Horserace
April 1, 2008 11:29 AM

John McCain's 100 Years In Iraq

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other Democrats have been critical of presumptive GOP nominee John McCain for suggesting that America could be in Iraq for 100 years.

"We can't afford to stay in Iraq, like John McCain said, for another 100 years," Obama said in Lancaster, PA., echoing other comments he has made on the trail.

"We cannot take four more years of more of the same and if you listen to Sen. McCain, he wants to keep troops in Iraq, he has said, for up to 100 years,” Clinton said in February. She made similar remarks last month.

Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean has called McCain "a blatant opportunist who...is promising to keep our troops in Iraq for 100 years."

The charge results from comments McCain made at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire in January. After a questioner told McCain that President Bush has talked about staying in Iraq for 50 years, McCain said, "make it a hundred."

He continued: "We've been in Japan for 60 years. We've been in South Korea for 50 years or so. That would be fine with me, as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed."

Here's the video:



McCain appears to be talking about maintaining a presence in Iraq, not continuing the type of war America is now fighting. He suggests it would be acceptable to "maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world" similar to that in Japan and Korea.

The nonpartisan Annenberg Political Fact Check calls the DNC's suggestion, based on these comments, that McCain has called for an "endless war" in Iraq a "rank falsehood."

The McCain campaign, meanwhile, argues that Obama "has been knowingly twisting McCain's words," and McCain himself suggested that Obama's characterization of his comments exposes "a fundamental misunderstanding of history" on Obama's part, because he "has no experience or background on these issues."

But the Democratic frontrunner says his characterization is "entirely fair."

Pressed on the issue at a press conference, Obama, who advocates having troops looking after the American embassy and civilian populations in Iraq, as well as maintaining "a strike force in the region," either in or out of Iraq, after the war, said his position was "very different from saying we're going to have a permanent occupation in Iraq."

Obama continued:

"And it's certainly different from saying that we would have a high level of combat troops inside Iraq for a decade or two decades, or, as John McCain said, perhaps a hundred years. I'm just quoting back what he said. Unless you tell me that that's a misquote."
Tags:
john mccain ,
100 years ,
iraq ,
barack obama
Topics:
John McCain
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 11:49 AM PDT
I guess it%u2019s going to take the Republicans more time to bring Iraq (and the rest of the Middle East) under control unlike the couple of years that it took to bring Europe and the South Pacific. The Republican Conservatives covet a long term $money making opportunity for themselves at the cost of every American. Has any of the Presidential Candidates brought forth a plan to pay for the barrowed money (from China) that will come due?

Anyone?
Anyone??
Beuller?
Reply to this comment
by paladin777-2009 April 1, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
I only have two words to say: Stop Loss. Go see the movie and you''ll see how the burden of this foreign occupation is affecting the lives of our brave troops. McCain in typical Bush-esque fashion is quick to invoke war rhetoric against Iran and promise an increase in military size. I would not be surprised if he instituted the draft.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet April 1, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
Posted by Hillarygrl34 at 12:39 PM : Apr 01, 2008
+ report abuse

You Fascist can defend this until the end of time... it all means the same. We invaded and occupied a nation based of pure LIES. We are involved in a Civil War in that Country and there is NO END in sight. NONE! Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds April 1, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
McCain''s comment makes it clear that he advocates permanent US military bases in Iraq ala South Korea. That is something that the US does not want, need or can afford. Also permanent bases in Iraq will become a rallying cause for Muslim terrorists around the world. They will make America much less safe, though they will make war contractors much richer at the expense of our troops blood.
Reply to this comment
by advanceus April 1, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
It''s scary McCain is the nominee for President, it could happen. I can understand why he is constantly misspeaking himself at his age, he should just go home and not worry about the rest of the world. It is not like it was back when the Presidents were in their 70s, there is too much going on in the world for them to keep track. NOT that I am saying older citizens should sit on the sofa, but we need to face it sometimes it is better if the younger run things.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds April 1, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
"McCain himself suggested that Obama''s characterization of his comments exposes "a fundamental misunderstanding of history"

You couldn''t be more wrong. Obama does understand history and your comment, as do all thinking Americans. We just reject it! Disagreeing with a person (even a senile one like McCain) does not mean we don''t understand them, it just means we think they''re wrong.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 1:02 PM PDT

I believe in all due respect that the McCain foreign policy and revisionist look at American History in transcending Radical Islamic Extremism could be equated to Radical Republican Extremism! (For fun and profit).
Reply to this comment
by crimsonjefri April 1, 2008 1:24 PM PDT
You bunch of liberals are pathetic. You''re *** right the enemy is different. These Islamic extremists hate America and what we stand for. IF you think they wouldn''t kill you (liberals or conservatives) you are more of an idiot than I thought. Wake up people!! These people attacked US first. What is going to take for you to realize that these extremists must be eliminated ( a nuke in Anytown, USA?)McCain,Obama,nor Clinton would be my first choice for President, but whoever wins had better protect this Country or 9-11 will look like a picnic in Central Park.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 1:34 PM PDT
Obama cites that words mean something. However, when the Rev. Wright says racist, anti-semetic and anti-American things they are merely sound bites of his worst five gaffs. Taken out of context according to Obama means that words don''t mean anything. Never seems to apply when Obama makes the most of sound bites out of context now does it? I would tend to just call B. Hussein Obama two-faced but one-dimensional.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 1:35 PM PDT
I believe in all due respect that the McCain foreign policy and revisionist look at American History in transcending Radical Islamic Extremism could be equated to Radical Republican Extremism! (For fun and profit).

Posted by Mattcat25

Then you are the victim of an inadequate education and, hence, faulty thinking.
Reply to this comment
by crimsonjefri April 1, 2008 1:43 PM PDT
Obama says he is a Christian and not a Muslim...well, if his idea of Christianity is that of a raging maniac preacher in (Reverend) Wright then this nation has a problem. Rev Wright is no better than the cowardly men in the KKK who wore hooded sheets in order to promote hate. Christ came to give us love not hate!!
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds April 1, 2008 1:48 PM PDT
I believe in all due respect that the McCain foreign policy and revisionist look at American History in transcending Radical Islamic Extremism could be equated to Radical Republican Extremism! (For fun and profit).

Posted by Mattcat25 at 01:02 PM : Apr 01, 2008

RAmen, esp the for profit part, which is the driving force behind ALL GOP foreign policy decisions.
Reply to this comment
by javalation April 1, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
Why would McCain imagine that Iraq will ever be like Japan or Korea? Because he chooses to be ignorant of the vast factional differences of the people in the ME. It will never be like the homogeneous people of Japan or Korea, and will most likely always be a dangerous place for Americans to live.
Reply to this comment
by kladinvt April 1, 2008 2:13 PM PDT
The more relevant question to ask McCain & all those who enabled Bush''s war, is ''why are we there?" It certainly had NOTHING to do with 911? So then why? And With every single reason for invading Iraq, now gone up in smoke, why are we there & why should we remain there?
And what''s become of Osama or does he even matter to these warmongers?
I
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 2:23 PM PDT
Posted by mudrose at 01:35 PM : Apr 01, 2008

"Then you are the victim of an inadequate education and, hence, faulty thinking."

Mud, would you like to elaborate on my education?
Or, would you like to explain the Republican War Passion?

Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 2:26 PM PDT
Posted by mudrose at 01:35 PM : Apr 01, 2008

"Then you are the victim of an inadequate education and, hence, faulty thinking."

Mud, would you like to elaborate on my education?
Or, would you like to explain the Republican War Passion?
Posted by Mattcat25

What for? It would be pointless to educate you.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
What for? It would be pointless to educate you.
Posted by mudrose at 02:26 PM : Apr 01, 2008


It%u2019s pointless to attack me personally, this is a common tactic from people that don%u2019t like what they read, hear, or see.

War is sick, and people that display an affinity for war and work themselves up into war frenzy could be identified with being Ill.


Reply to this comment
by inventagod April 1, 2008 3:09 PM PDT

John ''The Same Bu$h Shame'' McCain
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 3:09 PM PDT
War is sick, and people that display an affinity for war and work themselves up into war frenzy could be identified with being Ill.
Posted by Mattcat25

Well shut my mouth. Tell it to the Founders that separated from England. Tell it to the Rough Riders during the Spanish-American War. Tell it to the Dough Boys and the GI''s in the Pacific. Tell it especially to the families of the 9/11 victims. You are a fool to assume like Neville Chamberlain that there are people out there that can be pacified. Like I said, it''s pointless to educate you.
Reply to this comment
by joefrat1 April 1, 2008 3:30 PM PDT
Mattcat25, where where you when Saddam was routinely pulling people off the street, and raping them, incarcerating them and killing them at will? The US actions to eliminate one of the most evil and dangerous tyrants of our generation has made the free world and the U.S. safer. Had he had remained in power and with his near-unlimited oil wealth,he would have the capability to do whatever horrendous deeds he desired.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 3:42 PM PDT
You know, I liked watching John Wayne movies and Audie Murphy when I was kid. The %u201CGood Guyz%u201D would always win! I like sports, but this is not a football game. There are no clear colors even on the side of the United States that invaded a sovereign country that was under UN sanctions, had no air force and a depleted army.

Even with the fact that Saddam Hussein didn%u2019t have weapons of mass destruction, if the US could%u2019ve secured this campaign successfully a few years ago, I would support the effort. During WWII the allies had one fully equipped and supported soldier for every 35 to 40 civilians in Germany. In Iraq the US would%u2019ve needed 250,000 troops to properly secure just the City of Bagdad.

There were never (and, still isn%u2019t) enough troops on the ground, they didn%u2019t have all the necessary equipment and training to control the population, the US disbanded the Iraqi military turning them into the armed insurgency, and through mismanagement and corruption $billions of dollars have gone to fund the opposition.

If the Republicans want a warrior state society they could at least do the job right.

Go team!
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 4:08 PM PDT
Posted by Mattcat25

If you got your impressions from John Wayne movies and representations of Audie Murphy, that would explain your inability to comprehend and discern fact from fiction.

It''s regrettable to learn that America is no longer in the business of educating it''s society - not historically or classically.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 4:17 PM PDT
If you got your impressions from John Wayne movies and representations of Audie Murphy, that would explain your inability to comprehend and discern fact from fiction.
Posted by mudrose at 04:08 PM : Apr 01, 2008


I don%u2019t play war anymore%u2026the inability to comprehend and discern fact from fiction would be derived from Republican Right Wing War Propaganda Radio and Fox News. The American People have been lead down a path that can%u2019t be compared to neither our revolution, nor the two world wars but, for private profits by a fascist ideology.



Reply to this comment
by joefrat1 April 1, 2008 4:17 PM PDT
Hey Mattcat, how nice that you assign "sovereignty" to Iraq. Since 1932, when the Brits granted independence to Iraq, the country has been ruled by autocrats. Saddam himself only gained power by a bloody coup in 1979. There is NO shame in the U.S. invasion and overthrow of this dispicable dictatorship. You, my friend, were lucky enough to have been born in a free society, that gives you the opportunity to voice whatever differences you may have. Undoubtedly, you do not understand the value of "freedom", which Iraq citizens are now enjoying for the first time in their lifetime, thanks to the courage of President Bush. One last word, I am shockingly unimpressed by the "military leadership" skills, you profess to possess by your "inane" comments on the adequacy of troop levels and armament.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 4:21 PM PDT
I don%u2019t play war anymore%u2026the inability to comprehend and discern fact from fiction would be derived from Republican Right Wing War Propaganda Radio and Fox News. The American People have been lead down a path that can%u2019t be compared to neither our revolution, nor the two world wars but, for private profits by a fascist ideology.
Posted by Mattcat25

Sure, sure, always religious or class warfare. Let me tell you something fella, pimping poverty and victimization is a very lucrative business. The elitists aren''t on the right - Al Gore, John Edwards, Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Soros.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 4:22 PM PDT
Posted by joefrat1 at 04:17 PM : Apr 01, 2008

So share, what really turns you on about war?
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 4:30 PM PDT
Posted by joefrat1 at 04:17 PM : Apr 01, 2008

So share, what really turns you on about war?
Posted by Mattcat25

Now if you read about Neville Chamberlain, you wouldn''t ask that question.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 4:37 PM PDT
Repbulicans love war, a vote for any GOP candidate is a direct endorsement and approval for more of what they like, more war.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 4:40 PM PDT
Repbulicans love war, a vote for any GOP candidate is a direct endorsement and approval for more of what they like, more war.
Posted by Mattcat25

Okay, fella, that''s it for me. You like to have the last word. Nothing more, nothing less, just the last word. Wish it was significant, instead of being merely drivel.
Reply to this comment
by joefrat1 April 1, 2008 4:43 PM PDT
Hey mattcat, listen. WE (the USA) is the strongest economic economy in the history of civilization. We are also the strongest military ever assembled. Finally, we are the most MORAL nation in history. War doesn''t turn me on, but people like you too often are too interested in partisan politics, instead of dealing with the real issues facing us. You take too "lightly" the subject of Islamic terrorism - the supporters of which would very gladly slit your (and my) throat for no other reason, than to satisfy thw words of Allah.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 1, 2008 4:45 PM PDT
It%u2019s good to engage, that%u2019s what this format is all about thank -you.
And, happy war fantasies!
Reply to this comment
by joefrat1 April 1, 2008 4:45 PM PDT
It is unfortunate that you, your anti-war liberal friends, and both Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary just do "not get it"!
Reply to this comment
by Syndicate April 1, 2008 6:41 PM PDT
I wonder if Obama will pledge to Bring troops home from WWII and the korean conflict too. If we don''t need troops in Iraq then sure as hell don''t need them in Germany, Japan or Korea, do we?
Reply to this comment
by whitepicks2 April 1, 2008 7:07 PM PDT
Republicans LOVE war.
Reply to this comment
by scottyusa April 1, 2008 7:35 PM PDT
I wonder if Obama will pledge to Bring troops home from WWII and the korean conflict too. If we don''''t need troops in Iraq then sure as hell don''''t need them in Germany, Japan or Korea, do we?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Cbscrash07 at 06:41 PM : Apr 01, 2008

Right on!
Reply to this comment
by scottyusa April 1, 2008 7:38 PM PDT
I bet if McCain said he was going to go to the moon and find Alice the democrats would take him seriously.
Reply to this comment
by shawnhussey April 1, 2008 7:47 PM PDT
Senator McCain''s words have been grossly distorted by the Democratic presidential candidates.John McCain is planning to defeat Al Qaeda and the other terrorists in Iraq.Then,he would keep an American presence there in order to isure that liberty and democracy remain in Iraq.The establishment of a free Iraq is a major defeat for Islamic terrorism.Senator McCain wants to assist the Iraqis in preserving their newly earned liberty and democracy.Senators Clinton and Obama would abandon the Iraqi people in their time of need.I''m proud to be supporting John McCain for President.
Reply to this comment
by obama8years April 1, 2008 9:08 PM PDT
Ok this is what I got so far again PLEASE IF SOMETHING IS NOT TRUE I WILL TAKE IT OFF. HONEST

Now I think I have a complete list....if anything is not true, I will take it off the list.

CAN ANYONE AD ANYTHING, AM I MISSING ANYTHING ABOUT OBAMA AND HIS ASSOCIATION TO UNSAVORY CHARACTERS. MUCH APPRECIATED. MAKING A LIST AND CHECKING IT TWICE.

How can anyone even think of voting for Obama.

- Went with farakahn to the million man march

- 20 years of church, he stated he rarely missed a sun.

- Related to Muslim Cousin who wants sharia law

- Ties to Ayers who is a known terrorist

- His Wife is finally proud of america

- His wife wrote an essay on black seperatists in
Princeton

- His pastor gave farakahn an award

- His pastor is pro-hamas

- Obama Cousin campaigning for change in kenya.

- Obama lied about his liberal past

- Obama lied about his pastor

- Obama PA campaign Ad about Oil was a Fraud

- Obama Said Babys are a Pain(not exact quote)

- Relationship with Rezco

- Michelle Obama Finances with Hospital
Reply to this comment
by obama8years April 1, 2008 9:23 PM PDT
ONE THOUSAND DOLLAR REWARD $1,000
(prove anything on this list is false and ill email to your paypal)

CAN ANYONE AD ANYTHING, AM I MISSING ANYTHING ABOUT OBAMA AND HIS ASSOCIATION TO UNSAVORY CHARACTERS. MUCH APPRECIATED. MAKING A LIST AND CHECKING IT TWICE.

How can anyone even think of voting for Obama.

- Went with farakahn to the million man march

- 20 years of church, he stated he rarely missed a sun.

- Related to Muslim Cousin who wants sharia law

- Ties to Ayers who is a known terrorist

- His Wife is finally proud of america

- His wife wrote an essay on black seperatists in
Princeton

- His pastor gave farakahn an award

- His pastor is pro-hamas

- Obama Cousin campaigning for change in kenya.

- Obama lied about his liberal past

- Obama lied about his pastor

- Obama PA campaign Ad about Oil was a Fraud

- Obama Said Babys are a Pain(not exact quote)

- Relationship with Rezco

- Michelle Obama Finances with Hospital
Reply to this comment
by drdave212 April 1, 2008 9:52 PM PDT
Obama: Deceiver-in-Chief...."100 year war"

Anybody who has viewed the town hall meeting knows exactly what McCain said. It''s disgusting & pathetic that Obama thinks we Americans are so stupid as to fall for such deception. But then again polls show Americans have fallen for his Wright/absent-from-church-that-day deception. Still a lot of folks are beginning to smell a rat. Now a Boston "historian" appears out of thin air to proxy for Obama and nuance the deception even further. It''s just another slick but deperate attempt by the old Chicago political machine headed by David Axelrod to float Obama: Deceiver-in-Chief.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 April 1, 2008 10:19 PM PDT
Iraq is not Japan or Korea. It''s a guerilla war, a civil war. We can''t maintain a non-combat presence there.

Japan & Korea had single part leadership. They were not factionalized the way that Iraq is.

Iraq is more like Somalia and Lebanon and McCain''s Vietnam experience has him grounded in a type of warfare and diplomacy that''s not relevant to the situation we''re in.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 April 2, 2008 10:02 AM PDT
The GOP has demonstrated an abnormal perverse obsession with killing and war. Here are some other (9) reasons to vote for the Republicans to maintain their agenda in 2008:


Perpetual War (100 years occupation of Iraq if necessary was a direct quote from Republican Presidential nominee John McCain).

Unfair taxation of the middle class
High prices for energy and everything else
High medical costs and prescription drugs
Pollution
Corruption
Religious hypocrisy and abuse of church status tax laws
Degradation of our infrastructure
Continued export of American jobs to overseas slave labor
Decline in US stature and respect of the world community
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented