Public Eye
November 7, 2007 9:04 AM

Ron Paul, Validated and Vindicated?

(WARNER BROTHERS)
If you build it, they will come.

If by ‘it’ you mean a campaign war chest, and by ‘they’ you mean the media.

Ladies and gentlemen, meet the newly-validated Ron Paul, who set an all-time GOP mark for one-day campaign fundraising on Monday, according to the Associated Press:
Paul's total deposed Mitt Romney as the single-day fundraising record holder in the Republican presidential field. When it comes to sums amassed in one day, Paul now ranks only behind Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton, who raised nearly $6.2 million on June 30, and Barack Obama.
Ron Paul’s big haul was proof that he is the candidate of the Internet constituency this year – with supporters devoting a website to the one-day effort – no doubt aided by linking it to Guy Fawkes and the Wachowski Brothers’ film “V for Vendetta.”

(I mean, really. Can you imagine a better hook for Internet people than the guys who made the “Matrix” movies?)

And in light of his record-breaking day, the news media are beginning to cover him as more than a curiosity. The Boston Herald rang up a Harvard professor to pooh-pooh the avalanche of cash and interest:
“If you are on that third tier of candidates, attention is the biggest part of the game. He now has two months to try and transform this little bit of impetus into something more substantial, but my sense is that he won’t get the traction,” saidThomas Patterson of Harvard’s JFK School of Government.
The Washington Post’s political blogger extraordinaire Chris Cilizza broke down the What It Means angle:
The practical impact of Paul's surprising fundraising strength is that he will have the money to be on television in early states in a major way from here on out. Paul is already up with two television ads in New Hampshire (watch them here and here). While the ads are somewhat amateurish -- they lack the fancy production values of commercials produced by Romney, for example -- they get across Paul's central message: we need to get out of Iraq and we need to return to the basic governing principles laid out in the Constitution.
And then this morning, Paul got a solid segment on CNN that finally consisted of more than “Why are you bothering?” or “Do you seriously think you have a shot?” — even ending with co-anchor John Roberts adding “A awful lot of what he says makes a lot of sense.” (Thank you, TVEyes)

So Ron Paul’s big day drew some attention from the news media. And it’s also going to buy some ads to spread the word even further. It’s an interesting development that will create a dynamic that the GOP contenders must address in the next month.

As for now, though, he’s still the 16 seed on the first day of the NCAA tournament.

He’s the tree falling in the woods, without much media exposure, and making a deafening noise.

He’s Howard Dean without the scream.

But he’s making a serious move, if only on to force people to pay attention to his message.

Paul’s supporters tied the fundraising drive to “Guy Fawkes” day, commemorating his attempt to blow up Parliament on the 5th of November in 1605 and inspiring a poem that began “Remember, remember the fifth of November …”

Regardless of what happens to Ron Paul and his candidacy, political strategists and academics will be remembering this fifth of November for some time.

(Correction: An earlier version of this post indicated that Ron Paul's campaign staff was reponsible for the November 5th event. The fundraising drive was conducted by his supporters nationwide.)
Tags:
Ron Paul ,
Chris Cilizza ,
Guy Fawkes
Topics:
In The News
Add a Comment See all 34 Comments
by correction2-2009 November 7, 2007 1:52 PM EST
Actually, the entire effort, site, promotion, and donation for the 5th of November were of the people and by the people with absolutely no ties to Paul''s campaign.

Ron Paul fans run their race the way they believe the government should be run... displaying more success with little oversight or governance.
Reply to this comment
by graytroutman November 7, 2007 2:07 PM EST
One wonders if you did any research at all before writing this article. The entire point of the November 5th donation was that it was not organized by Dr. Paul''s campaign, rather it is a demonstration by the people that believe in his message that their candidate deserves to be heard. The mainstream media has ignored Dr. Paul and, when they could not ignore him, have done their best to belittle his chances. November 5th was the day when the people of this country announced their opinion as to whether he was a serious candidate. You don''t call us for your "scientific" polls, so we let you know we''re here the only way we could.
Reply to this comment
by thirty3na3rd November 7, 2007 2:10 PM EST
Thank you, Matthew!
What a fresh perspective of the momentum of the Ron Paul campaign, as well as an analysis of the November 5th event that doesn''t drone on about Guy Fawkes Day being any more than a satirical choice of date to use and nothing more than that. I look forward to reading more.
Reply to this comment
by colihondro-2009 November 7, 2007 2:10 PM EST
CORRECTION TO THE FOLLOWING:
Paul%u2019s campaign tied the fundraising drive to %u201CGuy Fawkes%u201D day
---------------------------
Although Ron mentioned (in a few different places) what his *supporters organized, the Fifth of November website was put up by *supporters and rallied by them as well. Ron Paul did not "tie the fundraising drive to Guy Fawkes Day", nor commemorate an attempt to blow up Parliament. The tie-in was generated by American citizens who want change.

