Couric & Co.
February 12, 2008 1:04 PM

"Jingle mail:" The Awful Sound Of "Voluntary" Foreclosure

(LATimes.com)
Guest blogger Peter Viles is a senior producer for LATimes.com and author of the real estate and housing blog LA Land.
As the foreclosure crisis deepens, banks and lenders are talking openly about one of their worst fears: "jingle mail" – the phrase that describes what happens when a borrower gives up on a house and a mortgage, and simply mails the keys back to the lender and walks away from the mortgage.

Why would a homeowner do such a thing? Because they overpaid for their home, now owe way more than their house is worth, and can't see the point in stretching their finances any longer. The consequences are serious for the borrower: a foreclosure, even if it's voluntary, damages your credit rating for years to come.

But some homeowners are just that desperate.

One of them, writing under the blog name "condoblue," caused controversy on my blog when she wrote to say she was thinking of walking way from a $520,000 mortgage: "I realize I agreed to the deal when I signed the mortgage papers," she wrote, "but I am within my rights to walk away from a bad deal and suffer the consequences, just as many corporations write down billions of dollars of debt, lose money for their shareholders, and lay off people as a result of their bad decisions."

Surprisingly, most of my readers agreed with her. When I posted a poll asking whether walking away from a bad mortgage is "irresponsible" or "the smart thing to do," 63 percent agreed with "condoblue" – that walking away is the smart choice. And that's a scary trend for banks and lenders.
Tags:
voluntary foreclosure ,
guest blog
Topics:
Guest Blogs

Video and Galleries

Add a Comment
by jemler February 13, 2008 1:23 PM PST
It disgusts me to know that people are voluntarily foreclosing on their property. Where is the accountability on the front end to do their homework and make good decisions? Just because your home is going down in value doesn''t mean that it''s not the same home you agreed to purchase. Do they not value their own integrity? They signed the papers. They should stand behind their own commitment. This whole idea of "it''s just business" is the slimy approach to "you can''t hold me accountable". This mentality is what caused us to lose faith in a man''s handshake, turn to contracts, and now what? How can we ever do business if each party doesn''t uphold its end of the deal. Voluntarily foreclosing is selfish and irresponsible. It''s these types of people- who think it''s just business and only affects them- that are ruining our American economy. I think there should be more severe repercussions against those who simply walk away- such as NEVER being able to obtain credit ever again.
Reply to this comment
by lukemullhous February 13, 2008 5:46 PM PST
Everyone knew the rules beforehand. The lenders when the downturn came that the borrowers could walkaway, but, hey, while the bonuses are rolling in, who cares, right? people want to regulate during a bust but never when the cash is rolling in

now that financial institutions are busy with their writedowns, is it any wonder ordinary people aren''t following the same path.

as to never being able to get credit again, that mightn''t be such a bad thing, as its credit that brought us all here in the first place

Reply to this comment
by lassociates February 14, 2008 5:18 PM PST
Disgusts? Accountability? Surely you would be referring to the lenders that provided mortgage loans to people who can not even finance a piece of bubble gum, what about the mortgage brokers who consistently committed fraud to individuals with 5th grade reading levels. How about the real estate appraisers who "fudged" the numbers so the prospective buyer was unaware of the homes true value. How is it that you expect these homeowners to be accountable for actions far beyond their control. Most every real estate law and regulation has been written to fend off brokers who charge 5% in a yield spread, and investors who have "dirty" appraisals performed. Most of these people are simply victims of what the Clinton Administration passed allowing non-conforming mortgage loans, as well as simply being victimized in the fiercely growing loosely regulated mortgage industry. You want disgust? Just think about who is footing the bill for all of these foreclosures after the lending institutions made billions of dollars and are just now realizing why nobody else would loan most of these people money. Accountability? My opinion of accountability is the lending institutions are now being forced to account for the billions of dollars in profit by victimizing prospective homebuyers, and the government failing to stop these criminals from doing so.
Reply to this comment
by dinobo2 June 20, 2009 11:28 PM PDT
I agree. After trying to short sale my home and the bank denying every offer a few up to $200,000. I tried to keep my home and told the bank since the home was still in my name, I would be willing to take the home for $225,000,(market value of $175,000)(I owed 225,00 on the first and $120,000 on the second) they (the bank) were trying to sell it for $175,000 while still in my name. They quickly took the home out of my name and sold it to a bank for $150,000 who sold the house for $175,000. If you do the math the bank took a $75,000 loss just to spite me or they made money somewhere on the deal that people aren't aware of.
by dinobo2 June 20, 2009 11:10 PM PDT
Jemler:
accountability on the front end to do their homework and make good decisions?

Me:
You tell me who bought a home knowing the Banks were playing games with or loans.
Where was this home work out there telling people the housing market was about to collapse so hey "Don't buy a home".

Jemler:
Just because your home is going down in value doesn''t mean that it''s not the same home you agreed to purchase. Do they not value their own integrity? They signed the papers. They should stand behind their own commitment.

Me:
This is a very ridiculous remark. "Just because their home is going down." Exactly why to walk away. We are not talking 10-20 thousand dollars get real were talking 30-50% in some states.
Most people buy homes as investments, in hopes to retire in one day or sell and use the money to buy a lesser home when the kids are grown, so that they can retire comfortably. Where is the desire to own a home you will never be able to sell because you owe more then your neighbor. Why own? Why not just rent if your not going to receive any equity.

Jemler:
This whole idea of "it''s just business" is the slimy approach to "you can''t hold me accountable". This mentality is what caused us to lose faith in a man''s handshake, turn to contracts, and now what? How can we ever do business if each party doesn''t uphold its end of the deal. Voluntarily foreclosing is selfish and irresponsible. It''s these types of people- who think it''s just business and only affects them- that are ruining our American economy. I think there should be more severe repercussions against those who simply walk away- such as NEVER being able to obtain credit ever again.

Me:
Accountable? Who is accountable for causing this mess? Who is going to give me back my retirement I lost when the housing price's dropped?
Accountable? Tell it to the banks.
As for credit who cares. You don't get it these people's lives are so damaged the last thing they care about is credit.
They can get there credit again, but where can they go to get their hopes, desire, and ability to try again.

Until you walk in the shoe's of others you should not judge. There are many reasons why people are walking away.

Don't forget the effects of the economy, Job loss's, Business's closings, Loss of retirements, Paycuts etc.....
Reply to this comment

About Couric & Co.

Go for a look behind the scenes at The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric for stuff we like and for surprises. It's also a place for you to post comments and join our conversation about the news.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented