Starting Gate: The Wright Stuff

(CBS)
In a combative appearance at the national press club this morning, Wright provided more ammunition for critics who contend that his brand of theology is divisive at best, troubling at worst. In his prepared remarks, Wright contended that such criticisms were not an attack on himself or Obama’s campaign but on what he called the “black church.”
And he did nothing to distance himself from earlier comments that have been looped and replayed over and over again. He praised Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan as an important voice for black Americans while insisting that he did not agree with everything the controversial leader has said. Wright described Sunday mornings as the most segregated time in the nation, blasted the U.S. government and, asked whether he believes that it spread the AIDS virus within the black community, insisted, “I believe our government is capable of doing anything.”
Obama’s campaign says their candidate has said all he’s going to say about his former pastor but that’s not going to stop the questions he’ll get as he stumps in North Carolina and Indiana this week in advance of very important contests in those states.
Rev. Wright has made a point of insisting that his role is not that of a politician but of a religious and community leader. That’s not going to be of much comfort to Obama’s campaign. Whether he sees himself as a politician or not, Wright has thrust himself right back into the middle of the political conversation – and has done so in a very confrontational manner.
Wright insisted that he’s not Barack Obama’s spiritual adviser, but the two are linked in the minds of voters and provides an opening for political opponents to use in or out of context. “Maybe now an honest dialogue about race in this country will begin,” Wright said according to prepared remarks. “Just maybe now as that dialogue begins the religious tradition that has kept hope alive for a people struggling to survive in countless hopeless situations will be understood." The dialogue will certainly continue – and not in the way Obama’s campaign would like.
Worth More Than A Hundred: The DNC has produced a new ad using John McCain’s “100 years” line from the primaries in which he said that the U.S. might have some sort of presence in Iraq for that long if that’s what it takes to win the war. “What John McCain doesn't understand is that the American people aren't fine with being in Iraq for 100 years in any capacity," DNC Chair Howard Dean said in a release on the ad. "The American people want a President who will responsibly end the war, not more of the same failed policy in Iraq that continues to cost $12 billion a month. They want a President who will invest that money here at home to create jobs and ensure our kids have health care. The more voters learn about John McCain, we're confident they will recognize that he is the wrong choice for America's future." You can watch the ad here.
Debateable: The debate over debates. It’s about as predictable as B-list celebrities showing up at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner. The candidate looking for something to spur a comeback invariably wants more debate opportunities to do so and the front-runner wants to run out the clock. No surprise then that the Clinton campaign is calling for expansive, Lincoln-Douglass style debates. And no surprise that Obama is saying, no thanks. "We have participated in 21 nationally televised debates, the most in primary history, including four exclusively with Senator Clinton. Senator Clinton refused an earlier invitation that had been accepted to debate in North Carolina. Over the next 10 days, we believe it's important to talk directly to the voters of Indiana and North Carolina about fixing our economy, cutting the cost of health care and ending a war in Iraq that never should have been authorized in the first place," said Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs.
Around The Track
No wonder McCain shared cake with Bush the day he was filmed playing guitar as the city went under water.
Because if this does not happen and Obama is the nominee, we lose the WH! Hillary is the best choice right now, she will beat McCain and she wont need the black vote to do it. Bush did''nt need it and he was elected TWICE!!
There is NO WAY Ubama can carry the main stream of society.....you know, the ones who cling to God and guns.
It%u2019s hate the (American) Media, hate the (American) Liberals, hate the (American former president, and current Presidential candidate) Clintons.
Rush Limbaugh spews hate against Americans and America everyday.
Yeah , your one of them
In comparison to the Reverend Wright, Rush Limbaugh has done absolutely nothing to aid his fellow American, serve in the military, or give a fair and positive depiction of actual facts facing Americans.
Just tell us what was said -- WE (the people) will decide if it''s meaningful. We don''t need you or your brethren or sistren in the media to tell us what things mean.
Here is what we DO need you tell us: What Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would do if elected. Nothing more, nothing less. If you would stop talking for a moment and begin LISTENING to We-the-People, you would recognize the redundancy of voter frustration. Know why 90% of voters are frustrated, Vaughn (& company)? It''s because instead of finding out what we need to know (what candidates would do if elected), all the media wants to talk about is polling, fund raising, gaffes.
Next time you write about how dysfunctional American democracy is, you might start with that decisive fact.
He speaks of embracing Change and transformation to that of respect and kindness while being irreverent of the late JFK, Lyndon Johnson and the above-mentioned; he speaks conceptually of embracing difference while he treads the threshold of a bitter diatribe of Eurocentrist thought, music, language and worship.
How does he do so? Leaping from left and right brain hemispheres to oral traditions of Hebrew teachings, he feigns authority and makes bold statements from non-existent sources adding new fields of knowledge as he thunders on.
Demarcating himself as a preacher not a politician or political analyst, he exclaims that his speech is not about the candidacies of Senators McCain, Clinton and Obama. Jeremiah Wright continuously makes an affirmation of a positive, inevitable Change to come; not coincidentally, he finally brings his speech of Change to a climax of Yes We Can make this Change as an obvious endorsement of Senator Obama and then he humbly makes a plug for his book which is to emerge sometime in 2008
-
by carenza-2009
April 29, 2008 11:05 AM PDT
- It is grossly unfair to judge Obama by what his former pastor has said. If those are the standards then who would be more culpable than Hilary Clinton. She was party to the lies and deceit that was embedded in her husband''s race for presidency and the presidency itself. I think that the honest truth is that people have found a perfect excuse to say I will not support Obama, this is definitely more PC than saying "I don''t support him because he is black".
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 18 Comments