I know that is not what you "SAID", but it is certainly not clear that you are aware of the difference.
Reply to this comment
by colihondro-2009 November 7, 2007 2:18 PM EST
Thanks for the correction!
You are a much more responsible journalist (and better writer) than CBS''s Kevin Drum, who is afraid of allowing comments on his "article" about Ron Paul.
Reply to this comment
by pierson98 November 7, 2007 2:30 PM EST

Good article, quite a turn-around from yesterday''s CBSnews.com piece on Ron Paul. Your article balances positive and pessimistic views of the campaign, and uses sources and evidence to back it up. Yesterday''s CBSnews article on "Political Animal" was a ridiculous rant whose author was apparently angry that people were giving to the Paul campaign, and saying "stop being children. grr!!"

Just curious, what caused the change?

Reply to this comment
by klutometis-2009 November 7, 2007 2:32 PM EST
"newly-validated Ron Paul . . ."

Money talks, yes; and I hope the longshot-defamation will cease now.
Reply to this comment
by vitavero November 7, 2007 2:42 PM EST
Thank for being fair and unbiased in you article. It is refreshing to see reporters who leave there personal agendas at the door much like Ron Paul does. If he''s elected it will be invigorating for America to have a President who stands upon the principles of Liberty for All instead of his/her own personal agenda. Unbiased - Thank You.

Scott
Reply to this comment
by cdolnez November 7, 2007 2:48 PM EST
I still ask that RP supporters boycott CBS and their sponsors after the article yesterday by CBS''''s Kevin Drum.
Reply to this comment
by brettrix November 7, 2007 2:48 PM EST
This is awesome - look what my $100 will buy.
We are doing it again on November 11th - For our Veterans during this time of WAR.
thisnovember11th.com
I will contribute more on Sunday than I did on the 5th... Gold is way above $800 and I bought it in June, when i first heard of Ron Paul!

AWESOME NEWS CBS - I love the 16th seed analogy... I will make sure this #16 seed wins the tourney!
Reply to this comment
by dh4paul November 7, 2007 3:01 PM EST
Mr. Felling, I can''t thank you enough for providing a BALANCED look at the Ron Paul phenomenon. As a Paul supporter, I have had to watch helplessly as many members of the media cut down one of the only honest politicians in Washington. They often use terms like "fringe" or "long-shot" to describe Dr. Paul and, indeed, many others. It''s refreshing to see a journalist who actually took the time to give Paul a fair shake. Much appreciated!
Reply to this comment
by klutometis-2009 November 7, 2007 3:08 PM EST
CNN segment mentioned above on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKPyrrFTU_Y
Reply to this comment
by memekiller November 7, 2007 4:30 PM EST
vbnvbn,
You''ve earned your kudos. I''m just being cute.
Reply to this comment
by eandatoo November 7, 2007 6:21 PM EST
Ron Paul is the best hope for America! Viva Ron Paul!
Reply to this comment
by lou4u-2009 November 7, 2007 6:22 PM EST
A refreshing piece of proper balanced journalism otherwise so lacking in the MSM. Thanks.
Reply to this comment
by redheads4ron November 7, 2007 6:30 PM EST
For those of us who are Ron Paul supporters and who donated on Monday, this mainstream coverage of him was exactly our goal. We are so passionate about Dr. Paul presidential candidacy that we spend our time and our money volunteering and trying to spread his message. It''s time the rest of the country start listening to what he is saying. There is nothing greater than an idea whose time has come. REDHEADS4RONPAUL.NET for more information and great movies on Ron Paul.
Reply to this comment
by nh4ronpaul November 7, 2007 7:11 PM EST
I hope that Drum guy was fired.
Reply to this comment
by lilelm November 7, 2007 10:03 PM EST
RON PAUL ''08.
A REAL Christian.
A constitutionalist.
A hero.
REAL and SMART.
Reply to this comment
by ziparmux November 7, 2007 10:38 PM EST
Ron Paul is the best hope for America! Viva Ron Paul!

Posted by eandatoo
It''s not just America at stake here, the world is watching, and hoping for a huge change in the US direction respecting foreign policy, internal respect for your constitution, which ripples around the worlds community.

What''s happened recently in Pakistan in my opinion is a direct result of the US (Bush & Co etc), one does hope that the US get''s their act together, for the sake of humanity. I so much hope and wish that someone like Ron Paul can change the direction of your country, and one hopes at last sanity will prevail and that sanity will ripple around the global community of countries, led by the most powerful country on this planet at this time, the US.

I have stated that Hillary will win, some time ago here on CBS, not because I want her to, but because of the corruption of politics, which isn''t just confined to the US. I for one hope so much now for an example to be set by the US for the whole global communty to follow, and if Ron Paul can deliver on his promises, we as a global community desperately in these most darkest of hours of our history, need the change, the end of the corporate led democracy, but rather a government for the people of the US, and for the people of the world.

Let us all sleep peacfully at night again America, regain control of your founding fathers dreams and aspirations of your countries goals, and not the goals of evil members of our global community.
Reply to this comment
by mickrussom November 7, 2007 10:40 PM EST
America , America, F- YEAH..

The last hope for freedom, the last hope for this constitutional republic is RON PAUL, if he doesnt win, its TIME TO LEAVE this SINKING SHIP. Bernanke prints money and our pay drops, we are losing everything!
Reply to this comment
by mickrussom November 7, 2007 10:41 PM EST
We are sick of the wars. We are sick of the 9 trillion in debt. We are sick of the inflation, M3 at 12.25 trillion, we are sick of the 850 billion trade deficit. We are sick of the government stealing our money to do these things. RON PAUL! Take this country back to give to the people!

Ron is the only candidate that even makes sense. The rest of the GOP candidates are authoritarian gun grabbing tax and spend hacks.

GOP hegemony in the senate, house and presidency without Ron Pauls influence (neocon vs conservative):
- 9 trillion in debt
- 60 trillion in entitlement obligations
- 850 billion/year trade deficit
- War in Iraq
- War in Afghanistan
- Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda alive
- Fomenting War with Iran
- 12.25 trillion M3 money supply, and expanding (massive inflation)
- GOP losing elections badly, Senator Craig, DeLay, Scandals
- August 2003 : Walden O''Dell "I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year"

Sept 27 2007
http://www.economist.com/images/20070929/TAB3.gif

Sept 24 2005
http://www.economist.com/images/20050924/TAB3.gif
Reply to this comment
by g-becker10 November 7, 2007 11:10 PM EST
Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who (1) wants our people removed from the Iraq civil war and (2) treats torture as an issue of morality and national honor and not as proof of testosterone. We don''t need another chicken hawk (Romney) or an ignorant bully (Giuliani), who offer Bush''s worst characteristics, or a real hawk (McCain) who would continue sacrificing Americans in Bush''s Iraq meatgrinder for four more years.
Reply to this comment
by stagnitto-2009 November 7, 2007 11:32 PM EST
Ron Paul:

Not a politician...

a STATESMAN!!! A Champion of the Constitution!

Go Ron Paul!!! True Hope for America!
Reply to this comment
by stagnitto-2009 November 7, 2007 11:37 PM EST
Do you support the Constitution?
Do you support our service men and women?

Veteran''s Day is the way to show that support.

http://www.thisnovember11th.com

Contribute $100.

Don''t just Talk the Talk.

WALK THE WALK!
Reply to this comment
by roiq November 8, 2007 1:47 AM EST
I''m not in this world
To live up to your expectations
Neither are you here to live up to mine.

Don''t underestimate
My ability
Don''t defamate my character
Don''t belittle
My authority
It is time you recognized my quality

I AM THAT I AM - Peter Tosh

LEARN TO LOVE

Let''s get ready to be free for the first time in our lives, America!
Reply to this comment
by freedom_usa November 8, 2007 2:23 AM EST
Ron Paul is the guy that arrives on the scene at the right time in history. He has inspired me to be a more active American in the political feild.
Reply to this comment
by nmlifestyles November 8, 2007 2:30 PM EST
How to Whip This Ron Paul Character and All His Whacky Followers.

Ron Paul can be defeated by ignorance. Ignore him if you can.
By lies. Misrepresent his positions whenever possible.
By word gaming. As Lenin advised, ?First, confuse the vocabulary.?
By contempt. Dismiss him as amusing and pathetic.
By smearing his supporters. Find the worst and spotlight them. Call them a cult.
By consensus. Dismiss him with peer-pressure ridicule.
By false accusations. Spread them quickly and far.
By never discussing his policies. Change the subject to his person.
By the polls. Ask the right people the right questions and get the answer you want.
By reporting his most unpopular votes. But don?t report his reasoning.
By rudeness. Wreck any debate where his ideas are winning.
With all these tools, he can be easily defeated. Use them generously.

But Ron Paul cannot be defeated by refuting him in an honest and courteous technical debate. Avoid that.

- Moderno Machiavelli
Reply to this comment
by mickrussom November 8, 2007 4:42 PM EST
The election is in the Bag, Ron Paul, the next POTUS.

People are screaming FRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOM!

They will have to kill this guy like they did JFK and RK to stop him.
Reply to this comment
by behinddrno November 8, 2007 11:58 PM EST
Just as Bill O%u2019Reilly stated, Ron Paul is crazy!
What sane politician would want to end uncontrolled spending?
What sane politician would want to return to a smaller government?
What sane politician would want to let the lowly citizen keep more of his paycheck?
What sane politician would want to end the funny money that allows them to borrow with no end?
What sane politician wants to be honest with his supporters?
What sane politician wants to have a single, unwavering opinion on every issue?
What sane politician wants to control the borders and decrease the flow of new social program dependent voters?
What sane politician wants to leave a gun in the hands of a lowly subject?
The logic continues with every crazy thing that Ron Paul stands for.

You have to admit, that for a politician, he is crazy!

The big mistake made my most people who call him crazy is that they are mistaking him for a %u201Creal politician%u201D.
He definitely is not a politician. He%u2019s a voice for the common people. He%u2019s honest. He%u2019s a patriot.
Reply to this comment
by behinddrno November 8, 2007 11:59 PM EST
Just as Bill O%u2019Reilly stated, Ron Paul is crazy!
What sane politician would want to end uncontrolled spending?
What sane politician would want to return to a smaller government?
What sane politician would want to let the lowly citizen keep more of his paycheck?
What sane politician would want to end the funny money that allows them to borrow with no end?
What sane politician wants to be honest with his supporters?
What sane politician wants to have a single, unwavering opinion on every issue?
What sane politician wants to control the borders and decrease the flow of new social program dependent voters?
What sane politician wants to leave a gun in the hands of a lowly subject?
The logic continues with every crazy thing that Ron Paul stands for.

You have to admit, that for a politician, he is crazy!

The big mistake made my most people who call him crazy is that they are mistaking him for a %u201Creal politician%u201D.
He definitely is not a politician. He%u2019s a voice for the common people. He%u2019s honest. He%u2019s a patriot.
Reply to this comment
by superbob26 November 9, 2007 7:28 PM EST
Through all the insults and negative insinuations, Ron Paul has stood tall and thus is slowly gaining respect. We need to follow his example.

When the media calls us crazy and writes us off as a bunch of X-Files conspiracy nuts, we should shrug and grin at their personal attacks and baffling level of incompetence.

When we are labeled as a coterie of computer hacks who are more "fans" than legitimately concerned citizens, we should just shake our head at the consistent misinformation.

When every positive statement towards our movement is qualified by citing rigged polling data, we should grit our teeth and move on.

When the establishment is incapable of recognizing and embracing true democracy, we should quietly vent our frustration.

But when they say Ron Paul cannot win. Then, we prove them wrong.

What we are doing is historic, and very soon the media will wonder why they did not see it coming. After all, he who refuses to see is the blindest.
Reply to this comment
by heyzuice November 10, 2007 2:03 AM EST
I have yet to meet a person that after a little consideration, thinks he doesn''t have a chance. The mainstream media is a dinosaur and is no longer as in controll as it thinks, the writers even know, hence the reson they are on strike. The few news people that still have the peoples respect keep insisting this election is going to hold a big surprise, and I''m betting they are talking about Dr Paul, so I hope you guys have some new job ideas because when the country is free we will no longer need anything accept the E channel for all our Britny and OJ needs.
Reply to this comment
by heyzuice November 10, 2007 2:04 AM EST
I have yet to meet a person that after a little consideration, thinks he doesn''t have a chance. The mainstream media is a dinosaur and is no longer as in controll as it thinks, the writers even know, hence the reson they are on strike. The few news people that still have the peoples respect keep insisting this election is going to hold a big surprise, and I''m betting they are talking about Dr Paul, so I hope you guys have some new job ideas because when the country is free we will no longer need anything accept the E channel for all our Britny and OJ needs.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 November 10, 2007 2:19 AM EST
Ron Paul is speaking common sense and, from what I%u2019ve seen he is gaining support amongst Republican Supporters that are have grown weary, or leery of the double speak and negative results of this particular Administration%u2019s policies.

We have one year now until the next Presidential Election and the only thing that the Republican Party is depending on is that Americans will continue to vote against their better interests. Will the Republican Party listen to their supporters? Or, will the GOP continue to force their agenda at the detriment of Americans?
Reply to this comment
See all 34 Comments

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye

  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented