John McCain's 100 Years In Iraq
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other Democrats have been critical of presumptive GOP nominee John McCain for suggesting that America could be in Iraq for 100 years.
"We can't afford to stay in Iraq, like John McCain said, for another 100 years," Obama said in Lancaster, PA., echoing other comments he has made on the trail.
"We cannot take four more years of more of the same and if you listen to Sen. McCain, he wants to keep troops in Iraq, he has said, for up to 100 years,” Clinton said in February. She made similar remarks last month.
Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean has called McCain "a blatant opportunist who...is promising to keep our troops in Iraq for 100 years."
The charge results from comments McCain made at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire in January. After a questioner told McCain that President Bush has talked about staying in Iraq for 50 years, McCain said, "make it a hundred."
He continued: "We've been in Japan for 60 years. We've been in South Korea for 50 years or so. That would be fine with me, as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed."
Here's the video:
McCain appears to be talking about maintaining a presence in Iraq, not continuing the type of war America is now fighting. He suggests it would be acceptable to "maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world" similar to that in Japan and Korea.
The nonpartisan Annenberg Political Fact Check calls the DNC's suggestion, based on these comments, that McCain has called for an "endless war" in Iraq a "rank falsehood."
The McCain campaign, meanwhile, argues that Obama "has been knowingly twisting McCain's words," and McCain himself suggested that Obama's characterization of his comments exposes "a fundamental misunderstanding of history" on Obama's part, because he "has no experience or background on these issues."
But the Democratic frontrunner says his characterization is "entirely fair."
Pressed on the issue at a press conference, Obama, who advocates having troops looking after the American embassy and civilian populations in Iraq, as well as maintaining "a strike force in the region," either in or out of Iraq, after the war, said his position was "very different from saying we're going to have a permanent occupation in Iraq."
Obama continued:
"And it's certainly different from saying that we would have a high level of combat troops inside Iraq for a decade or two decades, or, as John McCain said, perhaps a hundred years. I'm just quoting back what he said. Unless you tell me that that's a misquote."
"We can't afford to stay in Iraq, like John McCain said, for another 100 years," Obama said in Lancaster, PA., echoing other comments he has made on the trail.
"We cannot take four more years of more of the same and if you listen to Sen. McCain, he wants to keep troops in Iraq, he has said, for up to 100 years,” Clinton said in February. She made similar remarks last month.
Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean has called McCain "a blatant opportunist who...is promising to keep our troops in Iraq for 100 years."
The charge results from comments McCain made at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire in January. After a questioner told McCain that President Bush has talked about staying in Iraq for 50 years, McCain said, "make it a hundred."
He continued: "We've been in Japan for 60 years. We've been in South Korea for 50 years or so. That would be fine with me, as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed."
Here's the video:
McCain appears to be talking about maintaining a presence in Iraq, not continuing the type of war America is now fighting. He suggests it would be acceptable to "maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world" similar to that in Japan and Korea.
The nonpartisan Annenberg Political Fact Check calls the DNC's suggestion, based on these comments, that McCain has called for an "endless war" in Iraq a "rank falsehood."
The McCain campaign, meanwhile, argues that Obama "has been knowingly twisting McCain's words," and McCain himself suggested that Obama's characterization of his comments exposes "a fundamental misunderstanding of history" on Obama's part, because he "has no experience or background on these issues."
But the Democratic frontrunner says his characterization is "entirely fair."
Pressed on the issue at a press conference, Obama, who advocates having troops looking after the American embassy and civilian populations in Iraq, as well as maintaining "a strike force in the region," either in or out of Iraq, after the war, said his position was "very different from saying we're going to have a permanent occupation in Iraq."
Obama continued:
"And it's certainly different from saying that we would have a high level of combat troops inside Iraq for a decade or two decades, or, as John McCain said, perhaps a hundred years. I'm just quoting back what he said. Unless you tell me that that's a misquote."
Anyone?
Anyone??
Beuller?
+ report abuse
You Fascist can defend this until the end of time... it all means the same. We invaded and occupied a nation based of pure LIES. We are involved in a Civil War in that Country and there is NO END in sight. NONE! Sieg Heil Bush
You couldn''t be more wrong. Obama does understand history and your comment, as do all thinking Americans. We just reject it! Disagreeing with a person (even a senile one like McCain) does not mean we don''t understand them, it just means we think they''re wrong.
I believe in all due respect that the McCain foreign policy and revisionist look at American History in transcending Radical Islamic Extremism could be equated to Radical Republican Extremism! (For fun and profit).
Posted by Mattcat25
Then you are the victim of an inadequate education and, hence, faulty thinking.
Posted by Mattcat25 at 01:02 PM : Apr 01, 2008
RAmen, esp the for profit part, which is the driving force behind ALL GOP foreign policy decisions.
And what''s become of Osama or does he even matter to these warmongers?
I
"Then you are the victim of an inadequate education and, hence, faulty thinking."
Mud, would you like to elaborate on my education?
Or, would you like to explain the Republican War Passion?
"Then you are the victim of an inadequate education and, hence, faulty thinking."
Mud, would you like to elaborate on my education?
Or, would you like to explain the Republican War Passion?
Posted by Mattcat25
What for? It would be pointless to educate you.
Posted by mudrose at 02:26 PM : Apr 01, 2008
It%u2019s pointless to attack me personally, this is a common tactic from people that don%u2019t like what they read, hear, or see.
War is sick, and people that display an affinity for war and work themselves up into war frenzy could be identified with being Ill.
John ''The Same Bu$h Shame'' McCain
Posted by Mattcat25
Well shut my mouth. Tell it to the Founders that separated from England. Tell it to the Rough Riders during the Spanish-American War. Tell it to the Dough Boys and the GI''s in the Pacific. Tell it especially to the families of the 9/11 victims. You are a fool to assume like Neville Chamberlain that there are people out there that can be pacified. Like I said, it''s pointless to educate you.
Even with the fact that Saddam Hussein didn%u2019t have weapons of mass destruction, if the US could%u2019ve secured this campaign successfully a few years ago, I would support the effort. During WWII the allies had one fully equipped and supported soldier for every 35 to 40 civilians in Germany. In Iraq the US would%u2019ve needed 250,000 troops to properly secure just the City of Bagdad.
There were never (and, still isn%u2019t) enough troops on the ground, they didn%u2019t have all the necessary equipment and training to control the population, the US disbanded the Iraqi military turning them into the armed insurgency, and through mismanagement and corruption $billions of dollars have gone to fund the opposition.
If the Republicans want a warrior state society they could at least do the job right.
Go team!
If you got your impressions from John Wayne movies and representations of Audie Murphy, that would explain your inability to comprehend and discern fact from fiction.
It''s regrettable to learn that America is no longer in the business of educating it''s society - not historically or classically.
Posted by mudrose at 04:08 PM : Apr 01, 2008
I don%u2019t play war anymore%u2026the inability to comprehend and discern fact from fiction would be derived from Republican Right Wing War Propaganda Radio and Fox News. The American People have been lead down a path that can%u2019t be compared to neither our revolution, nor the two world wars but, for private profits by a fascist ideology.
Posted by Mattcat25
Sure, sure, always religious or class warfare. Let me tell you something fella, pimping poverty and victimization is a very lucrative business. The elitists aren''t on the right - Al Gore, John Edwards, Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Soros.
So share, what really turns you on about war?
So share, what really turns you on about war?
Posted by Mattcat25
Now if you read about Neville Chamberlain, you wouldn''t ask that question.
Posted by Mattcat25
Okay, fella, that''s it for me. You like to have the last word. Nothing more, nothing less, just the last word. Wish it was significant, instead of being merely drivel.
And, happy war fantasies!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Cbscrash07 at 06:41 PM : Apr 01, 2008
Right on!
Now I think I have a complete list....if anything is not true, I will take it off the list.
CAN ANYONE AD ANYTHING, AM I MISSING ANYTHING ABOUT OBAMA AND HIS ASSOCIATION TO UNSAVORY CHARACTERS. MUCH APPRECIATED. MAKING A LIST AND CHECKING IT TWICE.
How can anyone even think of voting for Obama.
- Went with farakahn to the million man march
- 20 years of church, he stated he rarely missed a sun.
- Related to Muslim Cousin who wants sharia law
- Ties to Ayers who is a known terrorist
- His Wife is finally proud of america
- His wife wrote an essay on black seperatists in
Princeton
- His pastor gave farakahn an award
- His pastor is pro-hamas
- Obama Cousin campaigning for change in kenya.
- Obama lied about his liberal past
- Obama lied about his pastor
- Obama PA campaign Ad about Oil was a Fraud
- Obama Said Babys are a Pain(not exact quote)
- Relationship with Rezco
- Michelle Obama Finances with Hospital
(prove anything on this list is false and ill email to your paypal)
CAN ANYONE AD ANYTHING, AM I MISSING ANYTHING ABOUT OBAMA AND HIS ASSOCIATION TO UNSAVORY CHARACTERS. MUCH APPRECIATED. MAKING A LIST AND CHECKING IT TWICE.
How can anyone even think of voting for Obama.
- Went with farakahn to the million man march
- 20 years of church, he stated he rarely missed a sun.
- Related to Muslim Cousin who wants sharia law
- Ties to Ayers who is a known terrorist
- His Wife is finally proud of america
- His wife wrote an essay on black seperatists in
Princeton
- His pastor gave farakahn an award
- His pastor is pro-hamas
- Obama Cousin campaigning for change in kenya.
- Obama lied about his liberal past
- Obama lied about his pastor
- Obama PA campaign Ad about Oil was a Fraud
- Obama Said Babys are a Pain(not exact quote)
- Relationship with Rezco
- Michelle Obama Finances with Hospital
Anybody who has viewed the town hall meeting knows exactly what McCain said. It''s disgusting & pathetic that Obama thinks we Americans are so stupid as to fall for such deception. But then again polls show Americans have fallen for his Wright/absent-from-church-that-day deception. Still a lot of folks are beginning to smell a rat. Now a Boston "historian" appears out of thin air to proxy for Obama and nuance the deception even further. It''s just another slick but deperate attempt by the old Chicago political machine headed by David Axelrod to float Obama: Deceiver-in-Chief.
Japan & Korea had single part leadership. They were not factionalized the way that Iraq is.
Iraq is more like Somalia and Lebanon and McCain''s Vietnam experience has him grounded in a type of warfare and diplomacy that''s not relevant to the situation we''re in.
-
by mattcat25
April 2, 2008 10:02 AM PDT
- The GOP has demonstrated an abnormal perverse obsession with killing and war. Here are some other (9) reasons to vote for the Republicans to maintain their agenda in 2008:
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 42 CommentsPerpetual War (100 years occupation of Iraq if necessary was a direct quote from Republican Presidential nominee John McCain).
Unfair taxation of the middle class
High prices for energy and everything else
High medical costs and prescription drugs
Pollution
Corruption
Religious hypocrisy and abuse of church status tax laws
Degradation of our infrastructure
Continued export of American jobs to overseas slave labor
Decline in US stature and respect of the world community