From The Road
March 12, 2008 4:57 PM

Obama Says He's as Qualified as Clinton, McCain

(CBS)

From CBS News' Maria Gavrilovic


CHICAGO -- Surrounded by retired military officers and American flags, Barack Obama presented his case for why he is the most qualified candidate to become commander-in-chief.

“On the most important national security question since the Cold War, I am the only candidate who opposed the war in Iraq from the beginning,” he said. “This judgment was not about speeches, it was about whether or not the United States of America would go to war in Iraq.”

He argued that his judgment supersedes arguments about his experience. “After years of being told that Democrats have to talk, act, and vote like John McCain to pass some commander-in-chief test, how many times do we have to learn that tough talk is not a substitute for sound judgment?” Obama asked. “After years of a war in Iraq that should’ve never been authorized, how many more politicians will appeal to the American people's fears instead of their hopes?”

Obama was asked if he thought Hillary Clinton was qualified to be commander-in-chief. "Yes, as I believe Senator McCain is. And, as I believe, I am," Obama said.

Clinton's campaign said today’s event was simply a stage show. “The Obama campaign knows well that he has not yet passed the commander-in-chief test which is why they are doing events like the one today,” said Clinton communications director Howard Wolfson. “The fact is that many voters still have concerns about his readiness to be commander-in-chief on day one.” Clinton held a similar event back on March 6th to highlight her qualifications as a military leader.

Decorated officer and Obama surrogate, General Tony McPeak, disagreed with that, describing the Illinois senator as “no shock Barack, no drama Obama.” “So when that phone rings, when that red phone rings at three a.m., you want a guy with this kind of temperament to answer that telephone," McPeak said.

The drama in recent days hasn’t been about current military affairs, though, but about former Democratic vice presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro, who said Obama was “very lucky to be where he is.” Although Obama hesitated to call the comments racist, he described them as “ridiculous and wrong headed.”

"I think they're not borne out of our history or by the facts,” he said. "If you pulled out a handbook of how to weigh your assets and liabilities in a presidential race, I don't think my name or my skin color would be in the asset column."

Obama said he had hoped that the issue of race would be been dispelled by now, but acknowledges that it has not. While he didn’t accuse the Clinton campaign of heightening the issue of race, he does believe that they have contributed to the controversy.

“I do think that the Clinton campaign has talked more over the course of the last month of what groups are supporting her and not supporting me and making the case that there are a set of voters that Obama may not get,” he explained. “I disagree with that and I believe that there are certain voters that she can or can’t get – she can’t get Republicans or independents.”
Tags:
Obama
Topics:
Barack Obama
Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by whanna4 March 14, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
we are finally beginning to find out more about barack that the conservatives will be using, things the media seems to gloss over like it will be no problem, just read obamas book and he explains everything. hogwash, if you think the clintons have been to mean to barack hold on if he does get the superdeligate nod. ladies and gentlemen we will find out if barack enjoyed drugs, gave some to friends, was his children present, was his wife present, has michelle discovered other things about america to be proud of, what things that his mentor or preacher believe does obama believe, should blacks get their own state or country in the u.s., should muslems have their own political party, does anyone truly believe the 80% to 90% black vote in baracks favor is not at least somewhat racist? will the reporting finally start looking at mr obama like the neocons will to help us make an educated decision about the most important person in the world? who is barack hussein obama? we know clinton, we know mccain, we need to know more, please we can''t take a chance on just change
Reply to this comment
by laurenbrillante March 14, 2008 3:25 AM EDT
He is as ready as most presidents are to be commander in chief. He is at least as ready as Hillary. But frankly I don''t want her in charge of our military or in our white house. She has exhibited poor judgement and a lapse of sanity in my perception...not qualities I look for in a commander in chief. I would feel much, much safer with Obama in charge. Bill Clinton had no commander in chief qualifications when he became president. Senator Obama already actually reads intelligence reports and in the months between winning an election and being sworn in a president is brought up to speed on intelligence etc. because on day one they have to have top security clearance and be aware of all of the situations at hand. They do this no matter who you are.
I am looking forward to a change in politics when Senator Obama becomes our president and commander in chief.
OBAMA/EDWARDS ''08
Reply to this comment
by ewnnrj March 13, 2008 9:59 PM EDT
The Clintonistas and Republicans posting here - and we can no longer tell them apart their rhetoric is all one - keep harping on fear and race.
Fortunately, the majority of Americans have outgrown them
Reply to this comment
by lilmamainga March 13, 2008 12:13 AM EDT
REGARDLESS OF WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING WHEN THEY DENY IT IS A RACIAL/GENDER ISSUE, I DISAGREE. WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IS PROBABLY THAT THE VOTERS WHO DON''T WANT EITHER ONE OF THE DEMOCRATIC CHOICES IS GOING TO END UP VOTING REPUBLICAN INSTEAD OF DEMOCRAT THEREBY ENSURING THAT MACAIN IS GOING TO BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT BASED ON THOSE FACTS ALONE! NOT TO MENTION THE DANGER TO OUR CITIZENS AS TEMPERS RISE AND ESCALATE OVER THE RACIAL ISSUE.
Reply to this comment
by sjbj2322 March 12, 2008 10:20 PM EDT
%u201CI disagree with that and I believe that there are certain voters that she can or can%u2019t get %u2013 she can%u2019t get Republicans or independents.%u201D

Well I guess the Mississippi vote dispelled that misguided by the facts statement, didn''t it Mr. Obama!
Reply to this comment
by jonswift2 March 12, 2008 10:19 PM EDT
Phillysage, what has Hillary Clinton led except a failed health care initiative and a campaign that has been inconsistent, overconfident, divisive, and willing to eat the Democratic party''s own young to succeed? Please answer that question. I will tell you in advance that the following answers which she has tried so far are not convincing: Rezko; she opened the door to Kosovar refugees (she gave a speech after the fact); she brought Peace to Northern Ireland (she encouraged women to be active in the process- laudable and positive, but not leadership); gave a speech on women''s rights in Beijing (again positive, but if this is the commander-in-chief test then Gloria Steinem is ready); Rezko.
Reply to this comment
by phillysage March 12, 2008 10:05 PM EDT
"Obama Says He''s as Qualified as Clinton, McCain"
You can put lipstick on a pig and call it Monique, but it''s still a pig! And Obama still ain''t prepared to be commander-in-chief.
He is a manipulative, skillful and smooth political speechmaker, but he has never shown he could lead anything out of a wet paper bag, period.
Reply to this comment
by jonswift2 March 12, 2008 9:45 PM EDT
Clinton keeps talking about this commander-in-chief test. What is it? Is it hard? There must be a course you can take or a book you can read. Maybe there is a condensed version, sort of like that National Intelligence Estimate that Clinton didn''t bother to read in full. It must be an easy test if George W passed it. Does it have something to do with being able to say I am right in the face of reality and keeping a straight face. Then I can see where Hillary Clinton passes it, as did her husband, and our current POTUS. The only test that I can conceive of for a commander-in-chief is whether they are smart, but realize they do not know everything; whether they inspire trust because they are consistent and are not continually changing the rules of engagement; and whether they are humble enough not to risk American lives for the sake of their ego. If that is the test then Obama passes, McCain probably does as well, and Hillary can join George W in summer school, where they can write 100 times "Being President is not about winning, its about the American people, all of them:.
Reply to this comment
by jonswift2 March 12, 2008 9:44 PM EDT
Clinton keeps talking about this commander-in-chief test. What is it? Is it hard? There must be a course you can take or a book you can read. Maybe there is a condensed version, sort of like that National Intelligence Estimate that Clinton didn''t bother to read in full. It must be an easy test if George W passed it. Does it have something to do with being able to say I am right in the face of reality and keeping a straight face. Then I can see where Hillary Clinton passes it, as did her husband, and our current POTUS. The only test that I can conceive of for a commander-in-chief is whether they are smart, but realize they do not know everything; whether they inspire trust because they are consistent and are not continually changing the rules of engagement; and whether they are humble enough not to risk American lives for the sake of their ego. If that is the test then Obama passes, McCain probably does as well, and Hillary can join George W in summer school, where they can write 100 times "Being President is not about winning, its about the American people, all of them:.
Reply to this comment
by deaconxavier March 12, 2008 9:15 PM EDT
you misquoted ferraro''s statement and downplayed its implications.

her exact quote was "he happens to be very luck to be WHO he is." not "where" he is, "who" he is.

you also conveniently left out the two preceding sentences which are greater points of contention than the sentence you decided to misquote: "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position." surely you were conscious of how you portrayed ferraro''s statement.

and while you''re at it, you''ve got a typo in the second-to-last paragraph.
Reply to this comment
by deaconxavier March 12, 2008 9:13 PM EDT
you misquoted ferraro''s statement and downplayed its implications.

her exact quote was "he happens to be very luck to be WHO he is." not "where" he is, "who" he is.

you also conveniently left out the two preceding sentences which are greater points of contention than the sentence you decided to misquote: "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position." surely you were conscious of how you portrayed ferraro''s statement.

and while you''re at it, you''ve got a typo in the second-to-last paragraph.
Reply to this comment
See all 11 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road