From The Road
March 6, 2008 4:47 PM

Clinton Weighs In On Re-Vote

(CBS)

From CBS News' Fernando Suarez:

WASHINGTON – As the Democrats try to figure out whether to allow voters in Michigan and Florida to re-vote in their primaries, Hillary Clinton said she preferred the states keep their current vote tally. "It's striking that we had two elections where the votes in Florida were of great importance,” she said. “1.7 million Floridians turned out to vote. They clearly believed their votes would count. And I think there has to be a way to make them count."

It’s not surprising Clinton would want Florida to keep their votes – she won Florida handily, a state where Barack Obama did not campaign, in accordance with Democratic Party rules. She also won Michigan, after Obama pulled his name off the ballot there, again because of party rules.

The problem for Clinton is that there is discussion of holding caucuses instead of primaries for the re-vote. She has expressed her dislike for the caucus process throughout this election, pointing out that the limited voting window leaves some would-be voters out of the process. Clinton also doesn’t do well in caucuses, only winning one of the 12 caucus states so far. "I think that it would be a grave disservice to the voters of Florida and Michigan to adopt any process that would disenfranchise anyone,” she said. “Therefore I am still committed to seating their delegations, and I know they're working with the Democratic Party to determine how best to proceed."

The Clinton campaign also took also took aim at Obama today, comparing his tactics of criticizing them to those of Ken Starr, the independent counsel whose investigation led to Bill Clinton’s impeachment. "I, for one, do not believe that imitating Ken Starr is the way to win a Democratic primary election for president,” said campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson. “But perhaps that theory will be tested."

The Obama campaign responded by calling the accusation “absurd.” "We don't believe that expecting candidates for the presidency to disclose their tax returns somehow constitutes Ken Starr tactics, but the kind of transparency and accountability that Americans are looking for and that's been missing in Washington for far too long," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton. "And if Senator Clinton doesn't think that the Republicans will ask these very same questions, then she's not as ready to go toe-to-toe with John McCain as she claims."

Clinton was also asked about comments McCain made where he called Obama "inexperienced," Clinton dodged the question saying, "Look, I have said that Senator McCain will bring a lifetime of experience to the campaign, I will bring a lifetime of experience and Senator Obama will bring a speech that he gave in 2002. I think that is a significant difference."
Tags:
Clinton
Topics:
Hillary Clinton
Add a Comment See all 32 Comments
by lhummer March 6, 2008 6:37 PM PST
I think it was idiotic for Wolfson to bring up Ken Starr. All it accomplished was to remind us of the unpleasantness of the last year of the Clinton presidency.
Reply to this comment
by shrimptonmcclams March 6, 2008 6:42 PM PST
In this one report there are enough contradictions to make even the best lawyer''s head spin.

Must we keep being pounded with her disingenuous, self-serving lies?
Reply to this comment
by shrimptonmcclams March 6, 2008 6:48 PM PST
In this one report there are enough contradictions to make even the best lawyer''s head spin.

Must we keep being pounded with her disingenuous, self-serving lies?
Reply to this comment
by jonsid2 March 6, 2008 6:52 PM PST
Concerning Florida, what is not mentioned is the reason 1.7 million Floridians turned out to vote was because on the ballot was a constitutional ammendment (Ammendment 1)to further reduce home property taxes for Florida residents. What person would not come out to vote if it meant cutting their property taxes?
Reply to this comment
by davo3795 March 6, 2008 6:56 PM PST
I live in Florida. I have been a Democrat for 36 years but if Florida voters continue to be disenfranchised, then I am registering Independent and taking a hard look at McCain. I had no input into the decision to move up the Primary as none of us Florida voters did. I took off work the day of the Primary and took the time to vote. Why should I have to be punished or asked to take the time to vote all over again for a decision I had no control over? This is unfair and there should be federal laws to prevent the disenfranchisment of voters.
We have no input and no rights in Florida right now all due to the DNC who makes laws for individual voters. My dad is rolling over in his grave but I am considering voting for a Republican if this nonsense is not settled.
Reply to this comment
by fjstratford March 6, 2008 7:06 PM PST
Obama will not win the Presidency if he cant win the BIG SWING STATES like Ohio and Florida - which Clinton and McCain won. And Pennsylvania - which Clinton and McCain will win.

If we want a Democratic president, we want Clinton to run against McCain. That is the only choice.
Reply to this comment
by jonsid2 March 6, 2008 7:15 PM PST
I live in North Carolina. In previous years, by the time I get to vote on May 6th, the nomination has usually been decided. Does that mean I am disenfranchised? Get over it Florida. I don''t hear Michigan complaining as loudly. The Repubs want Florida to count so Clinton will get the nomination and make it that much easier for McCain in November.
Reply to this comment
by liberty4you March 6, 2008 7:45 PM PST

PM must fire chief of staff: Opposition

BRODIE FENLON AND CAMPBELL CLARK

Globe and Mail Update

March 6, 2008 at 4:07 PM EST

Opposition MPs called for the head of the Prime Minister''s chief of staff, Ian Brodie, Thursday after it was revealed an offhand remark he made to journalists preceded the leak of a confidential diplomatic discussion that rocked the U.S. presidential campaign.

%u201CWe know that Ian Brodie, the chief of staff for the Prime Minister was involved, and this was clear involvement in American politics,%u201D said NDP Leader Jack Layton.
Reply to this comment
by jonsid2 March 6, 2008 7:54 PM PST
March 6, 2008 12:30 PM
A storm of reports in the Canadian media say that the Nafta-gate flap last week involving Barack Obama was started by a key aide to Canada''s prime minister - who told journalists that Hillary Clinton''s campaign - not Obama''s - had contacted the Canadian government to play down its Nafta-bashing.

Reply to this comment
by jedi08 March 6, 2008 8:33 PM PST
Ding dong the witch is dead. The wicked witch is dead
Reply to this comment
by jedi08 March 6, 2008 8:47 PM PST
Clinton will not win the Nomination is she doesn''t win the delegate count or the popular vote. I love all the Clinton people saying well Barak can''t win the big states. WHo cares about Cali. That state will vote Dem everytime in Nov. Same with New York. The only state that she has claim to right now that is a major player is Ohio. Obama has 7 or 8 states that he could win that she never could. The Clintons are killing the party right now. You know its time to drop out when Rush Limbaugh starts campaigning for you!
Reply to this comment
by hillsangels1 March 6, 2008 8:53 PM PST
If Florida and Michigan are not seated then our ''Democracy'' is something less than that. The world is watching us, so what does it say to them? That we are hypocrites of our own ideals? This is embarrassing for our country and a mockery to what we hold sacred. Do-over if you will in Michigan but the people of Florida have spoken. Let it stand.
Reply to this comment
by hillsangels1 March 6, 2008 8:58 PM PST
Dave 3795, your message is worth repeating.....

I live in Florida. I have been a Democrat for 36 years but if Florida voters continue to be disenfranchised, then I am registering Independent and taking a hard look at McCain. I had no input into the decision to move up the Primary as none of us Florida voters did. I took off work the day of the Primary and took the time to vote. Why should I have to be punished or asked to take the time to vote all over again for a decision I had no control over? This is unfair and there should be federal laws to prevent the disenfranchisment of voters.
We have no input and no rights in Florida right now all due to the DNC who makes laws for individual voters. My dad is rolling over in his grave but I am considering voting for a Republican if this nonsense is not settled.
Reply to this comment
by enugu-nine March 6, 2008 10:02 PM PST
CLinton knows she can''t win the nomination this year. So she is preparing the field for her run in 4 years against sitting president McCain. She will hurt Obama so badly that he won''t win the general election. I can read her sinister mind.
Reply to this comment
by gorgegirl4 March 6, 2008 10:02 PM PST
Obama has been bringing people in from out of state to "help" in the caucuses. Like in my town where I know practically everyone, I didn''t know half the people there who voted but their registration wasn''t even checked. I think there has been some ballot box stuffing going on with Obama and the Caucus.
Reply to this comment
by enugu-nine March 6, 2008 10:05 PM PST
lhummer1. You are right. It also reminds me that the Clintons lost congress to the republicans during his second year in office. A damage democrats are yet to recover from.
Reply to this comment
by gorgegirl4 March 6, 2008 10:25 PM PST
Obama has been bringing people in from out of state to "help" in the caucuses. Like in my town where I know practically everyone, I didn''t know half the people there who voted but their registration wasn''t even checked. I think there has been some ballot box stuffing going on with Obama and the Caucus.
Reply to this comment
by PulSamsara March 6, 2008 10:32 PM PST
Let the American People see your TAX RETURNS Clinton ! If you have nothing to hide - then let us see.
Reply to this comment
by davthewav1 March 6, 2008 11:06 PM PST
Well Hillary has finally gone over the edge. She is now stating her similarities with John McCain! If we wanted someone like John McCain to be president, then we would vote for McCain. When the prospect of a legitimate primary in Florida being held came up, she said she wanted to break the rules and count the votes that the DNC said they would not count because Florida, after being warned not to break the rules, went ahead and held the primary early anyway. When Michigan mentioned that it might hold a caucus instead of a primary to be counted she said no way, it had to be a primary or nothing. A caucus would be a lot more feasible in Michigan but might go Obama''s way. She is acting like a spoiled two year old child that didn''t get it''s way! She is willing to do and say anything to win including cheating and lying. Is that really who you want to be president, a 60 year old spoiled obnoxious brat? Obama has a lot more class and even after Hillary''s Swift Boat like attacks, he has chosen the high road.
Reply to this comment
by davthewav1 March 6, 2008 11:19 PM PST
Hillary compares herself similarily to John McCain, she''s indorsed by Rush Limbaugh, maybe she''s secretly a republican
Reply to this comment
by phylblade March 6, 2008 11:21 PM PST
We have already voted in Michigan. Obama''s name wasn''t on the ballot but there were constant announcements on TV, radio, and in the newspapers that a vote for "Other" was a vote for Obama or Edwards. I took my 96 year old mother in her wheelchair to vote - through the snow, to a polling place that didn''t expect a handicapped person - THAT VOTE SHOULD COUNT. If the DNC disenfranchises us, I will never vote for another Democrat.
Reply to this comment
by croft777 March 7, 2008 12:06 AM PST
davthewav1Well Hillary has finally gone over the edge. She is now stating her similarities with John McCain! If we wanted someone like John McCain to be president, then we would vote for McCain. When the prospect of a legitimate primary in Florida being held came up, she said she wanted to break the rules and count the votes that the DNC said they would not count because Florida, after being warned not to break the rules, went ahead and held the primary early anyway. When Michigan mentioned that it might hold a caucus instead of a primary to be counted she said no way, it had to be a primary or nothing. A caucus would be a lot more feasible in Michigan but might go Obama''''s way. She is acting like a spoiled two year old child that didn''''t get it''''s way! She is willing to do and say anything to win including cheating and lying. Is that really who you want to be president, a 60 year old spoiled obnoxious brat? Obama has a lot more class and even after Hillary''''s Swift Boat like attacks, he has chosen the high road.


What the he+ll are you talking about? Who swift boated who? I think that would be Obama. You''ll be finding new sh*it out on him as time goes by. He''s not what you think. The Obama train and his cult members are about as dirty as they get.
Reply to this comment
by croft777 March 7, 2008 12:08 AM PST
I can about bet you that if they do not hold a primary in Michigan and Florida, especially in Florida, those old people will be voting for McCain or not voting at all. They are old school and they no unfairness when they see it. You think they would really vote for Obama, don''t think so. I won''t if this election is not played fair. I won''t vote at all.
Reply to this comment
by me4bo March 7, 2008 12:34 AM PST
A very simple and no-cost method to this FL/MI maddness...divide the delegates evenly bet. Obama and HC. THE END!!!
Reply to this comment
by xzonz March 7, 2008 1:59 AM PST
SHE constantly belittles Obama and now by putting herself together with John Maccain is not good for the party. now she wants to divide the pArty- LETS SEE

can you imagine her as president? all the 35 yrs she has never changed. im getting the picture of what happened behind closed door in the 90s to get me health care and i have the picture as to why i don''t have health care right now
Reply to this comment
by porkfrog53 March 7, 2008 2:02 AM PST
The votes are NOT going to be divided evenly because we gave Hillary a landslide victory and that''s what the final outcome will be.

I don''t care what the DNC says anymore nor do I care what anyone elses opinion is on our election that was held one week early. Big deal. We voted and Hillary won really, really big. Obama lost. Get over it.

Obama ran national TV ads here prior to the elections which was against DNC rules and had big dollar fundraisers that was reported by our local TV. He was campaigning. You people want to ignore that, but it''s a fact and he still lost. He wants to change the rules on Super delegates and have them be pledged delegates now because he might not win. If this is the case, they are useless and have no purpose get rid of them and just use the peoples pledged delegates. No one will have to give them campaign contributions for their support.

Hillary Clinton waited until after the election and thanked the people of Florida, which was within the rules.

A caucus is basically a legal way to commit voter fraud. Have you seen what happened in the Texas'' caucus? It''s a free for all and very few people get to vote...you disenfranchise the people that can''t get in the door. This method should be trashed.
Reply to this comment
by porkfrog53 March 7, 2008 2:03 AM PST
The votes are NOT going to be divided evenly because we gave Hillary a landslide victory and that''s what the final outcome will be.

I don''t care what the DNC says anymore nor do I care what anyone elses opinion is on our election that was held one week early. Big deal. We voted and Hillary won really, really big. Obama lost. Get over it.

Obama ran national TV ads here prior to the elections which was against DNC rules and had big dollar fundraisers that was reported by our local TV. He was campaigning. You people want to ignore that, but it''s a fact and he still lost. He wants to change the rules on Super delegates and have them be pledged delegates now because he might not win. If this is the case, they are useless and have no purpose get rid of them and just use the peoples pledged delegates. No one will have to give them campaign contributions for their support.

Hillary Clinton waited until after the election and thanked the people of Florida, which was within the rules.

A caucus is basically a legal way to commit voter fraud. Have you seen what happened in the Texas'' caucus? It''s a free for all and very few people get to vote...you disenfranchise the people that can''t get in the door. This method should be trashed.
Reply to this comment
by porkfrog53 March 7, 2008 2:05 AM PST
The votes are NOT going to be divided evenly because we gave Hillary a landslide victory and that''s what the final outcome will be.

I don''t care what the DNC says anymore nor do I care what anyone elses opinion is on our election that was held one week early. Big deal. We voted and Hillary won really, really big. Obama lost. Get over it.

Obama ran national TV ads here prior to the elections which was against DNC rules and had big dollar fundraisers that was reported by our local TV. He was campaigning. You people want to ignore that, but it''s a fact and he still lost. He wants to change the rules on Super delegates and have them be pledged delegates now because he might not win. If this is the case, they are useless and have no purpose get rid of them and just use the peoples pledged delegates. No one will have to give them campaign contributions for their support.

Hillary Clinton waited until after the election and thanked the people of Florida, which was within the rules.

A caucus is basically a legal way to commit voter fraud. Have you seen what happened in the Texas'' caucus? It''s a free for all and very few people get to vote...you disenfranchise the people that can''t get in the door. This method should be trashed.
Reply to this comment
by porkfrog53 March 7, 2008 2:08 AM PST
The votes are NOT going to be divided evenly because we gave Hillary a landslide victory and that''s what the final outcome will be.

I don''t care what the DNC says anymore nor do I care what anyone elses opinion is on our election that was held one week early. Big deal. We voted and Hillary won really, really big. Obama lost. Get over it.

Obama ran national TV ads here prior to the elections which was against DNC rules and had big dollar fundraisers that was reported by our local TV. He was campaigning. You people want to ignore that, but it''s a fact and he still lost. He wants to change the rules on Super delegates and have them be pledged delegates now because he might not win. If this is the case, they are useless and have no purpose get rid of them and just use the peoples pledged delegates. No one will have to give them campaign contributions for their support.

Hillary Clinton waited until after the election and thanked the people of Florida, which was within the rules.

A caucus is basically a legal way to commit voter fraud. Have you seen what happened in the Texas'' caucus? It''s a free for all and very few people get to vote...you disenfranchise the people that can''t get in the door. This method should be trashed.
Reply to this comment
by porkfrog53 March 7, 2008 2:09 AM PST
Obama is an airhead who shouldn''t get the opportunity to answer the phone at 3 AM because he can''t answer tough questions at 3 PM. When reporters tried to question him he ran away like alittle girl. I thought he was going to cry. John McCain and Hillary Clinton both gave full interviews on all of their "bone headed" mistakes. But Obama thinks he can get away without answering if he just says it was bone headed and dismisses everyone.

For those that don''t watch the news or read the papers, "HILLARYS'' TAXES WILL BE RELEASED AFTER THE APRIL 15 TAX DEADLINE." She does not have to do that until she is the nominee. She does not have to follow obama''s campaign protocol.
Reply to this comment
by hhkeller March 7, 2008 4:19 AM PST
Howard Dean is an idiot. 1.7 Million Floridians voted already and that choice was clear. Michigan could use a new primary so just flip the bill and pay for a primary. This is a no brainer unless Deans motives are to ***** up and annoint the least popular of the two candidates
Reply to this comment
by l00ker March 7, 2008 9:20 AM PST
This broad accepted and help formulate the rules for the entire process, thinking that she would have wrapped it all up by Super Tuesday I. Now, her, her old man, and all of her tongue twister jewish court jesters, like this Lanie Davis and this Wolfson joker, will do whatever imaginable, in order to steal the nomination from Barack. This broad is just another Bush like media sideshow, and has used scene after media scene, in order to portray herself as everything other than the schizoid hapless bimbo that she is. And for her, only the dumb and illegal need to apply. Exactly like what we got from Bush, a complete jewish run media mirage.
Reply to this comment
See all 32 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road

  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented