From The Road
March 3, 2008 10:07 AM

Clinton Faces the Press Twice in Eight Hours

(CBS)
From CBS News' Fernando Suarez:

TOLEDO, OHIO -- Late last night aboard her campaign plane, Hillary Clinton held a press conference with friend and supporter, actor Ted Danson. Less than eight hours later, the Clinton campaign called for yet another press conference surprising many of the traveling reporters. But it soon became clear that the early morning press conference was aimed to draw attention to recent reports that a senior economic adviser for Barack Obama met with Canadian officials to downplay Obama’s tough talk on NAFTA. The Obama campaign has been on the record categorically denying such a meeting.

But a new memo shows that a meeting between Austan Goolsbee, Obama’s chief economic advisor did, in fact, take place with Canadian officials, according to the Associated Press.

“If you come to Ohio and both give speeches that are very critical of NAFTA and you send out misleading and false information about my position regarding NAFTA and then we find out that your chief economic adviser has gone to a foreign government and basically done the old ‘wink, wink, don’t pay attention, this is just political rhetoric.' I think that raises serious questions,” Clinton told reporters.

She suggested that if reporters were to substitute her name for Obama’s name in this story that she would have received greater scrutiny.

“Just ask yourself,” Clinton said. “If some of my advisers had been having private meetings with foreign governments basically saying 'ignore what I’m saying because its only political rhetoric,' I think it raises serious questions.”

Clinton’s comments come just one day before Ohioans are set to head to the polls, and she hopes the new developments will raise questions in the minds of voters.

She was asked about her chances in the upcoming primaries and how she has handled this long nomination process.

“This is the equivalent of the hazing process, who can withstand it? Who can keep going?”

And to that question, win or lose, Clinton again asserted that she plans on continuing the campaign. “I believe we will do well tomorrow I believe that’s going to be a very significant message to the country. Then we move on to Pennsylvania and states still ahead, so I’m just getting warmed up.”

Last night in Cleveland, Clinton made her way to the back of her campaign plane, armed with a beer in a red plastic cup and accompanied by Danson and his wife Mary Steenburgen. Clinton said she wanted to introduce the actors, but the lighthearted moment soon turned into a full-blown press conference with Clinton fielding a variety of questions from the likelihood that she can survive past March 4, to her continual references, in a TV ad and on the stump, to 3 a.m. phone calls to the president.

Clinton said she thinks the image of the phone call helps “dramatize” what the stakes are for people. “You know, I’ve been saying in many different ways for a year that stakes could not be higher, we face big challenges, we have real threats. I’ve said it over and over again. I think the jarring image of the phone call, which happens and is part of being president, helps to concentrate peoples’ attentions in ways that all the descriptives just don’t.”

Although most of the attention was focused on Clinton, one reporter did shout out a question to Danson asking him how he felt that his friend and colleague Larry David, from the HBO show "Curb Your Enthusiasm," was supporting Obama. Danson said jokingly, “I’m out of that show. I’m never going to do it again.”

Clinton chimed in, “So let’s all curb our enthusiasm.” Zing!
Tags:
Clinton
Topics:
Hillary Clinton
Add a Comment See all 22 Comments
by miaw77 March 3, 2008 11:51 AM PST
SHAME ON YOU, HILLARY CLINTON!!! You are a liar and a con artist!!! Your 2 newest ads are disgusting! The truth is...


1. A different Foreign Relations Subcommittee chaired by John Kerry has jurisdiction over Afghanistan. And the full Foreign Relations Committee was the one that held several hearings on the military efforts there.


2. As for being "too busy campaigning" to do their jobs... Clinton and McCain are both using that excuse! McCain was "too busy" to vote on the Economic Stimulus Package. Hillary was "too busy" to vote on Chris Dodd''s amendment NOT to grant immunity to the telecom companies and protect our civil liberties AND "too busy" to turn over her income tax returns (which we all know we will NEVER SEE).


You are such a snake!!! Drop out now before you completely destroy our party!!!
Reply to this comment
by hillsangels1 March 3, 2008 12:13 PM PST
To miaw77- the only liar here is Obama. The real Obama is only now starting to emerge and it won''t be long before he is discredited completely. He is not only not qualified to be President but he has run a campaign from the very beginning based on hypocracy- making every effort to cast a negative light on everybody else but himself. We are beginning to see that he is not only overly ambitious, but that he is a fraud as well. I, for one, was never fooled by him as were so many other Americans. Gosh... and now it feels like Novemember is such a long way off, doesn''t it?
Reply to this comment
by westafer2 March 3, 2008 12:30 PM PST
How long must America wait to finally say good by to Bill and Hillary Clinton and all the misery that we have had to endure from them over too many years. It%u2019s up to you Ohio, Texas, Rhode Island, and Vermont. End our pain tomorrow with your vote.
Reply to this comment
by wolfi101 March 3, 2008 12:51 PM PST
I was going to comment here, but actually, I don''t think, I can say it better than westafer2 and miaw77 have.

