual facts facing Americans.
    Reply to this comment
    by eroosevelt08 April 28, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
    It is not a question of race. It is just that Senator Obama has such a thin resume so far. He shows great promise, but he has not learned enough yet to be President. The standard of comparison is not George Bush. The standard is George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln. Senator Obama is just too young and inexperienced for the job. Senator Clinton will go down in history as what America needed in 2008.

    Reply to this comment
    by jack3213 April 28, 2008 2:08 PM PDT
    RJudy3- You made my point. All you can do is reiterate- not make any intelligent comment. LOL
    Reply to this comment
    by ronrileyco April 28, 2008 2:47 PM PDT
    Get over yourself, Vaughn. Rev Wright isn''t attacking you personally. And, even if he were, your role is to report what happens -- not be a player, not decide whether or not the words of this or that person will have this or that effect on Barack Obama.

    Just tell us what was said -- WE (the people) will decide if it''s meaningful. We don''t need you or your brethren or sistren in the media to tell us what things mean.

    Here is what we DO need you tell us: What Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would do if elected. Nothing more, nothing less. If you would stop talking for a moment and begin LISTENING to We-the-People, you would recognize the redundancy of voter frustration. Know why 90% of voters are frustrated, Vaughn (& company)? It''s because instead of finding out what we need to know (what candidates would do if elected), all the media wants to talk about is polling, fund raising, gaffes.

    Next time you write about how dysfunctional American democracy is, you might start with that decisive fact.
    Reply to this comment
    by rjudy3 April 28, 2008 2:59 PM PDT
    to jack-*** 3213: Thought you said you were going "adios", what happened? Cant get enough of THE TRUTH about your idol Obama and his anti-american wife?
    Reply to this comment
    by Po Win April 28, 2008 3:37 PM PDT
    Reverend Wright embedded threads of truth in a canvass of falsehoods: at one moment he states outright that he is not divisive or polarizing then he launches into thunderous, irreverent gestures and harsh critique of classical music, opera, psychiatry, pharmacology, JFK''s and Ted Kennedy''s Irish-American accents, and rationalizes this by making his thesis an imaginary cognitive difference between blacks and whites that elucidate his tangential truisms.

    He speaks of embracing Change and transformation to that of respect and kindness while being irreverent of the late JFK, Lyndon Johnson and the above-mentioned; he speaks conceptually of embracing difference while he treads the threshold of a bitter diatribe of Eurocentrist thought, music, language and worship.

    How does he do so? Leaping from left and right brain hemispheres to oral traditions of Hebrew teachings, he feigns authority and makes bold statements from non-existent sources adding new fields of knowledge as he thunders on.

    Demarcating himself as a preacher not a politician or political analyst, he exclaims that his speech is not about the candidacies of Senators McCain, Clinton and Obama. Jeremiah Wright continuously makes an affirmation of a positive, inevitable Change to come; not coincidentally, he finally brings his speech of Change to a climax of Yes We Can make this Change as an obvious endorsement of Senator Obama and then he humbly makes a plug for his book which is to emerge sometime in 2008
    Reply to this comment
    by Harpersage April 28, 2008 4:46 PM PDT
    Why would a precher - (Rev.) stand up infromt of the people and make a statement such as ''Wright'' did!!!!???. "THERE WAS NO TAKING HIS REMARKS OUT OF CONTEXT" because there''s only one way to take the words "******* AMERICA". Who dose he think he''s kidding, neither him or Obama have suffered in this country by any means and it appears to me that he''s using the unfortunate poor people in our country ( which includes not just black people but white as well) to cause unrest. There isn''t anyone picking on the black church over what this Rev. Wright said, they simply can''t understand why he''s using the people in the church to cause a disturbance? Besides neither Wright nor Obama are black or white but Mulada so why should ''we'' get angry or upset over this mess??? Lets all see it for what it is and move on--we don''t need to be fighting with each other because our country needs US ALL RIGHT NOW. What better way for our enemies to attack us than to use a distraction like us fighting each other.
    Reply to this comment
    by carenza-2009 April 29, 2008 11:05 AM PDT
    It is grossly unfair to judge Obama by what his former pastor has said. If those are the standards then who would be more culpable than Hilary Clinton. She was party to the lies and deceit that was embedded in her husband''s race for presidency and the presidency itself. I think that the honest truth is that people have found a perfect excuse to say I will not support Obama, this is definitely more PC than saying "I don''t support him because he is black".
    Reply to this comment
    See all 18 Comments

    About Horserace

    Description for Horserace

    Add to your favorite news reader
    google
    yahoo
    msn
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented