From The Road
April 23, 2008 11:03 AM

Obama Campaign Looks Ahead After Double Digit Loss in Pennsylvania

(CBS)

From CBS News’ Maria Gavrilovic:


CHICAGO – Barack Obama’s campaign continued to downplay their 10 point loss in the Pennsylvania primary this morning, arguing that they anticipated the results last night. “We don’t believe that the structure of the race has changed fundamentally,” said campaign manager David Plouffe, adding that they achieved their overall goal to cut down Hillary Clinton’s lead in the state.

Plouffe emphasized the importance of the May 6th primaries in North Carolina and Indiana, arguing that the combined total in the two states offer more pledged delegates than Pennsylvania. He called North Carolina a battleground state and said Clinton should be able to win there by her own definition of success.

“I know that North Carolina is one of the largest states in the country, so I’m sure the Clinton campaign thinks they are the favorites there,” campaign strategist David Axelrod argued last night. “But we feel pretty good about our chances and we're going to compete there.”

Both Plouffe and Axelrod believe that Obama’s performance in Pennsylvania is not an indication of how he will perform in a general election. “It’s not a predictive thing to say that if you don’t win in primary you won’t win in general,” Axelrod said.

Plouffe made a similar argument this morning. “The best chance we will have to win the general election is to stretch the playing field,” he said. “Rather than having to win every state you are competing in, extend the map.”

With $42.5 million cash on hand, the Obama campaign is confident they will be competitive in primaries to come. “We have the organizational ability, the financial ability and the appeal to put a lot of states in play,” Plouffe said.
Tags:
obama
Topics:
Barack Obama
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 12 Comments
by grahampoor April 24, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
Make that 9.2% with 100% reporting:
http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=12&ElectionID=27
Media bias for Obama? Hardly.
He tied in New Hampshire, won Nevada, Super Tuesday and Texas.
But you wouldn''t know it from reading the media reports.
This is a race for delegates.
Reply to this comment
by grahampoor April 24, 2008 2:33 PM EDT
Make that 9.2% with 100% reporting:
http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=12&ElectionID=27
Media bias for Obama? Hardly.
He tied in New Hampshire, won Nevada, Super Tuesday and Texas.
But you wouldn''t know it from reading the media reports.
This is a race for delegates.
Reply to this comment
by varto-2009 April 23, 2008 9:35 PM EDT
Hello Maria,

Please publish a correction to this article. The loss was NOT by double digits.

One would not make a big deal out of decimal points but since this single-, double-digit issue has become just that ... an issue ... in this campaign, please note that Hillary leads by 9.2% or something around that number.

Otherwise, in rounding figures we, for all intents and purposes, are omitting some of the votes!

It is your responsibility as a journalist to publish a correction.

Thank you in advance.


Reply to this comment
by saltfish55 April 23, 2008 8:57 PM EDT
What an irresponsible headline by CBS News! It was not a double-digit victory. It was a nine-point victory (9.4% precisely) and a far-cry from the 20-point lead she held previously.

The New York Times said it all: she should get out of the race:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/NY_Times_editorial_blames_Clinton_for_0423.html

She is shameful:

http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=4470

Reply to this comment
by saltfish55 April 23, 2008 8:56 PM EDT
What an irresponsible headline by CBS News! It was not a double-digit victory. It was a nine-point victory (9.4% precisely) and a far-cry from the 20-point lead she held previously.

The New York Times said it all: she should get out of the race:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/NY_Times_editorial_blames_Clinton_for_0423.html

She is shameful:

http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=4470

Reply to this comment
by formlessness-2009 April 23, 2008 5:27 PM EDT
every single comment on here has pointed out that she did not in fact get the 10% she supposedly needed to remain in the race. Close to the minimum isn''t the minimum. she should be dropping out right now, not claiming victory. She essentially saying mission accomplished from the deck of a sinking aircraft carrier.
Reply to this comment
by hhkeller April 23, 2008 4:21 PM EDT
If Obama practiced less in the mirror and more on the Senate floor he would have won already.
I think male politicians are so full of themselves they don''t see past their last shave orthe lump on the front.
Reply to this comment
by ericfrawley April 23, 2008 3:53 PM EDT
since when was 9.4% double digits?
Reply to this comment
by ericfrawley April 23, 2008 3:53 PM EDT
since when was 9.4% double digits?
Reply to this comment
by ericfrawley April 23, 2008 3:53 PM EDT
since when was 9.4% double digits?
Reply to this comment
by tongassberry April 23, 2008 2:53 PM EDT
Obama 08! ... For Change Vote Obama! ... John Mellencamp - Small Town http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eDkAG3R0h8 ... Bruce Springsteen - Radio Nowhere http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmLt6kcZ72Q ... Barack Obama 08!
Reply to this comment
by drmemory8 April 23, 2008 2:24 PM EDT
I%u2019d like to correct your fuzzy math. You have reported that Clinton won Pennsylvania by 10 percentage points. In fact, her margin of victory is 9.38% (with a few Philadelphia precincts still not reporting). Even if you round to the nearest whole number, it would be 9%. Reporting a %u201Cdouble digit%u201D win is inaccurate.

Bill
Tucson, AZ

Reply to this comment
See all 12 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Kennedy: Bishop Barred Me From Communion

    (310 recent comments)