PLEASE --- voters of March 4th --- deliver us from these Clintons.
Reply to this comment
by georgebernar March 3, 2008 12:55 PM PST
ELECTION 2008
Clintons to face fraud trial
Judge setting date, testimony to include ex-president, senator Hillary Clinton.

While Hillary Clinton battles Barack Obama on the campaign trail, a judge in Los Angeles is quietly preparing to set a trial date in a $17 million fraud suit that aims to expose an alleged culture of widespread corruption by the Clintons and the Democratic Party....

Why does the all the major news organization fail to report something as serious as this...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.v iew&pageId=56868


Amazing!
Reply to this comment
by astephens5 March 3, 2008 12:55 PM PST
Obama''s campaign has flat-out lied to everyone (about that meeting not taking place). And they''ve admitted it by not denying that it actually happened, but by trying to say that what''s being reported didn''t actually happen in it.

Hello?! Wake up people! Barack Obama is a phony and a liar. he is the very type of politician that he claims to be fighting against.
Reply to this comment
by cesalio45g March 3, 2008 1:09 PM PST
Hillary is a democratic BUSH: http://m-lib108.production.bigcharts.com/Portfolio

She and her husband have been involved in many scandals, promote negative campaigning, and deal with the dirtiest of politics that they can muster.

It is ashamed that "Billary" supporters think she is quailified when in fact, as a NY Senator she promised 200,000 new jobs but equated to a net loss of -30,000! "I thought we were going to have a democratic president." EXCUSES...

She voted for the war in IRAQ "I was mislead into my vote and Bush abused his power." Another Excuse!

The fact is, she has made plenty of mistakes and has not taken responsibility for not one!

Wake up! Obama is man enough to admit his faults and take responsibility for his actions. He has admitted his mistakes and corrects them. He is honest, hard working and truely cares for the American People.

And I am GLAD that the clintons are finally facing defeat in the election and hopefully the courtroom.
Reply to this comment
by alee25 March 3, 2008 1:13 PM PST
MSNBC %u201C..the Obama campaign is going to have a hard time somehow claiming their chief domestic policy adviser was meeting with the Canadians as a University of Chicago professor and not as an Obama emissary..This really does hit the Obama campaign on credibility..%u201D

Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson delivers a blistering denunciation of Obama: Huffingtonpost %u201CI was involved in that debate in every step of the effort to prevent this senseless war and I profoundly resent Obama''s distortion of George Bush''s folly into Hillary Clinton''s responsibility. I was in the middle of the debate in Washington. Obama wasn''t there. %u2026Senator Clinton''s position, stated in her floor speech, was in favor of allowing the United Nations weapons inspectors to complete their mission and to build a broad international coalition. Bush rejected her path. It was his war of choice%u2026%u201CTake Afghanistan%u2026 To date, his subcommittee has held no policy hearings at all -- none. At the same time that Obama claimed he was too busy campaigning to do anything substantive, racking up one of the worst attendance records in the Senate, Senator Clinton chaired extensive hearings of the Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health and attended many others as a member of the Armed Service Committee... Obama''s dereliction of duty on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee%u2026a feckless administration has had absolutely no oversight as it careens from disaster to disaster in Afghanistan...%u201D
Reply to this comment
by cbrown6416 March 3, 2008 1:20 PM PST
How could anyone think that she could stand up for a Nation when she couldn%u2019t even stand up to her husband after he cheated on her with so many women? Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Sally Perdue, Dolly Kyle Browning and that%u2019s the short list. If it was just one mistake then you can forgive and go on but with that many you stand up for yourself and do what%u2019s right, walkout.....
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 3, 2008 1:34 PM PST
Posted by rozz62 at 12:58 PM : Mar 03, 2008

Well said!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 3, 2008 1:35 PM PST
How could anyone think that she could stand up for a Nation when she couldn%u2019t even stand up to her husband after he cheated on her with so many women? Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Sally Perdue, Dolly Kyle Browning and that%u2019s the short list. If it was just one mistake then you can forgive and go on but with that many you stand up for yourself and do what%u2019s right, walkout.....


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by cbrown6416 at 01:20 PM : Mar 03, 2008

She stood up for herself and stayed in her marriage! Under the circumstances that''s very brave! Whatever her reason were, they were her own, and nobody elses business.
Reply to this comment
by March 3, 2008 2:02 PM PST
As usual, Clinton raises questions, Obama provides answers
Reply to this comment
by ifeelgood3 March 3, 2008 2:26 PM PST
Here''s an excerpt of an article entitled "Hillary Unmasked," dated Mar. 1st, written by *** Morris, a commentator on the website Rasmussen Reports.

"Her lifelong pattern of secrecy was once again evident. While publicly promoting transparency in government, she steadfastly refuses to release her personal income tax returns. That%u2019s a clear tip-off that there%u2019s something to hide. Recall that the Clintons selectively released tax returns in Arkansas, but refused to go back to 1980, when Hillary had her windfall in cattle futures.
During the debate, Hillary suggested that she%u2019d release the returns %u201Csoon,%u201D but her staff quickly backtracked. She implied that she%u2019s been too busy to deal with releasing the returns. Does she really think anyone believes that it will take more than simply making a copy of the return? She%u2019s stalling and there%u2019s a reason for that.
Most likely, the return will show how much Bill has been making from his partnership with the Sheik of Dubai and his other business ventures. Should the spouse of a presidential candidate be in business with a foreign leader who needs favors from the U.S. government? Definitely not. That%u2019s why we%u2019ll never see those returns."
Reply to this comment
by westafer2 March 3, 2008 2:30 PM PST
Senator Hillary Clinton claims "35 years of experience%u201D which is the entire length of time since her graduation from law school in 1973. But what kind of experience? Only during the past 7 years since her election to the US Senate in November 2000 in her adopted state of New York has Hillary Clinton in her own right actually been an elected official accountable to voters rather than the spouse of an elected official.
Barack Obama%u2019s experience has been different. In 1993 he became a lecturer of constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School and in 1996 was elected to the Illinois State Senate where he served 8 years prior to his election to the US Senate in November 2004. With his combined service as an Illinois State Senator and US Senator Barack Obama has been an elected official accountable to voters for the past 11 years.Senator Barack Obama has served in Washington long enough to understand that changes are needed and unlike his opponents he has already made a significant change. By refusing to accept money from lobbyists and political action committees Barack Obama is proving that one can become elected President of the United States without being beholden to money peddlers in Washington. Barack Obama raises the money necessary for his campaign directly from the people to whom he is accountable, people like you and me.
Reply to this comment
by ifeelgood3 March 3, 2008 2:35 PM PST
Here''s an excerpt of an article entitled "Hillary Unmasked," dated Mar. 1st, written by *** Morris, a commentator on the website Rasmussen Reports.
"Her lifelong pattern of secrecy was once again evident. While publicly promoting transparency in government, she steadfastly refuses to release her personal income tax returns. That%u2019s a clear tip-off that there%u2019s something to hide. Recall that the Clintons selectively released tax returns in Arkansas, but refused to go back to 1980, when Hillary had her windfall in cattle futures.
During the debate, Hillary suggested that she%u2019d release the returns %u201Csoon,%u201D but her staff quickly backtracked. She implied that she%u2019s been too busy to deal with releasing the returns. Does she really think anyone believes that it will take more than simply making a copy of the return? She%u2019s stalling and there%u2019s a reason for that.
Most likely, the return will show how much Bill has been making from his partnership with the Sheik of Dubai and his other business ventures. Should the spouse of a presidential candidate be in business with a foreign leader who needs favors from the U.S. government? Definitely not. That%u2019s why we%u2019ll never see those returns."
Reply to this comment
by hillarynow March 3, 2008 5:00 PM PST
After the way Obama and his rabid, rude, disloyal, dishonest followers claiming to be Democrats have treated Hillary and Bill Clinton I will now be voting for Nader if Obama wins the nomination.
Reply to this comment
by popstom1 March 3, 2008 5:27 PM PST
Obama Rezko Auchi and the funding
for that boneheaded mistake his
words He made the judgement call
he took the money yeah he donated
$150.000 what about the rest
Reply to this comment
by demndem March 4, 2008 11:14 PM PST
It is not good. I don''t want Republican to dominate the white house again after the Bush. But if Hillary continues the fight, sorry, I can''t stand the divisive Democrat anymore. I don''t think any candidate is good enough to be the president of the United States. I think we are just trying to choose one that is less insane, less stubborn, less self-interest, less ignorant..... And I think Obama wins in the less... tests. As Obama said before, it never runs out of good ideas, good policies, good plans in the House, it just needs a president who will listen with the ability to make right decision for the goodness of the people. Obama doesn''t need to bring a brilliant economic plan or rich experience in the White House to be a good president. But he needs to have a very very tough will to go against all the obstacles, and the frequent attacks from his rivals - both from the Republicans and the Hillary side. Believe me, Hillary only gets challenge from the Obama''s supporters whereas Obama faces both sides because he is the only one can really win the Republicans.
If Hillary represents the Democrat in November, I will turn to the Republicans for sure. Beware!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by demndem March 4, 2008 11:15 PM PST
It is not good. I don''t want Republican to dominate the white house again after the Bush. But if Hillary continues the fight, sorry, I can''t stand the divisive Democrat anymore. I don''t think any candidate is good enough to be the president of the United States. I think we are just trying to choose one that is less insane, less stubborn, less self-interest, less ignorant..... And I think Obama wins in the less... tests. As Obama said before, it never runs out of good ideas, good policies, good plans in the House, it just needs a president who will listen with the ability to make right decision for the goodness of the people. Obama doesn''t need to bring a brilliant economic plan or rich experience in the White House to be a good president. But he needs to have a very very tough will to go against all the obstacles, and the frequent attacks from his rivals - both from the Republicans and the Hillary side. Believe me, Hillary only gets challenge from the Obama''s supporters whereas Obama faces both sides because he is the only one can really win the Republicans.
If Hillary represents the Democrat in November, I will turn to the Republicans for sure. Beware!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by demndem March 4, 2008 11:19 PM PST
It is not good. I don''t want Republican to dominate the white house again after the Bush. But if Hillary continues the fight, sorry, I can''t stand the divisive Democrat anymore. I don''t think any candidate is good enough to be the president of the United States. I think we are just trying to choose one that is less insane, less stubborn, less self-interest, less ignorant..... And I think Obama wins in the less... tests. As Obama said before, it never runs out of good ideas, good policies, good plans in the House, it just needs a president who will listen with the ability to make right decision for the goodness of the people. Obama doesn''t need to bring a brilliant economic plan or rich experience in the White House to be a good president. But he needs to have a very very tough will to go against all the obstacles, and the frequent attacks from his rivals - both from the Republicans and the Hillary side. Believe me, Hillary only gets challenge from the Obama''s supporters whereas Obama faces both sides because he is the only one can really win the Republicans.
If Hillary represents the Democrat in November, I will turn to the Republicans for sure. Beware!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by demndem March 4, 2008 11:29 PM PST
I don''t think any candidate is good enough to be the president of the United States. I think we are just trying to choose one that is less insane, less stubborn, less self-interest, less ignorant..... And I think Obama wins in the less... tests. As Obama said before, it never runs out of good ideas, good policies, good plans in the House, it just needs a president who will listen with the ability to make right decision for the goodness of the people. Obama doesn''t need to bring a brilliant economic plan or rich experience in the White House to be a good president. But he needs to have a very very tough will to go against all the obstacles, and the frequent attacks from his rivals, - both from the Republicans and Hillary, and the betrayal from Obama''s own camp, if any. Believe me, Hillary only gets challenge from the Obama''s supporters whereas Obama faces both sides because he is the only one can really win the Republicans.
If Hillary represents the Democrat in November, I will turn to the Republicans for sure. Beware!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by demndem March 4, 2008 11:30 PM PST
I don''t think any candidate is good enough to be the president of the United States. I think we are just trying to choose one that is less insane, less stubborn, less self-interest, less ignorant..... And I think Obama wins in the less... tests. As Obama said before, it never runs out of good ideas, good policies, good plans in the House, it just needs a president who will listen with the ability to make right decision for the goodness of the people. Obama doesn''t need to bring a brilliant economic plan or rich experience in the White House to be a good president. But he needs to have a very very tough will to go against all the obstacles, and the frequent attacks from his rivals, - both from the Republicans and Hillary, and the betrayal from Obama''s own camp, if any. Believe me, Hillary only gets challenge from the Obama''s supporters whereas Obama faces both sides because he is the only one can really win the Republicans.
If Hillary represents the Democrat in November, I will turn to the Republicans for sure. Beware!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
See all 22 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road

  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented