Clinton Turns Tables, Calls Obama the "Establishment" Candidate

(CBS)
ORONO, MAINE -- For months, Hillary Clinton has battled the image that she is the "status quo" candidate - an image that has been strongly pushed by Barack Obama and former rival John Edwards.
But today, Clinton is trying to turn the tables on Obama saying that he has "increasingly run an establishment race and he has increasingly relied on big endorsements and celebrities to sort of attach himself to to get the kind of validation that comes from that sort of endorsement."
At a news conference at the University of Maine, Clinton added that Obama's positions have shifted with outside pressures.
"And he has increasingly, in my view, really tailored his positions so that they are more establishment-oriented like giving up on universal health care, so I think there is an argument to be made there. If we want a Democrat to be the Democratic standard bearer, who stands for the positive, progressive agenda of the Democratic party as opposed to more of the same or a little less than more of the same, then I think I’m the best candidate to carry that message."
In the past few days Clinton has sharpened her rhetoric toward Obama. Last night at a rally in Spokane, Washington, Clinton likened Obama to President Bush.
Clinton has also been saying that she is the best candidate to run against John McCain in the general election, claiming that her experience puts her in a better position to do so.
“I have been vetted, tested and proven as a winning candidate against tough opposition. I think that’s a great advantage that I take into the general election.”
She went on to say that she is the candidate who people can "imagine" to be the president, implying that Obama lacks that quality.
"There is no doubt in my mind that [McCain] and his campaign and the Republican party will once again try to make this about national security and its imperative that we have a Democratic candidate that people can imagine as commander-in-chief, standing there with Senator McCain, and I believe that I cross that threshold,” Clinton said.
For weeks, both the Obama campaign and the Clinton campaign have talked about the importance of delegates in this race, and with both Obama and Clinton in a dead heat for the party's nomination, every delegate is going to matter.
But Obama has called on superdelegates, who are not permanently committed to any one candidate, to back the support of pledged delegates. Clinton disagrees
“Well superdelegates by design are supposed to exercise independent judgment. That is the way the system works. But of course if Senator Obama and his campaign continue to push this position, which is really contrary to what the definition of superdelegate has historically meant, I will look forward to receiving the support of Senator Kennedy and Senator Kerry,” said Clinton.
"And I think, again, if people want to go after delegates were in places where I’ve won who are supporting somebody else, then what’s good for the goose should be good for the gander.”
Hillary claims to be so concerned with the poor and middle class of this country yet she turned her back on the poor and middle class with her 2002 Iraq Vote. Since her Iraq vote 3,952 service women and men have been killed in Iraq. Most of these hero''''s do not have Yale law degrees but rather come from blue collar working families.
Politics is not a game. It is about real people and political decisions have serious consequences. Hillary is a "seasoned politician." So too is George W. Bush and *** Cheney. This country doesn''''t need more "seasoned politicians". This country needs judgment. As Hillary stated herself, her Iraq vote was the most difficult decision she had to make. And she made it with "conviction". Unfortuanely she was dead wrong on the most important decsion of her life. Almost 4,000 Americans and hundred of thousands of Iraqis have been killed since that vote. That''''s not the type of "experience" this country and the world needs in its next President.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkS9y
5t0tR0
I wish journalists would begin to ask themselves what they can do for their country too.
It sums it all up right there.
But does she really think that we can''t figure out that the significant difference between her health care plan and Obama''s is that she will FINE people who can''t afford to buy it? That''s a ridiculous policy, and a unconscionable position to take. Does she really think we''re that dumb?
And now that Barack is the establishment candidate? While at the same time saying that what distinguishes her is more ''experience,'' i.e. time spent in Washington...? Staggering.
She spent six years on the national board of directors of Wal-Mart, while he was organizing poor neighborhoods in Chicago for $12,000 a year, but he''s establishment?
I''m not buying.
But does she really think that we can''t figure out that the significant difference between her health care plan and Obama''s is that she will FINE people who can''t afford to buy it? That''s a ridiculous policy, and a unconscionable position to take. Does she really think we''re that dumb?
(more on health care here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/why-not-single-payer-par_b_84862.html)
And now that Barack is the establishment candidate? While at the same time saying that what distinguishes her is more ''experience,'' i.e. time spent in Washington...? Staggering.
She spent six years on the national board of directors of Wal-Mart, while he was organizing poor neighborhoods in Chicago for $12,000 a year, but he''s establishment?
I''m not buying.
But does she really think that we can''t figure out that the significant difference between her health care plan and Obama''s is that she will FINE people who can''t afford to buy it? That''s a ridiculous policy, and a unconscionable position to take. Does she really think we''re that dumb?
(more on health care here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/why-not-single-payer-par_b_84862.html)
And now that Barack is the establishment candidate? While at the same time saying that what distinguishes her is more ''experience,'' i.e. time spent in Washington...? Staggering.
She spent six years on the national board of directors of Wal-Mart, while he was organizing poor neighborhoods in Chicago for $12,000 a year, but he''s establishment?
I''m not buying.
I know I sound like a TOTAL racist, I''m NOT (I would absolutely vote for Obama,if he is nominated)I am however a realist. I firmly beleive Hillary has a decent chance of beating the "Old White Guy" I beleive she will draw plenty of Republican women voters to her side in November. Hopefully enough to offset the amount of Democratic men that can''t bring themselves to vote for a woman/minority President.
This election is way too important to throw up a unelectable candidate like Obama. I personally would be shocked if he pulled 40% against Mc Cain in November.
If my arguments don''t sway you how about this: Rush Limbaugh is telling his listeners how much harder it would be for the Republican nominee to defeat Obama rater than Hillary. Enough Said??
Oligarchy aint democracy. Billary put the crown down......
They represent the best *** non-representative, Special Interests fluffing government money can buy.
They represent the best *** non-representative, Special Interests fluffing government money can buy.
Part 1
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/5516076.html
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMfUajhL24I&feature=related
Obama criticized hillary for her time spent on the corporate board of walmart....check out the profit his wife, michele, made (largely due to WALMART) as a rep. of an illinois food processing co. in particular treehouse foods (google michele obama, walmart). She apparently did not have any problems taking over $50,000!!! Obama....what a hypocrite.
On healthcare....how many poor people will choose to have healthcare???? I suppose not too many, and who will pay for that WHEN, not if, but when they get sick and go to the emergency room?? It doesn''t take a rocket scientist to figure it out!! If Obama thinks he will be able to collect back premiums from services already rendered he doesn''t have a grasp on the reality of that happening!!! Not happening now and won''t happen then. At least with Hillary''s plan all will be covered...thank you.
Obama''s all about CHANGE....how is that healthcare plan seriously any different than the current healthcare plan...oh and that''s working sooooo well!!
However, here is something that''s undeniable, whether you want to believe or deny that she is responsible for the controversies, the "vast right wing conspiracy," or the tongue wagging about the Clintons, the fact remains she is simply a greater target come November.
However, here is something that''s undeniable, whether you want to believe or deny that she is responsible for the controversies, the "vast right wing conspiracy," or the tongue wagging about the Clintons, the fact remains she is simply a greater target come November.
As for dprivette''s remarks, Treehouse is not WalMart, and Michelle was on the board of Treehouse the first year it was established, and resigned within the first year.
BTW, how much did you have to pay Perez Hilton to report positively and exclusively on you?
-
by scorpiotwo-2009
February 11, 2008 5:09 PM PST
- I am shocked by the ignorance displayed on this page. Please do not make fun of candidates names. You sound like a fool and look as previously stated. Hillary is up to the tipical spin. She is down, so now she is attacking. YOU CAN NOT STOP A MOVEMENT!!! Yes we can--Barack Obama all of the way!! The intelligent know!!!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 41 Comments